https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=27506https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=31652https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=51043
Problems with SimpleLoopUnswitch cause the bug reports above.
```
while (...) {
if (C) { A }
else { B }
}
Into:
C' = freeze(C)
if (C') {
while (...) { A }
} else {
while (...) { B }
}
```
This problem can be solved by adding a freeze on hoisted branches(above transform) and has been solved by D29015.
However, D29015 is now reverted by performance regression(2b5a897651)
It is not the first time that an added freeze has caused performance regression.
SimplifyCFG also had a problem with UB caused by branching-on-undef, which was solved by adding freeze to the branching condition. (D104569)
Performance regression occurred in D104569, and patches such as D105344 and D105392 were written to minimize it.
This patch will correct the SimpleLoopUnswitch as D104569 handles the SimplyCFG while minimizing performance loss by introducing patches like D105344 and D105392(This patch was rebased with the author's permission)
Reviewed By: reames
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D106041
Added an additional check for constants after simplification of
"select _, true, false" pattern. We need to prevent attempts to unswitch constant
conditions for two reasons:
a) Doing that doesn't make any sense, in the best case it will just burn
some compile time.
b) SimpleLoopUnswitch isn't designed to unswitch constant conditions
(due to (a)), so attempting that can cause miscompiles. The attached
testcase is an example of such miscompile.
Also added an assertion that'll make sure we aren't trying to replace
constants, so it will help us prevent such bugs in future. The assertion
from D110751 is another layer of protection against such cases.
Reviewed By: aeubanks
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D110752
As part of the nontrivial unswitching we could end up removing child
loops. This patch add a notification to the pass manager when
that happens (using the markLoopAsDeleted callback).
Without this there could be stale LoopAccessAnalysis results cached
in the analysis manager. Those analysis results are cached based on
a Loop* as key. Since the BumpPtrAllocator used to allocate
Loop objects could be resetted between different runs of for
example the loop-distribute pass (running on different functions),
a new Loop object could be created using the same Loop pointer.
And then when requiring the LoopAccessAnalysis for the loop we
got the stale (corrupt) result from the destroyed loop.
Reviewed By: aeubanks
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D109257
This is enabled by default. Drop explicit uses in preparation for
removing the option.
Also drop RUN lines that are now the same (typically modulo a
-verify-memoryssa option).
To help with debugging non-trivial unswitching issues.
Don't care about the legacy pass, nobody is using it.
If a pass's string params are empty (e.g. "simple-loop-unswitch"), don't
default to the empty constructor for the pass params. We should still
let the parser take care of it in case the parser has its own defaults.
Reviewed By: asbirlea
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D105933
It is confusing to have two ways of specifying the same pass
('simple-loop-unswitch' and 'unswitch'). This patch replaces
'unswitch' by 'simple-loop-unswitch' to get a unique identifier.
Using 'simple-loop-unswitch' instead of 'unswitch' also has the
advantage of matching how the pass is named in DEBUG_TYPE etc. So
this makes it a bit more consistent how we refer to the pass in
options such as -passes, -print-after and -debug-only.
Reviewed By: aeubanks
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D105628
There was a bug from cost calculation for partially invariant unswitch.
The costs of non-duplicated blocks are substracted from the total LoopCost, so
anything that is duplicated should not be counted.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D103816
This fixes the miscompilation reported in https://reviews.llvm.org/rG5bb38e84d3d0#986154 .
`select _, true, false` matches both m_LogicalAnd and m_LogicalOr, making later
transformations confused.
Simplify the branch condition to not have the form.
Hello all,
I'm trying to fix unsafe propagation of poison values in and/or conditions by using
equivalent select forms (`select i1 A, i1 B, i1 false` and `select i1 A, i1 true, i1 false`)
instead.
D93065 has links to patches for this.
This patch allows unswitch to happen if the condition is in this form as well.
`collectHomogenousInstGraphLoopInvariants` is updated to keep traversal if
Root and the visiting I matches both m_LogicalOr()/m_LogicalAnd().
Other than this, the remaining changes are almost straightforward and simply replaces
Instruction::And/Or check with match(m_LogicalOr()/m_LogicalAnd()).
