libunwind ARM EHABI does not support _Unwind_ForcedUnwind yet.
In addition, ARM EHABI makes `_Unwind_Exception` a typedef so
`struct _Unwind_Exception*` cannot be used.
Forced unwinding is like a foreign exception, which can be caught by `catch (...)` and rethrown.
If not rethrown, `__cxa_end_cath` will call `_Unwind_DeleteException` to destroy the object.
The behavior going through empty `throw()` and non-empty `throw(int)` is not
clear (https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98785), so I do not add such
tests.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D95200
The two operations have acted differently since Clang 8, but were
unfortunately mangled the same. The new mangling uses new "vendor
extended expression" syntax proposed in
https://github.com/itanium-cxx-abi/cxx-abi/issues/112
GCC had the same mangling problem, https://gcc.gnu.org/PR88115, and
will hopefully be switching to the same mangling as implemented here.
Additionally, fix the mangling of `__uuidof` to use the new extension
syntax, instead of its previous nonstandard special-case.
Adjusts the demangler accordingly.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D93922
1.
All `_URC_HANDLER_FOUND` return values need to set `landingPad`
and its value does not matter for `_URC_CONTINUE_UNWIND`. So we
can always set `landingPad` to unify code.
2.
For an exception specification (`ttypeIndex < 0`), we can check `_UA_FORCE_UNWIND` first.
3.
The so-called type 3 search (`actions & _UA_CLEANUP_PHASE && !(actions & _UA_HANDLER_FRAME)`)
is actually conceptually wrong. For a catch handler or an unmatched dynamic
exception specification, `_UA_HANDLER_FOUND` should be returned immediately. It
still appeared to work because the `ttypeIndex==0` case would return
`_UA_HANDLER_FOUND` at a later time.
This patch fixes the conceptual error and simplifies the code by handling type 3
the same way as type 2 (which is also what libsupc++ does).
The only difference between phase 1 and phase 2 is what to do with a cleanup
(`actionEntry==0`, or a `ttypeIndex==0` is found in the action record chain):
phase 1 returns `_URC_CONTINUE_UNWIND` while phase 2 returns `_URC_HANDLER_FOUND`.
Reviewed By: #libc_abi, compnerd
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D93190
We've been using this patch in Android so we can avoid including the
demangler in libc++.so. It comes with a rather large cost in RSS and
isn't commonly needed.
Reviewed By: #libc_abi, compnerd
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D88189
cmake_minimum_required(VERSION) calls cmake_policy(VERSION),
which sets all policies up to VERSION to NEW.
LLVM started requiring CMake 3.13 last year, so we can remove
a bunch of code setting policies prior to 3.13 to NEW as it
no longer has any effect.
Reviewed By: phosek, #libunwind, #libc, #libc_abi, ldionne
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D94374
In 7cd67904f7, we removed the unnecessary nullptr checks from the libc++abi
definition of operator delete, but we forgot to update the definition in
libc++ (damn code duplication!). Then, in d4a1e03c5f, I synced the
definitions across libc++ and libc++abi, but I did it the wrong way around.
I re-added the if() checks to libc++abi instead of removing them from libc++.
In ef74f0fdc3, we re-removed the if() check from operator delete, but
only in libc++abi. This patch corrects this mess and removes it
consistently in libc++ and libc++abi.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D93473
In three cases we call `scan_eh_tab` to parse LSDA:
* `actions & _UA_SEARCH_PHASE`
* `actions & _UA_CLEANUP_PHASE && actions & _UA_HANDLER_FRAME && !native_exception`
* `actions & _UA_CLEANUP_PHASE && !(actions & _UA_HANDLER_FRAME)`
Check
`actions & _UA_CLEANUP_PHASE && actions & _UA_HANDLER_FRAME && native_exception` first,
then we can move three `scan_eh_tab` into one place.
Another simplification is that we can check whether the result of `scan_eh_tab`
is `_UA_CONTINUE_UNWIND` or `_UA_FATAL_PHASE1_ERROR` first. Then many of the
original checks will be dead and can thus be deleted.
