Motivated by D88183, this seeks to clarify the current loop nomenclature with added illustrations, examples for possibly unexpected situations (infinite loops not part of the "parent" loop, logical loops sharing the same header, ...), and clarification on what other sources may consider a loop. The current document also has multiple errors that are fixed here.
Some selected errors:
* Loops a defined as strongly-connected components. A component a partition of all nodes, i.e. a subloop can never be a component. That is, the document as it currently is only covers top-level loops, even it also uses the term SCC for subloops.
* "a block can be the header of two separate loops at the same time" (it is considered a single loop by LoopInfo)
* "execute before some interesting event happens" (some interesting event is not well-defined)
Reviewed By: baziotis, Whitney
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D88408
Recently I had to use it and although one assumes it returns null if
there's no parent loop, I think it helps to doc it.
Reviewed By: Meinersbur
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D74890
In the approval of D65299, commited as rL367440, I mentioned that my
proposed wording was lacking the word "maximal". It is added now for
correctness.
llvm-svn: 367445
Given the example:
header:
br i1 %c, label %next, label %header
next:
br i1 %c2, label %exit, label %header
We end up with a loop containing both header and next. Given that, the describing the loop in terms of cycles is confusing since we have multiple distinct cycles within a single Loop. Standardize on the SCC to clarify.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D65299
llvm-svn: 367440
I've noticed a lot of confusion around this area recently with key terms being misused in a number of threads. To help reign that in, let's go ahead and document the current terminology and meaning thereof.
My hope is to grow this over time into a broader discussion of canonical loop forms - yes, there are more than one ... many more than one - but for the moment, simply having the key terminology is a good stopping place.
Note: I am landing this *without* an LGTM. All feedback so far has been positive, and trying to apply all of the suggested changes/extensions would cause the review to never end. Instead, I decided to land it with the obvious fixes made based on reviewer comments, then iterate from there.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D65164
llvm-svn: 366960
Stefanos Baziotis