No other compiler accepts this as an extension, not even in permissive
mode. We're not doing anyone any favors by allowing this, and it's
unlikely to be at all common, even in Clang-only code, in the wild.
Currently a capture-default which is not the first element in the lambda-capture
is diagnosed with a generic expected variable name or 'this' in lambda capture
list, which is true but not very helpful.
If we don't have already parsed a capture-default then a lone "&" or "=" is
likely to be a misplaced capture-default, so diagnose it as such.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D83681
Reviewed By: aaron.ballman
- add more tests (the test added in 2f448467e4 is weak);
- improve the `MyTemplate<type_typo, int>();` case, with this patch, typo correction
suggests the type decl, and no regressions found.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D83025
The DependentNameType must have a non-null NSS. This property could be
violated during typo correction.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D82738
instead of postfix-expressions, and improve error recovery for postfix
operators after unary-expressions.
This covers nullptr, __null, and some calls to type traits with special
parsing rules. We would previously not parse a postfix-expression suffix
for these expressions, so would reject expressions such as
__is_trivial(int)["foo"].
For the case where a postfix-expression suffix is *not* permitted after
a unary-expression (for example, after a new-expression or sizeof
expression), produce a diagnostic if one appears there anyway. That's
always ill-formed, but previously produced very bad diagnostics.
Reland https://reviews.llvm.org/D76696
All known crashes have been fixed, another attemption.
We have rolled out this to all internal users for a while, didn't see
big issues, we consider it is stable enough.
Reviewed By: sammccall
Subscribers: rsmith, hubert.reinterpretcast, ebevhan, jkorous, arphaman, kadircet, usaxena95, cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D78350
DiagnosticErrorTrap is usually inappropriate because it indicates
whether an error message was rendered in a given region (and is
therefore affected by -ferror-limit and by suppression of errors if we
see an invalid declaration).
hasErrorOccurred() is usually inappropriate because it indicates
whethere an "error:" message was displayed, regardless of whether the
message was a warning promoted to an error, and therefore depends on
things like -Werror that are usually irrelevant.
Where applicable, CodeSynthesisContexts are used to attach notes to
the first diagnostic produced in a region of code, isnstead of using an
error trap and then attaching a note to whichever diagnostic happened to
be produced last (or suppressing the note if the final diagnostic is a
disabled warning!).
This is mostly NFC.
Summary:
Asm goto is not supported by SLH. Warn if an instance of asm goto is detected
while SLH is enabled.
Test included.
Reviewed By: jyu2
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D79743
On the one hand, one might interpret the use of the max-token pragmas or
-fmax-tokens flag as an opt-in to the warning. However, in Chromium
we've found it useful to only opt in selected build configurations, even
though we have the pragmas in the code. For that reason, we think it
makes sense to turn it off by default.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D80014
Summary: Erroneous error diagnostic observed in VS2017 <numeric> header
Also correction to propagate usesFPIntrin from template func to instantiation.
Reviewers: rjmccall, erichkeane (no feedback received)
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D79631
This patch adds a matrix type to Clang as described in the draft
specification in clang/docs/MatrixSupport.rst. It introduces a new option
-fenable-matrix, which can be used to enable the matrix support.
The patch adds new MatrixType and DependentSizedMatrixType types along
with the plumbing required. Loads of and stores to pointers to matrix
values are lowered to memory operations on 1-D IR arrays. After loading,
the loaded values are cast to a vector. This ensures matrix values use
the alignment of the element type, instead of LLVM's large vector
alignment.
The operators and builtins described in the draft spec will will be added in
follow-up patches.
Reviewers: martong, rsmith, Bigcheese, anemet, dexonsmith, rjmccall, aaron.ballman
Reviewed By: rjmccall
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D72281
Objective-C++11 and under MS extensions.
This matches the MSVC behavior, and means that Objective-C behaves as a
set of extensions to the base language, rather than replacing the base
language rule with a different one.
The 'class' or 'struct' keyword is only permitted as part of either an
enum definition or a standalone opaque-enum-declaration, not as part of
an elaborated type specifier. We previously failed to diagnose this, and
generally didn't properly implement the restrictions on elaborated type
specifiers for enumeration types.
In passing, also fixed incorrect parsing for enum-bases, which we
previously parsed as a type-name, but are actually a type-specifier-seq.
This matters for cases like 'enum E : int *p;', which is valid as a
Microsoft extension.
Plus some minor parse diagnostic improvements.
