inherited constructors, which is cleaner and means you can now use DimOp()
to get a null op, instead of having to use Instruction::getNull<DimOp>().
This removes another 200 lines of code.
PiperOrigin-RevId: 240068113
- change this for consistency - everything else similar takes/returns a
Function pointer - the FuncBuilder ctor,
Block/Value/Instruction::getFunction(), etc.
- saves a whole bunch of &s everywhere
PiperOrigin-RevId: 236928761
This CL changes dialect op source files (.h, .cpp, .td) to follow the following
convention:
<full-dialect-name>/<dialect-namespace>Ops.{h|cpp|td}
Builtin and standard dialects are specially treated, though. Both of them do
not have dialect namespace; the former is still named as BuiltinOps.* and the
latter is named as Ops.*.
Purely mechanical. NFC.
PiperOrigin-RevId: 236371358
This implements the lowering of `floordiv`, `ceildiv` and `mod` operators from
affine expressions to the arithmetic primitive operations. Integer division
rules in affine expressions explicitly require rounding towards either negative
or positive infinity unlike machine implementations that round towards zero.
In the general case, implementing `floordiv` and `ceildiv` using machine signed
division requires computing both the quotient and the remainder. When the
divisor is positive, this can be simplified by adjusting the dividend and the
quotient by one and switching signs.
In the current use cases, we are unlikely to encounter affine expressions with
negative divisors (affine divisions appear in loop transformations such as
tiling that guarantee that divisors are positive by construction). Therefore,
it is reasonable to use branch-free single-division implementation. In case of
affine maps, divisors can only be literals so we can check the sign and
implement the case for negative divisors when the need arises.
The affine lowering pass can still fail when applied to semi-affine maps
(division or modulo by a symbol).
PiperOrigin-RevId: 228668181
This change is mechanical and merges the LowerAffineApplyPass and
LowerIfAndForPass into a single LowerAffinePass. It makes a step towards
defining an "affine dialect" that would contain all polyhedral-related
constructs. The motivation for merging these two passes is based on retiring
MLFunctions and, eventually, transforming If and For statements into regular
operations. After that happens, LowerAffinePass becomes yet another
legalization.
PiperOrigin-RevId: 227566113
River Riddle