This also clarifies some terminology used by the diagnostic (methods -> Objective-C methods, fields -> non-static data members, etc).
Many of the tests needed to be updated in multiple places for the diagnostic wording tweaks. The first instance of the diagnostic for that attribute is fully specified and subsequent instances cut off the complete list (to make it easier if additional subjects are added in the future for the attribute).
llvm-svn: 319002
Basically a regression after r316268.
However the diagnostic is correct, but the test coverage is bad.
So just like rL316500, introduce yet more tests,
and adjust the release notes.
See https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=35200
llvm-svn: 317421
rL316268 / D39122 has fixed PR35009, and now when in C,
these three(?) diagnostics properly use the enum's underlying
datatype.
While it was fixed, the test coverage was clearly insufficient,
because the -Wsign-compare change didn't show up in any of the
tests, until it was reported in the post-commit mail for rL316268.
So add the test for the -Wsign-compare diagnostic for enum
for C code, and while there, document this in the release notes.
The fix itself was obviously correct, so unless we want to silence
this new diagnosed case, i deem this commit to be NFC.
llvm-svn: 316500
Allow Obj-C ivars with incomplete array type but only as the last ivar.
Also add a requirement for ivars that contain a flexible array member to
be at the end of class too. It is possible to add in a subclass another
ivar at the end but we'll emit a warning in this case. Also we'll emit a
warning if a variable sized ivar is declared in class extension or in
implementation because subclasses won't know they should avoid adding
new ivars.
In ARC incomplete array objects are treated as __unsafe_unretained so
require them to be marked as such.
Prohibit synthesizing ivars with flexible array members because order of
synthesized ivars is not obvious and tricky to control. Spelling out
ivar explicitly gives control to developers and helps to avoid surprises
with unexpected ivar ordering.
For C and C++ changed diagnostic to tell explicitly a field is not the
last one and point to the next field. It is not as useful as in Obj-C
but it is an improvement and it is consistent with Obj-C. For C for
unions emit more specific err_flexible_array_union instead of generic
err_field_incomplete.
rdar://problem/21054495
Reviewers: rjmccall, theraven
Reviewed By: rjmccall
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D38773
llvm-svn: 316381
Summary:
As Mattias Eriksson has reported in PR35009, in C, for enums, the underlying type should
be used when checking for the tautological comparison, unlike C++, where the enumerator
values define the value range. So if not in CPlusPlus mode, use the enum underlying type.
Also, i have discovered a problem (a crash) when evaluating tautological-ness of the following comparison:
```
enum A { A_a = 0 };
if (a < 0) // expected-warning {{comparison of unsigned enum expression < 0 is always false}}
return 0;
```
This affects both the C and C++, but after the first fix, only C++ code was affected.
That was also fixed, while preserving (i think?) the proper diagnostic output.
And while there, attempt to enhance the test coverage.
Yes, some tests got moved around, sorry about that :)
Fixes PR35009
Reviewers: aaron.ballman, rsmith, rjmccall
Reviewed By: aaron.ballman
Subscribers: Rakete1111, efriedma, materi, cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D39122
llvm-svn: 316268
Changes behavior introduced in r298369 to only error out on
vector component invalid length access on OpenCL mode.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D38868
rdar://problem/33568748
llvm-svn: 316016
The first attempt, rL315614 was reverted because one libcxx
test broke, and i did not know at the time how to deal with it.
Summary:
Currently, clang only diagnoses completely out-of-range comparisons (e.g. `char` and constant `300`),
and comparisons of unsigned and `0`. But gcc also does diagnose the comparisons with the
`std::numeric_limits<>::max()` / `std::numeric_limits<>::min()` so to speak
Finally Fixes https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=34147
Continuation of https://reviews.llvm.org/D37565
Reviewers: rjmccall, rsmith, aaron.ballman
Reviewed By: rsmith
Subscribers: rtrieu, jroelofs, cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D38101
llvm-svn: 315875
Summary:
Currently, clang only diagnoses completely out-of-range comparisons (e.g. `char` and constant `300`),
and comparisons of unsigned and `0`. But gcc also does diagnose the comparisons with the
`std::numeric_limits<>::max()` / `std::numeric_limits<>::min()` so to speak
Finally Fixes https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=34147
Continuation of https://reviews.llvm.org/D37565
Reviewers: rjmccall, rsmith, aaron.ballman
Reviewed By: rsmith
Subscribers: rtrieu, jroelofs, cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D38101
llvm-svn: 315614
Move the logic for determining the `wchar_t` type information into the
driver. Rather than passing the single bit of information of
`-fshort-wchar` indicate to the frontend the desired type of `wchar_t`
through a new `-cc1` option of `-fwchar-type` and indicate the
signedness through `-f{,no-}signed-wchar`. This replicates the current
logic which was spread throughout Basic into the
`RenderCharacterOptions`.
