assigned to a struct. This is fallout from inlining results, which expose
far more patterns where people stuff CF objects into structs and pass them
around (and we can reason about it). The problem is that we don't have
a general way to detect when values have escaped, so as an intermediate step
we need to eagerly prune out such tracking.
Fixes <rdar://problem/11104566>.
llvm-svn: 153489
This required adding a change count token to BugReport, but also allowed us to ditch ImmutableList as the BugReporterVisitor data type.
Also, remove the hack from MallocChecker, now that visitors appear in the opposite order. This is not exactly a fix, but the common case -- custom diagnostics after generic ones -- is now the default behavior.
llvm-svn: 153369
Specifically, we use the last store of the leaked symbol in the leak diagnostic.
(No support for struct fields since the malloc checker doesn't track those
yet.)
+ Infrastructure to track the regions used in store evaluations.
This approach is more precise than iterating the store to
obtain the region bound to the symbol, which is used in RetainCount
checker. The region corresponds to what is uttered in the code in the
last store and we do not rely on the store implementation to support
this functionality.
llvm-svn: 153212
This is accomplished by calling markInteresting /during/ path diagnostic generation, and as such relies on deterministic ordering of BugReporterVisitors -- namely, that BugReporterVisitors are run in /reverse/ order from how they are added. (Right now that's a consequence of storing visitors in an ImmutableList, where new items are added to the front.) It's a little hacky, but it works for now.
I think this is the best we can do without storing the relation between the old and new symbols, and that would be a hit whether or not there ends up being an error.
llvm-svn: 153010
I tried to test the effects of this change on memory usage and run time, but what I saw on retain-release.m was indistinguishable from noise (debug and release builds). Even so, some caveman profiling showed 101 cache hits that we would have generated new summaries for before (i.e. not default or stop summaries), and the more code we analyze, the more memory we should save.
Maybe we should have a standard project for benchmarking the retain count checker's memory and time?
llvm-svn: 153007
The cocoa::deriveNamingConventions helper is just using method families anyway now, and the way RetainSummaryTemplate works means we're allocating an extra summary for every method with a relevant family.
Also, fix RetainSummaryTemplate to do the right thing w/r/t annotating an /existing/ summary. This was probably the real cause of <rdar://problem/10824732> and the fix in r152448.
llvm-svn: 152998
The symbol-aware stack hint combines the checker-provided message
with the information about how the symbol was passed to the callee: as
a parameter or a return value.
For malloc, the generated messages look like this :
"Returning from 'foo'; released memory via 1st parameter"
"Returning from 'foo'; allocated memory via 1st parameter"
"Returning from 'foo'; allocated memory returned"
"Returning from 'foo'; reallocation of 1st parameter failed"
(We are yet to handle cases when the symbol is a field in a struct or
an array element.)
llvm-svn: 152962
The only use of AggExprVisitor was in #if 0 code (the analyzer's incomplete C++ support), so there is no actual behavioral change anyway.
llvm-svn: 152856
BugVisitor DiagnosticPieces.
When checkers create a DiagnosticPieceEvent, they can supply an extra
string, which will be concatenated with the call exit message for every
call on the stack between the diagnostic event and the final bug report.
(This is a simple version, which could be/will be further enhanced.)
For example, this is used in Malloc checker to produce the ",
which allocated memory" in the following example:
static char *malloc_wrapper() { // 2. Entered call from 'use'
return malloc(12); // 3. Memory is allocated
}
void use() {
char *v;
v = malloc_wrapper(); // 1. Calling 'malloc_wrappers'
// 4. Returning from 'malloc_wrapper', which allocated memory
} // 5. Memory is never released; potential
memory leak
llvm-svn: 152837
inlining to be the reverse of their declaration.
This optimizes running time under inlining up to 20% since we do not
re-analyze the utility functions which are usually defined first in the
translation unit if they have already been analyzed while inlined into
the root functions.
llvm-svn: 152653
BFS should give slightly better performance. Ex: Suppose, we have two
roots R1 and R2. A callee function C is reachable through both. However,
C is not inlined when analyzing R1 due to inline stack depth limit. With
DFS, C will be analyzed as top level even though it would be analyzed as
inlined through R2. On the other hand, BFS could avoid analyzing C as
top level.
llvm-svn: 152652
AnalysisConsumer.
As a result:
- We now analyze the C++ methods which are defined within the
class body. These were completely skipped before.
- Ensure that AST checkers are called on functions in the
order they are defined in the Translation unit.
llvm-svn: 152650
track whether the referenced declaration comes from an enclosing
local context. I'm amenable to suggestions about the exact meaning
of this bit.
llvm-svn: 152491
as aborted, but didn't treat such cases as sinks in the ExplodedGraph.
Along the way, add basic support for CXXCatchStmt, expanding the set of code we actually analyze (hopefully correctly).
Fixes: <rdar://problem/10892489>
llvm-svn: 152468
We do not reanalyze a function, which has already been analyzed as an
inlined callee. As per PRELIMINARY testing, this gives over
50% run time reduction on some benchmarks without decreasing of the
number of bugs found.
Turning the mode on by default.
llvm-svn: 152440
Ted Kremenek