This will help us study the format of individual symbol
records more closely.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D7664
Reviewed by: Timur Iskhodzhanov
llvm-svn: 229730
with the Mach-O S_LITERAL_POINTERS section type.
Also fix the printing of the leading addresses for literal sections to be consistent and
not print the 0x prefix. Updated test cases to match.
llvm-svn: 229548
a gold binary explicitly. Substitute this binary into the tests rather
than just directly executing the 'ld' binary.
This should allow folks to inject a cross compiling gold binary, or in
my case to use a gold binary built and installed somewhere other than
/usr/bin/ld. It should also allow the tests to find 'ld.gold' so that
things work even if gold isn't the default on the system.
I've only stubbed out support in the makefile to preserve the existing
behavior with none of the fancy logic. If someone else wants to add
logic here, they're welcome to do so.
llvm-svn: 229251
This code didn't really make sense as is. If a filename is passed in,
the user obviously wants the coverage *for that file*, not *for
everything*.
llvm-svn: 229217
PR22575 occurred because we were unsafely storing references into a
std::vector. If the vector moved because it grew, we'd be left
iterating through garbage memory. This avoids the issue by simplifying
the logic to gather coverage information as we go, rather than storing
it and iterating over it.
I'm relying on the existing tests showing that this is semantically
NFC, since it's difficult to hit the issue this fixes without
relatively large covered programs.
llvm-svn: 229215
Now that llgo ships its own go command we can rely on it having support for $GCCGO.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D7628
llvm-svn: 229210
With this commit, llvm-dsymutil learns how to choose which DIEs
it will link in the final output and which ones it won't. This
is based on the 'valid relocation' information that has been
built in the previous commits.
The test only tests that we choose the right 'root DIEs'. The
selection algorithm (and especially the part that walk the
dependencies of a root DIE) lacks a bit test coverage. This
will be much easier to cover when we output actual Dwarf and
thus can use llvm-dwarfdump to verify the structure of the
emitted DIE trees. I'll add more tests then.
llvm-svn: 229183
These 'valid relocations' in the debug_info section will be how
dsymutil identifies the DIEs it needs to keep in the linked debug
information.
llvm-svn: 229178
because I didn't have binutils set up properly to build the gold plugin.
Fixes PR22581 which was filed because this broke the build for folks
relying on the plugin. Very sorry! =]
I've gotten the plugin stuff building now as well so it shouldn't keep
happening.
llvm-svn: 229156
LLVM's include tree and the use of using declarations to hide the
'legacy' namespace for the old pass manager.
This undoes the primary modules-hostile change I made to keep
out-of-tree targets building. I sent an email inquiring about whether
this would be reasonable to do at this phase and people seemed fine with
it, so making it a reality. This should allow us to start bootstrapping
with modules to a certain extent along with making it easier to mix and
match headers in general.
The updates to any code for users of LLVM are very mechanical. Switch
from including "llvm/PassManager.h" to "llvm/IR/LegacyPassManager.h".
Qualify the types which now produce compile errors with "legacy::". The
most common ones are "PassManager", "PassManagerBase", and
"FunctionPassManager".
llvm-svn: 229094
In particular this patch adds the ability to dump complete
function signature information including argument types as
correctly formatted strings. A side effect of this is that
almost all symbol and meta types are now formatted.
llvm-svn: 229076
Frequently you only want to iterate over children of a specific
type (e.g. functions). Previously you would get back a generic
interface that allowed iteration over the base symbol type,
which you would have to dyn_cast<> each one of. With this patch,
we allow the user to specify the concrete type as a template
parameter, and it will return an iterator which returns instances
of the concrete type directly.
llvm-svn: 228960
bfd creates the output file early, so calling exit(0) is not enough, the file needs to be explicitly deleted.
Patch by: H.J. Lu <hjl.tools@gmail.com>
llvm-svn: 228946
Summary:
Move calls to get_input_file and release_input_file out of
getModuleForFile(). Otherwise release_input_file may end up
unmapping a view of the file while the view is still being
used by the Module (on 32-bit hosts).
Fix for PR22482.
Test Plan: Add test using --no-map-whole-files.
Reviewers: rafael, nlewycky
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D7539
llvm-svn: 228842
This makes llvm-pdbdump available on all platforms, although it
will currently fail to create a dumper if there is no PDB reader
implementation for the current platform.
It implements dumping of compilands and children, which is less
information than was previously available, but it has to be
rewritten from scratch using the new set of interfaces, so the
rest of the functionality will be added back in subsequent commits.
llvm-svn: 228755
lto_codegen_compile_optimized. Also add lto_api_version.
Before this commit, we can only dump the optimized bitcode after running
lto_codegen_compile, but it includes some impacts of running codegen passes,
one example is StackProtector pass. We will get assertion failure when running
llc on the optimized bitcode, because StackProtector is effectively run twice.
After splitting lto_codegen_compile, the linker can choose to dump the bitcode
before running lto_codegen_compile_optimized.
lto_api_version is added so ld64 can check for runtime-availability of the new
API.
rdar://19565500
llvm-svn: 228000
terms of the new pass manager's TargetIRAnalysis.
Yep, this is one of the nicer bits of the new pass manager's design.
Passes can in many cases operate in a vacuum and so we can just nest
things when convenient. This is particularly convenient here as I can
now consolidate all of the TargetMachine logic on this analysis.
The most important change here is that this pushes the function we need
TTI for all the way into the TargetMachine, and re-creates the TTI
object for each function rather than re-using it for each function.
