Use existing KnownBits helpers from KnownBits.h to simplify G_ICMPs.
E.g.
x == x -> true
x != x -> false
load(x) > 1 -> true (when the load is known to be greater than 1)
And so on.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D102542
GCC warning:
```
/llvm-project/llvm/lib/CodeGen/GlobalISel/CombinerHelper.cpp: In member function ‘bool llvm::CombinerHelper::matchFunnelShiftToRotate(llvm::MachineInstr&)’:
/llvm-project/llvm/lib/CodeGen/GlobalISel/CombinerHelper.cpp:3882:35: warning: ?: using integer constants in boolean context, the expression will always evaluate to ‘true’ [-Wint-in-bool-context]
3882 | Opc == TargetOpcode::G_FSHL ? TargetOpcode::G_ROTL : TargetOpcode::G_ROTR;
| ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
```
Basically a port of isBitfieldExtractOpFromSExtInReg in AArch64ISelDAGToDAG.
This is only done post-legalization for now. Once the legalizer knows how to
decompose these back into shifts, this requirement can probably be removed.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D99230
Currently needsStackRealignment returns false if canRealignStack returns false.
This means that the behavior of needsStackRealignment does not correspond to
it's name and description; a function might need stack realignment, but if it
is not possible then this function returns false. Furthermore,
needsStackRealignment is not virtual and therefore some backends have made use
of canRealignStack to indicate whether a function needs stack realignment.
This patch attempts to clarify the situation by separating them and introducing
new names:
- shouldRealignStack - true if there is any reason the stack should be
realigned
- canRealignStack - true if we are still able to realign the stack (e.g. we
can still reserve/have reserved a frame pointer)
- hasStackRealignment = shouldRealignStack && canRealignStack (not target
customisable)
Targets can now override shouldRealignStack to indicate that stack realignment
is required.
This change will make it easier in a future change to handle the case where we
need to realign the stack but can't do so (for example when the register
allocator creates an aligned spill after the frame pointer has been
eliminated).
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D98716
Change-Id: Ib9a4d21728bf9d08a545b4365418d3ffe1af4d87
It is good to have a combined `divrem` instruction when the
`div` and `rem` are computed from identical input operands.
Some targets can lower them through a single expansion that
computes both division and remainder. It effectively reduces
the number of instructions than individually expanding them.
Reviewed By: arsenm, paquette
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D96013
If every element is extracted from a G_BUILD_VECTOR, pass through the source
registers. This is different to the extract(build_vector) combine because this
one tolerates multiple users as long as they're exhaustive.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D97890
This combine tries to do inter-block hoisting of extends of G_PHIs, into the
originating blocks of the phi's incoming value. The idea is to expose further
optimization opportunities that are normally obscured by the PHI.
Some basic heuristics, and a target hook for AArch64 is added, to allow tuning.
E.g. if the extend is used by a G_PTR_ADD, it doesn't perform this combine
since it may be folded into the addressing mode during selection.
There are very minor code size improvements on AArch64 -Os, but the real benefit
is that it unlocks optimizations like AArch64 conditional compares on some
benchmarks.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D95703
The builder was using the extend user as the insertion point, which meant that
we were incorrectly "moving" the load from its original position, and therefore
could violate memory operation ordering.
If the G_BR + G_BRCOND in this combine use the same MBB, then it will infinite
loop. Don't allow that to happen.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D95895
This is a restricted version of the combine in `DAGCombiner::MatchLoadCombine`.
(See D27861)
This tries to recognize patterns like below (assuming a little-endian target):
```
s8* x = ...
s32 val = a[0] | (a[1] << 8) | (a[2] << 16) | (a[3] << 24)
->
s32 val = *((i32)a)
s8* x = ...
s32 val = a[3] | (a[2] << 8) | (a[1] << 16) | (a[0] << 24)
->
s32 val = BSWAP(*((s32)a))
```
(This patch also handles the big-endian target case as well, in which the first
example above has a BSWAP, and the second example above does not.)
To recognize the pattern, this searches from the last G_OR in the expression
tree.
E.g.
```
Reg Reg
\ /
OR_1 Reg
\ /
OR_2
\ Reg
.. /
Root
```
Each non-OR register in the tree is put in a list. Each register in the list is
then checked to see if it's an appropriate load + shift logic.
If every register is a load + potentially a shift, the combine checks if those
loads + shifts, when OR'd together, are equivalent to a wide load (possibly with
a BSWAP.)
To simplify things, this patch
(1) Only handles G_ZEXTLOADs (which appear to be the common case)
(2) Only works in a single MachineBasicBlock
(3) Only handles G_SHL as the bit twiddling to stick the small load into a
specific location
An IR example of this is here: https://godbolt.org/z/4sP9Pj (lifted from
test/CodeGen/AArch64/load-combine.ll)
At -Os on AArch64, this is a 0.5% code size improvement for CTMark/sqlite3,
and a 0.4% improvement for CTMark/7zip-benchmark.
Also fix a bug in `isPredecessor` which caused it to fail whenever `DefMI` was
the first instruction in the block.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D94350
Returning int64_t was arbitrarily limiting for wide integer types, and
the functions should handle the full generality of the IR.
