Summary:
The codegen for conditions assumes that a normal variable declaration is used in a condition, but this is not the case when a structured binding is used.
This fixes [PR36747](http://llvm.org/pr36747).
Thanks Nicolas Lesser for contributing the patch.
Reviewers: lichray, rsmith
Reviewed By: lichray
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D44534
llvm-svn: 327780
Summary:
Let's suppose the `-Weverything` is passed.
Given code like
```
void F() {}
;
```
If the code is compiled with `-std=c++03`, it would diagnose that extra sema:
```
<source>:2:1: warning: extra ';' outside of a function is a C++11 extension [-Wc++11-extra-semi]
;
^~
```
If the code is compiled with `-std=c++11`, it also would diagnose that extra sema:
```
<source>:2:1: warning: extra ';' outside of a function is incompatible with C++98 [-Wc++98-compat-pedantic]
;
^~
```
But, let's suppose the C++11 or higher is used, and the used does not care
about `-Wc++98-compat-pedantic`, so he disables that diagnostic.
And that silences the complaint about extra `;` too.
And there is no way to re-enable that particular diagnostic, passing `-Wextra-semi` does nothing...
Now, there is also a related `no newline at end of file` diagnostic, which is also emitted by `-Wc++98-compat-pedantic`
```
<source>:2:2: warning: C++98 requires newline at end of file [-Wc++98-compat-pedantic]
;
^
```
But unlike the previous case, if `-Wno-c++98-compat-pedantic` is passed, that diagnostic stays displayed:
```
<source>:2:2: warning: no newline at end of file [-Wnewline-eof]
;
^
```
This diff refactors the code so `-Wc++98-compat-extra-semi` can be re-enabled, after the `-Wc++98-compat-pedantic` was disabled.
This seems ugly, but there does not seem to be any saner way.
Testing: `$ ninja check-clang`
Reviewers: rsmith, rtrieu, aaron.ballman
Reviewed By: aaron.ballman
Subscribers: jordan_rose, cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D43162
llvm-svn: 327558
We need to treat __unaligned like the other 'cvr' qualifiers when it
appears at the end of a function prototype. We weren't doing that in
some tentative parsing.
Fixes PR36638.
llvm-svn: 326962
Specifically, we would not properly parse these types within template arguments
(for non-type template parameters), and in tentative parses. Fixing both of
these essentially requires that we parse deduced template specialization types
as types in all contexts, even in template argument lists -- in particular,
tentative parsing may look ahead and annotate a deduced template specialization
type before we figure out that we're actually supposed to treat the tokens as a
template-name. We deal with this by simply permitting deduced template
specialization types when parsing template arguments, and converting them to
template template arguments.
llvm-svn: 326299
This is not quite NFC: we don't perform the usual arithmetic conversions unless
we have an operand of arithmetic or enumeration type any more. This matches the
standard rule, but actually has no effect other than to marginally improve our
diagnostics for the non-arithmetic, non-enumeration cases (by not performing
integral promotions on one operand if the other is a pointer).
llvm-svn: 322024
Suggest moving the following erroneous attrib list (based on location)
[[]] struct X;
to
struct [[]] X;
Additionally, added a fixme for the current implementation that diagnoses misplaced attributes to consider using the newly introduced diagnostic (that I think is more user-friendly).
llvm-svn: 321449
This is a slightly odd construct (it's more common to see "A (::B)()") but can
happen in friend declarations, and the parens are not redundant as they prevent
the :: binding to the left.
llvm-svn: 321318
This allows you to dump C++ code that spells bool instead of _Bool, leaves off the elaborated type specifiers when printing struct or class names, and other C-isms.
Fixes the -Wreorder issue and fixes the ast-dump-color.cpp test.
llvm-svn: 321310
This allows you to dump C++ code that spells bool instead of _Bool, leaves off the elaborated type specifiers when printing struct or class names, and other C-isms.
llvm-svn: 321223
Adding the new enumerator forced a bunch more changes into this patch than I
would have liked. The -Wtautological-compare warning was extended to properly
check the new comparison operator, clang-format needed updating because it uses
precedence levels as weights for determining where to break lines (and several
operators increased their precedence levels with this change), thread-safety
analysis needed changes to build its own IL properly for the new operator.
