Summary:
Prior to r329065, we used [-max, max] as the range of representable
values because LLVM's `fptrunc` did not guarantee defined behavior when
truncating from a larger floating-point type to a smaller one. Now that
has been fixed, we can make clang follow normal IEEE 754 semantics in this
regard and take the larger range [-inf, +inf] as the range of representable
values.
In practice, this affects two parts of the frontend:
* the constant evaluator no longer treats floating-point evaluations
that result in +-inf as being undefined (because they no longer leave
the range of representable values of the type)
* UBSan no longer treats conversions to floating-point type that are
outside the [-max, +max] range as being undefined
In passing, also remove the float-divide-by-zero sanitizer from
-fsanitize=undefined, on the basis that while it's undefined per C++
rules (and we disallow it in constant expressions for that reason), it
is defined by Clang / LLVM / IEEE 754.
Reviewers: rnk, BillyONeal
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D63793
llvm-svn: 365272
This is meant to be used with clang's __builtin_dynamic_object_size.
When 'true' is passed to this parameter, the intrinsic has the
potential to be folded into instructions that will be evaluated
at run time. When 'false', the objectsize intrinsic behaviour is
unchanged.
rdar://32212419
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D56761
llvm-svn: 352664
It's possible to determine the alignment of an alloca at compile-time.
Use this information to skip emitting some runtime alignment checks.
Testing: check-clang, check-ubsan.
This significantly reduces the amount of alignment checks we emit when
compiling X86ISelLowering.cpp. Here are the numbers from patched/unpatched
clangs based on r301361.
------------------------------------------
| Setup | # of alignment checks |
------------------------------------------
| unpatched, -O0 | 47195 |
| patched, -O0 | 30876 | (-34.6%)
------------------------------------------
llvm-svn: 301377
This patch teaches ubsan to insert exactly one null check for the 'this'
pointer per method/lambda.
Previously, given a load of a member variable from an instance method
('this->x'), ubsan would insert a null check for 'this', and another
null check for '&this->x', before allowing the load to occur.
Similarly, given a call to a method from another method bound to the
same instance ('this->foo()'), ubsan would a redundant null check for
'this'. There is also a redundant null check in the case where the
object pointer is a reference ('Ref.foo()').
This patch teaches ubsan to remove the redundant null checks identified
above.
Testing: check-clang, check-ubsan, and a stage2 ubsan build.
I also compiled X86FastISel.cpp with -fsanitize=null using
patched/unpatched clangs based on r293572. Here are the number of null
checks emitted:
-------------------------------------
| Setup | # of null checks |
-------------------------------------
| unpatched, -O0 | 21767 |
| patched, -O0 | 10758 |
-------------------------------------
Changes since the initial commit:
- Don't introduce any unintentional object-size or alignment checks.
- Don't rely on IRGen of C labels in the test.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D29530
llvm-svn: 295515
This reverts commit r295401. It breaks the ubsan self-host. It inserts
object size checks once per C++ method which fire when the structure is
empty.
llvm-svn: 295494
This patch teaches ubsan to insert exactly one null check for the 'this'
pointer per method/lambda.
Previously, given a load of a member variable from an instance method
('this->x'), ubsan would insert a null check for 'this', and another
null check for '&this->x', before allowing the load to occur.
Similarly, given a call to a method from another method bound to the
same instance ('this->foo()'), ubsan would a redundant null check for
'this'. There is also a redundant null check in the case where the
object pointer is a reference ('Ref.foo()').
This patch teaches ubsan to remove the redundant null checks identified
above.
Testing: check-clang and check-ubsan. I also compiled X86FastISel.cpp
with -fsanitize=null using patched/unpatched clangs based on r293572.
Here are the number of null checks emitted:
-------------------------------------
| Setup | # of null checks |
-------------------------------------
| unpatched, -O0 | 21767 |
| patched, -O0 | 10758 |
-------------------------------------
Changes since the initial commit: don't rely on IRGen of C labels in the
test.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D29530
llvm-svn: 295401
This patch teaches ubsan to insert exactly one null check for the 'this'
pointer per method/lambda.
Previously, given a load of a member variable from an instance method
('this->x'), ubsan would insert a null check for 'this', and another
null check for '&this->x', before allowing the load to occur.
Similarly, given a call to a method from another method bound to the
same instance ('this->foo()'), ubsan would a redundant null check for
'this'. There is also a redundant null check in the case where the
object pointer is a reference ('Ref.foo()').
This patch teaches ubsan to remove the redundant null checks identified
above.
Testing: check-clang and check-ubsan. I also compiled X86FastISel.cpp
with -fsanitize=null using patched/unpatched clangs based on r293572.
