The LitConfig is shared across the whole test suite. However, since
enabling recursive expansion can be a breaking change for some test
suites, it's important to confine the setting to test suites that
enable it explicitly.
Note that other issues were raised with the way recursiveExpansionLimit
operates. However, this commit simply moves the setting to the right
place -- the mechanism by which it works can be improved independently.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D77415
The patch introduces the system to distinctively store the information
needed for the Control Flow Graph as well as the instrumentary needed for
the follow-up changes: BlockFrequencyInfo and BranchProbabilityInfo.
The patch is a part of sequence of three patches, related to graphs Heat Coloring.
Reviewers: rcorcs, apilipenko, davidxl, sfertile, fedor.sergeev, eraman, bollu
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D76820
Constructors and delete operators cannot return a boolean value.
Therefore they cannot possibly follow the NS/CFError-related coding
conventions.
Patch by Valeriy Savchenko!
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D77551
Detect script locations in a more straightforward way: we don't need to
search for them because we know exactly where they are anyway.
Fix a file path escaping issue in exploded-graph-rewriter with Windows
backslashes in the path.
'REQUIRES: shell' remains in scan-build tests for now, so that to
observe the buildbot reaction on removing it in a cleaner experiment.
Patch by Denys Petrov!
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D76768
Saves only 36 includes of ASTContext.h and related headers.
There are two deps on ASTContext.h:
- C++ method overrides iterator types (TinyPtrVector)
- getting LangOptions
For #1, duplicate the iterator type, which is
TinyPtrVector<>::const_iterator.
For #2, add an out-of-line accessor to get the language options. Getting
the ASTContext from a Decl is already an out of line method that loops
over the parent DeclContexts, so if it is ever performance critical, the
proper fix is to pass the context (or LangOpts) into the predicate in
question.
Other changes are just header fixups.
Move function emitDeferredDiags from Sema to DeferredDiagsEmitter since it
is only used by DeferredDiagsEmitter.
Also skip visited functions to avoid exponential compile time.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D77028
So that constant expressions like the following are permitted:
and w0, w0, #~(0xfe<<24)
and w1, w1, #~(0xff<<24)
The behavior matches GNU as (opcodes/aarch64-opc.c:aarch64_logical_immediate_p).
Reviewed By: sdesmalen
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D75885
Summary:
In constructor type homing mode sometimes complete debug info for constexpr
types was missing, because there was not a constructor emitted. This change
makes constructor type homing ignore constexpr types.
Reviewers: rnk, dblaikie
Subscribers: aprantl, cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D77432
Fixes https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=45391
The LTO code generator happens after version script scanning and may
create references which will fetch some lazy symbols.
Currently a version script does not assign VER_NDX_LOCAL to lazy symbols
and such symbols will be made global after they are fetched.
Change findByVersion and findAllByVersion to work on lazy symbols.
For unfetched lazy symbols, we should keep them non-local (D35263).
Check isDefined() in computeBinding() as a compensation.
This patch fixes a companion bug that --dynamic-list does not export
libcall fetched symbols.
Reviewed By: grimar
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D77280
When entering a basic block, RDA inserts reaching definitions coming
from predecessor blocks (which will be negative numbers) in a rather
peculiar way. If you have incoming reaching definitions -4, -3, -2, -1,
it will insert those. If you have incoming reaching definitions
-1, -2, -3, -4, it will insert -1, -1, -1, -1, as the max is taken
at each step. That's probably not what was intended...
However, RDA only actually cares about the most recent reaching
definition from a predecessor (to calculate clearance), so this
ends up working fine as far as behavior is concerned. It does
waste memory on unnecessary reaching definitions though.
This patch changes the implementation to first compute the most
recent reaching definition in one loop, and then insert only that
one in a separate loop.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D77508
At the end of a basic block, RDA adjusts all the reaching defs it
found to be relative to the end of the basic block, rather than the
start of it. However, it also does this to registers which don't
have a reaching def, indicated by ReachingDefDefaultVal. This means
that code checking against ReachingDefDefaultVal will not skip them,
and may insert them into the reaching definition list. This is
ultimately harmless, but causes unnecessary work and is logically
not right.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D77506
Summary:
The only guarantee there seems to be in the clang-format packaging is
that an executable called `clang-format` is in the PATH. Use the
in-tree `clang-format-diff.py` to avoid assuming anything else.
Also remove dead code for SVN repo and switch to `git diff-index` which
is the git plumbing equivalent of `git diff` in this case.
