This reverts commit r313722.
It looks like compiler-rt/lib/tsan/rtl/tsan_libdispatch_mac.cc cannot be
compiled because some of the functions declared in the file do not match
the ones in the SDK headers (which are annotated with 'noescape').
llvm-svn: 313725
The attribute informs the compiler that the annotated pointer parameter
of a function cannot escape and enables IRGen to attach attribute
'nocapture' to parameters that are annotated with the attribute. That is
the only optimization that currently takes advantage of 'noescape', but
there are other optimizations that will be added later that improves
IRGen for ObjC blocks.
rdar://problem/19886775
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D32210
llvm-svn: 313722
The attribute informs the compiler that the annotated pointer parameter
of a function cannot escape and enables IRGen to attach attribute
'nocapture' to parameters that are annotated with the attribute. That is
the only optimization that currently takes advantage of 'noescape', but
there are other optimizations that will be added later that improves
IRGen for ObjC blocks.
rdar://problem/19886775
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D32520
llvm-svn: 313720
The recently behavior in the code that these tests were meant to be checking will be ammended as soon as a suitable change can be properly reviewed.
llvm-svn: 313684
Summary:
As requested by Sam McCall:
> Enums (not new I guess). Typical case: if (enum < 0 || enum > MAX)
> The warning strongly suggests that the enum < 0 check has no effect
> (for enums with nonnegative ranges).
> Clang doesn't seem to optimize such checks out though, and they seem
> likely to catch bugs in some cases. Yes, only if there's UB elsewhere,
> but I assume not optimizing out these checks indicates a deliberate
> decision to stay somewhat compatible with a technically-incorrect
> mental model.
> If this is the case, should we move these to a
> -Wtautological-compare-enum subcategory?
Reviewers: rjmccall, rsmith, aaron.ballman, sammccall, bkramer, djasper
Reviewed By: aaron.ballman
Subscribers: jroelofs, cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D37629
llvm-svn: 313677
Summary:
According to C99 6.3.2.1p1, structs and unions with nested
const-qualified fields (that is, const-qualified fields
declared at some recursive level of the aggregate) are not
modifiable lvalues. However, Clang permits assignments of
these lvalues.
With this patch, we both prohibit the assignment of records
with const-qualified fields and emit a best-effort diagnostic.
This fixes https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=31796 .
Committing on behalf of bevinh (Bevin Hansson).
Reviewers: rtrieu, rsmith, bjope
Reviewed By: bjope
Subscribers: Ka-Ka, rogfer01, bjope, fhahn, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D37254
llvm-svn: 313628
This fixes PR28903 by avoiding access check for inner enum constant. We
are performing access check because one enum constant references another
and because enum is defined in CXXRecordDecl. But access check doesn't
work because FindDeclaringClass doesn't expect more than one EnumDecl
and because inner enum has access AS_none due to not being an immediate
child of a record.
The change detects an enum is defined in wrong place and allows to skip
parsing its body. Access check is skipped together with body parsing.
There was no crash in C, added test case to cover the new error.
rdar://problem/28530809
Reviewers: rnk, doug.gregor, rsmith
Reviewed By: doug.gregor
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D37089
llvm-svn: 313386
Summary:
This is a first half(?) of a fix for the following bug:
https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=34147 (gcc -Wtype-limits)
GCC's -Wtype-limits does warn on comparison of unsigned value
with signed zero (as in, with 0), but clang only warns if the
zero is unsigned (i.e. 0U).
Also, be careful not to double-warn, or falsely warn on
comparison of signed/fp variable and signed 0.
Yes, all these testcases are needed.
Testing: $ ninja check-clang-sema check-clang-semacxx
Also, no new warnings for clang stage-2 build.
Reviewers: rjmccall, rsmith, aaron.ballman
Reviewed By: rjmccall
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D37565
llvm-svn: 312750
This makes -Wunreachable-code work for programs containing SEH (except for
__finally, which is still missing for now).
__try is modeled like try (but simpler since it can only have a single __except
or __finally), __except is fairly similar to catch (but simpler, since it can't
contain declarations). __leave is implemented similarly to break / continue.
Use the existing addTryDispatchBlock infrastructure (which
FindUnreachableCode() in ReachableCode.cpp uses via cfg->try_blocks_begin()) to
mark things in the __except blocks as reachable.
