Create the MemoryAccesses of invariant loads separately and before
all other MemoryAccesses.
Invariant loads are classified as synthesizable and therefore are not
contained in any statement. When iterating over all instructions of all
statements, the invariant loads are consequently not processed and
iterating over them separately becomes necessary.
This patch can change the order in which MemoryAccesses are created, but
otherwise has no functional change.
Some temporary code is introduced to ensure correctness, but will be
removed in the next commit.
llvm-svn: 314664
Instructions that compute escaping values might be synthesizable and
therefore not contained in any ScopStmt. When buildAccessFunctions is
changed to only iterate over the instruction list of statement,
"free" instructions still need to be written. We do this after the
main MemoryAccesses have been created.
This can change the order in which MemoryAccesses are created, but has
otherwise no functional change.
llvm-svn: 314663
In case a PHI node follows an error block we can assume that the incoming value
can only come from the node that is not an error block. As a result, conditions
that seemed non-affine before are now in fact affine.
This is a recommit of r312663 after fixing
test/Isl/CodeGen/phi_after_error_block_outside_of_scop.ll
llvm-svn: 314075
Such RTCs may introduce integer wrapping intrinsics with more than 64 bit,
which are translated to library calls on AOSP that are not part of the
runtime and will consequently cause linker errors.
Thanks to Eli Friedman for reporting this issue and reducing the test case.
llvm-svn: 314065
This reverts commit
r312410 - [ScopDetect/Info] Look through PHIs that follow an error block
The commit caused generation of invalid IR due to accessing a parameter
that does not dominate the SCoP.
llvm-svn: 312663
In case a PHI node follows an error block we can assume that the incoming value
can only come from the node that is not an error block. As a result, conditions
that seemed non-affine before are now in fact affine.
llvm-svn: 312410
Mark scalar dependences for different statements belonging to same BB
as 'Inter'.
Contributed-by: Nandini Singhal <cs15mtech01004@iith.ac.in>
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D37147
llvm-svn: 312324
By using statement lists in the entry blocks of region statements, instruction
level analyses also work on region statements.
We currently only model the entry block of a region statements, as this is
sufficient for most transformations the known-passes currently execute. Modeling
instructions in the presence of control flow (e.g. infinite loops) is left
out to not increase code complexity too much. It can be added when good use
cases are found.
This change set is reapplied, after a memory corruption issue had been fixed.
llvm-svn: 312210
By using statement lists in the entry blocks of region statements, instruction
level analyses also work on region statements.
We currently only model the entry block of a region statements, as this is
sufficient for most transformations the known-passes currently execute. Modeling
instructions in the presence of control flow (e.g. infinite loops) is left
out to not increase code complexity too much. It can be added when good use
cases are found.
llvm-svn: 312128
This patch allows annotating of metadata in ir instruction
(with "polly_split_after"), which specifies where to split a particular
scop statement.
Contributed-by: Nandini Singhal <cs15mtech01004@iith.ac.in>
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D36402
llvm-svn: 312107
Dragonegg generates most function parameters as pointers to the actual
parameters. However, it does not mark these parameters with the
dereferencable attribute.
Polly is conservative when it comes to invariant load
hoisting, thus we add runtime checks to invariant load hoisted pointers
when we do not know that pointers are dereferencable. This is correct behaviour,
but is a performance penalty.
Add a flag that allows all pointer parameters to be dereferencable. That
way, polly can speculatively load-hoist paramters to functions without
runtime checks.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D36461
llvm-svn: 311329
In the following loop:
int i;
for (i = 0; i < func(); i+=1)
;
SCoP:
for (int j = 0; j<n; j+=1)
S(i, j)
The value i is synthesizable in the SCoP that includes only the j-loop.
This is because i is fixed within the SCoP, it is irrelevant whether
it originates from another loop.
This fixes a strange case where a PHI was synthesiable in a SCoP,
but not its incoming value, triggering an assertion.
This should fix MultiSource/Applications/sgefa/sgefa of the
perf-x86_64-penryn-O3-polly-before-vectorizer-unprofitable buildbot.
llvm-svn: 309109
Summary:
For the ScopInfo lit testsuite, this patch removes some dependences on output behaviour of the legacy PM.
In most cases, these tests checked the tool output for labels created by the pass printer in the legacy PM. This doesn't work for the new PM anymore. Untangling the testcases is the first step to porting the testsuite for the new PM infrastructure.
