When processing a dSYM bundle, use llvm::sys::path to join the different
path components instead of using a string with hard coded forward
slashes as separators.
llvm-svn: 324622
Before this patch, llvm-dwarfdump would reject `bundel.dSYM/` as input,
while `bundel.dSYM` was accepted. The reason is that `path::extension()`
returns an empty string for the former, leading to the argument not
being recognized as a dSYM bundle.
llvm-svn: 324621
Summary:
Allow for options to be defined at compile time, like is already the case for
other sanitizers, via `SCUDO_DEFAULT_OPTIONS`.
Reviewers: alekseyshl, dberris
Reviewed By: alekseyshl, dberris
Subscribers: kubamracek, delcypher, llvm-commits, #sanitizers
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D42980
llvm-svn: 324620
Summary:
Concatenating Objective-C string literals inside an array literal
raises the warning -Wobjc-string-concatenation (which is enabled by default).
clang-format currently splits and concatenates string literals like
the following:
NSArray *myArray = @[ @"aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa" ];
into:
NSArray *myArray =
@[ @"aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa"
@"aaaaaaaaa" ];
which raises the warning. This is https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=36153 .
The options I can think of to fix this are:
1) Have clang-format disable Wobjc-string-concatenation by emitting
pragmas around the formatted code
2) Have clang-format wrap the string literals in a macro (which
disables the warning)
3) Disable string splitting for Objective-C string literals inside
array literals
I think 1) has no precedent, and I couldn't find a good
identity() macro for 2). So, this diff implements 3).
Test Plan: make -j12 FormatTests && ./tools/clang/unittests/Format/FormatTests
Reviewers: jolesiak, stephanemoore, djasper
Reviewed By: jolesiak
Subscribers: klimek, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D42704
llvm-svn: 324618
The last assume in the test says that %B12 is 0.
The first assume says that %and1 is less than %B12.
Therefore, %and1 is unsigned less than 0...does not compute.
That means this line:
Known.Zero.setHighBits(RHSKnown.countMinLeadingZeros() + 1);
...tries to set more bits than exist.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D43052
llvm-svn: 324610
ARMDisassembler now depends on the banked register tables in ARMUtils, so the
LLVMBuild.txt needed updating to reflect this.
Original commit mesage:
[ARM] Fix disassembly of invalid banked register moves
When disassembling banked register move instructions, we don't have an
assembly syntax for the unallocated register numbers, so we have to
return Fail rather than SoftFail. Previously we were returning SoftFail,
then crashing in the InstPrinter as we have no way to represent these
encodings in an assembly string.
This also switches the decoder to use the table-generated list of banked
registers, removing the duplicated list of encodings.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D43066
llvm-svn: 324606
The broken bot (clang-ppc64le-linux-multistage) is doign a shared-object build,
so I guess using lookupBankedRegByEncoding in the disassembler is a layering
violation?
llvm-svn: 324604
Refactor getLogBase2Vector into getLogBase2 to accept all scalars/vectors. Generalize from ConstantDataVector to support all constant vectors.
llvm-svn: 324603
When disassembling banked register move instructions, we don't have an
assembly syntax for the unallocated register numbers, so we have to
return Fail rather than SoftFail. Previously we were returning SoftFail,
then crashing in the InstPrinter as we have no way to represent these
encodings in an assembly string.
This also switches the decoder to use the table-generated list of banked
registers, removing the duplicated list of encodings.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D43066
llvm-svn: 324600
The UNSUPPORTED directive was not honored by the bot, presumably because
of the FIXME above it. This moves the comment down and removes the
remaining update check from basic-linking-x86.test.
This should un-break: llvm-clang-x86_64-expensive-checks-win/builds/7798/
llvm-svn: 324598
Summary:
GVN hoist pass is using PostDominatorTree analysis, therefore the analysis
should be listed in the pass initialization as a dependency.
Reviewed By: sebpop
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D43007
Author: ashlykov <arkady.shlykov@intel.com>
llvm-svn: 324597
Summary:
Currently libc++ implements some operations on valarray by using the
resize method. This method has a parameter with a default value.