Most of the changes to the tests are to ensure that the frontend uses
the correct type. Add a new test set under `test/Driver/wchar_t.c` to
ensure that we calculate the proper types for the various cases.
llvm-svn: 315126
As reported on cfe-commits, r314262 resulted in tentatively-defined
variables not being excluded for the warning.
Patch By: Elizabeth Andrews
llvm-svn: 314939
We were injecting the function into the wrong semantic context, resulting in it
failing to be registered as a global for redeclaration lookup. As a
consequence, we accepted invalid code since r310616.
Fixing that resulted in the "out-of-scope declaration" diagnostic firing a lot
more often. It turned out that warning codepath was non-conforming, because it
did not cause us to inject the implicitly-declared function into the enclosing
block scope. We now only warn if the type of the out-of-scope declaration
doesn't match the type of an implicitly-declared function; in all other cases,
we produce the normal warning for an implicitly-declared function.
llvm-svn: 314871
In C++, such initialization of std::array<T, N> types is guaranteed to work by
the standard, is completely idiomatic, and the "suggested" alternative from
Clang was technically invalid.
llvm-svn: 314838
C11 standard refers to the unsigned counterpart of the type ptrdiff_t
in the paragraph 7.21.6.1p7 where it defines the format specifier %tu.
In Clang (in PrintfFormatString.cpp, lines 508-510) there is a FIXME for this case,
in particular, Clang didn't diagnose %tu issues at all, i.e.
it didn't emit any warnings on the code printf("%tu", 3.14).
In this diff we add a method getUnsignedPointerDiffType for getting the corresponding type
similarly to how it's already done in the other analogous cases (size_t, ssize_t, ptrdiff_t etc)
and fix -Wformat diagnostics for %tu plus the emitted fix-it as well.
Test plan: make check-all
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D38270
llvm-svn: 314470
Currently AMDGPU inline asm only allow v and s as register names in constraints.
This patch allows the following register names in constraints: (n, m is unsigned integer, n < m)
v
s
{vn} or {v[n]}
{sn} or {s[n]}
{S} , where S is a special register name
{v[n:m]}
{s[n:m]}
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D37568
llvm-svn: 314452
Currently, if _attribute_((section())) is used for extern variables,
section information is not emitted in generated IR when the variables are used.
This is expected since sections are not generated for external linkage objects.
However NiosII requires this information as it uses special GP-relative accesses
for any objects that use attribute section (.sdata). GCC keeps this attribute in
middle-end.
This change emits the section information for all targets.
Patch By: Elizabeth Andrews
Differential Revision:https://reviews.llvm.org/D36487
llvm-svn: 314262
This commit fixes a bug in the handling of storage-only __fp16 vectors
where clang didn't promote __fp16 vector operands to float vectors.
Conceptually, it performs the following transformation on the AST in
CreateBuiltinBinOp and CreateBuiltinUnaryOp:
(Before)
typedef __fp16 half4 __attribute__ ((vector_size (8)));
typedef float float4 __attribute__ ((vector_size (16)));
half4 hv0, hv1, hv2, hv3;
hv0 = hv1 + hv2 + hv3;
(After)
float4 t0 = (float4)hv1 + (float4)hv2;
float4 t1 = t0 + (float4)hv3;
hv0 = (half4)t1;
Note that this commit fixes the bug for targets that set
HalfArgsAndReturns to true (ARM and ARM64). Targets using intrinsics
such as llvm.convert.to.fp16 to handle __fp16 are still broken.
rdar://problem/20625184
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D32520
llvm-svn: 314056
Fix for too aggressive error err_type_defined_in_enum introduced in
r313386. Defining tags inside enumerations is prohibited in C++ but
allowed in C.
Reviewers: aaron.ballman, rnk, doug.gregor
Reviewed By: rnk
Subscribers: alberto_magni, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D38109
llvm-svn: 313894
As Aaron Ballman has pointed out, that is not really correct.
So the key problem there is the invalidity of the testcase.
Revert r313747, and rework testcase in such a way, so these
details (platform-specific default enum sigdness) are
accounted for.
Also, add a C++-specific testcase.
llvm-svn: 313756
Recommit. Original commit was reverted because buildbots broke.
The error was only reproducible in the build with assertions.
The problem was that the diagnostic expected true/false as
bool, while it was provided as string "true"/"false".
