Commit Graph

4 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Serge Pavlov d526b13e61 Add extra operand to CALLSEQ_START to keep frame part set up previously
Using arguments with attribute inalloca creates problems for verification
of machine representation. This attribute instructs the backend that the
argument is prepared in stack prior to  CALLSEQ_START..CALLSEQ_END
sequence (see http://llvm.org/docs/InAlloca.htm for details). Frame size
stored in CALLSEQ_START in this case does not count the size of this
argument. However CALLSEQ_END still keeps total frame size, as caller can
be responsible for cleanup of entire frame. So CALLSEQ_START and
CALLSEQ_END keep different frame size and the difference is treated by
MachineVerifier as stack error. Currently there is no way to distinguish
this case from actual errors.

This patch adds additional argument to CALLSEQ_START and its
target-specific counterparts to keep size of stack that is set up prior to
the call frame sequence. This argument allows MachineVerifier to calculate
actual frame size associated with frame setup instruction and correctly
process the case of inalloca arguments.

The changes made by the patch are:
- Frame setup instructions get the second mandatory argument. It
  affects all targets that use frame pseudo instructions and touched many
  files although the changes are uniform.
- Access to frame properties are implemented using special instructions
  rather than calls getOperand(N).getImm(). For X86 and ARM such
  replacement was made previously.
- Changes that reflect appearance of additional argument of frame setup
  instruction. These involve proper instruction initialization and
  methods that access instruction arguments.
- MachineVerifier retrieves frame size using method, which reports sum of
  frame parts initialized inside frame instruction pair and outside it.

The patch implements approach proposed by Quentin Colombet in
https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=27481#c1.
It fixes 9 tests failed with machine verifier enabled and listed
in PR27481.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D32394

llvm-svn: 302527
2017-05-09 13:35:13 +00:00
Krzysztof Parzyszek a540997ce4 [Hexagon] Separate Hexagon subreg indices for different register classes
For pairs of 32-bit registers: isub_lo, isub_hi.
For pairs of vector registers: vsub_lo, vsub_hi.

Add generic subreg indices: ps_sub_lo, ps_sub_hi, and a function
  HexagonRegisterInfo::getHexagonSubRegIndex(RegClass, GenericSubreg)
that returns the appropriate subreg index for RegClass.

llvm-svn: 286377
2016-11-09 16:19:08 +00:00
Matthias Braun 5dce48e0a7 Missed a test in my last commit
llvm-svn: 279679
2016-08-24 22:32:11 +00:00
Krzysztof Parzyszek a7ed090bba Create subranges for new intervals resulting from live interval splitting
The register allocator can split a live interval of a register into a set
of smaller intervals. After the allocation of registers is complete, the
rewriter will modify the IR to replace virtual registers with the corres-
ponding physical registers. At this stage, if a register corresponding
to a subregister of a virtual register is used, the rewriter will check
if that subregister is undefined, and if so, it will add the <undef> flag
to the machine operand. The function verifying liveness of the subregis-
ter would assume that it is undefined, unless any of the subranges of the
live interval proves otherwise.
The problem is that the live intervals created during splitting do not
have any subranges, even if the original parent interval did. This could
result in the <undef> flag placed on a register that is actually defined.

Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D21189

llvm-svn: 279625
2016-08-24 13:37:55 +00:00