Reviewers: grosser, Meinersbur, bollu
Reviewed By: grosser
Subscribers: llvm-commits, pollydev
Tags: #polly
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D35727
llvm-svn: 308754
When performing invariant load hoisting we check that invariant load expressions
are not too complex. Up to this commit, we performed this check by counting the
sum of dimensions in the access range as a very simple heuristic. This heuristic
is a little too conservative, as it prevents hoisting for any scops with a
very large number of parameters. Hence, we update the heuristic to only count
existentially quantified dimensions and set dimensions. We expect this to still
detect the problematic expressions in h264 because of which this check was
originally introduced.
For some unknown reason, this complexity check was originally committed in
IslNodeBuilder. It really belongs in ScopInfo, as there is no point in
optimizing a program which we could have known earlier cannot be code generated.
The benefit of running the check early is that we can avoid to even hoist checks
that are expensive to code generate as invariant loads. This can be seen in
the changed tests, where we now indeed detect the scop, but just not invariant
load hoist the complicated access.
We also improve the formatting of the code, document it, and use isl++ to
simplify expressions.
llvm-svn: 308659
This is one possible solution to implement wrap-arounds for integers in
unsigned icmp operations. For example,
store i32 -1, i32* %A_addr
%0 = load i32, i32* %A_addr
%1 = icmp ult i32 %0, 0
%1 should hold false, because under the assumption of unsigned integers,
-1 should wrap around to 2^32-1. However, previously. it was assumed
that the MSB (Most Significant Bit - aka the Sign bit) was never set for
integers in unsigned operations.
This patch modifies the buildConditionSets function in ScopInfo.cpp to
give better information about the integers in these unsigned
comparisons.
Contributed-by: Annanay Agarwal <cs14btech11001@iith.ac.in>
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D35464
llvm-svn: 308608
Utilizing newer LLVM diagnostic remark API in order to enable use of
opt-viewer tool. Polly Diagnostic Remarks also now appear in YAML
remark file.
In this patch, I've added the OptimizationRemarkEmitter into certain
classes where remarks are being emitted and update the remark emit calls
itself. I also provide each remark a BasicBlock or Instruction from where
it is being called, in order to compute the hotness of the remark.
Patch by Tarun Rajendran!
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D35399
llvm-svn: 308233
We need to relax constraints on invariant loads so that they do not
create fake RAW dependences. So, we do not consider invariant loads as
scalar dependences in a region.
During these changes, it turned out that we do not consider `llvm::Value`
replacements correctly within `PPCGCodeGeneration` and `ISLNodeBuilder`.
The replacements dictated by `ValueMap` were not being followed in all
places. This was fixed in this commit. There is no clean way to decouple
this change because this bug only seems to arise when the relaxed
version of invariant load hoisting was enabled.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D35120
llvm-svn: 307907
This test fails, if polly is not linked into LLVM's tools. Our
lit site-config already deals with this by not adding the -load
option, if polly is linked into LLVM's tools.
llvm-svn: 306395
This reduces the compilation time of one reduced test case from Android from
16 seconds to 100 mseconds (we bail out), without negatively impacting any
other test case we currently have.
We still saw occasionally compilation timeouts on the AOSP buildbot. Hopefully,
those will go away with this change.
llvm-svn: 306235
r303971 added an assertion that SCEV addition involving an AddRec
and a SCEVUnknown must involve a dominance relation: either the
SCEVUnknown value dominates the AddRec's loop, or the AddRec's
loop header dominates the SCEVUnknown. This is generally fine
for most usage of SCEV because it isn't possible to write an
expression in IR which would violate it, but it's a bit inconvenient
here for polly.
To solve the issue, just avoid creating a SCEV expression which
triggers the asssertion.
I'm not really happy with this solution, but I don't have any better
ideas.
Fixes https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=33464.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D34259
llvm-svn: 305864
In r304074 we introduce a patch to accept results from side effect free
functions into SCEV modeling. This causes rejection of cases where the
call is happening outside the SCoP. This patch checks if the call is
outside the Region and treats the results as a parameter (SCEVType::PARAM)
to the SCoP instead of returning SCEVType::INVALID.
Patch by Sameer Abu Asal.
llvm-svn: 305423
Ignored intrinsics are ignored at code generation, therefore do not
need to be part of the instruction list.
Specifically, llvm.lifetime.* intrinisics are removed before code
generation, referencing them would cause a use-after-free error.
