for the data specific to a macro definition (e.g. what the tokens are), and
MacroDirective class which encapsulates the changes to the "macro namespace"
(e.g. the location where the macro name became active, the location where it was undefined, etc.)
(A MacroDirective always points to a MacroInfo object.)
Usually a macro definition (MacroInfo) is where a macro name becomes active (MacroDirective) but
splitting the concepts allows us to better model the effect of modules to the macro namespace
(also as a bonus it allows better modeling of push_macro/pop_macro #pragmas).
Modules can have their own macro history, separate from the local (current translation unit)
macro history; MacroDirectives will be used to model the macro history (changes to macro namespace).
For example, if "@import A;" imports macro FOO, there will be a new local MacroDirective created
to indicate that "FOO" became active at the import location. Module "A" itself will contain another
MacroDirective in its macro history (at the point of the definition of FOO) and both MacroDirectives
will point to the same MacroInfo object.
Introducing the separation of macro concepts is the first part towards better modeling of module macros.
llvm-svn: 175585
never key functions. We did not implement that rule for the
iOS ABI, which was driven by what was implemented in gcc-4.2.
However, implement it now for other ARM-based platforms.
llvm-svn: 173515
In the source
static void f();
static void f();
template<typename T>
static void g() {
f();
}
static void f() {
}
void h() {
g<int>();
}
the call to f refers to the second decl, but it is only marked used at the end
of the translation unit during instantiation, after the third f decl has been
linked in.
With this patch we mark all subsequent decls used, so that it is easy to check
if a symbol is used or not.
llvm-svn: 171888
This fixes pr14736. It is fairly ugly, but I don't think we can do much better
as we have to wait at least until the end of the typedef to know if the
function will have external linkage or not.
llvm-svn: 171240
uncovered.
This required manually correcting all of the incorrect main-module
headers I could find, and running the new llvm/utils/sort_includes.py
script over the files.
I also manually added quite a few missing headers that were uncovered by
shuffling the order or moving headers up to be main-module-headers.
llvm-svn: 169237
defined without a previous declaration. This is similar to
-Wmissing-prototypes, but for variables instead of functions.
Patch by Ed Schouten.
llvm-svn: 166498
The infrastructure for -Warc-repeated-use-of-weak got a little too heavy
to leave sitting at the top of Sema.cpp.
No functionality change.
llvm-svn: 164856
Like properties, loading from a weak ivar twice in the same function can
give you inconsistent results if the object is deallocated between the
two loads. It is safer to assign to a strong local variable and use that.
Second half of <rdar://problem/12280249>.
llvm-svn: 164855
The motivating example:
if (self.weakProp)
use(self.weakProp);
As with any non-atomic test-then-use, it is possible a weak property to be
non-nil at the 'if', but be deallocated by the time it is used. The correct
way to write this example is as follows:
id tmp = self.weakProp;
if (tmp)
use(tmp);
The warning is controlled by -Warc-repeated-use-of-receiver, and uses the
property name and base to determine if the same property on the same object
is being accessed multiple times. In cases where the base is more
complicated than just a single Decl (e.g. 'foo.bar.weakProp'), it picks a
Decl for some degree of uniquing and reports the problem under a subflag,
-Warc-maybe-repeated-use-of-receiver. This gives a way to tune the
aggressiveness of the warning for a particular project.
The warning is not on by default because it is not flow-sensitive and thus
may have a higher-than-acceptable rate of false positives, though it is
less noisy than -Wreceiver-is-weak. On the other hand, it will not warn
about some cases that may be legitimate issues that -Wreceiver-is-weak
will catch, and it does not attempt to reason about methods returning weak
values.
Even though this is not a real "analysis-based" check I've put the bug
emission code in AnalysisBasedWarnings for two reasons: (1) to run on
every kind of code body (function, method, block, or lambda), and (2) to
suggest that it may be enhanced by flow-sensitive analysis in the future.
The second (smaller) half of this work is to extend it to weak locals
and weak ivars. This should use most of the same infrastructure.
Part of <rdar://problem/12280249>
llvm-svn: 164854
function being instantiated. An error recovery codepath was recursively
performing name lookup (and triggering an unbounded stack of template
instantiations which blew out the stack before hitting the depth limit).
Patch by Wei Pan!
llvm-svn: 164586
passing -fretain-comments-from-system-headers. By default, the
compiler no longer parses such documentation comments, as they
can result in a noticeable compile time/PCH slowdown.
