Python 3.6 and 3.7 have been released.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D64444
Patch from Christian Biesinger <cbiesinger@google.com>!
llvm-svn: 365688
Summary:
There's a number of requirements for installing LLDB on macOS that are untypical for LLVM projects: use special install-prefix for LLDB.framework, ship headers and tools as framework resources, patch RPATHs, externalize debug-info to dSYM's and strip binaries with `-ST`. For some of it we could use `llvm_externalize_debuginfo()` in the past and just add special cases. However, this complicates the code for all projects and comes with the major drawback, that it adds all these actions at build-time, i.e. dSYM creation and stripping take a lot of time and don't make sense at build-time.
LLVM's distribution mechanism (https://llvm.org/docs/BuildingADistribution.html) appears to be the natural candidate to install LLDB. Based on D64399 (enable in standalone builds), this patch integrates framework installation with the distribution mechanism and adds custom stripping flags and dSYM creation at install-time. Unlike the abandoned D61952, it leaves build-tree binaries untouched, so there's no side-effects on testing. Potential install-order issues must be handled externally.
Please let me know what you think, while I run a few more tests and add remarks+documentation.
Reviewers: xiaobai, compnerd, JDevlieghere, davide, labath, mgorny
Reviewed By: xiaobai, JDevlieghere
Subscribers: lldb-commits, #lldb
Tags: #lldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D64408
llvm-svn: 365617
Summary: The custom lldb-framework target was meant to encapsulate all build steps that LLDB.framework needs on top of the ordinaly liblldb. In the end all of it happens in post-build steps, so we can do the same with liblldb and cut down another source of confusion.
Reviewers: xiaobai, JDevlieghere
Reviewed By: xiaobai, JDevlieghere
Subscribers: mgorny, lldb-commits, #lldb
Tags: #lldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D64397
llvm-svn: 365615
libc++abi became mandatory to link the libc++ binaries. LLDB only needs the build artifacts and not the linked output (we don't ship `libc++.dylib` and/or `libc++.a`). Disable the respective link steps to avoid the dependency to libc++abi.
<rdar://problem/51980716>
llvm-svn: 365038
Summary:
Specify message levels in CMake. Prefer STATUS (stdout).
As the default message mode (i.e. level) is NOTICE in CMake, more then necessary messages get printed to stderr. Some tools, noticably ccmake treat this as an error and require additional confirmation and re-running CMake's configuration step.
This commit specifies a mode (either STATUS or WARNING or FATAL_ERROR) instead of the default.
* I used `csearch -f 'llvm-project/.+(CMakeLists\.txt|cmake)' -l 'message\("'` to find all locations.
* Reviewers were chosen by the most common authors of specific files. If there are more suitable reviewers for these CMake changes, please let me know.
Patch by: Christoph Siedentop
Reviewers: zturner, beanz, xiaobai, kbobyrev, lebedev.ri, sgraenitz
Reviewed By: sgraenitz
Subscribers: mgorny, lebedev.ri, #sanitizers, lldb-commits, llvm-commits
Tags: #sanitizers, #lldb, #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D63370
llvm-svn: 363821
Other generators honor the `LIBRARY_OUTPUT_DIRECTORY` target property, but apparently Xcode doesn't. So we call `set_output_directory()` as `llvm_add_library()` would do and this works.
Note that `LIBRARY_OUTPUT_DIRECTORY` is still necessary, because it's used to store and read the target's absolute build directory (while `LLDB_FRAMEWORK_BUILD_DIR` is relative!).
llvm-svn: 363280
Summary:
If the provided LLVM build-tree used a multi-configuration generator like Xcode, `LLVM_TOOLS_BINARY_DIR` will have a generator-specific placeholder to express `CMAKE_CFG_INTDIR`. Thus `llvm-lit` and `llvm-tblgen` won't be found.
D62878 exports the actual configuration types so we can fix the path and add them to the search paths for `find_program()`.
Reviewers: xiaobai, labath, stella.stamenova
Reviewed By: xiaobai, stella.stamenova
Subscribers: mgorny, lldb-commits
Tags: #lldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D62879
llvm-svn: 362589
Summary:
Modify the way LLDB.framework tools are collected. This allows for better fine-tuning of the install behavior downstream. Each target calls `lldb_add_to_framework()` individually. When entering the function, the target exists and we can tweak its very own post-build and install steps. This was not possible with the old `LLDB_FRAMEWORK_TOOLS` approach.
No function change otherwise.
This is a reduced follow-up from the proposal in D61952.
