This follows up on the introduction of C API for the same object and is similar
to AffineExpr and AffineMap.
Reviewed By: stellaraccident
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D95437
The `getCapsule` and `createFromCapsule` comments incorrectly state the `PyMlirContext` and `MlirContext` in `PyLocation`, `PyAttribute`, and `PyType` classes.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D95413
* As discussed, fixes the ordering or (operands, results) -> (results, operands) in various `create` like methods.
* Fixes a syntax error in an ODS accessor method.
* Removes the linalg example in favor of a test case that exercises the same.
* Fixes FuncOp visibility to properly use None instead of the empty string and defaults it to None.
* Implements what was documented for requiring that trailing __init__ args `loc` and `ip` are keyword only.
* Adds a check to `InsertionPoint.insert` so that if attempting to insert past the terminator, an exception is raised telling you what to do instead. Previously, this would crash downstream (i.e. when trying to print the resultant module).
* Renames `_ods_build_default` -> `build_generic` and documents it.
* Removes `result` from the list of prohibited words and for single-result ops, defaults to naming the result `result`, thereby matching expectations and what is already implemented on the base class.
* This was intended to be a relatively small set of changes to be inlined with the broader support for ODS generating the most specific builder, but it spidered out once actually testing various combinations, so rolling up separately.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D95320
* Matches how all of the other shaped types are declared.
* No super principled reason fro this ordering beyond that it makes the one that was different be like the rest.
* Also matches ordering of things like ndarray, et al.
Reviewed By: ftynse, nicolasvasilache
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D94812
* This isn't exclusive with other mechanisms for more ODS centric op definitions, but based on discussions, we feel that we will always benefit from a python escape hatch, and that is the most natural way to write things that don't fit the mold.
* I suspect this facility needs further tweaking, and once it settles, I'll document it and add more tests.
* Added extensions for linalg, since it is unusable without them and continued to evolve my e2e example.
Reviewed By: ftynse
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D94752
* This allows us to hoist trait level information for regions and sized-variadic to class level attributes (_ODS_REGIONS, _ODS_OPERAND_SEGMENTS, _ODS_RESULT_SEGMENTS).
* Eliminates some splicey python generated code in favor of a native helper for it.
* Makes it possible to implement custom, variadic and region based builders with one line of python, without needing to manually code access to the segment attributes.
* Needs follow-on work for region based callbacks and support for SingleBlockImplicitTerminator.
* A follow-up will actually add ODS support for generating custom Python builders that delegate to this new method.
* Also includes the start of an e2e sample for constructing linalg ops where this limitation was discovered (working progressively through this example and cleaning up as I go).
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D94738
An invalid permutation will trigger a C++ assertion when attempting to create an AffineMap from the permutation.
This patch adds an `isPermutation` function to check the given permutation before creating the AffineMap.
Reviewed By: mehdi_amini
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D94492
* We've got significant missing features in order to use most of these effectively (i.e. custom builders, region-based builders).
* We presently also lack a mechanism for actually registering these dialects but they can be use with contexts that allow unregistered dialects for further prototyping.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D94368
This wasn't possible before because there was no support for affine expressions
as maps. Now that this support is available, provide the mechanism for
constructing maps with a layout and inspecting it.
Rework the `get` method on MemRefType in Python to avoid needing an explicit
memory space or layout map. Remove the `get_num_maps`, it is too low-level,
using the length of the now-avaiable pseudo-list of layout maps is more
pythonic.
Depends On D94297
Reviewed By: mehdi_amini
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D94302
Now that the bindings for AffineExpr have been added, add more bindings for
constructing and inspecting AffineMap that consists of AffineExprs.
Depends On D94225
Reviewed By: mehdi_amini
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D94297
This adds the Python bindings for AffineExpr and a couple of utility functions
to the C API. AffineExpr is a top-level context-owned object and is modeled
similarly to attributes and types. It is required, e.g., to build layout maps
of the built-in memref type.
Reviewed By: mehdi_amini
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D94225
* Works in tandem with prototype packaging scripts here: https://github.com/stellaraccident/mlir-py-release
* The `mlir` top-level now differentiates between in-tree builds where all packages are co-located and distribution mode where all native components are under a top-level `_mlir_libs` package.
* Also fixes the generated dialect python installation again. Hopefully the last tweak.
* With this, I am able to install and generate archives with the above setup script on Linux. Archive size=31M with just host codegen and headers/shared-libraries. Will need more linker tweaks when wiring up the next dependent project.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D93936
- Add `PyAffineMap` to wrap around `MlirAffineMap`.
- Add `mlirPythonAffineMapToCapsule` and `mlirPythonCapsuleToAffineMap` to interoperate with python capsule.
- Add and test some simple bindings of `PyAffineMap`.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D93200
This mirror the C++ API for NamedAttribute, and has the advantage or
internalizing earlier in the Context and not requiring the caller to
keep the StringRef alive beyong this call.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D93133
The default exception handling isn't very user friendly and does not
point accurately to the issue. Instead we can indicate which of the
operands isn't valid and provide contextual information in the error
message.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D92710
This is part of a larger refactoring the better congregates the builtin structures under the BuiltinDialect. This also removes the problematic "standard" naming that clashes with the "standard" dialect, which is not defined within IR/. A temporary forward is placed in StandardTypes.h to allow time for downstream users to replaced references.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D92435
This reduces the chances of segfault. While it is a good practice to ensure
robust custom printers, it is unfortunately common to have them crash on
invalid input.