Because of this, valarray may spuriously construct and destruct
objects of valarray's element type.
This patch fixes this issue and adds corresponding test cases.
Reviewers: EricWF, mclow.lists
Reviewed By: mclow.lists
Subscribers: rogfer01, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D41992
llvm-svn: 324596
NFC.
Adding MC regressions tests to cover several small x86 extensions as follows:
CLWB, CLZERO, F16C, INVPCID, PKU, POPCNT, RTM, SGX, SHA, SVM, VMFUNC, VTX
This patch is part of a larger task to cover MC encoding of all X86 isa sets started in revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D39952
Reviewers: RKSimon, craig.topper, zvi, AndreiGrischenko
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D41388
Change-Id: I254508cd17faca00b780be0fc2abf6c71b61faab
llvm-svn: 324595
Summary:
This patch is a fix for following issue:
https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=31362 The problem was caused by front end
lowering C calling conventions without taking into account calling conventions
enforced by attribute. In this case win64cc was no correctly lowered on targets
other than Windows.
Reviewed By: rnk (Reid Kleckner)
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D43016
Author: belickim <mateusz.belicki@intel.com>
llvm-svn: 324594
gcc resolves `__builtin_c?z` to `__c?zdi2` which leads to infinite
recursion. This problem has been observed for sparc64, mips64 and riscv.
Presumably this happens whenever an arch without dedicated bit counting
instructions is targeted. This patch provides a workaround.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D42902
llvm-svn: 324593
This commit attempts to re-land the r324480 which was reverted in
r324493 because it broke the Windows bots. For now I disabled the two
update tests on Windows until I'm able to debug this.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D42880
llvm-svn: 324592
Summary:
This patch is a follow-up to r323319 (which disables string literal breaking for
text protos) and it disables breaking before long string literals.
For example this:
```
keyyyyy: "long string literal"
```
used to get broken into:
```
keyyyyy:
"long string literal"
```
While at it, I also enabled it for LK_Proto and fixed a bug in the mustBreak code.
Reviewers: djasper, sammccall
Reviewed By: djasper
Subscribers: klimek, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D42957
llvm-svn: 324591
Summary:
The test was trying to reproduce a bug in handling of two concurrent
events, which was impossible to do reliably in a black-box style test.
In practice, this meant the test was only ever failing on remote
targets, as these were slow enough to trigger this.
Fortunately, we now have the ability to mock the server side of the
connection, which means we can simulate the failure deterministically,
so I rewrite the test to use the new gdb-client framework.
I've needed to add a couple of new packets to the mock server to be able
to do this. Instead of trying to guess how a "typical" gdb-client test
will want to handle this, I throw an exception in the implementation to
force the user to override them (the packets are only sent if the test
explicitly performs some action which will trigger them, so a basic test
which e.g. does not need the "continue" functionality will not need to
implement them).
Reviewers: owenpshaw
Subscribers: srhines, lldb-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D42959
llvm-svn: 324590
Add support of uge and sge latch condition to Loop Prediction for
reverse loops.
Reviewers: apilipenko, mkazantsev, sanjoy, anna
Reviewed By: anna
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D42837
llvm-svn: 324589
Tests the search for tools as defined in the spec. The OMP_TOOL_LIBRARIES
environment variable contains paths to the following files(in that order)
-to a nonexisting file
-to a shared library that does not have a ompt_start_tool function
-to a shared library that has an ompt_start_tool implementation returning NULL
-to a shared library that has an ompt_start_tool implementation returning a
pointer to a valid instance of ompt_start_tool_result_t
The expected result is that the last tool gets active and can print in the
thread-begin callback.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D42166
llvm-svn: 324588
Add a testcase that checks wheter the runtime can handle an ompt_start_tool
method that returns NULL indicating that no tool shall be loaded.