Here are the number of null checks emitted:
-------------------------------------
| Setup | # of null checks |
-------------------------------------
| unpatched, -O0 | 21767 |
| patched, -O0 | 10758 |
-------------------------------------
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D29530
llvm-svn: 295391
Summary:
This patch makes the type_mismatch static data 7 bytes smaller (and it
ends up being 16 bytes smaller due to alignment restrictions, at least
on some x86-64 environments).
It revs up the type_mismatch handler version since we're breaking binary
compatibility. I will soon post a patch for the compiler-rt side.
Reviewers: rsmith, kcc, vitalybuka, pgousseau, gbedwell
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D28242
llvm-svn: 291236
Introduce an Address type to bundle a pointer value with an
alignment. Introduce APIs on CGBuilderTy to work with Address
values. Change core APIs on CGF/CGM to traffic in Address where
appropriate. Require alignments to be non-zero. Update a ton
of code to compute and propagate alignment information.
As part of this, I've promoted CGBuiltin's EmitPointerWithAlignment
helper function to CGF and made use of it in a number of places in
the expression emitter.
The end result is that we should now be significantly more correct
when performing operations on objects that are locally known to
be under-aligned. Since alignment is not reliably tracked in the
type system, there are inherent limits to this, but at least we
are no longer confused by standard operations like derived-to-base
conversions and array-to-pointer decay. I've also fixed a large
number of bugs where we were applying the complete-object alignment
to a pointer instead of the non-virtual alignment, although most of
these were hidden by the very conservative approach we took with
member alignment.
Also, because IRGen now reliably asserts on zero alignments, we
should no longer be subject to an absurd but frustrating recurring
bug where an incomplete type would report a zero alignment and then
we'd naively do a alignmentAtOffset on it and emit code using an
alignment equal to the largest power-of-two factor of the offset.
We should also now be emitting much more aggressive alignment
attributes in the presence of over-alignment. In particular,
field access now uses alignmentAtOffset instead of min.
Several times in this patch, I had to change the existing
code-generation pattern in order to more effectively use
the Address APIs. For the most part, this seems to be a strict
improvement, like doing pointer arithmetic with GEPs instead of
ptrtoint. That said, I've tried very hard to not change semantics,
but it is likely that I've failed in a few places, for which I
apologize.
ABIArgInfo now always carries the assumed alignment of indirect and
indirect byval arguments. In order to cut down on what was already
a dauntingly large patch, I changed the code to never set align
attributes in the IR on non-byval indirect arguments. That is,
we still generate code which assumes that indirect arguments have
the given alignment, but we don't express this information to the
backend except where it's semantically required (i.e. on byvals).
This is likely a minor regression for those targets that did provide
this information, but it'll be trivial to add it back in a later
patch.
I partially punted on applying this work to CGBuiltin. Please
do not add more uses of the CreateDefaultAligned{Load,Store}
APIs; they will be going away eventually.
llvm-svn: 246985
Summary:
float_cast_overflow is the only UBSan check without a source location attached.
This patch propagates SourceLocations where necessary to get them to the
EmitCheck() call.
Reviewers: rsmith, ABataev, rjmccall
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D11757
llvm-svn: 244568
This flag controls whether a given sanitizer traps upon detecting
an error. It currently only supports UBSan. The existing flag
-fsanitize-undefined-trap-on-error has been made an alias of
-fsanitize-trap=undefined.
This change also cleans up some awkward behavior around the combination
of -fsanitize-trap=undefined and -fsanitize=undefined. Previously we
would reject command lines containing the combination of these two flags,
as -fsanitize=vptr is not compatible with trapping. This required the
creation of -fsanitize=undefined-trap, which excluded -fsanitize=vptr
(and -fsanitize=function, but this seems like an oversight).
Now, -fsanitize=undefined is an alias for -fsanitize=undefined-trap,
and if -fsanitize-trap=undefined is specified, we treat -fsanitize=vptr
as an "unsupported" flag, which means that we error out if the flag is
specified explicitly, but implicitly disable it if the flag was implied
by -fsanitize=undefined.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D10464
llvm-svn: 240105
This is a recommit of r231150, reverted in r231409. Turns out
that -fsanitize=shift-base check implementation only works if the
shift exponent is valid, otherwise it contains undefined behavior
itself.
Make sure we check that exponent is valid before we proceed to
check the base. Make sure that we actually report invalid values
of base or exponent if -fsanitize=shift-base or
-fsanitize=shift-exponent is specified, respectively.
llvm-svn: 231711
It's not that easy. If we're only checking -fsanitize=shift-base we
still need to verify that exponent has sane value, otherwise
UBSan-inserted checks for base will contain undefined behavior
themselves.
llvm-svn: 231409
-fsanitize=shift is now a group that includes both these checks, so
exisiting users should not be affected.
