Much to my surprise, '-disable-llvm-optzns' which I thought was the
magical flag I wanted to get at the raw LLVM IR coming out of Clang
deosn't do that. It still runs some passes over the IR. I don't want
that, I really want the *raw* IR coming out of Clang and I strongly
suspect everyone else using it is in the same camp.
There is actually a flag that does what I want that I didn't know about
called '-disable-llvm-passes'. I suspect many others don't know about it
either. It both does what I want and is much simpler.
This removes the confusing version and makes that spelling of the flag
an alias for '-disable-llvm-passes'. I've also moved everything in Clang
to use the 'passes' spelling as it seems both more accurate (*all* LLVM
passes are disabled, not just optimizations) and much easier to remember
and spell correctly.
This is part of simplifying how Clang drives LLVM to make it cleaner to
wire up to the new pass manager.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D28047
llvm-svn: 290392
It seems that there is small bug, and we can't generate assume loads
when some virtual functions have internal visibiliy
This reverts commit 982bb7d966947812d216489b3c519c9825cacbf2.
llvm-svn: 247332
Generating call assume(icmp %vtable, %global_vtable) after constructor
call for devirtualization purposes.
For more info go to:
http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/cfe-dev/2015-July/044227.html
Edit:
Fixed version because of PR24479.
After this patch got reverted because of ScalarEvolution bug (D12719)
Merged after John McCall big patch (Added Address).
http://reviews.llvm.org/D11859
llvm-svn: 247199
There was linker problem, and it turns out that it is not always safe
to refer to vtable. If the vtable is used, then we can refer to it
without any problem, but because we don't know when it will be used or
not, we can only check if vtable is external or it is safe to to emit it
speculativly (when class it doesn't have any inline virtual functions).
It should be fixed in the future.
http://reviews.llvm.org/D12385
llvm-svn: 246214
Generating available_externally vtables for optimizations purposes.
Unfortunatelly ItaniumABI doesn't guarantee that we will be able to
refer to virtual inline method by name.
But when we don't have any inline virtual methods, and key function is
not defined in this TU, we can generate that there will be vtable and
mark it as available_externally.
This is patch will help devirtualize better.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D11441
llvm-svn: 243090
unique them and permits the implementation of dynamic_cast (and
anything else which knows it's working with a complete class
type) to compare their addresses directly.
rdar://16005328
llvm-svn: 201020
This fixes pr13124.
From the discussion at
http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/pipermail/cfe-dev/2012-June/022606.html
we know that we cannot make funcions in a weak_odr vtable also weak_odr. They
should remain linkonce_odr.
The side effect is that we cannot emit a available_externally vtable unless we
also emit a copy of the function. This also has an issue: If codegen is going
to output a function, sema has to mark it used. Given llvm.org/pr9114, it looks
like sema cannot be more aggressive at marking functions used because
of vtables.
This leaves us with a few unpleasant options:
* Marking functions in vtables used if possible. This sounds a bit sloppy, so
we should avoid it.
* Producing available_externally vtables only when all the functions in it are
already used or weak_odr. This would cover cases like
--------------------
struct foo {
virtual ~foo();
};
struct bar : public foo {
virtual void zed();
};
void f() {
foo *x(new bar);
delete x;
}
void g(bar *x) {
x->~bar(); // force the destructor to be used
}
--------------------------
and
----------------------------------
template<typename T>
struct bar {
virtual ~bar();
};
template<typename T>
bar<T>::~bar() {
}
// make the destructor weak_odr instead of linkonce_odr
extern template class bar<int>;
void f() {
bar<int> *x(new bar<int>);
delete x;
}
----------------------------
These look like corner cases, so it is unclear if it is worth it.
* And finally: Just nuke this optimization. That is what this patch implements.
llvm-svn: 189852
never key functions. We did not implement that rule for the
iOS ABI, which was driven by what was implemented in gcc-4.2.
However, implement it now for other ARM-based platforms.
llvm-svn: 173515
is not defined in the current translation unit. Doing so lead to compile errors
such as PR9114.
Instead, when CodeGen is building the vtable, don't try to emit a definition
for functions that aren't marked used in the current translation unit.
Fixes PR9114.
llvm-svn: 124768
current translation unit as available_externally.
This helps devirtualize the second example in PR3100, comment 18:
struct S { S() {}; virtual void xyzzy(); };
inline void foo(S *s) { s->xyzzy(); }
void bar() { S s; foo(&s); }
This involved four major changes:
1. In DefineUsedVTables, always mark virtual member functions as referenced for
non-template classes and class template specializations.
2. In CodeGenVTables::ShouldEmitVTableInThisTU return true if optimizations are
enabled, even if the key function is not implemented in this translation
unit. We don't ever do this for code compiled with -fapple-kext, because we
don't ever want to devirtualize virtual member function calls in that case.
3. Give the correct linkage for vtables where the key function is not defined.
4. Update the linkage for RTTI structures when necessary.
llvm-svn: 124565
Chandler Carruth