`dispatch_async_and_wait()` was introduced in macOS 10.14. Let's
forward declare it to ensure we can compile the test with older SDKs and
guard execution by checking if the symbol is available. (We can't use
`__builtin_available()`, because that itself requires a higher minimum
deployment target.) We also need to specify the `-undefined
dynamic_lookup` compiler flag.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D85995
The linker errors caused by this revision have been addressed.
Add interceptors for `dispatch_async_and_wait[_f]()` which was added in
macOS 10.14. This pair of functions is similar to `dispatch_sync()`,
but does not force a context switch of the queue onto the caller thread
when the queue is active (and hence is more efficient). For TSan, we
can apply the same semantics as for `dispatch_sync()`.
From the header docs:
> Differences with dispatch_sync()
>
> When the runtime has brought up a thread to invoke the asynchronous
> workitems already submitted to the specified queue, that servicing
> thread will also be used to execute synchronous work submitted to the
> queue with dispatch_async_and_wait().
>
> However, if the runtime has not brought up a thread to service the
> specified queue (because it has no workitems enqueued, or only
> synchronous workitems), then dispatch_async_and_wait() will invoke the
> workitem on the calling thread, similar to the behaviour of functions
> in the dispatch_sync family.
Additional context:
> The guidance is to use `dispatch_async_and_wait()` instead of
> `dispatch_sync()` when it is necessary to mix async and sync calls on
> the same queue. `dispatch_async_and_wait()` does not guarantee
> execution on the caller thread which allows to reduce context switches
> when the target queue is active.
> https://gist.github.com/tclementdev/6af616354912b0347cdf6db159c37057
rdar://35757961
Reviewed By: kubamracek
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D85854
Add interceptors for `dispatch_async_and_wait[_f]()` which was added in
macOS 10.14. This pair of functions is similar to `dispatch_sync()`,
but does not force a context switch of the queue onto the caller thread
when the queue is active (and hence is more efficient). For TSan, we
can apply the same semantics as for `dispatch_sync()`.
From the header docs:
> Differences with dispatch_sync()
>
> When the runtime has brought up a thread to invoke the asynchronous
> workitems already submitted to the specified queue, that servicing
> thread will also be used to execute synchronous work submitted to the
> queue with dispatch_async_and_wait().
>
> However, if the runtime has not brought up a thread to service the
> specified queue (because it has no workitems enqueued, or only
> synchronous workitems), then dispatch_async_and_wait() will invoke the
> workitem on the calling thread, similar to the behaviour of functions
> in the dispatch_sync family.
Additional context:
> The guidance is to use `dispatch_async_and_wait()` instead of
> `dispatch_sync()` when it is necessary to mix async and sync calls on
> the same queue. `dispatch_async_and_wait()` does not guarantee
> execution on the caller thread which allows to reduce context switches
> when the target queue is active.
> https://gist.github.com/tclementdev/6af616354912b0347cdf6db159c37057
rdar://35757961
Reviewed By: kubamracek
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D85854
These lit configuration files are really Python source code. Using the
.py file extension helps editors and tools use the correct language
mode. LLVM and Clang already use this convention for lit configuration,
this change simply applies it to all of compiler-rt.
Reviewers: vitalybuka, dberris
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D63658
llvm-svn: 364591
Re-enable test that was disabled because it deadlocks when running on
the bot, but was never enabled again. Can't reproduce deadlock locally
so trying to investigate by re-enabling test.
llvm-svn: 360388
Summary:
Apparently, it makes a difference on where a block lives depending on if
it's passed "inline" versus assigned and then passed via a variable.
Both tests in this commit now give a signal, if `Block_copy` is used in
`dispatch_sync`.
Since these tests use different mechanisms (Objective-C retain versus
C++ copy constructor) as proxies to observe if the block was copied, we
should keep both of them.
Commit, that first avoided the unnecessary copy:
faef7d034a
Subscribers: kubamracek, #sanitizers, llvm-commits
Tags: #sanitizers, #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D60639
llvm-svn: 358469
I re-activated "broad strokes suppressions"
(ignore_noninstrumented_modules=1) in my last commit. Re-enable tests
that only fail on our bots to check if they work now.
llvm-svn: 358209
`--implicit-check-not='ThreadSanitizer'` checks in the entire output
while `// CHECK-NOT: ThreadSanitizer` only checks after (before) the
previous (next) match.
llvm-svn: 357727
Specify libdispatch header dir (include path) for lit tests. This is the
last missing piece in order to run the libdispatch tests on Linux even
when libdispatch is installed in a custom path instead of a default
(system) location.
llvm-svn: 357707
* Array index out of bounds: 100 iterations, but size of array is 2.
* Unmatched barrier_init (2) with barrier_wait (200)
* Number of iterations must be smaller than the available parallelism
for the queue, otherwise we deadlock (since every barrier_wait call
blocks the thread).
Scary: All of this worked reliably in gcd-apply.mm (for Darwin)
Rievewed By: kubamracek
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D59510
llvm-svn: 356418
Remove 'gcd' file prefix. GCD stands for Grand Central Dispatch, which
is another name for libdispatch.
https://apple.github.io/swift-corelibs-libdispatch/
Remove `REQUIRE: dispatch` from tests.
Also rename lit feature 'dispatch' -> 'libdispatch' to be more explicit
what this is about.
Reviewed By: kubamracek
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D59341
llvm-svn: 356202
Julian Lettner