Summary:
This seems like an obvious error - cut and paste issue?
The change does make a change to one of the lit tests - it stops s_buffer_load
re-ordering past an MUBUF instruction (which is not surprising).
Change-Id: I80be99de5b62af4f42e91af2591b76a52ac9efa6
Subscribers: arsenm, kzhuravl, jvesely, wdng, nhaehnle, yaxunl, tpr, t-tye, hiraditya, kerbowa, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D75686
Summary:
Making `Scale` a `TypeSize` in AArch64InstrInfo::getMemOpInfo,
has the effect that all places where this information is used
(notably, TargetInstrInfo::getMemOperandWithOffset) will need
to consider Scale - and derived, Offset - possibly being scalable.
This patch adds a new operand `bool &OffsetIsScalable` to
TargetInstrInfo::getMemOperandWithOffset and fixes up all
the places where this function is used, to consider the
offset possibly being scalable.
In most cases, this means bailing out because the algorithm does not
(or cannot) support scalable offsets in places where it does some
form of alias checking for example.
Reviewers: rovka, efriedma, kristof.beyls
Reviewed By: efriedma
Subscribers: wuzish, kerbowa, MatzeB, arsenm, nemanjai, jvesely, nhaehnle, hiraditya, kbarton, javed.absar, asb, rbar, johnrusso, simoncook, sabuasal, niosHD, jrtc27, MaskRay, zzheng, edward-jones, rogfer01, MartinMosbeck, brucehoult, the_o, PkmX, jocewei, jsji, Jim, lenary, s.egerton, pzheng, sameer.abuasal, apazos, luismarques, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D72758
Based on D72931
This adds a new feature called A16 which is enabled for gfx10.
gfx9 keeps the R128A16 feature so it can share all the instruction encodings
with gfx7/8.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D73956
We are using countPopulation on a LaneBitmask to determine
a number of registers it covers. This is the assumption which
does not necessarily need to be true. It is not changed but
factored into a single call SIRegisterInfo::getNumCoveredRegs().
Some other places are cleaned up with respect to assumptions
about subreg indexes values and tablegen behavior.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D74177
SIMachineScheduler uses isHighLatencyInstruction with the same
sematincs, but TargetInstrInfo has virtual isHighLatencyDef
method, so override it instead.
Added FLAT to the list of high latency opcodes and a check for
mayLoad since stores are not technically high latency in terms
of data dependency.
This change did not produce any visible impact on our tests.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D73582
Summary:
This removes a couple of unnecessary isReg checks, now that
memOpsHaveSameBasePtr can handle FI operands, but is otherwise NFC.
Reviewers: arsenm, rampitec
Subscribers: kzhuravl, jvesely, wdng, nhaehnle, yaxunl, dstuttard, tpr, t-tye, hiraditya, kerbowa, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D73485
Summary:
This is in preparation for getMemOperandsWithOffset returning more base
operands.
Depends on D73455.
Reviewers: arsenm, rampitec
Subscribers: kzhuravl, jvesely, wdng, nhaehnle, yaxunl, dstuttard, tpr, t-tye, hiraditya, kerbowa, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D73456
Summary:
This is in preparation for getMemOperandsWithOffset returning more base
operands.
Depends on D73454.
Reviewers: arsenm, rampitec
Subscribers: kzhuravl, jvesely, wdng, nhaehnle, yaxunl, dstuttard, tpr, t-tye, hiraditya, kerbowa, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D73455
Scheduler sends NumLoads argument into shouldClusterMemOps()
one less the actual cluster length. So for 2 instructions
it will pass just 1. Correct this number.
This is NFC for in tree targets.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D73292
We are relying on atrificial DAG edges inserted by the
MemOpClusterMutation to keep loads and stores together in the
post-RA scheduler. This does not work all the time since it
allows to schedule a completely independent instruction in the
middle of the cluster.
Removed the DAG mutation and added pass to bundle already
clustered instructions. These bundles are unpacked before the
memory legalizer because it does not work with bundles but also
because it allows to insert waitcounts in the middle of a store
cluster.
Removing artificial edges also allows a more relaxed scheduling.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D72737
The generic BaseMemOpClusterMutation calls into TargetInstrInfo to
analyze the address of each load/store instruction, and again to decide
whether two instructions should be clustered. Previously this had to
represent each address as a single base operand plus a constant byte
offset. This patch extends it to support any number of base operands.
The old target hook getMemOperandWithOffset is now a convenience
function for callers that are only prepared to handle a single base
operand. It calls the new more general target hook
getMemOperandsWithOffset.
The only requirements for the base operands returned by
getMemOperandsWithOffset are:
- they can be sorted by MemOpInfo::Compare, such that clusterable ops
get sorted next to each other, and
- shouldClusterMemOps knows what they mean.