All tool_available testcases need a separate folder to avoid file conflicts for
the generated tools.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D41904
llvm-svn: 324587
Instructions affected:
mthc1, mfhc1, add.d, sub.d, mul.d, div.d,
mov.d, neg.d, cvt.w.d, cvt.d.s, cvt.d.w, cvt.s.d
These instructions are now defined for
microMIPS32r3 + microMIPS32r6 in MicroMipsInstrFPU.td
since they shared their encoding with those already defined
in microMIPS32r6InstrInfo.td and have been therefore
removed from the latter file.
Some instructions present in MicroMipsInstrFPU.td which
did not have both AFGR64 and FGR64 variants defined have
been altered to do so.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D42738
llvm-svn: 324584
Summary:
Right now using a ProcResource automatically counts as usage of all
super ProcResGroups. All this is done during codegen, so there is no
way for schedulers to get this information at runtime.
This adds the information of which individual ProcRes units are
contained in a ProcResGroup in MCProcResourceDesc.
Reviewers: gchatelet
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D43023
llvm-svn: 324582
We were generating "fmov h0, wzr" instructions when FullFP16 is not enabled.
I've not added any tests, because the problem was visible in:
test/CodeGen/AArch64/arm64-zero-cycle-zeroing.ll,
which I had to change: I don't think Cyclone has FullFP16 enabled
by default, so it shouldn't be using this v8.2a instruction.
I've also removed these rdar tags, please shout if there are any objections.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D43020
llvm-svn: 324581
The KTEST instruction sets the C flag if the result of anding both operands together is all 1s. We can use this to lower (icmp eq/ne (bitcast (vXi1 X), -1)
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D42772
llvm-svn: 324577
Summary:
KTEST has weird flag behavior. The Z flag is set for all bits in the AND of the k-registers being 0, and the C flag is set for all bits being 1. All other flags are cleared.
We currently emit this instruction in EmitTEST and don't check the condition code. This can lead to strange things like using the S flag after a KTEST for a signed compare.
The domain reassignment pass can also transform TEST instructions into KTEST and is not protected against the flag usage either. For now I've disabled this part of the domain reassignment pass. I tried to comment out the checks in the mir test so that we could recover them later, but I couldn't figure out how to get that to work.
This patch moves the KTEST handling into LowerSETCC and now creates a ktest+x86setcc. I've chosen this approach because I'd like to add support for the C flag for all ones in a followup patch. To do that requires that I can rewrite the condition code going in the x86setcc to be different than the original SETCC condition code.
This fixes PR36182. I'll file a PR to fix domain reassignment once this goes in. Should this be merged to 6.0?
Reviewers: spatel, guyblank, RKSimon, zvi
Reviewed By: guyblank
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D42770
llvm-svn: 324576
Initially submitted as r324356 and reverted in r324386.
This change additionally contains a fix to crashes of the buildbots.
The source of the crash was undefined behaviour caused by
std::future<> whose std::promise<> was destroyed without calling
set_value().
llvm-svn: 324575
With fix: reimplemented.
Original commit message:
Recently introduced convertToDeclaration is very similar
to code used in filterModule function.
Patch reuses it to reduce duplication.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D42971
llvm-svn: 324574
The commit rL308422 introduces a restriction for folding unconditional
branches. Specifically if empty block with unconditional branch leads to
header of the loop then elimination of this basic block is prohibited.
However it seems this condition is redundantly strict.
If elimination of this basic block does not introduce more back edges
then we can eliminate this block.
The patch implements this relax of restriction.
The test profile/Linux/counter_promo_nest.c in compiler-rt project
is updated to meet this change.
Reviewers: efriedma, mcrosier, pacxx, hsung, davidxl
Reviewed By: pacxx
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D42691
llvm-svn: 324572
The test expects to see the pattern "load add store" twice
in a row.
However the test contains actually several instances of this pattern.
Currently the first pattern appears in the output twice.
But after LLVM change https://reviews.llvm.org/D42691 some addtional
modification is done and one of another pattern has been hoisted in
function entry block.
As a result we have another order of meeting this pattern.
The test is updated to meet this change.
llvm-svn: 324571
Jonas Devlieghere