Summary:
When processing a call to a function, which got passed less arguments than it
expects, the analyzer would crash.
I've also added a test for that and a analyzer warning which detects these
cases.
CC: cfe-commits
Differential Revision: http://llvm-reviews.chandlerc.com/D994
llvm-svn: 184288
The actual change here is a little more complicated than the summary above.
What we want to do is have our generic inlining tests run under whatever
mode is the default. However, there are some tests that depend on the
presence of C++ inlining, which still has some rough edges. These tests have
been explicitly marked as -analyzer-ipa=inlining in preparation for a new
mode that limits inlining to C functions and blocks. This will be the
default until the false positives for C++ have been brought down to
manageable levels.
llvm-svn: 162317
This check is also accessible through the debug.ExprInspection checker.
Like clang_analyzer_eval, you can use it to test the analyzer engine's
current state; the argument should be true or false to indicate whether or
not you expect the function to be inlined.
When used in the positive case (clang_analyzer_checkInlined(true)), the
analyzer prints the message "TRUE" if the function is ever inlined. However,
clang_analyzer_checkInlined(false) should never print a message; this asserts
that there should be no paths on which the current function is inlined, but
then there are no paths on which to print a message! (If the assertion is
violated, the message "FALSE" will be printed.)
This asymmetry comes from the fact that the only other chance to print a
message is when the function is analyzed as a top-level function. However,
when we do that, we can't be sure it isn't also inlined elsewhere (such as
in a recursive function, or if we want to analyze in both general or
specialized cases). Rather than have all checkInlined calls have an appended,
meaningless "FALSE" or "TOP-LEVEL" case, there is just no message printed.
void clang_analyzer_checkInlined(int);
For debugging purposes only!
llvm-svn: 161708
This was a regression introduced during the CallEvent changes; a call to
FunctionDecl::hasBody was also being used to replace the decl found by
lookup with the actual definition. To keep from making this mistake again
(particularly if/when we start inlining Objective-C methods), this commit
adds a "getDefinition()" method to CallEvent, which should do the right
thing under any circumstances.
llvm-svn: 159940
My hope is to reimplement this from first principles based on the simplifications of removing unneeded node builders
and re-evaluating how C++ calls are handled in the CFG. The hope is to turn inlining "on-by-default" as soon as possible
with a core set of things working well, and then expand over time.
llvm-svn: 147904
from how we process ordinary function calls, had a tremendous about of redundancy, and relied
strictly on inlining behavior (which was incomplete) to provide semantics instead of falling
back to the conservative analysis we use for C functions. This is a significant step into
making C++ analyzer support more useful.
llvm-svn: 128557
They cooperate in that NSErrorChecker listens for ImplicitNullDerefEvent events that
DereferenceChecker can dispatch.
ImplicitNullDerefEvent is when we dereferenced a location that may be null.
llvm-svn: 126659
the case where the called function has fewer
formal arguments than actual arguments. This
fixes a crash in the analyzer when doing
function call inlining.
Patch by Zhenbo Xu!
llvm-svn: 123458
translation unit is parsed. This enables us to inline some calls when still
analyzing one function at a time.
Actions are classified into Function, CXXMethod, ObjCMethod,
ObjCImplementation.
This does not hurt performance much. The analysis time for sqlite3.c:
before:
real 17m52.440s
user 17m49.460s
sys 0m2.010s
after:
real 18m0.500s
user 17m56.900s
sys 0m2.330s
DisplayProgress option is broken now. -inine-call action is removed. It
will be reenabled in another form, perhaps as an indenpendant option.
llvm-svn: 102689
Pavel Labath