Reviewed By: #libc_abi, ldionne
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D93186
Similar to D52401. Normally operator delete is defined in libc++abi
(LIBCPP_DISABLE_NEW_DELETE_DEFINITIONS is off by default).
C89 4.10.3.2 The free function
C99 7.20.3.2 The free function
C11 7.22.3.3 The free function
If ptr is a null pointer, no action shall occur.
free on MSDN:
If memblock is NULL, the pointer is ignored and free immediately returns.
Reviewed By: #libc_abi, ldionne
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D93339
Under the relative vtables ABI, __dynamic_cast will not work since it assumes
the vtable pointer is 2 ptrdiff_ts away from the start of the vtable (8-byte
offset to top + 8-byte pointer to typeinfo) when it is actually 8 bytes away
(4-byte offset to top + 4-byte offset to typeinfo). This adjusts the logic under
__dynamic_cast and other areas vtable calculations are done to support this ABI
when it's used.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D77606
We create threads using std::thread in various places in the test suite.
However, the usual std::thread constructor may not work on all platforms,
e.g. on platforms where passing a stack size is required to create a thread.
This commit introduces a simple indirection that makes it easier to tweak
how threads are created inside the test suite on various platforms. Note
that tests that are purposefully calling std::thread's constructor directly
(e.g. because that is what they're testing) were not modified.
This will fix remaining failures on gcc-9 buildbot: http://lab.llvm.org:8011/#/builders/101.
gcc-8 and gcc-9 do not support constexpr destructors nor constexpr allocation.
Fix gcc warnings: -Wconversion, -Wpragmas.
This should make the builder http://lab.llvm.org:8011/#/builders/101/ happy.
It uses gcc-9 and not Tip-Of-Trunk as its name indicates BTW.
GCC-10 passes all these tests.
Fix gcc warnings: -Wsign-compare, -Wparentheses, -Wpragmas.
Reviewed By: ldionne, #libc, #libc_abi
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D92099
There were a couple of places where we needed to call the underlying
platform's aligned allocation/deallocation function. Instead of having
the same logic all over the place, extract the logic into a pair of
helper functions __libcpp_aligned_alloc and __libcpp_aligned_free.
The code in libcxxabi/src/fallback_malloc.cpp looks like it could be
simplified after this change -- I purposefully did not simplify it
further to keep this change as straightforward as possible, since it
is touching very important parts of the library.
Also, the changes in libcxx/src/new.cpp and libcxxabi/src/stdlib_new_delete.cpp
are basically the same -- I just kept both source files in sync.
The underlying reason for this refactoring is to make it easier to support
platforms that provide aligned allocation through C11's aligned_alloc
function instead of posix_memalign. After this change, we'll only have
to add support for that in a single place.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D91379
This has been a long-standing TODO item, however we have now been requiring
a monorepo layout to build libc++ and libc++abi for a while now. Hence,
we can fix this code duplication issue now.
Note that it's still not super pretty to reach into libc++ to include
headers, but it's better than having duplicated code which can get out
of sync.
When building the runtimes, it's very important not to add rpaths unless
the user explicitly asks for them (the standard way being CMAKE_INSTALL_RPATH),
or to change the install name dir unless the user requests it (via
CMAKE_INSTALL_NAME_DIR).
llvm_setup_rpath() would override the install_name_dir of the runtimes
even if CMAKE_INSTALL_NAME_DIR was specified to something, which is wrong
and in fact even "dangerous" for the runtimes.
This issue was discovered when trying to build libc++ and libc++abi as
system libraries for Apple, where we set the install name dir to /usr/lib
explicitly. llvm_setup_rpath() would cause libc++ to have the wrong install
name dir, and for basically everything on the system to fail to load.
This was discovered just now because we previously used something closer
to a standalone build, where llvm_setup_rpath() wouldn't exist, and hence
not be used.
This is a revert of the following commits:
libunwind: 3a667b9bd8
libc++abi: 4877063e19
libc++: 88434fe05f
Those added llvm_setup_rpath() for consistency, so it seems reasonable
to revert.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D91099
Summary:
Before this patch, we could only link against the back-deployment libc++abi
dylib. This patch allows linking against the just-built libc++abi, but
running against the back-deployment one -- just like we do for libc++.