This change introduces two new UBSan kinds that sanitize only left-hand
side and right-hand side of shift operation. In practice, invalid
exponent value (negative or too large) tends to cause more portability
problems, including inconsistencies between different compilers, crashes
and inadequeate results on non-x86 architectures etc. That is,
-fsanitize=shift-exponent failures should generally be addressed first.
As a bonus, this change simplifies CodeGen implementation for emitting left
shift (separate checks for base and exponent are now merged by the
existing generic logic in EmitCheck()), and LLVM IR for these checks
(the number of basic blocks is reduced).
llvm-svn: 231150
Introduce the following -fsanitize-recover flags:
- -fsanitize-recover=<list>: Enable recovery for selected checks or
group of checks. It is forbidden to explicitly list unrecoverable
sanitizers here (that is, "address", "unreachable", "return").
- -fno-sanitize-recover=<list>: Disable recovery for selected checks or
group of checks.
- -f(no-)?sanitize-recover is now a synonym for
-f(no-)?sanitize-recover=undefined,integer and will soon be deprecated.
These flags are parsed left to right, and mask of "recoverable"
sanitizer is updated accordingly, much like what we do for -fsanitize= flags.
-fsanitize= and -fsanitize-recover= flag families are independent.
CodeGen change: If there is a single UBSan handler function, responsible
for implementing multiple checks, which have different recoverable setting,
then we emit two handler calls instead of one:
the first one for the set of "unrecoverable" checks, another one - for
set of "recoverable" checks. If all checks implemented by a handler have the
same recoverability setting, then the generated code will be the same.
llvm-svn: 225719
Summary:
This change makes CodeGenFunction::EmitCheck() take several
conditions that needs to be checked (all of them need to be true),
together with sanitizer kinds these checks are for. This would allow
to split one call into UBSan runtime into several calls in case
different sanitizer kinds would have different recoverability
settings.
Tests should be fixed accordingly, I'm working on it.
Test Plan: regression test suite.
Reviewers: rsmith
Reviewed By: rsmith
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D6219
llvm-svn: 221716
Summary:
This patch implements a new UBSan check, which verifies
that function arguments declared to be nonnull with __attribute__((nonnull))
are actually nonnull in runtime.
To implement this check, we pass FunctionDecl to CodeGenFunction::EmitCallArgs
(where applicable) and if function declaration has nonnull attribute specified
for a certain formal parameter, we compare the corresponding RValue to null as
soon as it's calculated.
Test Plan: regression test suite
Reviewers: rsmith
Reviewed By: rsmith
Subscribers: cfe-commits, rnk
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D5082
llvm-svn: 217389
Summary:
This patch adds a runtime check verifying that functions
annotated with "returns_nonnull" attribute do in fact return nonnull pointers.
It is based on suggestion by Jakub Jelinek:
http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/pipermail/llvm-commits/Week-of-Mon-20140623/223693.html.
Test Plan: regression test suite
Reviewers: rsmith
Reviewed By: rsmith
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D4849
llvm-svn: 215485
This is used to mark the instructions emitted by Clang to implement
variety of UBSan checks. Generally, we don't want to instrument these
instructions with another sanitizers (like ASan).
Reviewed in http://reviews.llvm.org/D4544
llvm-svn: 213291
it wasn't taking into account that the float should be truncated *before* the
range check happens. Thus (unsigned)-0.99 and (unsigned char)255.9 have defined
behavior and should not be trapped.
llvm-svn: 177362
implementation; this is much more inline with the original implementation
(i.e., pre-ubsan) and does not require run-time library support.
The trapping implementation can be invoked using either '-fcatch-undefined-behavior'
or '-fsanitize=undefined-trap -fsanitize-undefined-trap-on-error', with the latter
being preferred. Eventually, the -fcatch-undefined-behavior' flag will be removed.
llvm-svn: 173848
with respect to the lower "left-hand-side bitwidth" bits, even when negative);
see OpenCL spec 6.3j. This patch both implements this behaviour in the code
generator and "constant folding" bits of Sema, and also prevents tests
to detect undefinedness in terms of the weaker C99 or C++ specifications
from being applied.
llvm-svn: 171755
checks to enable. Remove frontend support for -fcatch-undefined-behavior,
-faddress-sanitizer and -fthread-sanitizer now that they don't do anything.
llvm-svn: 167413
We want the diagnostic, and if the load is optimized away, we still want to
trap it. Stop checking non-default address spaces; that doesn't work in
general.
llvm-svn: 167219
Richard Smith