Commit Graph

9 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Ben Shi b0eb391983 [clang][RISCV][test] Add more tests of the -mabi and -march options
1. There is no tests for mabi=ilp32e, and my patch covers that.
2. The tests in riscv-abi.c will show default ABI changes for special archs
   in the future, especially the arch with the F but without the D extension.
3. The tests in riscv-arch.c will show default arch changes for abi=ilp32,
   which is rv32imacfd currently, but it is better to be rv32imac.
   And it is also better for abi=ilp32f defaults to arch=imacf.

Reviewed By: MaskRay, luismarques

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D103878
2021-06-10 09:14:14 +08:00
Sam Elliott e3d5ff5a0b [RISCV] Match GCC `-march`/`-mabi` driver defaults
Summary:
Clang/LLVM is a cross-compiler, and so we don't have to make a choice
about `-march`/`-mabi` at build-time, but we may have to compute a
default `-march`/`-mabi` when compiling a program. Until now, each
place that has needed a default `-march` has calculated one itself.

This patch adds a single place where a default `-march` is calculated,
in order to avoid calculating different defaults in different places.

This patch adds a new function `riscv::getRISCVArch` which encapsulates
this logic based on GCC's for computing a default `-march` value
when none is provided. This patch also updates the logic in
`riscv::getRISCVABI` to match the logic in GCC's build system for
computing a default `-mabi`.

This patch also updates anywhere that `-march` is used to now use the
new function which can compute a default. In particular, we now
explicitly pass a `-march` value down to the gnu assembler.

GCC has convoluted logic in its build system to choose a default
`-march`/`-mabi` based on build options, which would be good to match.
This patch is based on the logic in GCC 9.2.0. This commit's logic is
different to GCC's only for baremetal targets, where we default
to rv32imac/ilp32 or rv64imac/lp64 depending on the target triple.

Tests have been updated to match the new logic.

Reviewers: asb, luismarques, rogfer01, kito-cheng, khchen

Reviewed By: asb, luismarques

Subscribers: sameer.abuasal, rbar, johnrusso, simoncook, apazos, sabuasal, niosHD, shiva0217, jrtc27, MaskRay, zzheng, edward-jones, MartinMosbeck, brucehoult, the_o, rkruppe, PkmX, jocewei, psnobl, benna, Jim, s.egerton, pzheng, cfe-commits

Tags: #clang

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D69383
2019-11-15 15:10:42 +00:00
Alex Bradbury e078967adf [RISCV] Hard float ABI support
The RISC-V hard float calling convention requires the frontend to:

* Detect cases where, once "flattened", a struct can be passed using
int+fp or fp+fp registers under the hard float ABI and coerce to the
appropriate type(s)
* Track usage of GPRs and FPRs in order to gate the above, and to
determine when signext/zeroext attributes must be added to integer
scalars

This patch attempts to do this in compliance with the documented ABI,
and uses ABIArgInfo::CoerceAndExpand in order to do this. @rjmccall, as
author of that code I've tagged you as reviewer for initial feedback on
my usage.

Note that a previous version of the ABI indicated that when passing an
int+fp struct using a GPR+FPR, the int would need to be sign or
zero-extended appropriately. GCC never did this and the ABI was changed,
which makes life easier as ABIArgInfo::CoerceAndExpand can't currently
handle sign/zero-extension attributes.

Re-landed after backing out 366450 due to missed hunks.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D60456

llvm-svn: 366480
2019-07-18 18:29:59 +00:00
Roger Ferrer Ibanez e41a74e8d2 [RISCV] Pass -target-abi to -cc1as
The RISC-V assembler needs the target ABI because it defines a flag of the ELF
file, as described in [1].

Make clang (the driver) to pass the target ABI to -cc1as in exactly the same
way it does for -cc1.

Currently -cc1as knows about -target-abi but is not handling it. Handle it and
pass it to the MC layer via MCTargetOptions.

[1] https://github.com/riscv/riscv-elf-psabi-doc/blob/master/riscv-elf.md#file-header

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D59298

llvm-svn: 356981
2019-03-26 08:01:18 +00:00
Mandeep Singh Grang b0895f04bc Revert "[RISCV] Mark unit tests as "requires: riscv-registered-target""
This reverts commit 8908dd12e7bbfc74e264233e900206ad31e285f0.

llvm-svn: 348402
2018-12-05 19:19:38 +00:00
Mandeep Singh Grang c77dd514ad [RISCV] Mark unit tests as "requires: riscv-registered-target"
Some of these tests break if the RISCV backend has not been built.

Reland D54816.

llvm-svn: 347720
2018-11-27 22:53:57 +00:00
Mandeep Singh Grang 02d3ca89bd Revert "[RISCV] Mark unit tests as "requires: riscv-registered-target""
This reverts commit 1a6a0c9ea2716378d55858c11adf5941608531f8.

llvm-svn: 347689
2018-11-27 19:13:52 +00:00
Mandeep Singh Grang bca7192462 [RISCV] Mark unit tests as "requires: riscv-registered-target"
Summary: Some of these tests break if the RISCV backend has not been built.

Reviewers: asb, apazos, sabuasal

Reviewed By: sabuasal

Subscribers: rbar, johnrusso, simoncook, sabuasal, niosHD, kito-cheng, shiva0217, jrtc27, zzheng, edward-jones, rogfer01, MartinMosbeck, brucehoult, the_o, rkruppe, PkmX, jocewei, cfe-commits

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D54816

llvm-svn: 347688
2018-11-27 19:13:13 +00:00
Alex Bradbury 71f45455e1 [RISCV] Add the RISCV target and compiler driver
As RV64 codegen has not yet been upstreamed into LLVM, we focus on RV32 driver 
support (RV64 to follow).

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D39963

llvm-svn: 322276
2018-01-11 13:36:56 +00:00