Summary:
In current indexing logic we get references to class itself when we see
a constructor/destructor which is only syntactically true. Semantically
this information is not correct. This patch marks that reference as
NameReference to let clients deal with it.
Reviewers: akyrtzi, gribozavr, nathawes, benlangmuir
Reviewed By: gribozavr, nathawes
Subscribers: nathawes, arphaman, cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D58814
llvm-svn: 355668
Summary:
Indexing context was skipping explicit template instantiations as well.
This patch makes sure it only skips implicit ones.
Subscribers: arphaman, jdoerfert, cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D58189
llvm-svn: 354262
Summary:
This makes BindingDecl's of the same name have different USRs, so that references can be correctly attributed.
int a[1] = {};
{ auto [x] = a; x; }
{ auto [x] = a; x; }
Reviewers: akyrtzi, arphaman, rsmith, hokein
Reviewed By: hokein
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D52445
llvm-svn: 344010
The 'decl' role is more canonical than the 'ref'. This helps us establish the
'specialization-of' relation just by looking at decls or defs.
rdar://31884960
llvm-svn: 317832
CXXDeductionGuideDecls can't be referenced so there's no need to output a symbol occurrence for them.
Also handle DeducedTemplateSpecializationTypeLocs in the TypeIndexer so we don't miss the symbol occurrences of the corresponding template decls.
Patch by Nathan Hawes!
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D36641
llvm-svn: 310933
of class template specializations
This commit fixes an issue where a forward declaration of a class template
specialization was not related to the base template. We need to relate even
forward declarations because specializations don't have to be defined.
rdar://32869409
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D34462
llvm-svn: 305996
"specializationOf" relation if they pseudo-override a type in the base template
This commit fixes an issue where Xcode's renaming engine couldn't find the
reference to the second occurrence of "InnerClass" in this example:
template<typename T> struct Ts { template<typename U> struct InnerClass { }; };
template<> struct Ts<int> {
template<typename U> struct InnerClass; // This occurrence wasn't renamed
};
rdar://31884960
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D34392
llvm-svn: 305911
static_assert declarations have to be visited while indexing so that we can
gather the references to declarations that are present in their assert
expression.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D33913
llvm-svn: 305504
specializations that 'override' declarations in the base template should use
the 'specializationOf' relation instead of 'specializationOf | overrideOf'.
The indexer relations are meant to be orthogonal, so 'specializationOf' is
better than the combined relation.
llvm-svn: 302136
that 'override' declarations in the base template should be recorded
This can be used for improved "go to definition" feature in Xcode.
rdar://31604739
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D32020
llvm-svn: 301180
Report the typedef as reference, and desugar it to report the underlying class as an
implicit 'base' reference.
Reporting the underlying base class for 'base' relations matches the ObjC handling and
leads to a simpler model.
llvm-svn: 296975
Part of this is to allow creating a USR for the canonical decl of that which is implicit and does
not have a source location.
rdar://28978992
llvm-svn: 285868
Condense the ObjCKIND and CXXKIND options into just KIND, since the
language was already specified on a per-symbol basis and this
information was redundant. This only changes the internal
representation; naturally the libclang interface remains the same.
llvm-svn: 264423
Enable it for USRs and names when indexing.
Forward references can have different template argument names; including them
makes USRs and names unstable, since the name depends on whether we saw a forward reference or not.
llvm-svn: 260866