Also, add XFAIL markup to flag expected errors.
Previously, these had to be set manually when building each of the
projects standalone, in order to get proper symbol visibility when
combining the two libraries.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D90021
This is a massive revert of the following commits (from most revent to oldest):
2b9b7b5775.
529ac3319728270234f169c2087283b5aa67446e5d796645d6
After checking-in the __config_site change, a lot of things started breaking
due to widespread reliance on various aspects of libc++'s build, notably the
fact that we can include the headers from the source tree, but also reliance
on various "internal" CMake variables used by the runtimes build and compiler-rt.
These were unintended consequences of the change, and after two days, we
still haven't restored all the bots to being green. Instead, now that I
understand what specific areas this will blow up in, I should be able to
chop up the patch into smaller ones that are easier to digest.
See https://reviews.llvm.org/D89041 for more details on this adventure.
In 5d796645, we stopped looking at the LIBCXXABI_LIBCXX_INCLUDES variable,
which broke users of the Standalone build. This patch reinstates that
variable, however it must point to the *installed* path of the libc++
headers, not the libc++ headers in the source tree (which has always
been the case, but wasn't enforced before).
If LIBCXXABI_LIBCXX_INCLUDES points to the libc++ headers in the source
tree, the `__config_site` header will fail to be found.
Copy over the compiler detection structure from libcxx, and set
_LIBCXXABI_WEAK like _LIBCPP_WEAK is set in libcxx.
This allows users to override operator new/delete, if using those
operators from libcxxabi instead of from libcxx.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D89863
This commit should really be named "Workaround external projects depending
on libc++ build system implementation details". It seems that the compiler-rt
build (and perhaps other projects) is relying on the fact that we copy libc++
and libc++abi headers to `<build-root>/include/c++/v1`. This was changed
by 5d796645, which moved the headers to `<build-root>/projects/libcxx/include/c++/v1`
and broke the compiler-rt build.
I'm committing this workaround to fix the compiler-rt build, but we should
remove reliance on implementation details like that. The correct way to
setup the compiler-rt build would be to "link" against the `cxx-headers`
target in CMake, or to run `install-cxx-headers` using an appropriate
installation prefix, and then manually add a `-I` path to that location.
While running this test on a bare metal target, I got an error as 'sleep' was not available on that system. As 'sleep' call is not doing anything useful for cases when _LIBCXXABI_HAS_NO_THREADS is defined. This patch puts it under this check.
Reviewed By: ldionne
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D89871
Prior to this patch, we would generate a fancy <__config> header by
concatenating <__config_site> and <__config>. This complexifies the
build system and also increases the difference between what's tested
and what's actually installed.
This patch removes that complexity and instead simply installs <__config_site>
alongside the libc++ headers. <__config_site> is then included by <__config>,
which is much simpler. Doing this also opens the door to having different
<__config_site> headers depending on the target, which was impossible before.
It does change the workflow for testing header-only changes to libc++.
Previously, we would run `lit` against the headers in libcxx/include.
After this patch, we run it against a fake installation root of the
headers (containing a proper <__config_site> header). This makes use
closer to testing what we actually install, which is good, however it
does mean that we have to update that root before testing header changes.
Thus, we now need to run `ninja check-cxx-deps` before running `lit` by
hand.
This commit was originally applied in 1e46d1aa3 and reverted in eb60c487
because it broke the libc++abi and libunwind test suites. This has now
been fixed.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D89041
Prior to this patch, we would generate a fancy <__config> header by
concatenating <__config_site> and <__config>. This complexifies the
build system and also increases the difference between what's tested
and what's actually installed.
This patch removes that complexity and instead simply installs <__config_site>
alongside the libc++ headers. <__config_site> is then included by <__config>,
which is much simpler. Doing this also opens the door to having different
<__config_site> headers depending on the target, which was impossible before.
