Much to my surprise, '-disable-llvm-optzns' which I thought was the
magical flag I wanted to get at the raw LLVM IR coming out of Clang
deosn't do that. It still runs some passes over the IR. I don't want
that, I really want the *raw* IR coming out of Clang and I strongly
suspect everyone else using it is in the same camp.
There is actually a flag that does what I want that I didn't know about
called '-disable-llvm-passes'. I suspect many others don't know about it
either. It both does what I want and is much simpler.
This removes the confusing version and makes that spelling of the flag
an alias for '-disable-llvm-passes'. I've also moved everything in Clang
to use the 'passes' spelling as it seems both more accurate (*all* LLVM
passes are disabled, not just optimizations) and much easier to remember
and spell correctly.
This is part of simplifying how Clang drives LLVM to make it cleaner to
wire up to the new pass manager.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D28047
llvm-svn: 290392
cannot assume that the current working directory is writable in all test
environments. I don't know a better way to write this test of hand, lets
discuss. Possibly, a better option would be to put these together with
other test testing the driver directly.
llvm-svn: 241885
This patch adds support for specifying where the profile is emitted in a
way similar to GCC. These flags are used to specify directories instead
of filenames. When -fprofile-generate=DIR is used, the compiler will
generate code to write to <DIR>/default.profraw.
The patch also adds a couple of extensions: LLVM_PROFILE_FILE can still be
used to override the directory and file name to use and -fprofile-use
accepts both directories and filenames.
To simplify the set of flags used in the backend, all the flags get
canonicalized to -fprofile-instr-{generate,use} when passed to the
backend. The decision to use a default name for the profile is done
in the driver.
llvm-svn: 241825
Chandler Carruth