have a nested name specifier. Strictly speaking, forward declarations of class
template partial specializations are not permitted at all, but that seems like
an obvious wording defect, and if we allow them without a nested name specifier
we should also allow them with a nested name specifier.
llvm-svn: 255383
context is the class itself but lookups should be performed starting with the
lookup parent of the class (class and base members don't shadow types from the
surrounding context because they have not been declared yet).
llvm-svn: 245236
arguments because the reloaded form might have become non-canonical across the
serialization/deserialization step (this particularly happens when the
canonical form of the type involves an expression).
llvm-svn: 244409
UsingShadowDecls over other declarations of the same entity in the lookup
results. This ensures that we build correct redeclaration chains for the
UsingShadowDecls (otherwise we could see assertions and other misbehavior in
modules builds, when merging combines multiple redeclaration chains for the
same entity from the same module into one chain).
llvm-svn: 243592
Previously we'd complain about redefinition of default arguments when we
instantiated a class with a friend template that inherits its default argument,
because we propagate the default template arguemnt onto the friend when we
reload the AST.
llvm-svn: 239857
if the merged definition is visible, and perform lookups into all merged copies
of the definition (not just for special members) so that we can complete the
redecl chains for members of the class.
llvm-svn: 233420
non-visible definition, skip the new definition and make the old one visible
instead of trying to parse it again and failing horribly. C++'s ODR allows
us to assume that the two definitions are identical.
llvm-svn: 233250
Richard Smith