Reviewers: starsid, mehdi_amini, vitalybuka, fhahn, kadircet
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D77428
The cmyk test is based on the known regression that resulted from:
rGf2fbdf76d8d0
This improves on the equivalent signed min/max change:
rG867f0c3c4d8c
The underlying icmp equivalence is:
~X pred ~Y --> Y pred X
For an icmp with constant, canonicalization results in a swapped pred:
~X < C --> X > ~C
We had a workaround because GCC 5 does not evaluate static assertions
that are dependent on template parameters. This commit removes the
workaround and marks the corresponding tests as unsupported with GCC 5.
This has the benefit of bringing the new and the old test formats closer
without having to carry a workaround for an old compiler in the new
test format.
Summary:
Currently we match the summary signature based on the arguments in the CallExpr.
There are a few problems with this approach.
1) Variadic arguments are handled badly. Consider the below code:
int foo(void *stream, const char *format, ...);
void test_arg_constraint_on_variadic_fun() {
foo(0, "%d%d", 1, 2); // CallExpr
}
Here the call expression holds 4 arguments, whereas the function declaration
has only 2 `ParmVarDecl`s. So there is no way to create a summary that
matches the call expression, because the discrepancy in the number of
arguments causes a mismatch.
2) The call expression does not handle the `restrict` type qualifier.
In C99, fwrite's signature is the following:
size_t fwrite(const void *restrict, size_t, size_t, FILE *restrict);
However, in a call expression, like below, the type of the argument does not
have the restrict qualifier.
void test_fread_fwrite(FILE *fp, int *buf) {
size_t x = fwrite(buf, sizeof(int), 10, fp);
}
This can result in an unmatches signature, so the summary is not applied.
The solution is to match the summary against the referened callee
`FunctionDecl` that we can query from the `CallExpr`.
Further patches will continue with additional refactoring where I am going to
do a lookup during the checker initialization and the signature match will
happen there. That way, we will not check the signature during every call,
rather we will compare only two `FunctionDecl` pointers.
Reviewers: NoQ, Szelethus, gamesh411, baloghadamsoftware
Subscribers: whisperity, xazax.hun, kristof.beyls, szepet, rnkovacs, a.sidorin, mikhail.ramalho, donat.nagy, dkrupp, Charusso, steakhal, danielkiss, ASDenysPetrov, cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D77410
Otherwise, we're missing some flags like the flags that are used by
sanitizer builds and the 32-bit builds. In the long term, I think it
would be better to have only %{compile_flags} and %{link_flags}, but
for the benefit of adopting the new format by default, I think it's OK
to add %{flags} to it.
Summary:
This revision adds a tensor_reshape operation that operates on tensors.
In the tensor world the constraints are less stringent and we can allow more
arbitrary dynamic reshapes, as long as they are contractions.
The expansion of a dynamic dimension into multiple dynamic dimensions is under-specified and is punted on for now.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D77360
Summary:
The previous change in https://reviews.llvm.org/D77311 attempted to
detect more C++ keywords. However it also precisely detected all
JavaScript keywords. That's generally correct, but many JavaScripy
keywords, e.g. `get`, are so-called pseudo-keywords. They can be used in
positions where a keyword would never be legal, e.g. in a dotted
expression:
x.type; // type is a pseudo-keyword, but can be used here.
x.get; // same for get etc.
This change introduces an additional parameter to
`IsJavaScriptIdentifier`, allowing clients to toggle whether they want
to allow `IdentifierName` tokens, i.e. pseudo-keywords.
Reviewers: krasimir
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D77548
This patch moves calls to their own recipe, to simplify the transition
to VPUser for operands of VPWidenRecipe, as discussed in D76992.
Subsequently additional information can be added to the recipe rather
than computing it during the execute step.
Reviewers: rengolin, Ayal, gilr, hsaito
Reviewed By: gilr
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D77467
Summary:
In D77454 we explain that `LoadInst` and `StoreInst` always have their alignment defined.
This allows to work backward here and to infer that `getNewAlignment` does not need to return `0` in case of failure.
Returning `1` also works since it needs to be greater than the Load/Store alignment which is a least `1`.
This is patch is part of a series to introduce an Alignment type.
See this thread for context: http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2019-July/133851.html
See this patch for the introduction of the type: https://reviews.llvm.org/D64790
Reviewers: courbet
Subscribers: hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D77538