Fixes <rdar://problem/11860820>.
llvm-svn: 163778
* Retain comments in the AST
* Serialize/deserialize comments
* Find comments attached to a certain Decl
* Expose raw comment text and SourceRange via libclang
llvm-svn: 158771
overload candidate, and include its message in any subsequent 'candidate not
viable due to substitution failure' note we may produce.
To keep the note small (since the 'overload resolution failed' diagnostics are
often already very verbose), the text of the SFINAE diagnostic is included as
part of the text of the note, and any notes which were attached to it are
discarded.
There happened to be spare space in OverloadCandidate into which a
PartialDiagnosticAt could be squeezed, and this patch goes to lengths to avoid
unnecessary PartialDiagnostic copies, resulting in no slowdown that I could
measure. (Removal in passing of some PartialDiagnostic copies has resulted in a
slightly smaller clang binary overall.) Even on a torture test, I was unable to
measure a memory increase of above 0.2%.
llvm-svn: 156297
so that we actually accumulate all the delayed diagnostics. Do
this so that we can restore those diagnostics to good standing
if it turns out that we were wrong to suppress, e.g. if the
tag specifier is actually an elaborated type specifier and not
a declaration.
llvm-svn: 156291
in the declaration of a non-static member function after the
(optional) cv-qualifier-seq, which in practice means in the exception
specification and late-specified return type.
The new scheme here used to manage 'this' outside of a member function
scope is more general than the Scope-based mechanism previously used
for non-static data member initializers and late-parsesd attributes,
because it can also handle the cv-qualifiers on the member
function. Note, however, that a separate pass is required for static
member functions to determine whether 'this' was used, because we
might not know that we have a static function until after declaration
matching.
Finally, this introduces name mangling for 'this' and for the implicit
'this', which is intended to match GCC's mangling. Independent
verification for the new mangling test case would be appreciated.
Fixes PR10036 and PR12450.
llvm-svn: 154799
- As with DiagnosticBuilder, it is very important that SemaDiagnosticBuilder be
completely inline to ensure that the compiler can rip it apart and sink it to
registers.
This is good for another 30k reduction in code size.
llvm-svn: 152708
NSNumber, and boolean literals. This includes both Sema and Codegen support.
Included is also support for new Objective-C container subscripting.
My apologies for the large patch. It was very difficult to break apart.
The patch introduces changes to the driver as well to cause clang to link
in additional runtime support when needed to support the new language features.
Docs are forthcoming to document the implementation and behavior of these features.
llvm-svn: 152137
The bug that was caught by Apple's internal buildbots was valid and also showed another bug in my implementation.
These are now fixed, with regression tests added to catch them both (not Darwin-specific).
Original log:
====================
Revert r151638 because it causes assertion hit on PCH creation for Cocoa.h
Original log:
---------------------
Correctly track tags and enum members defined in the prototype of a function, and ensure they are properly scoped.
This fixes code such as:
enum e {x, y};
int f(enum {y, x} n) {
return 0;
}
This finally fixes PR5464 and PR5477.
---------------------
I also reverted r151641 which was enhancement on top of r151638.
====================
llvm-svn: 151712
Original log:
---------------------
Correctly track tags and enum members defined in the prototype of a function, and ensure they are properly scoped.
This fixes code such as:
enum e {x, y};
int f(enum {y, x} n) {
return 0;
}
This finally fixes PR5464 and PR5477.
---------------------
I also reverted r151641 which was enhancement on top of r151638.
llvm-svn: 151667
function call (or a comma expression with a function call on its right-hand
side), possibly parenthesized, then the return type is not required to be
complete and a temporary is not bound. Other subexpressions inside a decltype
expression do not get this treatment.
This is implemented by deferring the relevant checks for all calls immediately
within a decltype expression, then, when the expression is fully-parsed,
checking the relevant constraints and stripping off any top-level temporary
binding.
Deferring the completion of the return type exposed a bug in overload
resolution where completion of the argument types was not attempted, which
is also fixed by this change.
llvm-svn: 151117
default arguments of function parameters. This simple-sounding task is
complicated greatly by two issues:
(1) Default arguments aren't actually a real context, so we need to
maintain extra state within lambda expressions to track when a
lambda was actually in a default argument.
(2) At the time that we parse a default argument, the FunctionDecl
doesn't exist yet, so lambda closure types end up in the enclosing
context. It's not clear that we ever want to change that, so instead
we introduce the notion of the "effective" context of a declaration
for the purposes of name mangling.
llvm-svn: 151011
David Blaikie