Reviewers: xiaobai, compnerd, JDevlieghere
Reviewed By: JDevlieghere
Subscribers: clayborg, friss, ki.stfu, mgorny, lldb-commits, labath, #lldb
Tags: #lldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D62472
llvm-svn: 361946
Windows has different types of runtime libraries which are ABI
incompatible with one another. This requires that the debug build of
lldb link against the debug build of python. Adjust the python search
to search for only the required type of python. This permits building a
release build of lldb against just the release build of python.
llvm-svn: 361915
Summary:
CMake cache scripts pre-populate the CMakeCache in a build directory with commonly used settings.
The CMake invocation from D61952 could look like this:
```
cmake -G Ninja -C /path/to/llvm-project/lldb/cmake/caches/Apple-lldb-osx.cmake -DLLVM_ENABLE_PROJECTS="clang;libcxx;libcxxabi;lldb" ../llvm-project/llvm
```
Options specified on the command line will override options in the cache files (as long as caches don't use `FORCE`).
What do you think? (This is a first proposal and not set in stone.)
Reviewers: xiaobai, compnerd, JDevlieghere, aprantl, labath
Subscribers: mgorny, lldb-commits, #lldb
Tags: #lldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D61956
llvm-svn: 361069
r360631 introduced a "syntax error" which meant that cmake was still not
honoring the value of LLDB_CAN_USE_LLDB_SERVER variable. The correct
syntax for seting an internal cache variable is "set(VAR value CACHE
INTERNAL)", but the patch omitted the "CACHE" keyword. The "syntax
error" is in quotes because without the CACHE keyword this is still
valid syntax for setting the value of LLDB_CAN_USE_LLDB_SERVER to "1
INTERNAL".
There doesn't seem to be a need for this to be a cache variable so I'm
reverting this variable to a plain one, as it was before r360621.
This will hopefully fix the windows build.
llvm-svn: 360652
We cannot manipulate the LLDB_TOOL_LLDB_SERVER_BUILD directly from
LLDBConfig.cmake because this would set the variable before the option
is defined in AddLLVM.cmake. Instead, we need to use the
LLDB_CAN_USE_LLDB_SERVER variable to conditionally add the lldb-server
subdirectory. This should ensure the variable doesn't get cleared.
llvm-svn: 360631
We can piggyback off the existing add_lldb_tool_subdirectory to decide
whether or not lldb-server should be built.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D61872
llvm-svn: 360621
CMake specifies that the DEPENDS field of add_custom_target is for files
and output of add_custom_command. In order to add a target dependency,
add_dependencies should be used.
llvm-svn: 359490
We were using the LLDB-Info.plist as the canonical holder of the
version number, but there is really no good reason to do this. If
anything the plist should be generated using the information provided
to CMake.
For now just remove the logic extracting the version from the plist
and rely on LLDB_VERSION_STRING.
llvm-svn: 358604
Summary:
Saves some build times, and they're not part of the usual
developer workflow.
Reviewers: JDevlieghere, friss
Subscribers: mgorny, lldb-commits
Tags: #lldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D60780
llvm-svn: 358528
Summary:
This line is unnecessary because add_llvm_executable will handle
linking the correct LLVM libraries for you. LLDB standalone builds are totally
fine without this.
In the best case, having this line here is harmless. In the worst case it can
cause link issues.
If you build lldb-server for android using the standalone build, this line
will cause LLVM_LIBRARY_DIR to be the first place you look for libraries.
This is an issue because if you built libc++, it will try to link against
that one instead of the one from the android NDK. Meanwhile, the LLVM libraries
you're linking against were linked against the libc++ from the NDK.
Ideally, we would take advantage of the AFTER option for link_directories(), but
that was not available in LLDB's minimum supported version of CMake (CMake 3.4.3).
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D60180
llvm-svn: 357817
FindPythonInterp and FindPythonLibs do two things, they set some
variables (PYTHON_LIBRARIES, PYTHON_INCLUDE_DIRS) and update the cached
variables (PYTHON_LIBRARY, PYTHON_INCLUDE_DIR) which are also used to
specify a custom python installation.
