Clang currently picks the second tentative definition when
VarDecl::getActingDefinition is called.
This can lead to attributes being dropped if they are attached to
tentative definitions that appear after the second one. This is
because VarDecl::getActingDefinition loops through VarDecl::redecls
assuming that the last tentative definition is the last element in the
iterator. However, it is the second element that would be the last
tentative definition.
This changeset modifies getActingDefinition to iterate through the
declaration chain in reverse, so that it can immediately return when
it encounters a tentative definition.
Originally the unit test for this changeset did not have a -triple
flag for the clang invocation, leading to this test being broken on
MacOS, since Mach-O does not support the section attribute.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D99732
Clang currently picks the second tentative definition when
VarDecl::getActingDefinition is called.
This can lead to attributes being dropped if they are attached to
tentative definitions that appear after the second one. This is
because VarDecl::getActingDefinition loops through VarDecl::redecls
assuming that the last tentative definition is the last element in the
iterator. However, it is the second element that would be the last
tentative definition.
This changeset modifies getActingDefinition to iterate through the
declaration chain in reverse, so that it can immediately return when
it encounters a tentative definition.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D99732
@kpn pointed out that the global variable initialization functions didn't
have the "strictfp" metadata set correctly, and @rjmccall said that there
was buggy code in SetFPModel and StartFunction, this patch is to solve
those problems. When Sema creates a FunctionDecl, it sets the
FunctionDeclBits.UsesFPIntrin to "true" if the lexical FP settings
(i.e. a combination of command line options and #pragma float_control
settings) correspond to ConstrainedFP mode. That bit is used when CodeGen
starts codegen for a llvm function, and it translates into the
"strictfp" function attribute. See bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=44571
Reviewed By: Aaron Ballman
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D102343
Original commit message:
[clang-repl] Implement partial translation units and error recovery.
https://reviews.llvm.org/D96033 contained a discussion regarding efficient
modeling of error recovery. @rjmccall has outlined the key ideas:
Conceptually, we can split the translation unit into a sequence of partial
translation units (PTUs). Every declaration will be associated with a unique PTU
that owns it.
The first key insight here is that the owning PTU isn't always the "active"
(most recent) PTU, and it isn't always the PTU that the declaration
"comes from". A new declaration (that isn't a redeclaration or specialization of
anything) does belong to the active PTU. A template specialization, however,
belongs to the most recent PTU of all the declarations in its signature - mostly
that means that it can be pulled into a more recent PTU by its template
arguments.
The second key insight is that processing a PTU might extend an earlier PTU.
Rolling back the later PTU shouldn't throw that extension away. For example, if
the second PTU defines a template, and the third PTU requires that template to
be instantiated at float, that template specialization is still part of the
second PTU. Similarly, if the fifth PTU uses an inline function belonging to the
fourth, that definition still belongs to the fourth. When we go to emit code in
a new PTU, we map each declaration we have to emit back to its owning PTU and
emit it in a new module for just the extensions to that PTU. We keep track of
all the modules we've emitted for a PTU so that we can unload them all if we
decide to roll it back.
Most declarations/definitions will only refer to entities from the same or
earlier PTUs. However, it is possible (primarily by defining a
previously-declared entity, but also through templates or ADL) for an entity
that belongs to one PTU to refer to something from a later PTU. We will have to
keep track of this and prevent unwinding to later PTU when we recognize it.
Fortunately, this should be very rare; and crucially, we don't have to do the
bookkeeping for this if we've only got one PTU, e.g. in normal compilation.
Otherwise, PTUs after the first just need to record enough metadata to be able
to revert any changes they've made to declarations belonging to earlier PTUs,
e.g. to redeclaration chains or template specialization lists.
It should even eventually be possible for PTUs to provide their own slab
allocators which can be thrown away as part of rolling back the PTU. We can
maintain a notion of the active allocator and allocate things like Stmt/Expr
nodes in it, temporarily changing it to the appropriate PTU whenever we go to do
something like instantiate a function template. More care will be required when
allocating declarations and types, though.
We would want the PTU to be efficiently recoverable from a Decl; I'm not sure
how best to do that. An easy option that would cover most declarations would be
to make multiple TranslationUnitDecls and parent the declarations appropriately,
but I don't think that's good enough for things like member function templates,
since an instantiation of that would still be parented by its original class.
Maybe we can work this into the DC chain somehow, like how lexical DCs are.