One simple follow-on is to enable clustering of AMDGPU FLAT instructions
with both vaddr and saddr (base register + offset register). I've left
a FIXME in the code for this case.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71655
In GlobalISel we may in some unfortunate circumstances generate PHIs with
operands that are on separate banks. If-conversion doesn't currently check for
that case and ends up generating a CSEL on AArch64 with incorrect register
operands.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D72961
a785209bc2 switched to using a pseudos instead of manually tying
operands on the regular instruction. The VGPR indexing mode path
should have the same problems that change attempted to avoid, so these
should use the same strategy.
Use a single pseudo for the VGPR indexing mode and movreld paths, and
expand it based on the subtarget later. These have essentially the
same constraints, reading the index from m0.
Switch from using an offset to the subregister index directly, instead
of computing an offset and re-adding it back. Also add missing pseudos
for existing register class sizes.
We do not have InstrItinerary so generic getInstLatency() was always
defaulting to return 1 cycle. We need to use TargetSchedModel instead
to compute an instruction's latency.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D72655
Summary:
The typo has been present since memOpsHaveSameBasePtr was introduced in
r313208.
It caused SIInstrInfo::shouldClusterMemOps to cluster more mem ops than
it was supposed to.
Subscribers: arsenm, kzhuravl, jvesely, wdng, nhaehnle, yaxunl, dstuttard, tpr, t-tye, hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71616
This fixes an assertion failure that triggers inside
getMemOperandWithOffset when Machine Sinking calls it on a MachineInstr
that is not a memory operation.
Different backends implement getMemOperandWithOffset differently: some
return false on non-memory MachineInstrs, others assert.
The Machine Sinking pass in at least SinkingPreventsImplicitNullCheck
relies on getMemOperandWithOffset to return false on non-memory
MachineInstrs, instead of asserting.
This patch updates the documentation on getMemOperandWithOffset that it
should return false on any MachineInstr it cannot handle, instead of
asserting. It also adapts the in-tree backends accordingly where
necessary.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71359
Summary:
Pre gfx9 we need to scavenge a 64-bit SGPR to use as the carry out for an Add.
If only one SGPR was available this crashed when trying to scavenge another
32bit SGPR to materialize the offset.
Instead, reuse a 32-bit SGPR from the carry out as the offset register.
Also prefer to use vcc for the unused carry out when it is available.
Reviewers: arsenm, rampitec
Subscribers: kzhuravl, jvesely, wdng, nhaehnle, yaxunl, dstuttard, tpr, t-tye, hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D70614
These opcodes use indirect register addressing so they need special handling by codegen (currently missing).
Reviewers: vpykhtin, arsenm, rampitec
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D70400
The usage of target boolean checks is overly inflexible, since sext
and zext of a compare are equally cheap. The choice is arbitrary, but
using 0/1 to some degree is the choice of lower resistance since
that's what most targets use. This enables a few combines that don't
bother to support ZeroOrNegativeOneBooleanContent.
readlane and writelane instructions are not allowed to use m0 as the
data operand, so spilling them is tricky and would require an
intermediate SGPR to spill it. Constrain the virtual register class in
this caes to disallow the inline spiller from folding the m0 operand
directly into the spill instruction.
I copied this hack from AArch64 which has the same problem for $sp.
That used to fail in the last testcase function because after
%0:sreg_64.sub0 was folded into %3:sreg_32_xm0_xexec COPY, it
was further folded into S_STORE_DWORD_IMM. Its legal effective
subreg class is SReg_32 while instruction expects more restricted
SReg_32_XM0_EXEC. However, SIInstrInfo::isLegalRegOperand()
passed the legality check and it was caught in the verifier.
Borrowed code from the verifier to check for RC legality.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D69445
Summary:
In loadSRsrcFromVGPR, if MBB is the same as Succ, Remiander is not the immediate dominator of Succ.
Reviewer:
arsenm
Differential Revision:
https://reviews.llvm.org/D69358
r375293 removed the SGPR spilling with scalar stores path, so this is
no longer necessary. This also always had the defect of adding the def
even when this path wasn't in use.
llvm-svn: 375448
If a PHI defines AGPR legalize its operands to AGPR.
At the moment we can get an AGPR PHI with VGPR operands.
I am not aware of any problems as it seems to be handled
gracefully in RA, but this is not right anyway.
It also slightly decreases VGPR pressure in some cases
because we do not have to a copy via VGPR.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D69206
llvm-svn: 375446
We handle it this way for some other address spaces.
Since r349196, SILoadStoreOptimizer has been trying to do this. This
is after SIFoldOperands runs, which can change the addressing
patterns. It's simpler to just split this earlier.
llvm-svn: 375366
Mostly use SReg_32 instead of SReg_32_XM0 for arbitrary values. This
will allow the register coalescer to do a better job eliminating
copies to m0.
For GlobalISel, as a terrible hack, use SGPR_32 for things that should
use SCC until booleans are solved.
llvm-svn: 375267
Summary:
Even though writelane doesn't have the same constraints as other valu
instructions it still can't violate the >1 SGPR operand constraint
Due to later register propagation (e.g. fixing up vgpr operands via
readfirstlane) changing writelane to only have a single SGPR is tricky.