Reviewed By: nikic
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D97756
Some benchmarks regress with non-trivial unswitching, so add an option
to opt-out of performing non-trivial unswitching while investigating.
Reviewed By: asbirlea
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D95796
From C11 and C++11 onwards, a forward-progress requirement has been
introduced for both languages. In the case of C, loops with non-constant
conditionals that do not have any observable side-effects (as defined by
6.8.5p6) can be assumed by the implementation to terminate, and in the
case of C++, this assumption extends to all functions. The clang
frontend will emit the `mustprogress` function attribute for C++
functions (D86233, D85393, D86841) and emit the loop metadata
`llvm.loop.mustprogress` for every loop in C11 or later that has a
non-constant conditional.
This patch modifies LoopDeletion so that only loops with
the `llvm.loop.mustprogress` metadata or loops contained in functions
that are required to make progress (`mustprogress` or `willreturn`) are
checked for observable side-effects. If these loops do not have an
observable side-effect, then we delete them.
Loops without observable side-effects that do not satisfy the above
conditions will not be deleted.
Reviewed By: jdoerfert
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D86844
CallInst::updateProfWeight() creates branch_weights with i64 instead of i32.
To be more consistent everywhere and remove lots of casts from uint64_t
to uint32_t, use i64 for branch_weights.
Reviewed By: davidxl
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D88609
CallInst::updateProfWeight() creates branch_weights with i64 instead of i32.
To be more consistent everywhere and remove lots of casts from uint64_t
to uint32_t, use i64 for branch_weights.
Reviewed By: davidxl
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D88609
This matches the legacy PM name and makes all tests in
Transforms/LoopSimplifyCFG pass under NPM.
Reviewed By: arsenm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D87948
When getUserCost was transitioned to use an explicit CostKind,
TCK_CodeSize was used even though the original kind was implicitly
SizeAndLatency so restore this behaviour. We now only query for
CodeSize when optimising for minsize.
I expect this to not change anything as, I think all, targets will
currently return the same value for CodeSize and SizeLatency. Indeed
I see no changes in the test suite for Arm, AArch64 and X86.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D85829
We can preserve make.implicit metadata in the split block if it is
guaranteed that after following the branch we always reach the block
where processing of null case happens, which is equivalent to
"initial condition must execute if the loop is entered".
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D84925
Reviewed By: asbirlea
Non-trivial unswitching simply moves terminator being unswitch from the loop
up to the switch block. It also preserves all metadata that was there. It might not
be a correct thing to do for `make.implicit` metadata. Consider case:
```
for (...) {
cond = // computed in loop
if (cond) return X;
if (p == null) throw_npe(); !make implicit
}
```
Before the unswitching, if `p` is null and we reach this check, we are guaranteed
to go to `throw_npe()` block. Now we unswitch on `p == null` condition:
```
if (p == null) !make implicit {
for (...) {
if (cond) return X;
throw_npe()
}
} else {
for (...) {
if (cond) return X;
}
}
```
Now, following `true` branch of `p == null` does not always lead us to
`throw_npe()` because the loop has side exit. Now, if we run ImplicitNullCheck
pass on this code, it may end up making the unswitch condition implicit. This may
lead us to turning normal path to `return X` into signal-throwing path, which is
not efficient.
Note that this does not happen during trivial unswitch: it guarantees that we do not
have side exits before condition being unswitched.
This patch fixes this situation by unconditional dropping of `make.implicit` metadata
when we perform non-trivial unswitch. We could preserve it if we could prove that the
condition always executes. This can be done as a follow-up.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D84916
Reviewed By: asbirlea
To match NewPM pass name, and also for readability.
Also rename rpo-functionattrs -> rpo-function-attrs while we're here.
Reviewed By: arsenm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D84694
Currently if instructions defined in a block are used in unreachable
blocks and SimpleLoopUnswitch attempts deleting the block, it triggers
assertion "Uses remain when a value is destroyed!".
This patch fixes it by replacing all uses of instructions from BB with
undefs before BB deletion.
Reviewed By: asbirlea
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D80551
Summary:
Update check to include the check for unreachable.
Basic blocks ending in unreachable are special cased, as these blocks may be already unswitched. Before this patch this check is only done for the default destination.
