The most general model has fields for the vbptr offset and the vbindex.
Don't initialize the vbptr offset if the vbindex is 0: we aren't
referencing an entity from a vbase.
Getting this wrong can make member pointer equality fail.
llvm-svn: 240043
We would get this right in the case where an explicit cast was formed
but not when we were performing an implicit conversion.
This fixes PR23828.
llvm-svn: 239625
This eliminates some i8* GEPs and makes the IR that clang emits a bit
more canonical. More work is needed for vftables, but that isn't a clear
win so I plan to send it for review.
llvm-svn: 220398
CodeGen would try to come up with an LLVM IR type for a pointer to
member type on the way to forming an LLVM IR type for a pointer to
pointer to member type.
However, if the pointer to member representation has not been locked in yet,
we would not be able to come up with a pointer to member IR type.
In these cases, make the pointer to member type an incomplete type.
This will make the pointer to pointer to member type a pointer to an
incomplete type. If the class eventually obtains an inheritance model,
we will make the pointer to member type represent the actual inheritance
model.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D5373
llvm-svn: 218084
This avoids encoding information about the function prototype into the
thunk at the cost of some function prototype bitcast gymnastics.
Fixes PR20653.
llvm-svn: 216782
Previously, assigning an inheritance model to a derived class would
trigger further assiginments to the various bases of the class. This
was done to fix a bug where we couldn't handle an implicit
base-to-derived conversion for pointers-to-members when the conversion
was ambiguous at an earlier point.
However, this is not how the MS scheme works. Instead, assign
inheritance models to *just* the class which owns to declaration we
ended up referencing.
N.B. This result is surprising in many ways. It means that it is
possible for a base to have a "larger" inheritance model than it's
derived classes. It also means that bases in the conversion path do not
get assigned a model.
struct A { void f(); void f(int); };
struct B : A {};
struct C : B {};
void f() { void (C::*x)() = &A::f; }
We can only begin to assign an inheritance model *after* we've seen the
address-of but *before* we've done the implicit conversion the more
derived pointer-to-member type. After that point, both 'A' and 'C' will
have an inheritance model but 'B' will not. Surprising, right?
llvm-svn: 215174
CRTP-like patterns involve a class which inherits from another class
using itself as a template parameter.
However, the base class itself may try to create a pointer-to-member
which involves the derived class. This is problematic because we
may not have finished parsing the most derived classes' base specifiers
yet.
It turns out that MSVC simply uses the unspecified inheritance model
instead of doing anything fancy.
This fixes PR19987.
llvm-svn: 210886
Previously we would calculate the inheritance model of a class when
requiring a pointer to member type of that class to be complete. The
inheritance model is used to figure out how many fields are used by the
member pointer.
However, once we require a pointer to member of a derived class type to
be complete, we can form pointers to members of bases without
calculating the inheritance model for those bases. This was causing
crashes on this simple test case:
struct A {
void f();
void f(int);
};
struct B : public A {};
void g() { void (B::*a)() = &B::f; }
Now we calculate the inheritance models of all base classes when
completing a member pointer type.
Fixes PR2007.
llvm-svn: 210813
The Win64 ABI docs on MSDN say that arguments bigger than 8 bytes are
passed by reference. Prior to this change, we were only applying this
logic to RecordType arguments. This affects both the Itanium and
Microsoft C++ ABIs.
Reviewers: majnemer
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D3587
llvm-svn: 207817
This code is trying to test if the pointer is *not* null. Therefore we
should use 'or' instead of 'and' to combine the results of 'icmp ne'.
This logic is consistent with the general member pointer comparison code
in EmitMemberPointerComparison.
llvm-svn: 207815
Virtual methods expect 'this' to point to the vfptr containing the
virtual method, and this extends to virtual member pointer thunks. The
relevant vfptr is always at offset zero on entry to the thunk, and no
this adjustment is needed.
Previously we would not include the vfptr adjustment in the member
pointer, and we'd look at the vfptr offset when loading from the vftable
in the thunk.
Fixes PR18917.
llvm-svn: 201835
The MS ABI requires that we determine the vbptr offset if have a
virtual inheritance model. Instead, raise an error pointing to the
diagnostic when this happens.
This fixes PR18583.