We add a different kind of translation unit `TU_Incremental` which is a
complete translation unit that we might nonetheless incrementally extend later.
Because it is complete (and we might want to generate code for it), we do
perform template instantiation, but because it might be extended later, we don't
warn if it declares or uses undefined internal-linkage symbols.
This patch teaches clang-repl how to recover from errors by disconnecting the
most recent PTU and update the primary PTU lookup tables. For instance:
```./clang-repl
clang-repl> int i = 12; error;
In file included from <<< inputs >>>:1:
input_line_0:1:13: error: C++ requires a type specifier for all declarations
int i = 12; error;
^
error: Parsing failed.
clang-repl> int i = 13; extern "C" int printf(const char*,...);
clang-repl> auto r1 = printf("i=%d\n", i);
i=13
clang-repl> quit
```
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D104918
This reverts commit 6775fc6ffa.
It also reverts "[lldb] Fix compilation by adjusting to the new ASTContext signature."
This reverts commit 03a3f86071.
We see some failures on the lldb infrastructure, these changes might play a role
in it. Let's revert it now and see if the bots will become green.
Ref: https://reviews.llvm.org/D104918
https://reviews.llvm.org/D96033 contained a discussion regarding efficient
modeling of error recovery. @rjmccall has outlined the key ideas:
Conceptually, we can split the translation unit into a sequence of partial
translation units (PTUs). Every declaration will be associated with a unique PTU
that owns it.
The first key insight here is that the owning PTU isn't always the "active"
(most recent) PTU, and it isn't always the PTU that the declaration
"comes from". A new declaration (that isn't a redeclaration or specialization of
anything) does belong to the active PTU. A template specialization, however,
belongs to the most recent PTU of all the declarations in its signature - mostly
that means that it can be pulled into a more recent PTU by its template
arguments.
The second key insight is that processing a PTU might extend an earlier PTU.
Rolling back the later PTU shouldn't throw that extension away. For example, if
the second PTU defines a template, and the third PTU requires that template to
be instantiated at float, that template specialization is still part of the
second PTU. Similarly, if the fifth PTU uses an inline function belonging to the
fourth, that definition still belongs to the fourth. When we go to emit code in
a new PTU, we map each declaration we have to emit back to its owning PTU and
emit it in a new module for just the extensions to that PTU. We keep track of
all the modules we've emitted for a PTU so that we can unload them all if we
decide to roll it back.
Most declarations/definitions will only refer to entities from the same or
earlier PTUs. However, it is possible (primarily by defining a
previously-declared entity, but also through templates or ADL) for an entity
that belongs to one PTU to refer to something from a later PTU. We will have to
keep track of this and prevent unwinding to later PTU when we recognize it.
Fortunately, this should be very rare; and crucially, we don't have to do the
bookkeeping for this if we've only got one PTU, e.g. in normal compilation.
Otherwise, PTUs after the first just need to record enough metadata to be able
to revert any changes they've made to declarations belonging to earlier PTUs,
e.g. to redeclaration chains or template specialization lists.
It should even eventually be possible for PTUs to provide their own slab
allocators which can be thrown away as part of rolling back the PTU. We can
maintain a notion of the active allocator and allocate things like Stmt/Expr
nodes in it, temporarily changing it to the appropriate PTU whenever we go to do
something like instantiate a function template. More care will be required when
allocating declarations and types, though.
We would want the PTU to be efficiently recoverable from a Decl; I'm not sure
how best to do that. An easy option that would cover most declarations would be
to make multiple TranslationUnitDecls and parent the declarations appropriately,
but I don't think that's good enough for things like member function templates,
since an instantiation of that would still be parented by its original class.
Maybe we can work this into the DC chain somehow, like how lexical DCs are.
We add a different kind of translation unit `TU_Incremental` which is a
complete translation unit that we might nonetheless incrementally extend later.
Because it is complete (and we might want to generate code for it), we do
perform template instantiation, but because it might be extended later, we don't
warn if it declares or uses undefined internal-linkage symbols.
This patch teaches clang-repl how to recover from errors by disconnecting the
most recent PTU and update the primary PTU lookup tables. For instance:
```./clang-repl
clang-repl> int i = 12; error;
In file included from <<< inputs >>>:1:
input_line_0:1:13: error: C++ requires a type specifier for all declarations
int i = 12; error;
^
error: Parsing failed.
clang-repl> int i = 13; extern "C" int printf(const char*,...);
clang-repl> auto r1 = printf("i=%d\n", i);
i=13
clang-repl> quit
```
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D104918
Named return of a variable with aligned attribute would
trip an assert in case alignment was dependent.