It does change the workflow for testing header-only changes to libc++.
Previously, we would run `lit` against the headers in libcxx/include.
After this patch, we run it against a fake installation root of the
headers (containing a proper <__config_site> header). This makes use
closer to testing what we actually install, which is good, however it
does mean that we have to update that root before testing header changes.
Thus, we now need to run `ninja check-cxx-deps` before running `lit` by
hand.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D89041
This patch ensures that __shared_weak_count provides a consistent vtable
regardless of if RTTI is enabled or if we are targeting a static or shared
libc++ build.
This patch is technically ABI breaking, but only for a very specific
configuration that no vendor should be shipping.
Note that _LIBCPP_BUILD_STATIC is not normally defined when building
libc++.a, but instead it must be manually provided by the user or the
__config_site.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D32838
Previously, we would define new/delete in both libc++ and libc++abi.
Not only does this cause code bloat, but also it's technically an ODR
violation since we don't know which operator will be selected. Furthermore,
since those are weak definitions, we should strive to have as few of them
as possible (to improve load times).
My preferred choice would have been to put the operators in libc++ only
by default, however that would create a circular dependency between
libc++ and libc++abi, which GNU linkers don't handle.
Folks who want to ship new/delete in libc++ instead of libc++abi are
free to do so by turning on LIBCXX_ENABLE_NEW_DELETE_DEFINITIONS at
CMake configure time.
On Apple platforms, this shouldn't be an ABI break because we re-export
the new/delete symbols from libc++abi. This change actually makes libc++
behave closer to the system libc++ shipped on Apple platforms.
On other platforms, this is an ABI break for people linking against libc++
but not libc++abi. However, vendors have been consulted in D68269 and no
objection was raised. Furthermore, the definitions can be controlled to
appear in libc++ instead with the CMake option.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D68269
This is the libcxxabi counterpart of D89545, and would have been part
of that patch if I'd spotted it soon enough (oops). One test in
libcxxabi is using the `%lu` printf format to refer to `size_t`, which
should be `%zu`.
Reviewed By: ldionne, #libc_abi
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D89547
Remove check for standalone and shared library mode in libcxxabi to
allow including tests in said mode. This check prevented running the
tests in standalone mode with static libraries, which is the case for
baremetal targets.
Fix check-unwind target trying to use a non-existent llvm-lit executable
in standalone mode. Copy the HandleOutOfTreeLLVM logic from libcxxabi to
libunwind in order to make the tests work in standalone mode.
Reviewed By: ldionne, #libc_abi, #libc
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D86540
We used <iostream> in several places where we don't actually need the
full power of <iostream>, and where using basic `std::printf` is enough.
This is better, since `std::printf` can be supported on systems that don't
have a notion of locales, while <iostream> can't.
There are several places in LLVM's CMake setup that try to remove the
`stdlib=...` flag from the CMake flags. All this code however only considered
the `-stdlib=` variant of the flag but not the alternative spelling with a
double dash. This causes that when one adds `--stdlib=...` to the user-provided
CMake flags that this gets transformed into just `-` which ends up causing the
build system to think it should read the source from stdin (which then lead to
very confusing build errors).
This just adds the alternative spelling before the`-stdlib=` variant in all
these places
Reviewed By: ldionne
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D87133
This is needed when running the tests in Freestanding mode, where main()
isn't treated specially. In Freestanding, main() doesn't get mangled as
extern "C", so whatever runtime we're using fails to find the entry point.
One way to solve this problem is to define a symbol alias from __Z4mainiPPc
to _main, however this requires all definitions of main() to have the same
mangling. Hence this commit.
This reverts commit c7d4aa711a. I am still investigating the issue,
but it looks like that commit has an interaction with ld64 that causes
new/delete weak re-exports not to work properly anymore. This is weird
because this commit did not touch the exports of new/delete -- I am
still investigating.
This is a temporary workaround until the new/delete situation is made
better (i.e. we don't include new/delete in both libc++ and libc++abi
by default).
Instead of managing two copies of the symbol lists, reuse the same list
in libc++abi and libc++.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D88623