For a definition (of most linkage types), dso_local is set for ELF -fno-pic/-fpie
and COFF, but not for Mach-O. This nuance causes unneeded binary format differences.
This patch replaces (function) `define ` with `define{{.*}} `,
(variable/constant/alias) `= ` with `={{.*}} `, or inserts appropriate `{{.*}} `
if there is an explicit linkage.
* Clang will set dso_local for Mach-O, which is currently implied by TargetMachine.cpp. This will make COFF/Mach-O and executable ELF similar.
* Eventually I hope we can make dso_local the textual LLVM IR default (write explicit "dso_preemptable" when applicable) and -fpic ELF will be similar to everything else. This patch helps move toward that goal.
This aims to fix a missed inlining case.
If there's a virtual call in the callee on an alloca (stack allocated object) in
the caller, and the callee is inlined into the caller, the post-inline cleanup
would devirtualize the virtual call, but if the next iteration of
DevirtSCCRepeatedPass doesn't happen (under the new pass manager), which is
based on a heuristic to determine whether to reiterate, we may miss inlining the
devirtualized call.
This enables inlining in clang/test/CodeGenCXX/member-function-pointer-calls.cpp.
This is a second commit after a revert
https://reviews.llvm.org/rG4569b3a86f8a4b1b8ad28fe2321f936f9d7ffd43 and a fix
https://reviews.llvm.org/rG41e06ae7ba91.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D69591
DevirtSCCRepeatedPass iteration. Needs ReviewPublic
This aims to fix a missed inlining case.
If there's a virtual call in the callee on an alloca (stack allocated object) in
the caller, and the callee is inlined into the caller, the post-inline cleanup
would devirtualize the virtual call, but if the next iteration of
DevirtSCCRepeatedPass doesn't happen (under the new pass manager), which is
based on a heuristic to determine whether to reiterate, we may miss inlining the
devirtualized call.
This enables inlining in clang/test/CodeGenCXX/member-function-pointer-calls.cpp.
As per the discussion on D58375, we disable test that have optimizations under
the new PM. This patch adds -fno-experimental-new-pass-manager to RUNS that:
- Already run with optimizations (-O1 or higher) that were missed in D58375.
- Explicitly test new PM behavior along side some new PM RUNS, but are missing
this flag if new PM is enabled by default.
- Specify -O without the number. Based on getOptimizationLevel(), it seems the
default is 2, and the IR appears to be the same when changed to -O2, so
update the test to explicitly say -O2 and provide -fno-experimental-new-pass-manager`.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D63156
llvm-svn: 364066
The tests that failed on a windows host have been fixed.
Original message:
Start setting dso_local for COFF.
With this there are still some GVs where we don't set dso_local
because setGVProperties is never called. I intend to fix that in
followup commits. This is just the bare minimum to teach
shouldAssumeDSOLocal what it should do for COFF.
llvm-svn: 325940
With this there are still some GVs where we don't set dso_local
because setGVProperties is never called. I intend to fix that in
followup commits. This is just the bare minimum to teach
shouldAssumeDSOLocal what it should do for COFF.
llvm-svn: 325915
The Win64 ABI docs on MSDN say that arguments bigger than 8 bytes are
passed by reference. Prior to this change, we were only applying this
logic to RecordType arguments. This affects both the Itanium and
Microsoft C++ ABIs.
Reviewers: majnemer
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D3587
llvm-svn: 207817
relied on an artifact of how the inliner and subsequent passes in
clang's -O3 mode happen to treat basic blocks and the labels for the
basic blocks. In my work on the inliner, and changed this fundamental
assumption, and the label that was being checked on the entry basic
block will no longer appear in opt builds. There was no reason to expect
the label to always be present anyways, much to my regret.
I've changed the test to just ensure that we return an immediate
constant. If there are intervening instructions, that's bad, but not
really that relevant to the test.
I'd love it if others have a better way of checking that a function body
contains only a 'ret' instruction that isn't dependent on whether or not
the entry block receives a label...
llvm-svn: 153243
Fangrui Song