Summary:
This patch would cause clang emit more diagnostics, but it is much better than https://reviews.llvm.org/D76831
```cpp
struct A {
A(int);
~A() = delete;
};
void k() {
A a;
}
```
before the patch:
/tmp/t3.cpp:24:5: error: no matching constructor for initialization of 'A'
A a;
^
/tmp/t3.cpp:20:3: note: candidate constructor not viable: requires 1 argument, but 0 were provided
A(int);
^
/tmp/t3.cpp:19:8: note: candidate constructor (the implicit copy constructor) not viable: requires 1 argument, but 0 were provided
struct A {
After the patch:
/tmp/t3.cpp:24:5: error: no matching constructor for initialization of 'A'
A a;
^
/tmp/t3.cpp:20:3: note: candidate constructor not viable: requires 1 argument, but 0 were provided
A(int);
^
/tmp/t3.cpp:19:8: note: candidate constructor (the implicit copy constructor) not viable: requires 1 argument, but 0 were provided
struct A {
^
/tmp/t3.cpp:24:5: error: attempt to use a deleted function
A a;
^
/tmp/t3.cpp:21:3: note: '~A' has been explicitly marked deleted here
~A() = delete;
Reviewers: sammccall
Reviewed By: sammccall
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D77395
Haojian Wu