Signed-off-by: Matheus Izvekov <mizvekov@gmail.com>
Reviewed By: rsmith
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D105380
Named return of a variable with aligned attribute would
trip an assert in case alignment was dependent.
Signed-off-by: Matheus Izvekov <mizvekov@gmail.com>
Reviewed By: rsmith
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D105380
According to https://eel.is/c++draft/over.literal
> double operator""_Bq(long double); // OK: does not use the reserved identifier _Bq ([lex.name])
> double operator"" _Bq(long double); // ill-formed, no diagnostic required: uses the reserved identifier _Bq ([lex.name])
Obey that rule by keeping track of the operator literal name status wrt. leading whitespace.
Fix: https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=50644
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D104299
This change adds an option which, in addition to dumping the record
layout as is done by -fdump-record-layouts, causes us to compute the
layout for all complete record types (rather than the as-needed basis
which is usually done by clang), so that we will dump them as well.
This is useful if we are looking for layout differences across large
code bases without needing to instantiate every type we are interested in.
Reviewed By: dexonsmith
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D104484
This implements the 'using enum maybe-qualified-enum-tag ;' part of
1099. It introduces a new 'UsingEnumDecl', subclassed from
'BaseUsingDecl'. Much of the diff is the boilerplate needed to get the
new class set up.
There is one case where we accept ill-formed, but I believe this is
merely an extended case of an existing bug, so consider it
orthogonal. AFAICT in class-scope the c++20 rule is that no 2 using
decls can bring in the same target decl ([namespace.udecl]/8). But we
already accept:
struct A { enum { a }; };
struct B : A { using A::a; };
struct C : B { using A::a;
using B::a; }; // same enumerator
this patch permits mixtures of 'using enum Bob;' and 'using Bob::member;' in the same way.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D102241
Warn when a declaration uses an identifier that doesn't obey the reserved
identifier rule from C and/or C++.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D93095
In some cases, we want to provide the alias name for the clang builtins.
For example, the arguments must be constant integers for some RISC-V builtins.
If we use wrapper functions, we could not constrain the arguments be constant
integer. This attribute is used to achieve the purpose.
Besides this, use `clang_builtin_alias` is more efficient than using
wrapper functions. We use this attribute to deal with test time issue
reported in https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=49962.
In our downstream testing, it could decrease the testing time from 6.3
seconds to 3.7 seconds for vloxei.c test.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D100611
The idiom:
```
DeclContext::lookup_result R = DeclContext::lookup(Name);
for (auto *D : R) {...}
```
is not safe when in the loop body we trigger deserialization from an AST file.
The deserialization can insert new declarations in the StoredDeclsList whose
underlying type is a vector. When the vector decides to reallocate its storage
the pointer we hold becomes invalid.
This patch replaces a SmallVector with an singly-linked list. The current
approach stores a SmallVector<NamedDecl*, 4> which is around 8 pointers.
The linked list is 3, 5, or 7. We do better in terms of memory usage for small
cases (and worse in terms of locality -- the linked list entries won't be near
each other, but will be near their corresponding declarations, and we were going
to fetch those memory pages anyway). For larger cases: the vector uses a
doubling strategy for reallocation, so will generally be between half-full and
full. Let's say it's 75% full on average, so there's N * 4/3 + 4 pointers' worth
of space allocated currently and will be 2N pointers with the linked list. So we
break even when there are N=6 entries and slightly lose in terms of memory usage
after that. We suspect that's still a win on average.
Thanks to @rsmith!
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D91524
SUMMARY:
n the patch https://reviews.llvm.org/D87451 "add new option -mignore-xcoff-visibility"
we did as "The option -mignore-xcoff-visibility has no effect on visibility attribute when compile with -emit-llvm option to generated LLVM IR."
in these patch we let -mignore-xcoff-visibility effect on generating IR too. the new feature only work on AIX OS
Reviewer: Jason Liu,
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D89986
This patch responds to a comment from @vitalybuka in D96203: suggestion to
do the change incrementally, and start by modifying this file name. I modified
the file name and made the other changes that follow from that rename.
