Summary: In the ThinLTO compilation, if a function is inlined in the profiling binary, we need to inline it before annotation. If the callee is not available in the primary module, a first step is needed to import that callee function. For the current implementation, if the call is an indirect call, which has been promoted to >1 targets and inlined, SamplePGO will only import one target with the largest sample count. This patch fixed the bug to import all targets instead.
Reviewers: tejohnson, davidxl
Reviewed By: tejohnson
Subscribers: sanjoy, llvm-commits, mehdi_amini
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D36637
llvm-svn: 313678
Summary: Fix the bug when promoted call return type mismatches with the promoted function, we should not try to inline it. Otherwise it may lead to compiler crash.
Reviewers: davidxl, tejohnson, eraman
Reviewed By: tejohnson
Subscribers: llvm-commits, sanjoy
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D38018
llvm-svn: 313658
Summary: SampleProfileLoader inlines hot functions if it is inlined in the profiled binary. However, the inline needs to be guarded by legality check, otherwise it could lead to correctness issues.
Reviewers: eraman, davidxl
Reviewed By: eraman
Subscribers: vitalybuka, sanjoy, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D37779
llvm-svn: 313277
Summary: SampleProfileLoader inlines hot functions if it is inlined in the profiled binary. However, the inline needs to be guarded by legality check, otherwise it could lead to correctness issues.
Reviewers: eraman, davidxl
Reviewed By: eraman
Subscribers: sanjoy, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D37779
llvm-svn: 313195
Summary: This change passes down ACT to SampleProfileLoader for the new PM. Also remove the default value for SampleProfileLoader class as it is not used.
Reviewers: eraman, davidxl
Reviewed By: eraman
Subscribers: sanjoy, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D37773
llvm-svn: 313080
Updating remark API to newer OptimizationDiagnosticInfo API. This
allows remarks to show up in diagnostic yaml file, and enables use
of opt-viewer tool.
Hotness information for remarks (L505 and L751) do not display hotness
information, most likely due to profile information not being
propagated yet. Unsure if this is the desired outcome.
Patch by Tarun Rajendran.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D36127
llvm-svn: 310763
Summary:
Since r293359, most dump() function are only defined when
`!defined(NDEBUG) || defined(LLVM_ENABLE_DUMP)` holds. print() functions
only used by dump() functions are now unused in release builds,
generating lots of warnings. This patch only defines some print()
functions if they are used.
Reviewers: MatzeB
Reviewed By: MatzeB
Subscribers: arsenm, mzolotukhin, nhaehnle, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D35949
llvm-svn: 309553
Summary:
DominatorTreeBase used to have IsPostDominators (bool) member to indicate if the tree is a dominator or a postdominator tree. This made it possible to switch between the two 'modes' at runtime, but it isn't used in practice anywhere.
This patch makes IsPostDominator a template argument. This way, it is easier to switch between different algorithms at compile-time based on this argument and design external utilities around it. It also makes it impossible to incidentally assign a postdominator tree to a dominator tree (and vice versa), and to further simplify template code in GenericDominatorTreeConstruction.
Reviewers: dberlin, sanjoy, davide, grosser
Reviewed By: dberlin
Subscribers: mzolotukhin, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D35315
llvm-svn: 308040
Summary: r305009 disables recursive inlining for indirect calls in sample loader pass. The same logic applies to direct recursive calls.
Reviewers: iteratee, davidxl
Reviewed By: iteratee
Subscribers: sanjoy, llvm-commits, eraman
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D34456
llvm-svn: 305934
Summary: Early-inlining of recursive call makes the code size bloat exponentially. We should not disable it.
Reviewers: davidxl, dnovillo, iteratee
Reviewed By: iteratee
Subscribers: iteratee, llvm-commits, sanjoy
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D34017
llvm-svn: 305009
Before this patch, we always called method 'findCalleeFunctionSamples()' on
intrinsic calls. However, intrinsic calls like llvm.dbg.value() are not viable
candidates for obvious reasons.
No functional change intended.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D32008
llvm-svn: 300541
Summary: If there is suffix added in the function name (e.g. module hash added by thinLTO), we will not be able to find a match in profile as the suffix does not exist in profile. This patch build a map from function name to Function *. The map includes the entry for the stripped function name so that inlineHotFunctions can find the corresponding function to promote/inline.