Differential Revision: http://llvm-reviews.chandlerc.com/D2842
llvm-svn: 201824
With this change, we give different results for __alignof than MSVC, but
our record layout is compatible.
Some data member pointers also now have a size that is not a multiple of
their alignment.
Fixes PR18618.
Reviewers: majnemer
Differential Revision: http://llvm-reviews.chandlerc.com/D2669
llvm-svn: 200585
This makes the C++ ABI depend entirely on the target: MS ABI for -win32 triples,
Itanium otherwise. It's no longer possible to do weird combinations.
To be able to run a test with a specific ABI without constraining it to a
specific triple, new substitutions are added to lit: %itanium_abi_triple and
%ms_abi_triple can be used to get the current target triple adjusted to the
desired ABI. For example, if the test suite is running with the i686-pc-win32
target, %itanium_abi_triple will expand to i686-pc-mingw32.
Differential Revision: http://llvm-reviews.chandlerc.com/D2545
llvm-svn: 199250
Although VBPtrs were being placed correctly by the ms-abi layout engine,
their offsets were being improperly reported to the ASTRecordLayout
builder due to a bug. This patch fixes that and fixes the test cases to
use the correct values.
y
llvm-svn: 199168
This patch refactors microsoft record layout to be more "natural". The
most dominant change is that vbptrs and vfptrs are injected after the
fact. This simplifies the implementation and the math for the offest
for the first base/field after the vbptr.
llvm-svn: 198818
If a class is using the unspecified inheritance model for member
pointers and later we find the class is defined to use single
inheritance, zero out the vbptr offset field of the member pointer when
it is formed.
llvm-svn: 192664
There were three things missing from the original implementation:
- We would omit the 'E' qualifier for members int 64-bit mode.
- We would not exmaine the qualifiers in 'IsMember' mode.
- We didn't generate the correct backref to the base class.
llvm-svn: 187753
Also addresses a review comment from John from on r180985 by removing
the "== -1" check, since it's now reusing the correct code which has the
comment.
llvm-svn: 183318
Summary:
This only supports converting along non-virtual inheritance paths by
changing the field offset or the non-virtual base adjustment.
This implements three kinds of conversions:
- codegen for Value conversions
- Constant emission for APValue
- Constant folding for CastExprs
In almost all constant initialization settings
EmitMemberPointer(APValue) is called, except when the expression
contains a reinterpret cast.
reinterpret casts end up being a big corner case because the null value
changes between different kinds of member pointers.
Reviewers: rsmith
CC: cfe-commits
Differential Revision: http://llvm-reviews.chandlerc.com/D741
llvm-svn: 181543
Without any conversion, this is pretty straightforward. Most of the
fields can be zeros. The order is:
- field offset or pointer
- nonvirtual adjustment (for MI functions)
- vbptr offset (for unspecified)
- virtual adjustment offset (for virtual inheritance)
Differential Revision: http://llvm-reviews.chandlerc.com/D699
llvm-svn: 180985
Summary:
Like Itanium, comparisons are basically bitwise comparisons of the two
values, with an exception for null member function pointers. If two
function pointers are null, only the function pointer field matters for
comparison purposes. The rest of the bits can be arbitrary. We take
advantage of this in isZeroInitializable(), and it may matter once we
start emitting conversions.
Reviewers: rjmccall
CC: cfe-commits
Differential Revision: http://llvm-reviews.chandlerc.com/D695
llvm-svn: 180800
Summary:
Handles all inheritance models for both data and function member
pointers.
Also implements isZeroInitializable() and refactors some of the null
member pointer code.
MSVC supports converting member pointers through virtual bases, which
clang does not (yet?) support. Implementing that extension is covered
by http://llvm.org/15713
Reviewers: rjmccall
CC: cfe-commits
Differential Revision: http://llvm-reviews.chandlerc.com/D613
llvm-svn: 179305
Summary:
For non-dynamic classes (no virtual bases), member data pointers are
simple offsets from the base of the record. Dynamic classes use an
aggregate for member data pointers and are therefore currently
unsupported.
Unlike Itanium, the ms ABI uses 0 to represent null for polymorphic
classes. Non-polymorphic classes use -1 like Itanium, since 0 is a
valid field offset.
Reviewers: rjmccall
CC: timurrrr, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: http://llvm-reviews.chandlerc.com/D558
llvm-svn: 177753
David Majnemer