Reviewers: vitalybuka, echristo, MaskRay, jansvoboda11, aaron.ballman
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D96974
Follow-up on D95336. A bunch of these cases were found manually, the
rest made sense to be included to eliminate llvm-else-after-return
Clang-Tidy warnings.
Combined with 'da98651 - Revert "DR2064:
decltype(E) is only a dependent', this change (5a391d3) caused verifier
errors when building Chromium. See https://crbug.com/1168494#c1 for a
reproducer.
Additionally it reverts changes that were dependent on this one, see
below.
> Following up on PR48517, fix handling of template arguments that refer
> to dependent declarations.
>
> Treat an id-expression that names a local variable in a templated
> function as being instantiation-dependent.
>
> This addresses a language defect whereby a reference to a dependent
> declaration can be formed without any construct being value-dependent.
> Fixing that through value-dependence turns out to be problematic, so
> instead this patch takes the approach (proposed on the core reflector)
> of allowing the use of pointers or references to (but not values of)
> dependent declarations inside value-dependent expressions, and instead
> treating template arguments as dependent if they evaluate to a constant
> involving such dependent declarations.
>
> This ends up affecting a bunch of OpenMP tests, due to OpenMP
> imprecisely handling instantiation-dependent constructs, bailing out
> early instead of processing dependent constructs to the extent possible
> when handling the template.
>
> Previously committed as 8c1f2d15b8, and
> reverted because a dependency commit was reverted.
This reverts commit 5a391d38ac.
It also restores clang/test/SemaCXX/coroutines.cpp to its state before
da986511fb.
Revert "[c++20] P1907R1: Support for generalized non-type template arguments of scalar type."
> Previously committed as 9e08e51a20, and
> reverted because a dependency commit was reverted. This incorporates the
> following follow-on commits that were also reverted:
>
> 7e84aa1b81 by Simon Pilgrim
> ed13d8c667 by me
> 95c7b6cadb by Sam McCall
> 430d5d8429 by Dave Zarzycki
This reverts commit 4b574008ae.
Revert "[msabi] Mangle a template argument referring to array-to-pointer decay"
> [msabi] Mangle a template argument referring to array-to-pointer decay
> applied to an array the same as the array itself.
>
> This follows MS ABI, and corrects a regression from the implementation
> of generalized non-type template parameters, where we "forgot" how to
> mangle this case.
This reverts commit 18e093faf7.
Previously committed as 9e08e51a20, and
reverted because a dependency commit was reverted. This incorporates the
following follow-on commits that were also reverted:
7e84aa1b81 by Simon Pilgrim
ed13d8c667 by me
95c7b6cadb by Sam McCall
430d5d8429 by Dave Zarzycki
function when the receiver is nil
Callee-destroyed arguments to a method have to be destroyed in the
caller function when the receiver is nil as the method doesn't get
executed. This fixes PR48207.
rdar://71808391
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D93273
except where they are necessary to disambiguate the target.
This substantially improves diagnostics from the standard library,
which are otherwise full of `::__1::` noise.
mangling support for non-type template parameters of class type and
template parameter objects.
The Itanium side of this follows the approach I proposed in
https://github.com/itanium-cxx-abi/cxx-abi/issues/47 on 2020-09-06.
The MSVC side of this was determined empirically by observing MSVC's
output.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D89998
friends.
When determining whether a function has a template instantiation
pattern, look for other declarations of that function that were
instantiated from a friend function definition, rather than assuming
that checking for member specialization information on whichever
declaration name lookup found will be sufficient.
Checks to make sure that stdlib's (std::)free is being appropriately
used. Presently checks for the following misuses:
- free(&stack_object)
- free(stack_array)
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D89988
Permitting non-standards-driven "do the best you can" constant-folding
of array bounds is permitted solely as a GNU compatibility feature. We
should not be doing it in any language mode that is attempting to be
conforming.
From https://reviews.llvm.org/D20090 it appears the intent here was to
permit `__constant int` globals to be used in array bounds, but the
change in that patch only added half of the functionality necessary to
support that in the constant evaluator. This patch adds the other half
of the functionality and turns off constant folding for array bounds in
OpenCL.
I couldn't find any spec justification for accepting the kinds of cases
that D20090 accepts, so a reference to where in the OpenCL specification
this is permitted would be useful.
