The implementations of __libcpp_mutex_destroy and __libcpp_condvar_destroy
are already NOPs, so this optimization is safe to perform.
See r365273 and PR27658 for more information.
llvm-svn: 365281
Summary:
The type timespec is unconditionally used in __threading_support.
Since the C library is only required to provide it in C11, this might
cause problems for platforms with external thread porting layer (i.e.
when _LIBCPP_HAS_THREAD_API_EXTERNAL is defined) with pre-C11
C libraries.
In our downstream port of libc++ we used to provide a definition of
timespec in __external_threading, but this solution is not ideal
because timespec is not a reserved name.
This patch renames timespec into __libcpp_timespec_t in the
thread-related parts of libc++. For all cases except external
threading this type is an alias for ::timespec (and no functional
changes are intended).
In case of external threading it is expected that the
__external_threading header will either provide a similar typedef (if
timespec is available in the vendor's C library) or provide a
definition of __libcpp_timespec_t compatible with POSIX timespec.
Reviewers: ldionne, mclow.lists, EricWF
Reviewed By: ldionne
Subscribers: dexonsmith, libcxx-commits, christof, carwil
Tags: #libc
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D63328
llvm-svn: 364012
As of r360984, LLD supports dependent libraries feature for ELF.
libunwind, libc++abi and libc++ have library dependencies: libdl librt
and libpthread, which means that when libunwind and libc++ are being
statically linked (using -static-libstdc++ flag), user has to manually
specify -ldl -lpthread which is onerous.
This change includes the lib pragma to specify the library dependencies
directly in the source that uses those libraries. This doesn't make any
difference when using linkers that don't support dependent libraries.
However, when using LLD that has dependent libraries feature, users no
longer have to manually specifying library dependencies when using
static linking, linker will pick the library automatically.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D62090
llvm-svn: 362048
to reflect the new license. These used slightly different spellings that
defeated my regular expressions.
We understand that people may be surprised that we're moving the header
entirely to discuss the new license. We checked this carefully with the
Foundation's lawyer and we believe this is the correct approach.
Essentially, all code in the project is now made available by the LLVM
project under our new license, so you will see that the license headers
include that license only. Some of our contributors have contributed
code under our old license, and accordingly, we have retained a copy of
our old license notice in the top-level files in each project and
repository.
llvm-svn: 351648
Summary:
This patch improves how libc++ handles min/max macros within the headers. Previously libc++ would undef them and emit a warning.
This patch changes libc++ to use `#pragma push_macro` to save the macro before undefining it, and `#pragma pop_macro` to restore the macros and the end of the header.
Reviewers: mclow.lists, bcraig, compnerd, EricWF
Reviewed By: EricWF
Subscribers: cfe-commits, krytarowski
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D33080
llvm-svn: 304357
It is my opinion that libc++ should never use `<cassert>`, including in the `dylib`.
This patch remove all uses of `assert` from within libc++ and replaces most of them with `_LIBCPP_ASSERT` instead.
Additionally this patch turn `LIBCXX_ENABLE_ASSERTIONS` off by default,
because the standard library should not be aborting user programs unless explicitly asked to.
llvm-svn: 294107
This reverts commit r292883. Unfortunately <string_view> uses
_LIBCPP_ASSERT in a way which is not compatible with the C++11 dylib
build. I'll investigate more tomorrow.
llvm-svn: 292923
Summary:
It is my opinion that libc++ should never use `<cassert>`, including in the `dylib`. This patch remove all uses of `assert` from within libc++ and replaces most of them with `_LIBCPP_ASSERT` instead.
Additionally this patch turn `LIBCXX_ENABLE_ASSERTIONS` off by default, because the standard library should not be aborting user programs unless explicitly asked to.
Reviewers: mclow.lists, compnerd, smeenai
Reviewed By: mclow.lists
Subscribers: mgorny, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D29063
llvm-svn: 292883
Summary:
This patch allows threads not created using `std::thread` to use `std::notify_all_at_thread_exit` by ensuring the TL state has been initialized within `std::notify_all_at_thread_exit`.
Additionally this patch "fixes" a potential oddity in `__thread_local_pointer::reset(pointer)`, which would previously delete the old thread local data. However there should *never* be old thread local data because pthread *should* null it out on thread exit. Unfortunately it's possible that pthread failed to do this according to the spec:
>
> Upon key creation, the value NULL shall be associated with the new key in all active threads. Upon thread creation, the value NULL shall be associated with all defined keys in the new thread.
>
> An optional destructor function may be associated with each key value. At thread exit, if a key value has a non-NULL destructor pointer, and the thread has a non-NULL value associated with that key, the value of the key is set to NULL, and then the function pointed to is called with the previously associated value as its sole argument. The order of destructor calls is unspecified if more than one destructor exists for a thread when it exits.
>
> If, after all the destructors have been called for all non-NULL values with associated destructors, there are still some non-NULL values with associated destructors, then the process is repeated. If, after at least {PTHREAD_DESTRUCTOR_ITERATIONS} iterations of destructor calls for outstanding non-NULL values, there are still some non-NULL values with associated destructors, implementations may stop calling destructors, or they may continue calling destructors until no non-NULL values with associated destructors exist, even though this might result in an infinite loop.
However if pthread fails to delete the value it is probably incorrect for us to do it. Destroying the value performs all of the "at thread exit" actions registered with it but we are way past "at thread exit".
Reviewers: mclow.lists, bcraig, EricWF
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D24159
llvm-svn: 280588
This patch extracts out all the pthread dependencies of libcxx into the
new header __threading_support. The motivation is to make it easy to
re-target libcxx into platforms that do not support pthread.
Original patch from Fulvio Esposito (fulvio.esposito@outlook.com) - D11781
Applied with tweaks - D19412
Change-Id: I301111f0075de93dd8129416e06babc195aa936b
llvm-svn: 268734
If you're crazy enough to want this sort of thing, then add
-D_LIBCPP_HAS_NO_THREADS to your CXXFLAGS and
--param=additiona_features=libcpp-has-no-threads to your lit commnad line.
http://reviews.llvm.org/D3969
llvm-svn: 217271
functions to protect against duration and time_point overflow. Since
we're about to wait anyway, we can afford to spend a few more cycles on
this checking. I purposefully did not treat the timed try_locks with
overflow checking. This fixes
http://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=13721 . I'm unsure if the standard
needs clarification in this area, or if this is simply QOI. The
<chrono> facilities were never intended to overflow check, but just to
not overflow if durations stayed within +/- 292 years.
llvm-svn: 162925
Eric Fiselier