Contributed-by: Nandini Singhal <cs15mtech01004@iith.ac.in>
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D33768
llvm-svn: 304483
Such instructions are generates on-demand by the CodeGenerator and thus
do not need representation in a statement.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D33642
llvm-svn: 304151
Certain affine memory accesses which we model today might contain products of
parameters which we might combined into a new parameter to be able to create an
affine expression that represents these memory accesses. Especially in the
context of OpenCL, this approach looses information as memory accesses such as
A[get_global_id(0) * N + get_global_id(1)] are assumed to be linear. We
correctly recover their multi-dimensional structure by assuming that parameters
that are the result of a function call at IR level likely are not parameters,
but indeed induction variables. The resulting access is now
A[get_global_id(0)][get_global_id(1)] for an array A[][N].
llvm-svn: 304075
Side-effect free function calls with only constant parameters can be easily
re-generated and consequently do not prevent us from modeling a SCEV. This
change allows array subscripts to reference function calls such as
'get_global_id()' as used in OpenCL.
We use the function name plus the constant operands to name the parameter. This
is possible as the function name is required and is not dropped in release
builds the same way names of llvm::Values are dropped. We also provide more
readable names for common OpenCL functions, to make it easy to understand the
polyhedral model we generate.
llvm-svn: 304074
Summary: This patch outputs all the list of instructions in BlockStmts.
Reviewers: Meinersbur, grosser, bollu
Subscribers: bollu, llvm-commits, pollydev
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D33163
llvm-svn: 304062
Summary:
My goal is to make the newly added `AllowWholeFunctions` options more usable/powerful.
The changes to ScopBuilder.cpp are exclusively checks to prevent `Region.getExit()` from being dereferenced, since Top Level Regions (TLRs) don't have an exit block.
In ScopDetection's `isValidCFG`, I removed a check that disallowed ReturnInstructions to have return values. This might of course have been intentional, so I would welcome your feedback on this and maybe a small explanation why return values are forbidden. Maybe it can be done but needs more changes elsewhere?
The remaining changes in ScopDetection are simply to consider the AllowWholeFunctions option in more places, i.e. allow TLRs when it is set and once again avoid derefererncing `getExit()` if it doesn't exist.
Finally, in ScopHelper.cpp I extended `polly::isErrorBlock` to handle regions without exit blocks as well: The original check was if a given BasicBlock dominates all predecessors of the exit block. Therefore I do the same for TLRs by regarding all BasicBlocks terminating with a ReturnInst as predecessors of a "virtual" function exit block.
Patch by: Lukas Boehm
Reviewers: philip.pfaffe, grosser, Meinersbur
Reviewed By: grosser
Subscribers: pollydev, llvm-commits, bollu
Tags: #polly
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D33411
llvm-svn: 303790
This speeds up scop modeling for scops with many redundent existentially
quantified constraints. For the attached test case, this change reduces
scop modeling time from minutes (hours?) to 0.15 seconds.
This change resolves a compilation timeout on the AOSP build.
Thanks Eli for reporting _and_ reducing the test case!
Reported-by: Eli Friedman <efriedma@codeaurora.org>
llvm-svn: 303600
- We use the outermost dimension of arrays since we need this
information to generate GPU transfers.
- In general, if we do not know the outermost dimension of the array
(because the indexing expression is non-affine, for example) then we
simply cannot generate transfer code.
- However, for Fortran arrays, we can use the Fortran array
representation which stores the dimensions of all arrays.
- This patch uses the Fortran array representation to generate code that
computes the outermost dimension size.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D32967
llvm-svn: 303429
Summary:
- Rename global / local naming convention that did not make much sense
to Visible / Invisible, where the visible refers to whether the ALLOCATE
call to the Fortran array is present in the current module or not.
- This match now works on both cross fortran module globals and on
parameters to functions since neither of them are necessarily allocated
at the point of their usage.
- Add testcase that matches against both a load and a store against
function parameters.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D33190
llvm-svn: 303356
- This breaks the previous assumption that Fortran Arrays are `GlobalValue`.
- The names of functions were getting unwieldy. So, I renamed the
Fortran related functions.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D33075
llvm-svn: 303040
- Move the testcases to ScopInfo/ since the processing takes place in
ScopBuilder.
- Cleanup testcases, run -polly-canonicalize on them, find minimal set
of opt parameters.
llvm-svn: 302886
Summary:
In case two arrays share base pointers in the same invariant load equivalence
class, we canonicalize all memory accesses to the first of these arrays
(according to their order in the equivalence class).
This enables us to optimize kernels such as boost::ublas by ensuring that
different references to the C array are interpreted as accesses to the same
array. Before this change the runtime alias check for ublas would fail, as it
would assume models of the C array with differing (but identically valued) base
pointers would reference distinct regions of memory whereas the referenced
memory regions were indeed identical.
As part of this change we remove most of the MemoryAccess::get*BaseAddr
interface. We removed already all references to get*BaseAddr in previous
commits to ensure that no code relies on matching base pointers between
memory accesses and scop arrays -- except for three remaining uses where we
need the original base pointer. We document for these situations that
MemoryAccess::getOriginalBaseAddr may return a base pointer that is distinct
to the base pointer of the scop array referenced by this memory access.