Bumped the recently-added ExtWarn for 'enum E : int x;' to be
DefaultError; this is not an intentional extension, so producing an
error by default seems appropriate, but the warning flag to disable it
may still be useful for code written against old Clang. The same
treatment is given here to the diagnostic for 'enum class E x;', which
we similarly have incorrectly accepted for many years. These diagnostics
continue to be suppressed under -fms-extensions and when compiling
Objective-C code. We will need to decide separately whether Objective-C
should follow the C++ rules or the (older) MSVC rules.
Previously we implemented non-standard disambiguation rules to
distinguish an enum-base from a bit-field but otherwise treated a :
after an elaborated-enum-specifier as introducing an enum-base. That
misparses various examples (anywhere an elaborated-type-specifier can
appear followed by a colon, such as within a ternary operator or
_Generic).
We now implement the C++11 rules, with the old cases accepted as
extensions where that seemed reasonable. These amount to:
* an enum-base must always be accompanied by an enum definition (except
in a standalone declaration of the form 'enum E : T;')
* in a member-declaration, 'enum E :' always introduces an enum-base,
never a bit-field
* in a type-specifier (or similar context), 'enum E :' is not
permitted; the colon means whatever else it would mean in that
context.
Fixed underlying types for enums are also permitted in Objective-C and
under MS extensions, plus as a language extension in all other modes.
The behavior in ObjC and MS extensions modes is unchanged (but the
bit-field disambiguation is a bit better); remaining language modes
follow the C++11 rules.
Fixes PR45726, PR39979, PR19810, PR44941, and most of PR24297, plus C++
core issues 1514 and 1966.
test cases
Add support for #pragma float_control
Reviewers: rjmccall, erichkeane, sepavloff
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D72841
This reverts commit 85dc033cac, and makes
corrections to the test cases that failed on buildbots.
Summary:
When using -ftrivial-auto-var-init=* options to initiate automatic
variables in a file, to disable initialization on some variables,
currently we have to manually annotate the variables with uninitialized
attribute, such as
int dont_initialize_me __attribute((uninitialized));
Making pragma clang attribute to support this attribute would make
annotating variables much easier, and could be particular useful for
bisection efforts, e.g.
void use(void*);
void buggy() {
int arr[256];
int boom;
float bam;
struct { int oops; } oops;
union { int oof; float aaaaa; } oof;
use(&arr);
use(&boom);
use(&bam);
use(&oops);
use(&oof);
}
Reviewers: jfb, rjmccall, aaron.ballman
Reviewed By: jfb, aaron.ballman
Subscribers: aaron.ballman, george.burgess.iv, dexonsmith, MaskRay, phosek, hubert.reinterpretcast, gbiv, manojgupta, llozano, srhines, cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D78693
This reverts commit 61ba1481e2.
I'm reverting this because it breaks the lldb build with
incomplete switch coverage warnings. I would fix it forward,
but am not familiar enough with lldb to determine the correct
fix.
lldb/source/Plugins/TypeSystem/Clang/TypeSystemClang.cpp:3958:11: error: enumeration values 'DependentExtInt' and 'ExtInt' not handled in switch [-Werror,-Wswitch]
switch (qual_type->getTypeClass()) {
^
lldb/source/Plugins/TypeSystem/Clang/TypeSystemClang.cpp:4633:11: error: enumeration values 'DependentExtInt' and 'ExtInt' not handled in switch [-Werror,-Wswitch]
switch (qual_type->getTypeClass()) {
^
lldb/source/Plugins/TypeSystem/Clang/TypeSystemClang.cpp:4889:11: error: enumeration values 'DependentExtInt' and 'ExtInt' not handled in switch [-Werror,-Wswitch]
switch (qual_type->getTypeClass()) {
Introduction/Motivation:
LLVM-IR supports integers of non-power-of-2 bitwidth, in the iN syntax.
Integers of non-power-of-two aren't particularly interesting or useful
on most hardware, so much so that no language in Clang has been
motivated to expose it before.
However, in the case of FPGA hardware normal integer types where the
full bitwidth isn't used, is extremely wasteful and has severe
performance/space concerns. Because of this, Intel has introduced this
functionality in the High Level Synthesis compiler[0]
under the name "Arbitrary Precision Integer" (ap_int for short). This
has been extremely useful and effective for our users, permitting them
to optimize their storage and operation space on an architecture where
both can be extremely expensive.
We are proposing upstreaming a more palatable version of this to the
community, in the form of this proposal and accompanying patch. We are
proposing the syntax _ExtInt(N). We intend to propose this to the WG14
committee[1], and the underscore-capital seems like the active direction
for a WG14 paper's acceptance. An alternative that Richard Smith
suggested on the initial review was __int(N), however we believe that
is much less acceptable by WG14. We considered _Int, however _Int is
used as an identifier in libstdc++ and there is no good way to fall
back to an identifier (since _Int(5) is indistinguishable from an
unnamed initializer of a template type named _Int).