All "real" semantic checking for this operator has been deferred to a future
patch. For now, we use the relational comparison rules and arbitrarily give
the builtin form of the operator a return type of 'void'.
llvm-svn: 320707
Summary:
This feature was discussed but not yet proposed. It allows a structured binding to appear as a //condition//
if (auto [ok, val] = f(...))
So the user can save an extra //condition// if the statement can test the value to-be-decomposed instead. Formally, it makes the value of the underlying object of the structured binding declaration also the value of a //condition// that is an initialized declaration.
Considering its logicality which is entirely evident from its trivial implementation, I think it might be acceptable to land it as an extension for now before I write the paper.
Reviewers: rsmith, faisalv, aaron.ballman
Reviewed By: rsmith
Subscribers: aaron.ballman, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D39284
llvm-svn: 320011
Summary:
This is so we can implement concepts per P0734R0. Relevant failing test
cases are disabled.
Reviewers: hubert.reinterpretcast, rsmith, saar.raz, nwilson
Reviewed By: saar.raz
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D40380
Patch by Changyu Li!
llvm-svn: 319992
This also clarifies some terminology used by the diagnostic (methods -> Objective-C methods, fields -> non-static data members, etc).
Many of the tests needed to be updated in multiple places for the diagnostic wording tweaks. The first instance of the diagnostic for that attribute is fully specified and subsequent instances cut off the complete list (to make it easier if additional subjects are added in the future for the attribute).
llvm-svn: 319002
The right shift operator was not seen as a valid operator in a fold expression, which is PR32563.
Patch by Nicolas Lesser ("Blitz Rakete")!
llvm-svn: 317032
GCC ignore qualifiers on array types. Since we seem to have this
function primarily for GCC compatibility, we should try to match that
behavior.
This also adds a few more test-cases __builtin_types_compatible_p,
which were inspired by GCC's documentation on the builtin.
llvm-svn: 315951
function-style cast.
This fires for cases such as
T(x);
... where 'x' was previously declared and T is a type. This construct declares
a variable named 'x' rather than the (probably expected) interpretation of a
function-style cast of 'x' to T.
llvm-svn: 314570
This is similar to what's done on arm and x86_64, where
these calling conventions are silently ignored, as in
SVN r245076.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D36105
llvm-svn: 310303
'#pragma pack (pop)' and suspicious uses of '#pragma pack' in included files
The second recommit (r309106) was reverted because the "non-default #pragma
pack value chages the alignment of struct or union members in the included file"
warning proved to be too aggressive for external projects like Chromium
(https://bugs.chromium.org/p/chromium/issues/detail?id=749197). This recommit
makes the problematic warning a non-default one, and gives it the
-Wpragma-pack-suspicious-include warning option.
The first recommit (r308441) caused a "non-default #pragma pack value might
change the alignment of struct or union members in the included file" warning
in LLVM itself. This recommit tweaks the added warning to avoid warnings for
#includes that don't have any records that are affected by the non-default
alignment. This tweak avoids the previously emitted warning in LLVM.
Original message:
This commit adds a new -Wpragma-pack warning. It warns in the following cases:
- When a translation unit is missing terminating #pragma pack (pop) directives.
- When entering an included file if the current alignment value as determined
by '#pragma pack' directives is different from the default alignment value.
- When leaving an included file that changed the state of the current alignment
value.
rdar://10184173
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D35484
llvm-svn: 309386
The warning fires on non-suspicious code in Chromium. Reverting until a
solution is figured out.
> Recommit r308327 2nd time: Add a warning for missing
> '#pragma pack (pop)' and suspicious uses of '#pragma pack' in included files
>
> The first recommit (r308441) caused a "non-default #pragma pack value might
> change the alignment of struct or union members in the included file" warning
> in LLVM itself. This recommit tweaks the added warning to avoid warnings for
> #includes that don't have any records that are affected by the non-default
> alignment. This tweak avoids the previously emitted warning in LLVM.
>
> Original message:
>
> This commit adds a new -Wpragma-pack warning. It warns in the following cases:
>
> - When a translation unit is missing terminating #pragma pack (pop) directives.
> - When entering an included file if the current alignment value as determined
> by '#pragma pack' directives is different from the default alignment value.
> - When leaving an included file that changed the state of the current alignment
> value.
>
> rdar://10184173
>
> Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D35484
llvm-svn: 309186
'#pragma pack (pop)' and suspicious uses of '#pragma pack' in included files
The first recommit (r308441) caused a "non-default #pragma pack value might
change the alignment of struct or union members in the included file" warning
in LLVM itself. This recommit tweaks the added warning to avoid warnings for
#includes that don't have any records that are affected by the non-default
alignment. This tweak avoids the previously emitted warning in LLVM.