Reviewers: sebpop, Meinersbur, zinob, gareevroman, pollydev, huihuiz, efriedma, jdoerfert
Reviewed By: Meinersbur
Subscribers: etherzhhb
Tags: #polly
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D28518
llvm-svn: 302636
SCoPs with unfeasible runtime context are thrown away and therefore
do not need their uses verified.
The added test case requires a complexity limit to exceed.
Normally, error statements are removed from the SCoP and for that
reason are skipped during the verification. If there is a unfeasible
runtime context (here: because of the complexity limit being reached),
the removal of error statements and other SCoP construction steps are
skipped to not waste time. Error statements are not modeled in SCoPs
and therefore have no requirements on whether the scalars used in
them are available.
llvm-svn: 302234
Since r294891, in MemoryAccess::computeBoundsOnAccessRelation(), we skip
manually bounding the access relation in case the parameter of the load
instruction is already a wrapped set. Later on we assume that the lower
bound on the set is always smaller or equal to the upper bound on the
set. Bug 32715 manages to construct a sign wrapped set, in which case
the assertion does not necessarily hold. Fix this by handling a sign
wrapped set similar to a normal wrapped set, that is skipping the
computation.
Contributed-by: Maximilian Falkenstein <falkensm@student.ethz.ch>
Reviewers: grosser
Subscribers: pollydev, llvm-commits
Tags: #Polly
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D32893
llvm-svn: 302231
LLVM-IR names are commonly available in debug builds, but often not in release
builds. Hence, using LLVM-IR names to identify statements or memory reference
results makes the behavior of Polly depend on the compile mode. This is
undesirable. Hence, we now just number the statements instead of using LLVM-IR
names to identify them (this issue has previously been brought up by Zino
Benaissa).
However, as LLVM-IR names help in making test cases more readable, we add an
option '-polly-use-llvm-names' to still use LLVM-IR names. This flag is by
default set in the polly tests to make test cases more readable.
This change reduces the time in ScopInfo from 32 seconds to 2 seconds for the
following test case provided by Eli Friedman <efriedma@codeaurora.org> (already
used in one of the previous commits):
struct X { int x; };
void a();
#define SIG (int x, X **y, X **z)
typedef void (*fn)SIG;
#define FN { for (int i = 0; i < x; ++i) { (*y)[i].x += (*z)[i].x; } a(); }
#define FN5 FN FN FN FN FN
#define FN25 FN5 FN5 FN5 FN5
#define FN125 FN25 FN25 FN25 FN25 FN25
#define FN250 FN125 FN125
#define FN1250 FN250 FN250 FN250 FN250 FN250
void x SIG { FN1250 }
For a larger benchmark I have on-hand (10000 loops), this reduces the time for
running -polly-scops from 5 minutes to 4 minutes, a reduction by 20%.
The reason for this large speedup is that our previous use of printAsOperand
had a quadratic cost, as for each printed and unnamed operand the full function
was scanned to find the instruction number that identifies the operand.
We do not need to adjust the way memory reference ids are constructured, as
they do not use LLVM values.
Reviewed by: efriedma
Tags: #polly
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D32789
llvm-svn: 302072
This makes it easier to read and possibly even modify the test cases, as there
is no need to keep the variable increment in steps of one. More importantly, by
using explicit variable names we do not need to rely on the implicit numbering
of statements when dumping the scop information.
This makes it easier to read and possibly even modify the test cases.
Furthermore, by using explicit variables we do not need to rely on the implicit
numbering of statements when dumping the scop information. In a future commit,
this implicit numbering will likely not be used any more to refer to LLVM-IR
values as it is very expensive to construct.
llvm-svn: 301689
Trivial fix for two testcases. When Polly isn't linked into opt,
independent of whether it's built in-tree or not, these testcases forget
to load the appropriate library.
Contributed-by: Philip Pfaffe <philip.pfaffe@gmail.com>
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D31596
llvm-svn: 299357
In case LLVM pointers are annotated with !dereferencable attributes/metadata
or LLVM can look at the allocation from which a pointer is derived, we can know
that dereferencing pointers is safe and can be done unconditionally. We use this
information to proof certain pointers as save to hoist and then hoist them
unconditionally.
llvm-svn: 297375
Only when load-hoisted we can be sure the base pointer is invariant
during the SCoP's execution. Most of the time it would be added to
the required hoists for the alias checks anyway, except with
-polly-ignore-aliasing, -polly-use-runtime-alias-checks=0 or if
AliasAnalysis is already sure it doesn't alias with anything
(for instance if there is no other pointer to alias with).
