Enable querying shape function library ops from the module. Currently
supports singular or array of them (as long as array has all unique ops
in mappings). The preferred canonical form would have one library, but
given the invariant on the mapping, this can easily be achieved by a
simple merging pass.
Preferred the attribute approach vs naming convention as these could be
added in multiple different ways.
Op with mapping from ops to corresponding shape functions for those op
in the library and mechanism to associate shape functions to functions.
The mapping of operand to shape function is kept separate from the shape
functions themselves as the operation is associated to the shape
function and not vice versa, and one could have a common library of
shape functions that can be used in different contexts.
Use fully qualified names and require a name for shape fn lib ops for
now and an explicit print/parse (based around the generated one & GPU
module op ones).
This commit reverts d9da4c3e73. Fixes
missing headers (don't know how that was working locally).
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D91672
Op with mapping from ops to corresponding shape functions for those op
in the library and mechanism to associate shape functions to functions.
The mapping of operand to shape function is kept separate from the shape
functions themselves as the operation is associated to the shape
function and not vice versa, and one could have a common library of
shape functions that can be used in different contexts.
Use fully qualified names and require a name for shape fn lib ops for
now and an explicit print/parse (based around the generated one & GPU
module op ones).
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D91672
If block A and B are in different regions and region of A is not an ancestor of
B, either A is included in region of B or the two regions are disjoint. In both
case A doesn't post-dominate B.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D91225
Having the input dumped on failure seems like a better
default: I debugged FileCheck tests for a while without knowing
about this option, which really helps to understand failures.
Remove `-dump-input-on-failure` and the environment variable
FILECHECK_DUMP_INPUT_ON_FAILURE which are now obsolete.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D81422
All ops of the SCF dialect now use the `scf.` prefix instead of `loop.`. This
is a part of dialect renaming.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D79844
The current Liveness analysis does not support operations with nested regions.
This causes issues when querying liveness information about blocks nested within
operations. Furthermore, the live-in and live-out sets are not computed properly
in these cases.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D77714
The Dominance analysis currently misses a utility function to find the nearest common dominator of two given blocks. This is required for a huge variety of different control-flow analyses and transformations. This commit adds this function and moves the getNode function from DominanceInfo to DominanceInfoBase, as it also works for post dominators.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D75507
Summary:
This enables tracking calls that cross symbol table boundaries. It also simplifies some of the implementation details of CallableOpInterface, i.e. there can only be one region within the callable operation.
Depends On D72042
Reviewed By: jpienaar
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D72043
Using the two call interfaces, CallOpInterface and CallableOpInterface, this change adds support for an initial multi-level CallGraph. This call graph builds a set of nodes for each callable region, and connects them via edges. An edge may be any of the following types:
* Abstract
- An edge not produced by a call operation, used for connecting to internal nodes from external nodes.
* Call
- A call edge is an edge defined via a call-like operation.
* Child
- This is an artificial edge connecting nested callgraph nodes.
This callgraph will be used, and improved upon, to begin supporting more interesting interprocedural analyses and transformation. In a followup, this callgraph will be used to support more complex inlining support.
PiperOrigin-RevId: 270724968
Jacques Pienaar