Reviewers: davidxl, dnovillo, tejohnson
Reviewed By: davidxl
Subscribers: mehdi_amini, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D31952
llvm-svn: 300507
Summary: For iterative SamplePGO, an indirect call can be speculatively promoted to multiple direct calls and get inlined. All these promoted direct calls will share the same callsite location (offset+discriminator). With the current implementation, we cannot distinguish between different promotion candidates and its inlined instance. This patch adds callee_name to the key of the callsite sample map. And added helper functions to get all inlined callee samples for a given callsite location. This helps the profile annotator promote correct targets and inline it before annotation, and ensures all indirect call targets to be annotated correctly.
Reviewers: davidxl, dnovillo
Reviewed By: davidxl
Subscribers: andreadb, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D31950
llvm-svn: 300240
Summary: Now the SamplePGO support is more stable, we do not need so many verbose optimization remarks emitted.
Reviewers: dnovillo, davidxl
Reviewed By: davidxl
Subscribers: fhahn, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D31826
llvm-svn: 299883
Summary: ThinLTO will annotate the CFG twice. If the branch weight is set by the first annotation, we should not set the branch weight again in the second annotation because the first annotation is more accurate as there is less optimization that could affect debug info accuracy.
Reviewers: tejohnson, davidxl
Reviewed By: tejohnson
Subscribers: mehdi_amini, aprantl, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D31228
llvm-svn: 298602
Summary:
In SamplePGO, if the profile is collected from non-LTO binary, and used to drive ThinLTO, the indirect call promotion may fail because ThinLTO adjusts local function names to avoid conflicts. There are two places of where the mismatch can happen:
1. thin-link prepends SourceFileName to front of FuncName to build the GUID (GlobalValue::getGlobalIdentifier). Unlike instrumentation FDO, SamplePGO does not use the PGOFuncName scheme and therefore the indirect call target profile data contains a hash of the OriginalName.
2. backend compiler promotes some local functions to global and appends .llvm.{$ModuleHash} to the end of the FuncName to derive PromotedFunctionName
This patch tries at the best effort to find the GUID from the original local function name (in profile), and use that in ICP promotion, and in SamplePGO matching that happens in the backend after importing/inlining:
1. in thin-link, it builds the map from OriginalName to GUID so that when thin-link reads in indirect call target profile (represented by OriginalName), it knows which GUID to import.
2. in backend compiler, if sample profile reader cannot find a profile match for PromotedFunctionName, it will try to find if there is a match for OriginalFunctionName.
3. in backend compiler, we build symbol table entry for OriginalFunctionName and pointer to the same symbol of PromotedFunctionName, so that ICP can find the correct target to promote.
Reviewers: mehdi_amini, tejohnson
Reviewed By: tejohnson
Subscribers: llvm-commits, Prazek
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D30754
llvm-svn: 297757
Summary: We do not need that special handling because the debug info is more accurate now. Performance testing shows no regression on google internal benchmarks.
Reviewers: davidxl, aprantl
Reviewed By: aprantl
Subscribers: llvm-commits, aprantl
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D30658
llvm-svn: 297038
Summary: For SamplePGO, the profile may contain cross-module inline stacks. As we need to make sure the profile annotation happens when all the hot inline stacks are expanded, we need to pass this info to the module importer so that it can import proper functions if necessary. This patch implemented this feature by emitting cross-module targets as part of function entry metadata. In the module-summary phase, the metadata is used to build call edges that points to functions need to be imported.
Reviewers: mehdi_amini, tejohnson
Reviewed By: tejohnson
Subscribers: davidxl, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D30053
llvm-svn: 296498
Summary: SamplePGO uses branch_weight annotation to represent callsite hotness. When ICP promotes an indirect call to direct call, we need to make sure the direct call is annotated with branch_weight in SamplePGO mode, so that downstream function inliner can use hot callsite heuristic.
Reviewers: davidxl, eraman, xur
Reviewed By: davidxl, xur
Subscribers: mehdi_amini, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D30282
llvm-svn: 296028
Summary: The discriminator has been encoded, and only the base discriminator should be used during profile matching.
Reviewers: dblaikie, davidxl
Reviewed By: dblaikie, davidxl
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D30218
llvm-svn: 295999
Summary: Checking CS.getCalledFunction() == nullptr does not necessary indicate indirect call. We also need to check if CS.getCalledValue() is not a constant.
Reviewers: davidxl
Reviewed By: davidxl
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D29570
llvm-svn: 294260
Summary: When type casting of the return value is needed, promoteIndirectCall will return the type casting instruction instead of the direct call. This patch changed to return the direct call instruction instead.