Two more parts in Polly assume that this load-hoisting took place:
- setNewAccessRelation() which contains an assert which tests this.
- BlockGenerator which would use to the base ptr from the original
code if not load-hoisted (if the access expression is regenerated)
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D30694
llvm-svn: 297195
There is no point in optimizing unreachable code, hence our test cases should
always return.
This commit is part of a series that makes Polly more robust on the presence of
unreachables.
llvm-svn: 297158
These test cases should work in combination with
https://reviews.llvm.org/D12676, but became outdated over time. Update them
in preparation of discussions with Daniel Berlin on how to represent unreachable
in the post-dominator tree.
llvm-svn: 297157
There is no point in optimizing unreachable code, hence our test cases should
always return.
This commit is part of a series that makes Polly more robust on the presence of
unreachables.
llvm-svn: 297150
There is no point in optimizing unreachable code, hence our test cases should
always return.
This commit is part of a series that makes Polly more robust on the presence of
unreachables.
llvm-svn: 297147
r296992 made ScalarEvolution's CompareValueComplexity less aggressive,
and that broke the polly test being fixed in this change. This change
explicitly bumps CompareValueComplexity in said test case to make it
pass.
Can someone from the polly team please can give me an idea on if this
case is important enough to have
scalar-evolution-max-value-compare-depth be 3 by default?
llvm-svn: 296994
These loads cannot be savely hoisted as the condition guarding the
non-affine region cannot be duplicated to also protect the hoisted load
later on. Today they are dropped in ScopInfo. By checking for this early, we
do not even try to model them and possibly can still optimize smaller regions
not containing this specific required-invariant load.
llvm-svn: 296744
Multi-disjunct access maps can easily result in inbound assumptions which
explode in case of many memory accesses and many parameters. This change reduces
compilation time of some larger kernel from over 15 minutes to less than 16
seconds.
Interesting is the test case test/ScopInfo/multidim_param_in_subscript.ll
which has a memory access
[n] -> { Stmt_for_body3[i0, i1] -> MemRef_A[i0, -1 + n - i1] }
which requires folding, but where only a single disjunct remains. We can still
model this test case even when only using limited memory folding.
For people only reading commit messages, here the comment that explains what
memory folding is:
To recover memory accesses with array size parameters in the subscript
expression we post-process the delinearization results.
We would normally recover from an access A[exp0(i) * N + exp1(i)] into an
array A[][N] the 2D access A[exp0(i)][exp1(i)]. However, another valid
delinearization is A[exp0(i) - 1][exp1(i) + N] which - depending on the
range of exp1(i) - may be preferrable. Specifically, for cases where we
know exp1(i) is negative, we want to choose the latter expression.
As we commonly do not have any information about the range of exp1(i),
we do not choose one of the two options, but instead create a piecewise
access function that adds the (-1, N) offsets as soon as exp1(i) becomes
negative. For a 2D array such an access function is created by applying
the piecewise map:
[i,j] -> [i, j] : j >= 0
[i,j] -> [i-1, j+N] : j < 0
After this patch we generate only the first case, except for situations where
we can proove the first case to be invalid and can consequently select the
second without introducing disjuncts.
llvm-svn: 296679
Without this simplification for a loop nest:
void foo(long n1_a, long n1_b, long n1_c, long n1_d,
long p1_b, long p1_c, long p1_d,
float A_1[][p1_b][p1_c][p1_d]) {
for (long i = 0; i < n1_a; i++)
for (long j = 0; j < n1_b; j++)
for (long k = 0; k < n1_c; k++)
for (long l = 0; l < n1_d; l++)
A_1[i][j][k][l] += i + j + k + l;
}
the assumption:
n1_a <= 0 or (n1_a > 0 and n1_b <= 0) or
(n1_a > 0 and n1_b > 0 and n1_c <= 0) or
(n1_a > 0 and n1_b > 0 and n1_c > 0 and n1_d <= 0) or
(n1_a > 0 and n1_b > 0 and n1_c > 0 and n1_d > 0 and
p1_b >= n1_b and p1_c >= n1_c and p1_d >= n1_d)
is taken rather than the simpler assumption:
p9_b >= n9_b and p9_c >= n9_c and p9_d >= n9_d.
The former is less strict, as it allows arbitrary values of p1_* in case, the
loop is not executed at all. However, in practice these precise constraints
explode when combined across different accesses and loops. For now it seems
to make more sense to take less precise, but more scalable constraints by
default. In case we find a practical example where more precise constraints
are needed, we can think about allowing such precise constraints in specific
situations where they help.