Note that this change also affects the code generation in one test:
because after 'const int n = 0' we now treat 'n' as a constant
expression with value 0, it's now a null pointer, so '(local int *)n'
forms a null pointer rather than a zero pointer.
Reviewed By: Anastasia
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D89520
This fixes miscomputation of __builtin_constant_evaluated in the
initializer of a variable that's not usable in constant expressions, but
is readable when constant-folding.
If evaluation of a constant initializer fails, we throw away the
evaluated result instead of keeping it as a non-constant-initializer
value for the variable, because it might not be a correct value.
To avoid regressions for initializers that are foldable but not formally
constant initializers, we now try constant-evaluating some globals in
C++ twice: once to check for a constant initializer (in an mode where
is_constannt_evaluated returns true) and again to determine the runtime
value if the initializer is not a constant initializer.
Instead of framing the interface around whether the variable is an ICE
(which is only interesting in C++98), primarily track whether the
initializer is a constant initializer (which is interesting in all C++
language modes).
No functionality change intended.
for which it matters.
This is a step towards separating checking for a constant initializer
(in which std::is_constant_evaluated returns true) and any other
evaluation of a variable initializer (in which it returns false).
References to different declarations of the same entity aren't different
values, so shouldn't have different representations.
Recommit of e6393ee813, most recently
reverted in 9a33f027ac due to a bug caused
by ObjCInterfaceDecls not propagating availability attributes along
their redeclaration chains; that bug was fixed in
e2d4174e9c.
We previously took a shortcut and said that weak variables never have
constant initializers (because those initializers are never correct to
use outside the variable). We now say that weak variables can have
constant initializers, but are never usable in constant expressions.
References to different declarations of the same entity aren't different
values, so shouldn't have different representations.
Recommit of e6393ee813 with fixed handling
for weak declarations. We now look for attributes on the most recent
declaration when determining whether a declaration is weak. (Second
recommit with further fixes for mishandling of weak declarations. Our
behavior here is fundamentally unsound -- see PR47663 -- but this
approach attempts to not make things worse.)
Instead of relying on whether a certain identifier is a builtin, introduce BuiltinAttr to specify a declaration as having builtin semantics.
This fixes incompatible redeclarations of builtins, as reverting the identifier as being builtin due to one incompatible redeclaration would have broken rest of the builtin calls.
Mostly-compatible redeclarations of builtins also no longer have builtin semantics. They don't call the builtin nor inherit their attributes.
A long-standing FIXME regarding builtins inside a namespace enclosed in extern "C" not being recognized is also addressed.
Due to the more correct handling attributes for builtin functions are added in more places, resulting in more useful warnings.
Tests are updated to reflect that.
Intrinsics without an inline definition in intrin.h had `inline` and `static` removed as they had no effect and caused them to no longer be recognized as builtins otherwise.
A pthread_create() related test is XFAIL-ed, as it relied on it being recognized as a builtin based on its name.
The builtin declaration syntax is too restrictive and doesn't allow custom structs, function pointers, etc.
It seems to be the only case and fixing this would require reworking the current builtin syntax, so this seems acceptable.
Fixes PR45410.
Reviewed By: rsmith, yutsumi
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D77491
References to different declarations of the same entity aren't different
values, so shouldn't have different representations.
Recommit of e6393ee813 with fixed
handling for weak declarations. We now look for attributes on the most
recent declaration when determining whether a declaration is weak.
This effectively disables r340386 on Darwin, and provides a command line flag
to opt into/out of this behaviour. This change is needed to compile certain
Apple headers correctly.
rdar://47688592
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D86881
a default argument.
Default arguments can (after recent language changes) refer to
parameters of the same function. Make sure they're added to the local
instantiation scope before transforming a default argument so that we
can remap such references to them properly.
parameters with default arguments.
Directly follow the wording by relaxing the AST invariant that all
parameters after one with a default arguemnt also have default
arguments, and removing the diagnostic on missing default arguments
on a pack-expanded parameter following a parameter with a default
argument.
Testing also revealed that we need to special-case explicit
specializations of templates with a pack following a parameter with a
default argument, as such explicit specializations are otherwise
impossible to write. The standard wording doesn't address this case; a
issue has been filed.
This exposed a bug where we would briefly consider a parameter to have
no default argument while we parse a delay-parsed default argument for
that parameter, which is also fixed.
Partially incorporates a patch by Raul Tambre.
Benson Chu