Reviewers: davidxl
Reviewed By: davidxl
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D29569
llvm-svn: 294205
Summary: In iterative sample pgo where profile is collected from PGOed binary, we may see indirect call targets promoted and inlined in the profile. Before profile annotation, we need to make this happen in order to annotate correctly on IR. This patch explicitly promotes these indirect calls and inlines them before profile annotation.
Reviewers: xur, davidxl
Reviewed By: davidxl
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D29040
llvm-svn: 293657
Summary: In iterative sample pgo where profile is collected from PGOed binary, we may see indirect call targets promoted and inlined in the profile. Before profile annotation, we need to make this happen in order to annotate correctly on IR. This patch explicitly promotes these indirect calls and inlines them before profile annotation.
Reviewers: xur, davidxl
Reviewed By: davidxl
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D29040
llvm-svn: 292979
After r289755, the AssumptionCache is no longer needed. Variables affected by
assumptions are now found by using the new operand-bundle-based scheme. This
new scheme is more computationally efficient, and also we need much less
code...
llvm-svn: 289756
Summary: SampleProfileLoader pass may be invoked twice by LTO. The 2nd pass should not append more summary info as it is already preset by the 1st pass.
Reviewers: eraman, davidxl
Subscribers: mehdi_amini, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D27733
llvm-svn: 289725
Summary: Now that we have more precise debug info, we should change back to use maximum to get basic block weight.
Reviewers: dnovillo
Subscribers: andreadb, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D24788
llvm-svn: 282084
Summary: Callsites in the same basic block should share the same hotness. This patch checks for the hottest callsite in the same basic block, and use the hotness for all callsites in that basic block for early inline decisions. It also fixes the test to add "-S" so theat the "CHECK-NOT" is actually checking the content.
Reviewers: dnovillo
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D24734
llvm-svn: 281927
Summary: It does not make sense to set equal weights for all unkown branches as we have static branch prediction available.
Reviewers: dnovillo
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D24732
llvm-svn: 281912
Summary: The call target count profile is directly derived from LBR branch->target data. This is more reliable than instruction frequency profiles that could be moved across basic block boundaries. This patches uses call target count profile to annotate call instructions.
Reviewers: davidxl, dnovillo
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D24410
llvm-svn: 281911
Summary: Previously we reline on inst-combine to remove inlinable invoke instructions. This causes trouble because a few extra optimizations are schedule early that could introduce too much CFG change (e.g. simplifycfg removes too much control flow). This patch handles invoke instruction in-place during sample profile annotation, so that we do not rely on instcombine to remove those invoke instructions.
Reviewers: davidxl, dnovillo
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D24409
llvm-svn: 281870
Summary: The refined propagation algorithm is more accurate and robust.
Reviewers: davidxl, dnovillo
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D23224
llvm-svn: 278522
Besides a general consistently benefit, the extra layer of indirection
allows the mechanical part of https://reviews.llvm.org/D23256 that
requires touching every transformation and analysis to be factored out
cleanly.
Thanks to David for the suggestion.
llvm-svn: 278078
This unblocks the new PM part of River's patch in
https://reviews.llvm.org/D22706
Conveniently, this same change was needed for D21921 and so these
changes are just spun out from there.
llvm-svn: 276515
Summary:
For sample-based PGO, using BFI to calculate callsite count is sometime not accurate. This is because with sampling based approach, if a callsite resides in a hot loop deeply nested in a bunch of cold branches, the callsite's BFI frequency would be inaccurately calculated due to lack of samples in the cold branch.
E.g.
if (A1 && A2 && A3 && ..... && A10) {
for (i=0; i < 100000000; i++) {
callsite();
}
}
Assume that A1 to A100 are all 100% taken, and callsite has 1000 samples and thus is considerred hot. Because the loop's trip count is huge, it's normal that all branches outside the loop has no sample at all. As a result, we can only use static branch probability to derive the the frequency of the loop header. Assuming that static heuristic thinks each branch is 50% taken, then the count calculated from BFI will be 1/(2^10) of the actual value.
In order to get more accurate callsite count, we directly annotate the weight on the call instruction, and directly use it when checking callsite hotness.
Note that this mechanism can also be shared by instrumentation based callsite hotness analysis. The side benefit is that it breaks the dependency from Inliner to BFI as call count is embedded in the IR.
Reviewers: davidxl, eraman, dnovillo
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D22118
llvm-svn: 275073
Dehao Chen