We're now prepared to teach the targets to produce function-specific TTI
objects with specific subtargets cached, etc.
One piece of feedback I'd love here is whether its worth renaming any of
this stuff. None of the names really seem that awesome to me at this
point, but TargetTransformInfoWrapperPass is particularly ... odd.
TargetIRAnalysisWrapper might make more sense. I would want to do that
rename separately anyways, but let me know what you think.
llvm-svn: 227731
This should be sufficient to replace the initial (minor) function pass
pipeline in Clang with the new pass manager. I'll probably add an (off
by default) flag to do that just to ensure we can get extra testing.
llvm-svn: 227726
I've added RUN lines both to the basic test for EarlyCSE and the
target-specific test, as this serves as a nice test that the TTI layer
in the new pass manager is in fact working well.
llvm-svn: 227725
produce it.
This adds a function to the TargetMachine that produces this analysis
via a callback for each function. This in turn faves the way to produce
a *different* TTI per-function with the correct subtarget cached.
I've also done the necessary wiring in the opt tool to thread the target
machine down and make it available to the pass registry so that we can
construct this analysis from a target machine when available.
llvm-svn: 227721
live in a class.
While this isn't really significant right now, I need to expose some
state to the pass construction expressions, and making them get
evaluated within a class context is a nice way to collect members that
they may need to access.
llvm-svn: 227715
base which it adds a single analysis pass to, to instead return the type
erased TargetTransformInfo object constructed for that TargetMachine.
This removes all of the pass variants for TTI. There is now a single TTI
*pass* in the Analysis layer. All of the Analysis <-> Target
communication is through the TTI's type erased interface itself. While
the diff is large here, it is nothing more that code motion to make
types available in a header file for use in a different source file
within each target.
I've tried to keep all the doxygen comments and file boilerplate in line
with this move, but let me know if I missed anything.
With this in place, the next step to making TTI work with the new pass
manager is to introduce a really simple new-style analysis that produces
a TTI object via a callback into this routine on the target machine.
Once we have that, we'll have the building blocks necessary to accept
a function argument as well.
llvm-svn: 227685
type erased interface and a single analysis pass rather than an
extremely complex analysis group.
The end result is that the TTI analysis can contain a type erased
implementation that supports the polymorphic TTI interface. We can build
one from a target-specific implementation or from a dummy one in the IR.
I've also factored all of the code into "mix-in"-able base classes,
including CRTP base classes to facilitate calling back up to the most
specialized form when delegating horizontally across the surface. These
aren't as clean as I would like and I'm planning to work on cleaning
some of this up, but I wanted to start by putting into the right form.
There are a number of reasons for this change, and this particular
design. The first and foremost reason is that an analysis group is
complete overkill, and the chaining delegation strategy was so opaque,
confusing, and high overhead that TTI was suffering greatly for it.
Several of the TTI functions had failed to be implemented in all places
because of the chaining-based delegation making there be no checking of
this. A few other functions were implemented with incorrect delegation.
The message to me was very clear working on this -- the delegation and
analysis group structure was too confusing to be useful here.
The other reason of course is that this is *much* more natural fit for
the new pass manager. This will lay the ground work for a type-erased
per-function info object that can look up the correct subtarget and even
cache it.
Yet another benefit is that this will significantly simplify the
interaction of the pass managers and the TargetMachine. See the future
work below.
The downside of this change is that it is very, very verbose. I'm going
to work to improve that, but it is somewhat an implementation necessity
in C++ to do type erasure. =/ I discussed this design really extensively
with Eric and Hal prior to going down this path, and afterward showed
them the result. No one was really thrilled with it, but there doesn't
seem to be a substantially better alternative. Using a base class and
virtual method dispatch would make the code much shorter, but as
discussed in the update to the programmer's manual and elsewhere,
a polymorphic interface feels like the more principled approach even if
this is perhaps the least compelling example of it. ;]
Ultimately, there is still a lot more to be done here, but this was the
huge chunk that I couldn't really split things out of because this was
the interface change to TTI. I've tried to minimize all the other parts
of this. The follow up work should include at least:
1) Improving the TargetMachine interface by having it directly return
a TTI object. Because we have a non-pass object with value semantics
and an internal type erasure mechanism, we can narrow the interface
of the TargetMachine to *just* do what we need: build and return
a TTI object that we can then insert into the pass pipeline.
2) Make the TTI object be fully specialized for a particular function.
This will include splitting off a minimal form of it which is
sufficient for the inliner and the old pass manager.
3) Add a new pass manager analysis which produces TTI objects from the
target machine for each function. This may actually be done as part
of #2 in order to use the new analysis to implement #2.
4) Work on narrowing the API between TTI and the targets so that it is
easier to understand and less verbose to type erase.
5) Work on narrowing the API between TTI and its clients so that it is
easier to understand and less verbose to forward.
6) Try to improve the CRTP-based delegation. I feel like this code is
just a bit messy and exacerbating the complexity of implementing
the TTI in each target.
Many thanks to Eric and Hal for their help here. I ended up blocked on
this somewhat more abruptly than I expected, and so I appreciate getting
it sorted out very quickly.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D7293
llvm-svn: 227669
segname,sectname to specify a Mach-O section to print. The printing is based on
the section type or section attributes.
The printing of the module initialization and termination section types is printed
with this change. Printing of other section types will be added next.
llvm-svn: 227649
Peter Collingbourne