[0]https://www.intel.com/content/www/us/en/software/programmable/quartus-prime/hls-compiler.html)
[1]http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg14/www/docs/n2472.pdf
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D73967
Summary:
Previously, we treated CXXUuidofExpr as quite a special case: it was the
only kind of expression that could be a canonical template argument, it
could be a constant lvalue base object, and so on. In addition, we
represented the UUID value as a string, whose source form we did not
preserve faithfully, and that we partially parsed in multiple different
places.
With this patch, we create an MSGuidDecl object to represent the
implicit object of type 'struct _GUID' created by a UuidAttr. Each
UuidAttr holds a pointer to its 'struct _GUID' and its original
(as-written) UUID string. A non-value-dependent CXXUuidofExpr behaves
like a DeclRefExpr denoting that MSGuidDecl object. We cache an APValue
representation of the GUID on the MSGuidDecl and use it from constant
evaluation where needed.
This allows removing a lot of the special-case logic to handle these
expressions. Unfortunately, many parts of Clang assume there are only
a couple of interesting kinds of ValueDecl, so the total amount of
special-case logic is not really reduced very much.
This fixes a few bugs and issues:
* PR38490: we now support reading from GUID objects returned from
__uuidof during constant evaluation.
* Our Itanium mangling for a non-instantiation-dependent template
argument involving __uuidof no longer depends on which CXXUuidofExpr
template argument we happened to see first.
* We now predeclare ::_GUID, and permit use of __uuidof without
any header inclusion, better matching MSVC's behavior. We do not
predefine ::__s_GUID, though; that seems like a step too far.
* Our IR representation for GUID constants now uses the correct IR type
wherever possible. We will still fall back to using the
{i32, i16, i16, [8 x i8]}
layout if a definition of struct _GUID is not available. This is not
ideal: in principle the two layouts could have different padding.
Reviewers: rnk, jdoerfert
Subscribers: arphaman, cfe-commits, aeubanks
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D78171
Summary:
Previously, clang emitted a less-usefull diagnostic and didnt recover
well when the keywords is used as identifier in function paramter.
```
void foo(int case, int x); // previously we drop all parameters after
`int case`.
```
Reviewers: sammccall
Reviewed By: sammccall
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D77633
in the token stream.
Previously we deleted all template-id annotations at the end of each
top-level declaration. That doesn't work: we can do some lookahead and
form a template-id annotation, and then roll back that lookahead, parse,
and decide that we're missing a semicolon at the end of a top-level
declaration, before we reach the annotation token. In that situation,
we'd end up parsing the annotation token after deleting its associated
data, leading to various forms of badness.
We now only delete template-id annotations if the preprocessor can
assure us that there are no annotation tokens left in the token stream
(or if we're already at EOF). This lets us delete the annotation tokens
earlier in a lot of cases; we now clean them up at the end of each
statement and class member, not just after each top-level declaration.
This also permitted some simplification of the delay-parsed templates
cleanup code.
scope.
There are a few contexts in which we assume a name is a template name;
if such a context is one where we should perform an unqualified lookup,
and lookup finds nothing, we would form a dependent template name even
if the name is not dependent. This happens in particular for the lookup
of a pseudo-destructor.
In passing, rename ActOnDependentTemplateName to just ActOnTemplateName
given that we apply it for non-dependent template names too.
Instead of bailing out of parsing when we encounter an invalid
template-name or template arguments in a template-id, produce an
annotation token describing the invalid construct.
This avoids duplicate errors and generally allows us to recover better.
In principle we should be able to extend this to store some kinds of
invalid template-id in the AST for tooling use, but that isn't handled
as part of this change.
This reverts commit 0788acbccb.
This reverts commit c2d7a1f79cedfc9fcb518596aa839da4de0adb69: Revert "[clangd] Add test for FindTarget+RecoveryExpr (which already works). NFC"
It causes a crash on invalid code:
class X {
decltype(unresolved()) foo;
};
constexpr int s = sizeof(X);
Summary:
After we parse the switch condition, we don't do the type check for
type-dependent expr (e.g. TypoExpr) (in Sema::CheckSwitchCondition), then the
TypoExpr is corrected to an invalid-type expr (in Sema::MakeFullExpr) and passed
to the ActOnStartOfSwitchStmt, which triggers the assertion.