Original message:
This commit adds a new -Wpragma-pack warning. It warns in the following cases:
- When a translation unit is missing terminating #pragma pack (pop) directives.
- When entering an included file if the current alignment value as determined
by '#pragma pack' directives is different from the default alignment value.
- When leaving an included file that changed the state of the current alignment
value.
rdar://10184173
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D35484
llvm-svn: 309106
This seems to have broken the sanitizer-x86_64-linux buildbot. Reverting until
it's fixed, especially since this landed just before the 5.0 branch.
> This commit adds a new -Wpragma-pack warning. It warns in the following cases:
>
> - When a translation unit is missing terminating #pragma pack (pop) directives.
> - When entering an included file if the current alignment value as determined
> by '#pragma pack' directives is different from the default alignment value.
> - When leaving an included file that changed the state of the current alignment
> value.
>
> rdar://10184173
>
> Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D35484
llvm-svn: 308455
and suspicious uses of '#pragma pack' in included files
This commit adds a new -Wpragma-pack warning. It warns in the following cases:
- When a translation unit is missing terminating #pragma pack (pop) directives.
- When entering an included file if the current alignment value as determined
by '#pragma pack' directives is different from the default alignment value.
- When leaving an included file that changed the state of the current alignment
value.
rdar://10184173
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D35484
llvm-svn: 308441
of '#pragma pack' in included files
This commit adds a new -Wpragma-pack warning. It warns in the following cases:
- When a translation unit is missing terminating #pragma pack (pop) directives.
- When entering an included file if the current alignment value as determined
by '#pragma pack' directives is different from the default alignment value.
- When leaving an included file that changed the state of the current alignment
value.
rdar://10184173
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D35484
llvm-svn: 308327
The goal of this commit is to fix clang-format so it does not merge tokens when
using the alternative spelling keywords. (eg: "not foo" should not become "notfoo")
The problem is that Preprocessor::HandleIdentifier used to drop the identifier info
from the token for these keyword. This means the first condition of
TokenAnnotator::spaceRequiredBefore is not met. We could add explicit check for
the spelling in that condition, but I think it is better to keep the IdentifierInfo
and handle the operator keyword explicitly when needed. That actually leads to simpler
code, and probably slightly more efficient as well.
Another side effect of this change is that __identifier(and) will now work as
one would expect, removing a FIXME from the MicrosoftExtensions.cpp test
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D35172
llvm-svn: 308008
This change avoid a crash that occurred when skipping to EOF while parsing an
ObjC interface/implementation.
rdar://31963299
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D34185
llvm-svn: 305719
There's a Microsoft header in the Windows SDK which won't
compile with clang because it uses an operator name (and)
as a field name. This patch allows that file to compile by
setting the option which disables operator names.
The header which doesn't compile <Query.h> C:/Program Files (x86)/
Windows Kits/10/include/10.0.14393.0/um\Query.h:259:40:
error: expected member name or ';' after declaration specifiers
/* [case()] */ NODERESTRICTION or;
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ^
1 error generated.
Contributed for Melanie Blower
Differential Revision:https://reviews.llvm.org/D33505
llvm-svn: 303798
Summary:
The trial parse for declarative syntax accepts an invalid pack
declaration syntax, which is ambiguous with valid pack expansions of
expressions. This commit removes the invalid pack declaration syntax to
avoid mistaking valid pack expansions as invalid declarator components.
Additionally, the trial parse of a //template-argument-list// then needs
to handle the optional ellipsis that is part of that grammar, as opposed
to relying on the trial parse for declarators accepting stray ellipses.
Reviewers: rsmith, rcraik, aaron.ballman
Reviewed By: rsmith
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D33339
llvm-svn: 303472
We were incorrectly setting PrevTokLocation to the first token in the
annotation token instead of the last when consuming it. To fix this without
adding a complex switch to the hot path through ConsumeToken, we now have a
ConsumeAnnotationToken function for consuming annotation tokens in addition
to the other Consume*Token special case functions.
llvm-svn: 303372
`__builtin_available`
This commit allows us to use the macOS/iOS/tvOS/watchOS platform names in
`@available`/`__builtin_available`.
rdar://32067795
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D33000
llvm-svn: 302540
Zhihao Yuan