Original commit message:
Defer some shl transforms to DAGCombine.
The shl instruction is used to represent multiplication by a constant
power of two as well as bitwise left shifts. Some InstCombine
transformations would turn an shl instruction into a bit mask operation,
making it difficult for later analysis passes to recognize the
constsnt multiplication.
Disable those shl transformations, deferring them to DAGCombine time.
An 'shl X, C' instruction is now treated mostly the same was as 'mul X, C'.
These transformations are deferred:
(X >>? C) << C --> X & (-1 << C) (When X >> C has multiple uses)
(X >>? C1) << C2 --> X << (C2-C1) & (-1 << C2) (When C2 > C1)
(X >>? C1) << C2 --> X >>? (C1-C2) & (-1 << C2) (When C1 > C2)
The corresponding exact transformations are preserved, just like
div-exact + mul:
(X >>?,exact C) << C --> X
(X >>?,exact C1) << C2 --> X << (C2-C1)
(X >>?,exact C1) << C2 --> X >>?,exact (C1-C2)
The disabled transformations could also prevent the instruction selector
from recognizing rotate patterns in hash functions and cryptographic
primitives. I have a test case for that, but it is too fragile.
llvm-svn: 155362
While the patch was perfect and defect free, it exposed a really nasty
bug in X86 SelectionDAG that caused an llc crash when compiling lencod.
I'll put the patch back in after fixing the SelectionDAG problem.
llvm-svn: 155181
The shl instruction is used to represent multiplication by a constant
power of two as well as bitwise left shifts. Some InstCombine
transformations would turn an shl instruction into a bit mask operation,
making it difficult for later analysis passes to recognize the
constsnt multiplication.
Disable those shl transformations, deferring them to DAGCombine time.
An 'shl X, C' instruction is now treated mostly the same was as 'mul X, C'.
These transformations are deferred:
(X >>? C) << C --> X & (-1 << C) (When X >> C has multiple uses)
(X >>? C1) << C2 --> X << (C2-C1) & (-1 << C2) (When C2 > C1)
(X >>? C1) << C2 --> X >>? (C1-C2) & (-1 << C2) (When C1 > C2)
The corresponding exact transformations are preserved, just like
div-exact + mul:
(X >>?,exact C) << C --> X
(X >>?,exact C1) << C2 --> X << (C2-C1)
(X >>?,exact C1) << C2 --> X >>?,exact (C1-C2)
The disabled transformations could also prevent the instruction selector
from recognizing rotate patterns in hash functions and cryptographic
primitives. I have a test case for that, but it is too fragile.
llvm-svn: 155136
exact/nsw/nuw shifts and have instcombine infer them when it can prove
that the relevant properties are true for a given shift without them.
Also, a variety of refactoring to use the new patternmatch logic thrown
in for good luck. I believe that this takes care of a bunch of related
code quality issues attached to PR8862.
llvm-svn: 125267
clang's -Wuninitialized-experimental warning.
While these don't look like real bugs, clang's
-Wuninitialized-experimental analysis is stricter
than GCC's, and these fixes have the benefit
of being general nice cleanups.
llvm-svn: 124073
While there, I noticed that the transform "undef >>a X -> undef" was wrong.
For example if X is 2 then the top two bits must be equal, so the result can
not be anything. I fixed this in the constant folder as well. Also, I made
the transform for "X << undef" stronger: it now folds to undef always, even
though X might be zero. This is in accordance with the LangRef, but I must
admit that it is fairly aggressive. Also, I added "i32 X << 32 -> undef"
following the LangRef and the constant folder, likewise fairly aggressive.
llvm-svn: 123417
A = shl x, 42
...
B = lshr ..., 38
which can be transformed into:
A = shl x, 4
...
iff we can prove that the would-be-shifted-in bits
are already zero. This eliminates two shifts in the testcase
and allows eliminate of the whole i128 chain in the real example.
llvm-svn: 112314
framework, which is good at ripping through bitfield
operations. This generalize a bunch of the existing
xforms that instcombine does, such as
(x << c) >> c -> and
to handle intermediate logical nodes. This is useful for
ripping up the "promote to large integer" code produced by
SRoA.
llvm-svn: 112304
with a fix for self-hosting
rotate CallInst operands, i.e. move callee to the back
of the operand array
the motivation for this patch are laid out in my mail to llvm-commits:
more efficient access to operands and callee, faster callgraph-construction,
smaller compiler binary
llvm-svn: 101465
with a fix
rotate CallInst operands, i.e. move callee to the back
of the operand array
the motivation for this patch are laid out in my mail to llvm-commits:
more efficient access to operands and callee, faster callgraph-construction,
smaller compiler binary
llvm-svn: 101397
of the operand array
the motivation for this patch are laid out in my mail to llvm-commits:
more efficient access to operands and callee, faster callgraph-construction,
smaller compiler binary
llvm-svn: 101364
aggressive changed the canonical form from sext(trunc(x)) to ashr(lshr(x)),
make sure to transform a couple more things into that canonical form,
and catch a case where we missed turning zext/shl/ashr into a single sext.
llvm-svn: 93787
lshr+ashr instead of trunc+sext. We want to avoid type
conversions whenever possible, it is easier to codegen expressions
without truncates and extensions.
llvm-svn: 93107
Benjamin Kramer