Fix https://github.com/clangd/clangd/issues/311
Reviewers: sammccall
Subscribers: ilya-biryukov, kadircet, usaxena95, cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D76592
Summary:
The parsing of GNU C extended asm statements was a little brittle and
had a few issues:
- It was using Parse::ParseTypeQualifierListOpt to parse the `volatile`
qualifier. That parser is really meant for TypeQualifiers; an asm
statement doesn't really have a type qualifier. This is still maybe
nice to have, but not necessary. We now can check for the `volatile`
token by properly expanding the grammer, rather than abusing
Parse::ParseTypeQualifierListOpt.
- The parsing of `goto` was position dependent, so `asm goto volatile`
wouldn't parse. The qualifiers should be position independent to one
another. Now they are.
- We would warn on duplicate `volatile`, but the parse error for
duplicate `goto` was a generic parse error and wasn't clear.
- We need to add support for the recent GNU C extension `asm inline`.
Adding support to the parser with the above issues highlighted the
need for this refactoring.
Link: https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/Extended-Asm.html
Reviewers: aaron.ballman
Reviewed By: aaron.ballman
Subscribers: aheejin, jfb, nathanchance, cfe-commits, echristo, efriedma, rsmith, chandlerc, craig.topper, erichkeane, jyu2, void, srhines
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D75563
After a first attempt to fix the test-suite failures, my first recommit
caused the same failures again. I had updated CMakeList.txt files of
tests that needed -fcommon, but it turns out that there are also
Makefiles which are used by some bots, so I've updated these Makefiles
now too.
See the original commit message for more details on this change:
0a9fc9233e
This includes fixes for:
- test-suite: some benchmarks need to be compiled with -fcommon, see D75557.
- compiler-rt: one test needed -fcommon, and another a change, see D75520.
This reverts commit 0a9fc9233e.
Going to look at the asan failures.
I find the failures in the test suite weird, because they look
like compile time test and I don't understand how that can be
failing, but will have a brief look at that too.
This makes -fno-common the default for all targets because this has performance
and code-size benefits and is more language conforming for C code.
Additionally, GCC10 also defaults to -fno-common and so we get consistent
behaviour with GCC.
With this change, C code that uses tentative definitions as definitions of a
variable in multiple translation units will trigger multiple-definition linker
errors. Generally, this occurs when the use of the extern keyword is neglected
in the declaration of a variable in a header file. In some cases, no specific
translation unit provides a definition of the variable. The previous behavior
can be restored by specifying -fcommon.
As GCC has switched already, we benefit from applications already being ported
and existing documentation how to do this. For example:
- https://gcc.gnu.org/gcc-10/porting_to.html
- https://wiki.gentoo.org/wiki/Gcc_10_porting_notes/fno_common
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D75056
Summary:
Clang's "asm goto" feature didn't initially support outputs constraints. That
was the same behavior as gcc's implementation. The decision by gcc not to
support outputs was based on a restriction in their IR regarding terminators.
LLVM doesn't restrict terminators from returning values (e.g. 'invoke'), so
it made sense to support this feature.
Output values are valid only on the 'fallthrough' path. If an output value's used
on an indirect branch, then it's 'poisoned'.
In theory, outputs *could* be valid on the 'indirect' paths, but it's very
difficult to guarantee that the original semantics would be retained. E.g.
because indirect labels could be used as data, we wouldn't be able to split
critical edges in situations where two 'callbr' instructions have the same
indirect label, because the indirect branch's destination would no longer be
the same.
Reviewers: jyknight, nickdesaulniers, hfinkel
Reviewed By: jyknight, nickdesaulniers
Subscribers: MaskRay, rsmith, hiraditya, llvm-commits, cfe-commits, craig.topper, rnk
Tags: #clang, #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D69876
The syntax rules for ptr-operator allow attributes after *, &,
&&, therefore we should be able to parse the following:
void fn() {
void (*[[attr]] x)() = &fn;
void (&[[attr]] y)() = fn;
void (&&[[attr]] z)() = fn;
}
However the current logic in TryParsePtrOperatorSeq does not consider
the presence of attributes leading to unexpected parsing errors.
Moreover we should also consider _Atomic a possible qualifier that can
appear after the sequence of attribute specifiers.
user interface and documentation, and update __cplusplus for C++20.
WG21 considers the C++20 standard to be finished (even though it still
has some more steps to pass through in the ISO process).
The old flag names are accepted for compatibility, as usual, and we
still have lots of references to C++2a in comments and identifiers;
those can be cleaned up separately.
Richard Smith