Added most of the missing vector folding patterns for AVX2 (as well as fixing the vpermpd and verpmq patterns)
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D7492
llvm-svn: 228688
This patch adds the complete AMD Bulldozer XOP instruction set to the memory folding pattern tables for stack folding, etc.
Note: Many of the XOP instructions have multiple table entries as it can fold loads from different sources.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D7484
llvm-svn: 228685
This patch teaches X86FastISel how to select AVX instructions for scalar
float/double convert operations.
Before this patch, X86FastISel always selected legacy SSE instructions
for FPExt (from float to double) and FPTrunc (from double to float).
For example:
\code
define double @foo(float %f) {
%conv = fpext float %f to double
ret double %conv
}
\end code
Before (with -mattr=+avx -fast-isel) X86FastIsel selected a CVTSS2SDrr which is
legacy SSE:
cvtss2sd %xmm0, %xmm0
With this patch, X86FastIsel selects a VCVTSS2SDrr instead:
vcvtss2sd %xmm0, %xmm0, %xmm0
Added test fast-isel-fptrunc-fpext.ll to check both the register-register and
the register-memory float/double conversion variants.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D7438
llvm-svn: 228682
This commit isn't using the correct context, and is transfoming calls
that are operands to loads rather than calls that are operands to an
icmp feeding into an assume. I've replied on the original review thread
with a very reduced test case and some thoughts on how to rework this.
llvm-svn: 228677
nodes when folding bitcasts of constants.
We can't fold things and then check after-the-fact whether it was legal.
Once we have formed the DAG node, arbitrary other nodes may have been
collapsed to it. There is no easy way to go back. Instead, we need to
test for the specific folding cases we're interested in and ensure those
are legal first.
This could in theory make this less powerful for bitcasting from an
integer to some vector type, but AFAICT, that can't actually happen in
the SDAG so its fine. Now, we *only* whitelist specific int->fp and
fp->int bitcasts for post-legalization folding. I've added the test case
from the PR.
(Also as a note, this does not appear to be in 3.6, no backport needed)
llvm-svn: 228656
Win64 has specific contraints on what valid prologues and epilogues look
like. This constraint is born from the flexibility and descriptiveness
of Win64's unwind opcodes.
Prologues previously emitted by LLVM could not be represented by the
unwind opcodes, preventing operations powered by stack unwinding to
successfully work.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D7520
llvm-svn: 228641
for any padding introduced by SROA. In particular, do not emit debug info
for an alloca that represents only the padding introduced by a previous
iteration.
Fixes PR22495.
llvm-svn: 228632
intermediate representation. This
- increases consistency by using the same granularity everywhere
- allows for pieces < 1 byte
- DW_OP_piece didn't actually allow storing an offset.
Part of PR22495.
llvm-svn: 228631
Remove handling for DW_TAG_constant. We started producing it in
r110656, but reverted that in r110876 without dropping the support.
Finish the job.
llvm-svn: 228623
These tests the two optimizations for backedge insertion currently implemented and the split backedge flag which is currently off by default.
llvm-svn: 228617
Without a valid data layout, deferenceable(N) doesn't get parsed or
propagated. Since this is the key item we are testing, add a dependency
on the pass.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D7508
llvm-svn: 228611
This is just adding really simple tests which should have been part of the original submission. When doing so, I discovered that I'd mistakenly removed required pieces when preparing the patch for upstream submission. I fixed two such bugs in this submission.
llvm-svn: 228610
While a theoretical GC might change dereferenceability on collection,
there is no such known collector and no need to account for the case
with a flag yet.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D7454
llvm-svn: 228606
When creating a scev for sext({X,+,Y}), scev checks if the expression
is equivalent to {sext X,+,zext Y}. If it can prove that, it also
tags the original {X,+,Y} as <nsw>, which is not correct.
In the test case I run `-scalar-evolution` twice because the bug
manifests only once SCEV has run through and seen the `sext`
expressions (and then does a in-place mutation on {X,+,Y}).