This change speeds up the new test case from taking very long (waited at least
a minute, but it probably takes a lot more) to below a second.
llvm-svn: 296456
Instead of counting the number of read-only accesses, we now count the number of
distinct read-only array references when checking if a run-time alias check
may be too complex. The run-time alias check is quadratic in the number of
base pointers, not the number of accesses.
Before this change we accidentally skipped SPEC's lbm test case.
llvm-svn: 295567
Trying to fold such kind of dimensions will result in a division by zero,
which crashes the compiler. As such arrays are likely to invalidate the
scop anyhow (but are not illegal in LLVM-IR), there is no point in trying
to optimize the array layout. Hence, we just avoid the folding of
constant dimensions of size zero.
llvm-svn: 295415
Before this change wrapping range metadata resulted in exponential growth of
the context, which made context construction of large scops very slow. Instead,
we now just do not model the range information precisely, in case the number
of disjuncts in the context has already reached a certain limit.
llvm-svn: 295360
Commit r230230 introduced the use of range metadata to derive bounds for
parameters, instead of just looking at the type of the parameter. As part of
this commit support for wrapping ranges was added, where the lower bound of a
parameter is larger than the upper bound:
{ 255 < p || p < 0 }
However, at the same time, for wrapping ranges support for adding bounds given
by the size of the containing type has acidentally been dropped. As a result,
the range of the parameters was not guaranteed to be bounded any more. This
change makes sure we always add the bounds given by the size of the type and
then additionally add bounds based on signed wrapping, if available. For a
parameter p with a type size of 32 bit, the valid range is then:
{ -2147483648 <= p <= 2147483647 and (255 < p or p < 0) }
llvm-svn: 295349
When deriving the range of valid values of a scalar evolution expression might
be a range [12, 8), where the upper bound is smaller than the lower bound and
where the range is expected to possibly wrap around. We theoretically could
model such a range as a union of two non-wrapping ranges, but do not do this
as of yet. Instead, we just do not derive any bounds. Before this change,
we could have obtained bounds where the maximal possible value is strictly
smaller than the minimal possible value, which is incorrect and also caused
assertions during scop modeling.
llvm-svn: 294891
Before this change we created an additional reload in the copy of the incoming
block of a PHI node to reload the incoming value, even though the necessary
value has already been made available by the normally generated scalar loads.
In this change, we drop the code that generates this redundant reload and
instead just reuse the scalar value already available.
Besides making the generated code slightly cleaner, this change also makes sure
that scalar loads go through the normal logic, which means they can be remapped
(e.g. to array slots) and corresponding code is generated to load from the
remapped location. Without this change, the original scalar load at the
beginning of the non-affine region would have been remapped, but the redundant
scalar load would continue to load from the old PHI slot location.
It might be possible to further simplify the code in addOperandToPHI,
but this would not only mean to pull out getNewValue, but to also change the
insertion point update logic. As this did not work when trying it the first
time, this change is likely not trivial. To not introduce bugs last minute, we
postpone further simplications to a subsequent commit.
We also document the current behavior a little bit better.
Reviewed By: Meinersbur
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D28892
llvm-svn: 292486
This allows us to delinearize code such as the one below, where the array
sizes are A[][2 * n] as there are n times two elements in the innermost
dimension. Alternatively, we could try to generate another dimension for the
struct in the innermost dimension, but as the struct has constant size,
recovering this dimension is easy.
struct com {
double Real;
double Img;
};
void foo(long n, struct com A[][n]) {
for (long i = 0; i < 100; i++)
for (long j = 0; j < 1000; j++)
A[i][j].Real += A[i][j].Img;
}
int main() {
struct com A[100][1000];
foo(1000, A);
llvm-svn: 288489
We now collect:
Number of total loops
Number of loops in scops
Number of scops
Number of scops with maximal loop depth 1
Number of scops with maximal loop depth 2
Number of scops with maximal loop depth 3
Number of scops with maximal loop depth 4
Number of scops with maximal loop depth 5
Number of scops with maximal loop depth 6 and larger
Number of loops in scops (profitable scops only)
Number of scops (profitable scops only)
Number of scops with maximal loop depth 1 (profitable scops only)
Number of scops with maximal loop depth 2 (profitable scops only)
Number of scops with maximal loop depth 3 (profitable scops only)
Number of scops with maximal loop depth 4 (profitable scops only)
Number of scops with maximal loop depth 5 (profitable scops only)
Number of scops with maximal loop depth 6 and larger (profitable scops only)
These statistics are certainly completely accurate as we might drop scops
when building up their polyhedral representation, but they should give a good
indication of the number of scops we detect.