The condition for the exit cases and the default case must be the same, because we should never leave edges from the switch instruction to a basic block that we are unswitching. In PR45355 we still have a remaining edge (that we're attempting to remove from the DT) because its the default edge to an unreachable-terminated block where we unswitch a case edge to that block.
Resolves PR45355.
Reviewers: chandlerc
Subscribers: hiraditya, uabelho, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D78279
Summary:
Update the check for the default exit block to not only check that the
terminator is not unreachable, but also check that unreachable block has
*only* the unreachable instruction.
Reviewers: chandlerc
Subscribers: hiraditya, uabelho, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D78277
Summary:
Loop unswitch hoists branches on loop-invariant conditions. However, if this
condition is poison/undef and the branch wasn't originally reachable, loop
unswitch introduces UB (since the optimized code will branch on poison/undef and
the original one didn't)).
We fix this problem by freezing the condition to ensure we don't introduce UB.
We will now transform the following:
while (...) {
if (C) { A }
else { B }
}
Into:
C' = freeze(C)
if (C') {
while (...) { A }
} else {
while (...) { B }
}
This patch fixes the root cause of the following bug reports (which use the old loop unswitch, but can be reproduced with minor changes in the code and -enable-nontrivial-unswitch):
- https://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=27506
- https://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=31652
Reviewers: reames, majnemer, chenli, sanjoy, hfinkel
Reviewed By: reames
Subscribers: hiraditya, jvesely, nhaehnle, filcab, regehr, trentxintong, nlopes, llvm-commits, mzolotukhin
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D29015
SCEV caches the exiting blocks when computing exit counts. In
SimpleLoopUnswitch, we split the exit block of the loop to unswitch.
Currently we only invalidate the loop containing that exit block, but if
that block is the exiting block for a parent loop, we have stale cache
entries. We have to invalidate the top-most loop that contains the exit
block as exiting block. We might also be able to skip invalidating the
loop containing the exit block, if the exit block is not an exiting
block of that loop.
There are also 2 more places in SimpleLoopUnswitch, that use a similar
problematic approach to get the loop to invalidate. If the patch makes
sense, I will also update those places to a similar approach (they deal
with multiple exit blocks, so we cannot directly re-use
getTopMostExitingLoop).
Fixes PR43972.
Reviewers: skatkov, reames, asbirlea, chandlerc
Reviewed By: asbirlea
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D70786
Summary:
Add a flag to the FunctionToLoopAdaptor that allows enabling MemorySSA only for the loop pass managers that are known to preserve it.
If an LPM is known to have only loop transforms that *all* preserve MemorySSA, then use MemorySSA if `EnableMSSALoopDependency` is set.
If an LPM has loop passes that do not preserve MemorySSA, then the flag passed is `false`, regardless of the value of `EnableMSSALoopDependency`.
When using a custom loop pass pipeline via `passes=...`, use keyword `loop` vs `loop-mssa` to use MemorySSA in that LPM. If a loop that does not preserve MemorySSA is added while using the `loop-mssa` keyword, that's an error.
Add the new `loop-mssa` keyword to a few tests where a difference occurs when enabling MemorySSA.
Reviewers: chandlerc
Subscribers: mehdi_amini, Prazek, george.burgess.iv, sanjoy.google, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D66376
llvm-svn: 369548
Only instructions with two or more unique successors should be considered for unswitching.
Patch Author: Daniil Suchkov.
Reviewers: reames, asbirlea, skatkov
Reviewed By: skatkov
Subscribers: hiraditya, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D64404
llvm-svn: 365611
This test exposes a bug in SimpleLoopUnswitch that leads to a crash on
assert(SuccessorsCount > 1 && "Cannot unswitch a condition without multiple distinct successors!");
when SimpleLoopUnswitch considers unswitching of a loop by a switch with one successor.
Fix will be submitted soon.
Patch Author: Daniil Suchkov.
Reviewers: reames, asbirlea, skatkov
Reviewed By: skatkov
Subscribers: zzheng, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D64403
llvm-svn: 365600
As it's causing some bot failures (and per request from kbarton).
This reverts commit r358543/ab70da07286e618016e78247e4a24fcb84077fda.
llvm-svn: 358546
hyeongyu kim