Summary:
As requested by Sam McCall:
> Enums (not new I guess). Typical case: if (enum < 0 || enum > MAX)
> The warning strongly suggests that the enum < 0 check has no effect
> (for enums with nonnegative ranges).
> Clang doesn't seem to optimize such checks out though, and they seem
> likely to catch bugs in some cases. Yes, only if there's UB elsewhere,
> but I assume not optimizing out these checks indicates a deliberate
> decision to stay somewhat compatible with a technically-incorrect
> mental model.
> If this is the case, should we move these to a
> -Wtautological-compare-enum subcategory?
Reviewers: rjmccall, rsmith, aaron.ballman, sammccall, bkramer, djasper
Reviewed By: aaron.ballman
Subscribers: jroelofs, cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D37629
llvm-svn: 313745
This reverts commit r313722.
It looks like compiler-rt/lib/tsan/rtl/tsan_libdispatch_mac.cc cannot be
compiled because some of the functions declared in the file do not match
the ones in the SDK headers (which are annotated with 'noescape').
llvm-svn: 313725
The attribute informs the compiler that the annotated pointer parameter
of a function cannot escape and enables IRGen to attach attribute
'nocapture' to parameters that are annotated with the attribute. That is
the only optimization that currently takes advantage of 'noescape', but
there are other optimizations that will be added later that improves
IRGen for ObjC blocks.
rdar://problem/19886775
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D32210
llvm-svn: 313722
The attribute informs the compiler that the annotated pointer parameter
of a function cannot escape and enables IRGen to attach attribute
'nocapture' to parameters that are annotated with the attribute. That is
the only optimization that currently takes advantage of 'noescape', but
there are other optimizations that will be added later that improves
IRGen for ObjC blocks.
rdar://problem/19886775
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D32520
llvm-svn: 313720
The recently behavior in the code that these tests were meant to be checking will be ammended as soon as a suitable change can be properly reviewed.
llvm-svn: 313684
Summary:
As requested by Sam McCall:
> Enums (not new I guess). Typical case: if (enum < 0 || enum > MAX)
> The warning strongly suggests that the enum < 0 check has no effect
> (for enums with nonnegative ranges).
> Clang doesn't seem to optimize such checks out though, and they seem
> likely to catch bugs in some cases. Yes, only if there's UB elsewhere,
> but I assume not optimizing out these checks indicates a deliberate
> decision to stay somewhat compatible with a technically-incorrect
> mental model.
> If this is the case, should we move these to a
> -Wtautological-compare-enum subcategory?
Reviewers: rjmccall, rsmith, aaron.ballman, sammccall, bkramer, djasper
Reviewed By: aaron.ballman
Subscribers: jroelofs, cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D37629
llvm-svn: 313677
Summary:
According to C99 6.3.2.1p1, structs and unions with nested
const-qualified fields (that is, const-qualified fields
declared at some recursive level of the aggregate) are not
modifiable lvalues. However, Clang permits assignments of
these lvalues.
With this patch, we both prohibit the assignment of records
with const-qualified fields and emit a best-effort diagnostic.
This fixes https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=31796 .
Committing on behalf of bevinh (Bevin Hansson).
Reviewers: rtrieu, rsmith, bjope
Reviewed By: bjope
Subscribers: Ka-Ka, rogfer01, bjope, fhahn, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D37254
llvm-svn: 313628
This fixes PR28903 by avoiding access check for inner enum constant. We
are performing access check because one enum constant references another
and because enum is defined in CXXRecordDecl. But access check doesn't
work because FindDeclaringClass doesn't expect more than one EnumDecl
and because inner enum has access AS_none due to not being an immediate
child of a record.
The change detects an enum is defined in wrong place and allows to skip
parsing its body. Access check is skipped together with body parsing.
There was no crash in C, added test case to cover the new error.
rdar://problem/28530809
Reviewers: rnk, doug.gregor, rsmith
Reviewed By: doug.gregor
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D37089
llvm-svn: 313386
Summary:
This is a first half(?) of a fix for the following bug:
https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=34147 (gcc -Wtype-limits)
GCC's -Wtype-limits does warn on comparison of unsigned value
with signed zero (as in, with 0), but clang only warns if the
zero is unsigned (i.e. 0U).
Also, be careful not to double-warn, or falsely warn on
comparison of signed/fp variable and signed 0.
Yes, all these testcases are needed.
Testing: $ ninja check-clang-sema check-clang-semacxx
Also, no new warnings for clang stage-2 build.
Reviewers: rjmccall, rsmith, aaron.ballman
Reviewed By: rjmccall
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D37565
llvm-svn: 312750
Aaron Ballman