llvm-svn: 287973
Our original statistics were added before we introduced a more fine-grained
diagnostic system, but the granularity of our statistics has never been
increased accordingly. This change introduces now one statistic counter per
diagnostic to enable us to collect fine-grained statistics about who certain
scops are not detected. In case coarser grained statistics are needed, the
user is expected to combine counters manually.
llvm-svn: 287968
Do not assume a load to be hoistable/invariant if the pointer is used by
another instruction in the SCoP that might write to memory and that is
always executed.
llvm-svn: 287272
The validity of a branch condition must be verified at the location of the
branch (the branch instruction), not the location of the icmp that is
used in the branch instruction. When verifying at the wrong location, we
may accept an icmp that is defined within a loop which itself dominates, but
does not contain the branch instruction. Such loops cannot be modeled as
we only introduce domain dimensions for surrounding loops. To address this
problem we change the scop detection to evaluate and verify SCEV expressions at
the right location.
This issue has been around since at least r179148 "scop detection: properly
instantiate SCEVs to the place where they are used", where we explicitly
set the scope to the wrong location. Before this commit the scope
was not explicitly set, which probably also resulted in the scope around the
ICmp to be choosen.
This resolves http://llvm.org/PR30989
Reported-by: Eli Friedman <efriedma@codeaurora.org>
llvm-svn: 286769
Assumptions can either be added for a given basic block, in which case the set
describing the assumptions is expected to match the dimensions of its domain.
In case no basic block is provided a parameter-only set is expected to describe
the assumption.
The piecewise expressions that are generated by the SCEVAffinator sometimes
have a zero-dimensional domain (e.g., [p] -> { [] : p <= -129 or p >= 128 }),
which looks similar to a parameter-only domain, but is still a set domain.
This change adds an assert that checks that we always pass parameter domains to
addAssumptions if BB is empty to make mismatches here fail early.
We also change visitTruncExpr to always convert to parameter sets, if BB is
null. This change resolves http://llvm.org/PR30941
Another alternative to this change would have been to inspect all code to make
sure we directly generate in the SCEV affinator parameter sets in case of empty
domains. However, this would likely complicate the code which combines parameter
and non-parameter domains when constructing a statement domain. We might still
consider doing this at some point, but as this likely requires several non-local
changes this should probably be done as a separate refactoring.
Reported-by: Eli Friedman <efriedma@codeaurora.org>
llvm-svn: 286444
When extracting constant expressions out of SCEVs, new parameters may be
introduced, which have not been registered before. This change scans
SCEV expressions after constant extraction again to make sure newly
introduced parameters are registered.
We may for example extract the constant '8' from the expression '((8 * ((%a *
%b) + %c)) + (-8 * %a))' and obtain the expression '(((-1 + %b) * %a) + %c)'.
The new expression has a new parameter '(-1 + %b) * %a)', which was not
registered before, but must be registered to not crash.
This closes http://llvm.org/PR30953
Reported-by: Eli Friedman <efriedma@codeaurora.org>
llvm-svn: 286430
We don't actually check whether a MemoryAccess is affine in very many
places, but one important one is in checks for aliasing.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D25706
llvm-svn: 285746
When adding an llvm.memcpy instruction to AliasSetTracker, it uses the raw
source and target pointers which preserve bitcasts.
MemAccInst::getPointerOperand() also returns the raw target pointers, but
Scop::buildAliasGroups() did not for the source pointer. This lead to mismatches
between AliasSetTracker and ScopInfo on which pointer to use.
Fixed by also using raw pointers in Scop::buildAliasGroups().
llvm-svn: 285071
Integer math in LLVM IR is modular. Integer math in isl is
arbitrary-precision. Modeling LLVM IR math correctly in isl requires
either adding assumptions that math doesn't actually overflow, or
explicitly wrapping the math. However, expressions with the "nsw" flag
are special; we can pretend they're arbitrary-precision because it's
undefined behavior if the result wraps. SCEV expressions based on IR
instructions with an nsw flag also carry an nsw flag (roughly; actually,
the real rule is a bit more complicated, but the details don't matter
here).
Before this patch, SCEV flags were also overloaded with an additional
function: the ZExt code was mutating SCEV expressions as a hack to
indicate to checkForWrapping that we don't need to add assumptions to
the operand of a ZExt; it'll add explicit wrapping itself. This kind of
works... the problem is that if anything else ever touches that SCEV
expression, it'll get confused by the incorrect flags.