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D7495
llvm-svn: 228586
veqv (vector equivalence)
vnand
vorc
I increased the AddedComplexity for these instructions to 500 to ensure they are generated instead of issuing other VSX instructions.
Phabricator review: http://reviews.llvm.org/D7469
llvm-svn: 228580
For the attached test case different types are used in the ICmpInst
and SelectInst that represent the min/max expressions. However, if the
ICmpInst type is smaller a comparison with the sign/zero extended
operands would have yielded the same result. This situation might
arise after the instruction combination pass was applied.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D7338
llvm-svn: 228572
wrong basic block.
This would happen when the result of an invoke was used by a phi instruction
in the invoke's normal destination block. An instruction to reload the invoke's
value would get inserted before the critical edge was split and a new basic
block (which is the correct insertion point for the reload) was created. This
commit fixes the bug by splitting the critical edge before all the reload
instructions are inserted.
Also, hoist up the code which computes the insertion point to the only place
that need that computation.
rdar://problem/15978721
llvm-svn: 228566
Some parts of DeadArgElim were only considering the individual fields
of StructTypes separately, but others (where insertvalue &
extractvalue instructions occur) also looked into ArrayTypes.
This one is an actual bug; the mismatch can lead to an argument being
considered used by a return sub-value that isn't being tracked (and
hence is dead by default). It then gets incorrectly eliminated.
llvm-svn: 228559
Previously, a non-extractvalue use of an aggregate return value meant
the entire return was considered live (the algorithm gave up
entirely). This was correct, but conservative. It's better to actually
look at that Use, making the analysis results apply to all sub-values
under consideration.
E.g.
%val = call { i32, i32 } @whatever()
[...]
ret { i32, i32 } %val
The return is using the entire aggregate (sub-values 0 and 1). We can
still simplify @whatever if we can prove that this return is itself
unused.
Also unifies the logic slightly between aggregate and non-aggregate
cases..
llvm-svn: 228558
Make assume (load (call|invoke) != null) set nonNull return attribute
for the call and invoke. Also include tests.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D7107
llvm-svn: 228556
add recurrences don't overflow.
This change makes the optimization more restrictive. It still assumes
that an overflowing `add nsw` is undefined behavior; and this change
will need revisiting once we have a consistent semantics for poison
values.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D7331
llvm-svn: 228552
Summary:
The alias.scope metadata represents sets of things an instruction might
alias with. When generically combining the metadata from two
instructions the result must be the union of the original sets, because
the new instruction might alias with anything any of the original
instructions aliased with.
Reviewers: hfinkel
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D7490
llvm-svn: 228525
While various DAG combines try to guarantee that a vector SETCC
operation will have the same output size as input, there's nothing
intrinsic to either creation or LegalizeTypes that actually guarantees
it, so the function needs to be ready to handle a mismatch.
Fortunately this is easy enough, just extend or truncate the naturally
compared result.
I couldn't reproduce the failure in other backends that I know have
SIMD, so it's probably only an issue for these two due to shared
heritage.
Should fix PR21645.
llvm-svn: 228518
different fields.
We can show that two GEPs off of the same (possibly multidimensional)
array of structs, into different fields, can't alias. Quoting:
For two GEPOperators GEP1 and GEP2, if we find that:
- both GEPs begin indexing from the exact same pointer;
- the last indices in both GEPs are constants, indexing into a struct;
- said indices are different, hence,the pointed-to fields are different;
- and both GEPs only index through arrays prior to that;
this lets us determine that the struct that GEP1 indexes into and the
struct that GEP2 indexes into must either precisely overlap or be
completely disjoint. Because they cannot partially overlap, indexing
into different non-overlapping fields of the struct will never alias.
The other BasicAA::aliasGEP rules worked in some cases, but not all
(for example, the i32x3 struct in the testcase).
We can add this simple ad-hoc rule to complement them.
rdar://19717375
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D7453
llvm-svn: 228498
Paul Robinson