I believe the canonical way to do this is to use the PYTHON_LIBRARIES
and PYTHON_INCLUDE_DIRS variables instead of the cached ones. However,
since the cached variables are accessible from the cache and GUI, this
is a lot less confusing when you're trying to debug why a variable did
or didn't get the value you expected. Furthermore, as far as I can tell,
the implementation uses the cached variables to set their LIBRARIES/DIRS
counterparts. This is also the reason this works today even though we
mix-and-match.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D59968
llvm-svn: 357282
The package name is LibEdit, so we should use that name in the call to
find_package_handle_standard_args. Failing to do so results in the
standard_args (such as the one telling us whether REQUIRED was used in
the find_package invocation) not being handled.
llvm-svn: 356263
Summary:
The current install-clang-headers target installs clang's resource
directory headers. This is different from the install-llvm-headers
target, which installs LLVM's API headers. We want to introduce the
corresponding target to clang, and the natural name for that new target
would be install-clang-headers. Rename the existing target to
install-clang-resource-headers to free up the install-clang-headers name
for the new target, following the discussion on cfe-dev [1].
I didn't find any bots on zorg referencing install-clang-headers. I'll
send out another PSA to cfe-dev to accompany this rename.
[1] http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/cfe-dev/2019-February/061365.html
Reviewers: beanz, phosek, tstellar, rnk, dim, serge-sans-paille
Subscribers: mgorny, javed.absar, jdoerfert, #sanitizers, openmp-commits, lldb-commits, cfe-commits, llvm-commits
Tags: #clang, #sanitizers, #lldb, #openmp, #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D58791
llvm-svn: 355340
This was previously scattered between the main CMakeLists.txt file and
LLDBGenerateConfig.cmake and LLDBConfig.cmake. This caused the some of
the code to be executed in incorrect order. Specifically, the check for
el_winsertstr was done before libedit_LIBRARIES was computed, and so it
always failed on the first run.
Moving it the two checks to a central place makes sure this doesn't
happen again and improves the overall readability.
llvm-svn: 355103
Summary:
Generator expressions are not supported in the `BUILD_RPATH` target property.
`BUILD_RPATH` is only supported in 3.8+ https://cliutils.gitlab.io/modern-cmake/chapters/intro/newcmake.html
`LLDB_FRAMEWORK_INSTALL_DIR` should not overwrite, but rather add an install RPATH (and it should be the first)
Reviewers: xiaobai, lanza
Reviewed By: xiaobai
Subscribers: mgorny
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D57989
llvm-svn: 354037
Restore the previous behavior of using install directories for
LLVM_MAIN_INCLUDE_DIR, LLVM_LIBRARY_DIR and LLVM_BINARY_DIR. The update
from llvm-config to CMake has changed the values of those values to use
LLVM_BUILD_* which is plain wrong and breaks stand-alone builds.
Instead, use the CMake counterparts of the values returned
by llvm-config.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D57995
llvm-svn: 353925
Summary:
D57334 added entitlements support in `add_llvm_library()` so we can use it for library targets in LLDB.
Additionally this patch fixes the way that the entitlements argument is passed on from `add_lldb_executable()` to `add_llvm_executable()`. We still need the explicit parsing and passing on of single- and multi-value arguments as long as we are on CMake < 3.7 (due to bug https://gitlab.kitware.com/cmake/cmake/merge_requests/133).
Reviewers: beanz, JDevlieghere, aprantl
Reviewed By: JDevlieghere
Subscribers: mgorny, lldb-commits, #lldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D57378
llvm-svn: 352629
Refactor the get_llvm_lit_path() logic to respect LLVM_EXTERNAL_LIT,
and require the fallback to be defined explicitly
as LLVM_DEFAULT_EXTERNAL_LIT. This fixes building libcxx standalone
after r346888.
The old logic was using LLVM_EXTERNAL_LIT both as user-defined cache
variable and an optional pre-definition of default value from caller
(e.g. libcxx). It included a hack to make this work by assigning
the value back and forth but it was fragile and stopped working
in libcxx.
The new logic is simpler and more transparent. Default value is
provided in a separate variable, and used only when user-specified
variable is empty (i.e. not overriden).
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D57282
llvm-svn: 352374
Summary:
When cross-compiling LLDB, we want to use llvm-tblgen built for the
host, not the target.
Reviewers: compnerd, sgraenitz
Subscribers: mgorny, lldb-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D57194
llvm-svn: 352235
Summary:
I did this for two reasons:
- Using the CMake packages simplifies building LLDB Standalone. This is for two
reasons: 1) We were doing a decent amount of work that is already done in the
LLVMConfig.cmake that we want to import, 2) We had to do some manual work to call
llvm-config, parse its output, and populate variables that the build system
uses.
- As far as I understand, using llvm-config makes it difficult if not impossible
to cross-compile LLDB standalone.
Reviewers: sgraenitz, labath, zturner, JDevlieghere, davide, aprantl, stella.stamenova
Subscribers: mgorny, lldb-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D56531
llvm-svn: 351863