Instead, with this patch, we make the decision about whether to
explicitly wrap the math a bit earlier, basing the decision purely on
the SCEV expression itself, and not its users.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D25287
llvm-svn: 284848
Update test after commit r284501:
[SCEV] Make CompareValueComplexity a little bit smarter
Contributed-by: Sanjoy Das <sanjoy@playingwithpointers.com>
llvm-svn: 284543
The test non_affine_loop_used_later.ll also tests the profability heuristic. Add
the option -polly-unprofitable-scalar-accs explicitely to ensure that the test
succeeds if the default value is changed.
llvm-svn: 284338
Under some conditions MK_Value read accessed where converted to MK_ExitPHI read
accessed. This is unexpected because MK_ExitPHI read accesses are implicit after
the scop execution. This behaviour was introduced in r265261, which fixed a
failed assertion/crash in CodeGen.
Instead, we fix this failure in CodeGen itself. createExitPHINodeMerges(),
despite its name, also handles accesses of kind MK_Value, only to skip them
because they access values that are usually not PHI nodes in the SCoP region's
exit block. Except in the situation observed in r265261.
Do not convert value accessed to ExitPHI accesses and do not handle
value accesses like ExitPHI accessed in CodeGen anymore.
llvm-svn: 284023
With this option one can disable the heuristic that assumes that statements with
a scalar write access cannot be profitably optimized. Such a statement instances
necessarily have WAW-dependences to itself. With DeLICM scalar accesses can be
changed to array accesses, which can avoid these WAW-dependence.
llvm-svn: 283233
ScopArrayInfo used to determine base pointer origins by looking up whether the
base pointer is a load. The "base pointer" for scalar accesses is the
llvm::Value being accessed. This is only a symbolic base pointer, it
represents the alloca variable (.s2a or .phiops) generated for it at code
generation.
This patch disables determining base pointer origin for scalars.
A test case where this caused a crash will be added in the next commit. In that
test SAI tried to get the origin base pointer that was only declared later,
therefore not existing. This is probably only possible for scalars used in
PHINode incoming blocks.
llvm-svn: 283232
The existing code would add the operands in the wrong order, and eventually
crash because the SCEV expression doesn't exactly match the parameter SCEV
expression in SCEVAffinator::visit. (SCEV doesn't sort the operands to
getMulExpr in general.)
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D23592
llvm-svn: 279087
Normally this is ensured when adding PHI nodes, but as PHI node dependences
do not need to be added in case all incoming blocks are within the same
non-affine region, this was missed.
This corrects an issue visible in LNT's sqlite3, in case invariant load hoisting
was disabled.
llvm-svn: 278792
This will make it easier to switch the default of Polly's invariant load
hoisting strategy and also makes it very clear that these test cases
indeed require invariant code hoisting to work.
llvm-svn: 278667
After having generated the code for a ScopStmt, we run a simple dead-code
elimination that drops all instructions that are known to be and remain unused.
Until this change, we only considered instructions for dead-code elimination, if
they have a corresponding instruction in the original BB that belongs to
ScopStmt. However, when generating code we do not only copy code from the BB
belonging to a ScopStmt, but also generate code for operands referenced from BB.
After this change, we now also considers code for dead code elimination, which
does not have a corresponding instruction in BB.
This fixes a bug in Polly-ACC where such dead-code referenced CPU code from
within a GPU kernel, which is possible as we do not guarantee that all variables
that are used in known-dead-code are moved to the GPU.
llvm-svn: 278103
This ensures that no trivially dead code is generated. This is not only cleaner,
but also avoids troubles in case code is generated in a separate function and
some of this dead code contains references to values that are not available.
This issue may happen, in case the memory access functions have been updated
and old getelementptr instructions remain in the code. With normal Polly,
a test case is difficult to draft, but the upcoming GPU code generation can
possibly trigger such problems. We will later extend this dead-code elimination
to region and vector statements.
llvm-svn: 276263
Check not only that the compiler is not crashing, but also whether the
probablematic part (The sequence of instructions simplified to '4') is reflected
in the output.
Thanks to Tobias for the hint.
llvm-svn: 275189
An assertion in visitSDivInstruction() checked whether the divisor is constant
by checking whether the argument is a ConstantInt. However, SCEVValidator allows
the divisor to be simplified to a constant by ScalarEvolution.
We synchronize the implementation of SCEVValidator and SCEVAffinator to both
accept simplified SCEV expressions.
llvm-svn: 275174
For llvm the memory accesses from nonaffine loops should be visible,
however for polly those nonaffine loops should be invisible/boxed.
This fixes llvm.org/PR28245
Cointributed-by: Huihui Zhang <huihuiz@codeaurora.org>
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D21591
llvm-svn: 274842
Michael Kruse