This allows toolchain drivers to add multiple libc++ include paths akin
to libstdc++. This is useful in multiarch setup when some headers might
be in target specific include directory. There should be no functional
change.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D45422
llvm-svn: 329748
Memory sanitizer compatibility are already done in
MemorySanitizer::doInitialization. It verifies whether the necessary offsets
exist and bails out if not. For this reason it is no good to duplicate two
checks in two projects. This patch removes clang check and postpones msan
compatibility validation till MemorySanitizer::doInitialization.
Another reason for this patch is to allow using msan with any CPU (given
compatible runtime) and custom mapping provided via the arguments added by
https://reviews.llvm.org/D44926.
Patch by vit9696.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D44927
llvm-svn: 329241
Summary:
Most Android headers live in a single directory, but a small handful
live in multiarch directories.
Reviewers: srhines
Reviewed By: srhines
Subscribers: javed.absar, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D44995
llvm-svn: 329234
Summary: Porting HWASan to Linux x86-64, the third of the three patches, clang part.
Reviewers: eugenis
Subscribers: cryptoad, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D44745
llvm-svn: 328361
r317337 missed that scudo is supported on MIPS32, so permit that option for
MIPS32.
Reviewers: cryptoad, atanasyan
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D42416
llvm-svn: 323412
As RV64 codegen has not yet been upstreamed into LLVM, we focus on RV32 driver
support (RV64 to follow).
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D39963
llvm-svn: 322276
As reported in llvm bugzilla 32377.
Here’s a patch to add preinclude of stdc-predef.h.
The gcc documentation says “On GNU/Linux, <stdc-predef.h> is pre-included.” See https://gcc.gnu.org/gcc-4.8/porting_to.html;
The preinclude is inhibited with –ffreestanding.
Basically I fixed the failing test cases by adding –ffreestanding which inhibits this behavior.
I fixed all the failing tests, including some in extra/test, there's a separate patch for that which is linked here
Note: this is a recommit after a test failure took down the original (r318669)
Patch By: mibintc
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D34158
llvm-svn: 320391
As reported in llvm bugzilla 32377.
Here’s a patch to add preinclude of stdc-predef.h.
The gcc documentation says “On GNU/Linux, <stdc-predef.h> is pre-included.”
See https://gcc.gnu.org/gcc-4.8/porting_to.html;
The preinclude is inhibited with –ffreestanding.
Basically I fixed the failing test cases by adding –ffreestanding which inhibits
this behavior.
I fixed all the failing tests, including some in extra/test, there's a separate
patch for that which is linked here
Patch By: mibintc
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D34158
llvm-svn: 318669
set -pie as default for musl linux targets
add detection of alpine linux
append appropriate compile flags for alpine
Reviewers: rnk
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D39588
llvm-svn: 318608
Summary:
This change adds Scudo as a possible Sanitizer option via -fsanitize=.
This allows for easier static & shared linking of the Scudo library, it allows
us to enforce PIE (otherwise the security of the allocator is moot), and check
for incompatible Sanitizers combo.
In its current form, Scudo is not compatible with any other Sanitizer, but the
plan is to make it work in conjunction with UBsan (-fsanitize=scudo,undefined),
which will require additional work outside of the scope of this change.
Reviewers: eugenis, kcc, alekseyshl
Reviewed By: eugenis, alekseyshl
Subscribers: llvm-commits, srhines
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D39334
llvm-svn: 317337
Summary:
Also enable -no-pie on Gnu toolchain (previously available on Darwin only).
Non-PIE executables won't even start on recent Android, and DT_RPATH is ignored by the loader.
Reviewers: srhines, danalbert
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D38430
llvm-svn: 316606
The flag will perform instrumentation necessary to the fuzzing,
but will NOT link libLLVMFuzzer.a library.
Necessary when modifying CFLAGS for projects which may produce
executables as well as a fuzzable target.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D36600
llvm-svn: 310733
Also comes with a cmake cache for building the runtime bits:
$ cmake <normal cmake flags> \
-DBAREMETAL_ARMV6M_SYSROOT=/path/to/sysroot \
-DBAREMETAL_ARMV7M_SYSROOT=/path/to/sysroot \
-DBAREMETAL_ARMV7EM_SYSROOT=/path/to/sysroot \
-C /path/to/clang/cmake/caches/BaremetalARM.cmake \
/path/to/llvm
https://reviews.llvm.org/D33259
llvm-svn: 303873
Previously, adding libfuzzer to a project was a multi-step procedure,
involving libfuzzer compilation, linking the library, and specifying
coverage flags.
With this change,libfuzzer can be enabled by adding a single
-fsanitize=fuzzer flag instead.
llvm-svn: 301212
Summary:
(This is a move-only refactoring patch. There are no functionality changes.)
This patch splits apart the Clang driver's tool and toolchain implementation
files. Each target platform toolchain is moved to its own file, along with the
closest-related tools. Each target platform toolchain has separate headers and
implementation files, so the hierarchy of classes is unchanged.
There are some remaining shared free functions, mostly from Tools.cpp. Several
of these move to their own architecture-specific files, similar to r296056. Some
of them are only used by a single target platform; since the tools and
toolchains are now together, some helpers now live in a platform-specific file.
The balance are helpers related to manipulating argument lists, so they are now
in a new file pair, CommonArgs.h and .cpp.
I've tried to cluster the code logically, which is fairly straightforward for
most of the target platforms and shared architectures. I think I've made
reasonable choices for these, as well as the various shared helpers; but of
course, I'm happy to hear feedback in the review.
There are some particular things I don't like about this patch, but haven't been
able to find a better overall solution. The first is the proliferation of files:
there are several files that are tiny because the toolchain is not very
different from its base (usually the Gnu tools/toolchain). I think this is
mostly a reflection of the true complexity, though, so it may not be "fixable"
in any reasonable sense. The second thing I don't like are the includes like
"../Something.h". I've avoided this largely by clustering into the current file
structure. However, a few of these includes remain, and in those cases it
doesn't make sense to me to sink an existing file any deeper.
Reviewers: rsmith, mehdi_amini, compnerd, rnk, javed.absar
Subscribers: emaste, jfb, danalbert, srhines, dschuff, jyknight, nemanjai, nhaehnle, mgorny, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D30372
llvm-svn: 297250
Petr Hosek