Reviewed By: stellaraccident
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D92536
* If ODS redefines this, it is fine, but I have found this accessor to be universally useful in the old npcomp bindings and I'm closing gaps that will let me switch.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D92287
* Add capsule get/create for Attribute and Type, which already had capsule interop defined.
* Add capsule interop and get/create for Location.
* Add Location __eq__.
* Use get() and implicit cast to go from PyAttribute, PyType, PyLocation to MlirAttribute, MlirType, MlirLocation (bundled with this change because I didn't want to continue the pattern one more time).
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D92283
MLIR C API use the `MlirStringRef` instead of `const char *` for the string type now. This patch sync the Python bindings with the C API modification.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D92007
This file is intended to be included by other files, including
out-of-tree dialects, and makes more sense in `include` than in `lib`.
Depends On D91652
Reviewed By: mehdi_amini
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D91961
Attributes represent additional data about an operation and are intended to be
modifiable during the lifetime of the operation. In the dialect-specific Python
bindings, attributes are exposed as properties on the operation class. Allow
for assigning values to these properties. Also support creating new and
deleting existing attributes through the generic "attributes" property of an
operation. Any validity checking must be performed by the op verifier after the
mutation, similarly to C++. Operations are not invalidated in the process: no
dangling pointers can be created as all attributes are owned by the context and
will remain live even if they are not used in any operation.
Introduce a Python Test dialect by analogy with the Test dialect and to avoid
polluting the latter with Python-specific constructs. Use this dialect to
implement a test for the attribute access and mutation API.
Reviewed By: stellaraccident, mehdi_amini
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D91652
- Add `mlirElementsAttrGetType` C API.
- Add `def_buffer` binding to PyDenseElementsAttribute.
- Implement the protocol to access the buffer.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D91021
* I had missed the note about "Standard size" in the docs. On Windows, the 'l' types are 32bit.
* This fixes the only failing MLIR-Python test on Windows.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D91283
This utility function is helpful for dialect-specific builders that need
to access the context through location, and the location itself may be
either provided as an argument or expected to be recovered from the
implicit location stack.
Reviewed By: stellaraccident
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D91623
In ODS, attributes of an operation can be provided as a part of the "arguments"
field, together with operands. Such attributes are accepted by the op builder
and have accessors generated.
Implement similar functionality for ODS-generated op-specific Python bindings:
the `__init__` method now accepts arguments together with operands, in the same
order as in the ODS `arguments` field; the instance properties are introduced
to OpView classes to access the attributes.
This initial implementation accepts and returns instances of the corresponding
attribute class, and not the underlying values since the mapping scheme of the
value types between C++, C and Python is not yet clear. Default-valued
attributes are not supported as that would require Python to be able to parse
C++ literals.
Since attributes in ODS are tightely related to the actual C++ type system,
provide a separate Tablegen file with the mapping between ODS storage type for
attributes (typically, the underlying C++ attribute class), and the
corresponding class name. So far, this might look unnecessary since all names
match exactly, but this is not necessarily the cases for non-standard,
out-of-tree attributes, which may also be placed in non-default namespaces or
Python modules. This also allows out-of-tree users to generate Python bindings
without having to modify the bindings generator itself. Storage type was
preferred over the Tablegen "def" of the attribute class because ODS
essentially encodes attribute _constraints_ rather than classes, e.g. there may
be many Tablegen "def"s in the ODS that correspond to the same attribute type
with additional constraints
The presence of the explicit mapping requires the change in the .td file
structure: instead of just calling the bindings generator directly on the main
ODS file of the dialect, it becomes necessary to create a new file that
includes the main ODS file of the dialect and provides the mapping for
attribute types. Arguably, this approach offers better separability of the
Python bindings in the build system as the main dialect no longer needs to know
that it is being processed by the bindings generator.
Reviewed By: stellaraccident
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D91542
This only exposes the ability to round-trip a textual pipeline at the
moment.
To exercise it, we also bind the libTransforms in a new Python extension. This
does not include any interesting bindings, but it includes all the
mechanism to add separate native extensions and load them dynamically.
As such passes in libTransforms are only registered after `import
mlir.transforms`.
To support this global registration, the TableGen backend is also
extended to bind to the C API the group registration for passes.
Reviewed By: stellaraccident
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D90819
Introduce an ODS/Tablegen backend producing Op wrappers for Python bindings
based on the ODS operation definition. Usage:
mlir-tblgen -gen-python-op-bindings -Iinclude <path/to/Ops.td> \
-bind-dialect=<dialect-name>
Reviewed By: mehdi_amini
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D90960
Slicing, that is element access with `[being🔚step]` structure, is
a common Python idiom for sequence-like containers. It is also necessary
to support custom accessor for operations with variadic operands and
results (an operation an return a slice of its operands that correspond
to the given variadic group).
Add generic utility to support slicing in Python bindings and use it
for operation operands and results.
Depends On D90923
Reviewed By: stellaraccident, mehdi_amini
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D90936
Enumerating elements in these classes is necessary to enable custom
operand accessors for variadic operands.
Depends On D90919
Reviewed By: stellaraccident
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D90923
Operations in a MLIR have a dictionary of attributes attached. Expose
those to Python bindings through a pseudo-container that can be indexed
either by attribute name, producing a PyAttribute, or by a contiguous
index for enumeration purposes, producing a PyNamedAttribute.
Depends On D90917
Reviewed By: stellaraccident
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D90919
The PyOpOperands container was erroneously constructing objects for
individual operands as PyOpResult. Operands in fact are just values,
which may or may not be results of another operation. The code would
eventually crash if the operand was a block argument. Add a test that
exercises the behavior that previously led to crashes.
Reviewed By: stellaraccident
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D90917
Alex Zinenko