types.
- I broke this in the switch to representing interfaces with opaque
types.
- <rdar://problem/6822660> clang crashes on subscript of interface in
32-bit mode
llvm-svn: 70009
better name) is the option that SmallTalk can use to intercept all
overflows, including unsigned. I added some testcases so we don't
break anything.
Also included is another patch from David for += and friends.
llvm-svn: 68267
LHS type and the computation result type; this encodes information into
the AST which is otherwise non-obvious. Fix Sema to always come up with the
right answer for both of these types. Fix IRGen and the analyzer to
account for these changes. This fixes PR2601. The approach is inspired
by PR2601 comment 2.
Note that this changes real *= complex in CodeGen from a silent
miscompilation to an explicit error.
I'm not really sure that the analyzer changes are correct, or how to
test them... someone more familiar with the analyzer should check those
changes.
llvm-svn: 67889
performance that the type of the returned llvm::Value for an expression
matches the converted type of the clang::Expr; mismatches will cause all
sorts of errors and silent miscompilations.
llvm-svn: 66321
normal expression, and change Evaluate and IRGen to evaluate it like a
normal expression. This simplifies the code significantly, and fixes
PR3396.
llvm-svn: 65622
tried to put FIXMEs on the most important things to fix up. Lots left
to do including more codegen, more documentation and cleaning code and
style cleanups.
llvm-svn: 64390
represents an implicit value-initialization of a subobject of a
particular type. This replaces the (ab)use of CXXZeroValueInitExpr
within initializer lists for the "holes" that occur due to the use of
C99 designated initializers.
The new test case is currently XFAIL'd, because CodeGen's
ConstExprEmitter (in lib/CodeGen/CGExprConstant.cpp) needs to be
taught to value-initialize when it sees ImplicitValueInitExprs.
llvm-svn: 63317
The approach I've taken in this patch is relatively straightforward,
although the code itself is non-trivial. Essentially, as we process
an initializer list we build up a fully-explicit representation of the
initializer list, where each of the subobject initializations occurs
in order. Designators serve to "fill in" subobject initializations in
a non-linear way. The fully-explicit representation makes initializer
lists (both with and without designators) easy to grok for codegen and
later semantic analyses. We keep the syntactic form of the initializer
list linked into the AST for those clients interested in exactly what
the user wrote.
Known limitations:
- Designating a member of a union that isn't the first member may
result in bogus initialization (we warn about this)
- GNU array-range designators are not supported (we warn about this)
llvm-svn: 63242
Anders Carlsson