This resolves a README entry and technically resolves PR4916,
but we still get poor code for the testcase in that PR because
GVN isn't CSE'ing uadd with add, filed as PR8817.
Previously we got:
_test7: ## @test7
addq %rsi, %rdi
cmpq %rdi, %rsi
movl $42, %eax
cmovaq %rsi, %rax
ret
Now we get:
_test7: ## @test7
addq %rsi, %rdi
movl $42, %eax
cmovbq %rsi, %rax
ret
llvm-svn: 122182
the old thing end up on the instcombine worklist. Not doing this
can cause an extra top-level iteration of instcombine, burning
compile time.
llvm-svn: 122179
sadd formed is half the size of the original type. We can
now compile this into a sadd.i8:
unsigned char X(char a, char b) {
int res = a+b;
if ((unsigned )(res+128) > 255U)
abort();
return res;
}
llvm-svn: 122178
checking to see if the high bits of the original add result were dead.
Inserting a smaller add and zexting back to that size is not good enough.
This is likely to be the fix for 8816.
llvm-svn: 122177
which have trapping constant exprs in them due to PHI nodes.
Eliminating them can cause the constant expr to be evalutated
on new paths if the input edges are critical.
llvm-svn: 122164
on the DragonEgg self-host bot. Unfortunately, the testcase is pretty messy and doesn't reduce well due to
interactions with other parts of InstCombine.
llvm-svn: 122072
a null endptr argument, because they may write to errno.
This fixes a seflhost miscompile observed on Linux targets when TBAA
was enabled.
llvm-svn: 122014
dragonegg self-host buildbot. Original commit message:
Add an InstCombine transform to recognize instances of manual overflow-safe addition
(performing the addition in a wider type and explicitly checking for overflow), and
fold them down to intrinsics. This currently only supports signed-addition, but could
be generalized if someone works out the magic constant formulas for other operations.
llvm-svn: 121965
(performing the addition in a wider type and explicitly checking for overflow), and
fold them down to intrinsics. This currently only supports signed-addition, but could
be generalized if someone works out the magic constant formulas for other operations.
Fixes <rdar://problem/8558713>.
llvm-svn: 121905
When it sees a promising select it now tries to figure out whether the condition of the select is known in any of the predecessors and if so it maps the operands appropriately.
llvm-svn: 121859
which is simpler than finding a place to insert in BB.
- Don't perform the 'if condition hoisting' xform on certain
i1 PHIs, as it interferes with switch formation.
This re-fixes "example 7", without breaking the world hopefully.
llvm-svn: 121764
first, it can kick in on blocks whose conditions have been
folded to a constant, even though one of the edges will be
trivially folded.
second, it doesn't clean up the "if diamond" that it just
eliminated away. This is a problem because other simplifycfg
xforms kick in depending on the order of block visitation,
causing pointless work.
llvm-svn: 121762
when simplifying, allowing them to be eagerly turned into switches. This
is the last step required to get "Example 7" from this blog post:
http://blog.regehr.org/archives/320
On X86, we now generate this machine code, which (to my eye) seems better
than the ICC generated code:
_crud: ## @crud
## BB#0: ## %entry
cmpb $33, %dil
jb LBB0_4
## BB#1: ## %switch.early.test
addb $-34, %dil
cmpb $58, %dil
ja LBB0_3
## BB#2: ## %switch.early.test
movzbl %dil, %eax
movabsq $288230376537592865, %rcx ## imm = 0x400000017001421
btq %rax, %rcx
jb LBB0_4
LBB0_3: ## %lor.rhs
xorl %eax, %eax
ret
LBB0_4: ## %lor.end
movl $1, %eax
ret
llvm-svn: 121690
Chris Lattner