codesign/libstuff checks that the `__LLVM` segment is directly
before `__LINKEDIT` by checking that `fileOff + fileSize == next segment
fileOff`. Previously, there would be gaps between the segments due to
the fact that their fileOffs are page-aligned but their fileSizes
aren't. In order to satisfy codesign, we page-align fileOff *before*
calculating fileSize. (I don't think codesign checks for the relative
ordering of other segments, so in theory we could do this just for
`__LLVM`, but ld64 seems to do it for all segments.)
Note that we *don't* round up the fileSize of the `__LINKEDIT` segment.
Since it's the last segment, it doesn't need to worry about contiguity;
in addition, codesign checks that the last (hidden) section in
`__LINKEDIT` covers the last byte of the segment, so if we rounded up
`__LINKEDIT`'s size we would have to do the same for its last section,
which is a bother.
While at it, I also addressed a FIXME in the linkedit-contiguity.s test
to cover more `__LINKEDIT` sections.
Reviewed By: #lld-macho, thakis, alexshap
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D100848
The previous approach of adding up the file sizes of the
component sections ignored the fact that the sections did not have to be
contiguous in the file. As such, it was underestimating the true size.
I discovered this issue because `codesign` checks whether `__LINKEDIT`
extends to the end of the file. Since we were underestimating segment
sizes, this check failed.
Reviewed By: #lld-macho, compnerd
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D84574
Summary:
As mentioned in https://reviews.llvm.org/D81326#2093931, I'm not sure it
makes sense to use the default target triple to determine -arch.
Long-term we should probably detect it from the input object files, but
in the meantime it would be nice not to have to add it to all our tests
by using a convenient default.
Reviewers: #lld-macho
Subscribers: arphaman, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D81983
Summary: After {D81326} landed, some tests started failing if they did
not have `-arch` specified. I think one of the reasons happened was due
to the fact that we were taking a reference to a temporary value that
was freed too early. Fixing that got the error to go away on my local
Linux machine.
Reviewed By: MaskRay
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D81802
Use the default target triple configured by the user to determine the
default architecture for `ld64.lld`. Stash the architecture in the
configuration as when linking against TBDs, we will need to filter out
the symbols based upon the architecture. Treat the Haswell slice as it
is equivalent to `x86_64` but with the extra Haswell extensions (e.g.
AVX2, FMA3, BMI1, etc). This will make it easier to add new
architectures in the future.
This change also changes the failure mode where an invalid `-arch`
parameter will result in the linker exiting without further processing.
Summary:
This is the first commit for the new Mach-O backend, designed to roughly
follow the architecture of the existing ELF and COFF backends, and
building off work that @ruiu and @pcc did in a branch a while back. Note
that this is a very stripped-down commit with the bare minimum of
functionality for ease of review. We'll be following up with more diffs
soon.
Currently, we're able to generate a simple "Hello World!" executable
that runs on OS X Catalina (and possibly on earlier OS X versions; I
haven't tested them). (This executable can be obtained by compiling
`test/MachO/relocations.s`.) We're mocking out a few load commands to
achieve this -- for example, we can't load dynamic libraries, but
Catalina requires binaries to be linked against `dyld`, so we hardcode
the emission of a `LC_LOAD_DYLIB` command. Other mocked out load
commands include LC_SYMTAB and LC_DYSYMTAB.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D75382
Jez Ng