This implementation puts a new check after SIFixSGPRCopies that prevents
multiple SGPRs being used in any writelane instructions.
The algorithm used is to check for trivial copy prop of suitable constants into
one of the SGPR operands and perform that if possible. If this isn't possible
put an explicit copy of Src1 SGPR into M0 and use that instead (this is
allowable for writelane as the constraint is for SGPR read-port and not
constant-bus access).
Reviewers: rampitec, tpr, arsenm, nhaehnle
Reviewed By: rampitec, arsenm, nhaehnle
Subscribers: arsenm, kzhuravl, jvesely, wdng, nhaehnle, mgorny, yaxunl, tpr, t-tye, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D51932
Change-Id: Ic7553fa57440f208d4dbc4794fc24345d7e0e9ea
llvm-svn: 375004
Summary:
Two conditions could lead to infinite loops when processing PHI nodes in
SIFixSGPRCopies.
The first condition involves a REG_SEQUENCE that uses registers defined by both
a PHI and a COPY.
The second condition arises when a physical register is copied to a virtual
register which is then used in a PHI node. If the same virtual register is
copied to the same physical register, the result is an endless loop.
%0:sgpr_64 = COPY $sgpr0_sgpr1
%2 = PHI %0, %bb.0, %1, %bb.1
$sgpr0_sgpr1 = COPY %0
Reviewers: alex-t, rampitec, arsenm
Reviewed By: rampitec
Subscribers: kzhuravl, jvesely, wdng, nhaehnle, yaxunl, dstuttard, tpr, t-tye, hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D68970
llvm-svn: 374944
We define mov/update dpp intrinsics as overloaded but do not
support i64, which is a practically useful type. Fix the
selection and lowering.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D68673
llvm-svn: 374910
SGPR_128 only includes the real allocatable SGPRs, and SReg_128 adds
the additional non-allocatable TTMP registers. There's no point in
allocating SReg_128 vregs. This shrinks the size of the classes
regalloc needs to consider, which is usually good.
llvm-svn: 374284
Allows targets to introduce regbankselectable
pseudo-instructions. Currently the closet feature to this is an
intrinsic. However this requires creating a public intrinsic
declaration. This litters the public intrinsic namespace with
operations we don't necessarily want to expose to IR producers, and
would rather leave as private to the backend.
Use a new instruction bit. A previous attempt tried to keep using enum
value ranges, but it turned into a mess.
llvm-svn: 373937
When SIFixSGPRCopies attempts to fix an illegal copy from vector to
scalar register it calls moveToVALU(). A copy from an agpr to sgpr
becomes a copy from agpr to agpr, which may result in the illegal
register class at a use of this copy.
Solution is to copy it always into a vgpr. This may result in a
subsequent copy into an agpr if that is what really needed, however
should not happen too often and likely will be folded later.
The opposite situation may not happen because an sgpr is always
illegal where agpr is legal, so such user instructions may not
exist.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D68358
llvm-svn: 373544
Summary:
Extend cachepolicy operand in the new VMEM buffer intrinsics
to supply information whether the buffer data is swizzled.
Also, propagate this information to MIR.
Intrinsics updated:
int_amdgcn_raw_buffer_load
int_amdgcn_raw_buffer_load_format
int_amdgcn_raw_buffer_store
int_amdgcn_raw_buffer_store_format
int_amdgcn_raw_tbuffer_load
int_amdgcn_raw_tbuffer_store
int_amdgcn_struct_buffer_load
int_amdgcn_struct_buffer_load_format
int_amdgcn_struct_buffer_store
int_amdgcn_struct_buffer_store_format
int_amdgcn_struct_tbuffer_load
int_amdgcn_struct_tbuffer_store
Furthermore, disable merging of VMEM buffer instructions
in SI Load/Store optimizer, if the "swizzled" bit on the instruction
is on.
The default value of the bit is 0, meaning that data in buffer
is linear and buffer instructions can be merged.
There is no difference in the generated code with this commit.
However, in the future it will be expected that front-ends
use buffer intrinsics with correct "swizzled" bit set.
Reviewers: arsenm, nhaehnle, tpr
Reviewed By: nhaehnle
Subscribers: arsenm, kzhuravl, jvesely, wdng, nhaehnle, yaxunl, dstuttard, tpr, t-tye, arphaman, jfb, Petar.Avramovic, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D68200
llvm-svn: 373491
Neither the base implementation of findCommutedOpIndices nor any in-tree target modifies the instruction passed in and there is no reason why they would in the future.
Committed on behalf of @hvdijk (Harald van Dijk)
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D66138
llvm-svn: 372882
This was relying on the SGPR usable for the carry out clobber to also
be used for the input. There was no carry out on gfx9. With no carry
out clobber to worry about, so the literal can just be directly used
with a VOP2 add.
llvm-svn: 371791
David Stuttard