Also changes the full form which returns the originally defined
vreg. Add another wrapper for the common case of just immediately
converting to int64_t (arguably this would be useful for the full
return value case as well).
One possible issue with this change is some of the existing uses did
break without conversion to getConstantVRegSExtVal, and it's possible
some without adequate test coverage are now broken.
It's fairly common to need matchers for a specific constant value, or for
common idioms like finding a negated register.
Add
- `m_SpecificICst`, which returns true when matching a specific value..
- `m_ZeroInt`, which returns true when an integer 0 is matched.
- `m_Neg`, which returns when a register is negated.
Also update a few places which use idioms related to the new matchers.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D91397
We can use KnownBitsAnalysis to cover cases when mask is not trivial. It can
also help with cases when mask is not constant but can still be folded into
one. Since 'and' is comutative we should treat both operands as possible
replacements.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D90674
This sequence of instructions can be simplified if they are single use and
some operands are constants. Additional combines may be applied afterwards.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D90223
Sequence of same shift instructions with constant operands can be combined into
a single shift instruction.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D90217
https://reviews.llvm.org/D88060
This adds the following combines
1) build_vector formation from insert_vec_elts
2) insert_vec_elts (build_vector) -> build_vector
https://reviews.llvm.org/D88865
This adds a single combine for GlobalISel to fold:
ptradd (inttoptr C1) C2
Into:
C1 + C2
Additionally, a small test for AArch64 is added.
Patch by pnappa.
When the first operand is a null pointer we can avoid making a G_PTR_ADD and
make a G_INTTOPTR with the offset operand.
This helps us avoid making add with 0 later on for targets such as AMDGPU.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D87140
When we see this:
```
%and = G_AND %x, %y
%xor = G_XOR %and, %y
```
Produce this:
```
%not = G_XOR %x, -1
%new_and = G_AND %not, %y
```
as long as we are guaranteed to eliminate the original G_AND.
Also matches all commuted forms. E.g.
```
%and = G_AND %y, %x
%xor = G_XOR %y, %and
```
will be matched as well.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D88104
The shift amount type does not necessarily match the result type. This
was inserting a trunc from s32 to s32, which asserted. Just preserve
the original shift amount type which can be legalized later.
https://reviews.llvm.org/D86393
Patch adds five new `GICombinerRules`, one for each of the following unary
FP instrs: `G_FNEG`, `G_FABS`, `G_FPTRUNC`, `G_FSQRT`, and `G_FLOG2`. The
combine rules perform the FP operation on the constant operand and replace
the original instr with the result. Patch additionally adds new combiner
tests for the AArch64 target to test these new combiner rules.
test/CodeGen/AArch64/GlobalISel/combine-trunc.mir was failing
due to the different order for evaluating function arguments.
This patch updates the related code to fix the issue.
https://reviews.llvm.org/D87668
Patch adds two new GICombinerRules, one for G_MUL(X, 1) and another for G_MUL(X, -1).
G_MUL(X, 1) is an identity combine, and G_MUL(X, -1) gets replaced with G_SUB(0, X).
Patch additionally adds new combiner tests for the AArch64 target to test these
new combiner rules, as well as updates AMDGPU GISel tests.
Patch by mkitzan
Add a combiner helper that replaces G_UNMERGE where all the destination lanes
are dead except the first one with a G_TRUNC.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D87174
Add a combiner helper that replaces G_UNMERGE of big constants into direct
use of smaller constants.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D87166
https://reviews.llvm.org/D87554
Patch adds one new GICombinerRule for G_FABS. The combine rule folds G_FABS(G_FABS(X)) to G_FABS(X).
Patch additionally adds new combiner tests for the AArch64 target to test this new combiner rule.
Patch by mkitzan.
Add the matching and applying function to the combiner helper for
G_UNMERGE_VALUES(G_MERGE_VALUES).
This combine also supports any merge-like input nodes, like G_BUILD_VECTORS
and is robust against bitcasts in between int unmerge and merge nodes.
When the input type of the merge node and the output type of the unmerge
node are not the same, but the sizes are, the combine still applies but
creates bitcasts between the sources and the destinations instead of
reusing the destinations directly.
Long term, the artifact combiner should probably reuse that helper, but
as of today, it doesn't use any outside helper, so I kept it this way.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D87117
This combine previously tried to take sequences like:
%cond = G_ICMP pred, a, b
G_BRCOND %cond, %truebb
G_BR %falsebb
%truebb:
...
%falsebb:
...
and by inverting the compare predicate and swapping branch targets, delete the
G_BR and instead have a single conditional branch to the falsebb. Since in an
earlier patch we have a combine to fold not(icmp) into just an inverted icmp,
we don't need this combine to do as much. This patch instead generalizes the
combine by just looking for:
G_BRCOND %cond, %truebb
G_BR %falsebb
%truebb:
...
%falsebb:
...
and then inverting the condition using a not (xor). The xor can be folded away
in a separate combine. This change also lets us avoid some optimization code
in the IRTranslator.
I also think that deleting G_BRs in the combiner is unnecessary. That's
something that targets can decide to do at selection time and could simplify
generic code in future.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D86664
Jessica Paquette