Re-use TryTerminatedBlock. This means we add EH edges from calls to the __try
block, but not from all other statements. While this is incomplete, it matches
LLVM's SEH codegen support. Also, in practice, BuildOpts.AddEHEdges is always
false in practice from what I can tell, so we never even insert the call EH
edges either.
https://reviews.llvm.org/D36914
llvm-svn: 311561
This reverts commit rL310403, which caused spurious warnings in libc++,
because it didn't properly handle templated scoped lockable types.
llvm-svn: 310698
This patch adds support for __builtin_cpu_is. I've tried to match the strings supported to the latest version of gcc.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D35449
llvm-svn: 310657
Such implicitly declared functions behave as if the enclosing block
contained the declaration extern int name() (C90, 6.3.3.2 Function calls),
thus their names should have block scope (C90, 6.1.2.1 Scope of identifiers).
This patch fixes https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=33224
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D33676
llvm-svn: 310616
Add warnings in cases where an implicit `this` argument is expected to
attributes because either `this` doesn't exist because the attribute is
on a free function, or because `this` is on a type that doesn't have a
corresponding capability/lockable/scoped_lockable attribute.
Reviewers: delesley, aaron.ballman
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D36237
llvm-svn: 310403
Delete the test that was broken by rL309725, and add it back in a
follow up commit. Also, improve the tests a bit.
Reviewers: delesley, aaron.ballman
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D36237
llvm-svn: 310402
An ABI change was introduced in r254596 that modified structure layouts when the 'packed' attribute was used on one-byte bitfields. Since the PS4 target needs to maintain backwards compatibility for all structure layouts, this change reintroduces the old behavior for PS4 targets only. It also introduces PS4 specific cases to the relevant test.
Patch by Matthew Voss.
llvm-svn: 310388
r282968 introduced a regression due to the lack of proper testing.
Re-add lax conversion support between non ext vectors for compound
assignments and add a test for that.
rdar://problem/28639467
llvm-svn: 309722
'#pragma pack (pop)' and suspicious uses of '#pragma pack' in included files
The second recommit (r309106) was reverted because the "non-default #pragma
pack value chages the alignment of struct or union members in the included file"
warning proved to be too aggressive for external projects like Chromium
(https://bugs.chromium.org/p/chromium/issues/detail?id=749197). This recommit
makes the problematic warning a non-default one, and gives it the
-Wpragma-pack-suspicious-include warning option.
The first recommit (r308441) caused a "non-default #pragma pack value might
change the alignment of struct or union members in the included file" warning
in LLVM itself. This recommit tweaks the added warning to avoid warnings for
#includes that don't have any records that are affected by the non-default
alignment. This tweak avoids the previously emitted warning in LLVM.
Original message:
This commit adds a new -Wpragma-pack warning. It warns in the following cases:
- When a translation unit is missing terminating #pragma pack (pop) directives.
- When entering an included file if the current alignment value as determined
by '#pragma pack' directives is different from the default alignment value.
- When leaving an included file that changed the state of the current alignment
value.
rdar://10184173
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D35484
llvm-svn: 309386
The warning fires on non-suspicious code in Chromium. Reverting until a
solution is figured out.
> Recommit r308327 2nd time: Add a warning for missing
> '#pragma pack (pop)' and suspicious uses of '#pragma pack' in included files
>
> The first recommit (r308441) caused a "non-default #pragma pack value might
> change the alignment of struct or union members in the included file" warning
> in LLVM itself. This recommit tweaks the added warning to avoid warnings for
> #includes that don't have any records that are affected by the non-default
> alignment. This tweak avoids the previously emitted warning in LLVM.
>
> Original message:
>
> This commit adds a new -Wpragma-pack warning. It warns in the following cases:
>
> - When a translation unit is missing terminating #pragma pack (pop) directives.
> - When entering an included file if the current alignment value as determined
> by '#pragma pack' directives is different from the default alignment value.
> - When leaving an included file that changed the state of the current alignment
> value.
>
> rdar://10184173
>
> Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D35484
llvm-svn: 309186
'#pragma pack (pop)' and suspicious uses of '#pragma pack' in included files
The first recommit (r308441) caused a "non-default #pragma pack value might
change the alignment of struct or union members in the included file" warning
in LLVM itself. This recommit tweaks the added warning to avoid warnings for
#includes that don't have any records that are affected by the non-default
alignment. This tweak avoids the previously emitted warning in LLVM.
Original message:
This commit adds a new -Wpragma-pack warning. It warns in the following cases:
- When a translation unit is missing terminating #pragma pack (pop) directives.
- When entering an included file if the current alignment value as determined
by '#pragma pack' directives is different from the default alignment value.
- When leaving an included file that changed the state of the current alignment
value.
rdar://10184173
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D35484
llvm-svn: 309106
MIPS gcc supports `long_call/far/near` attributes only, but other
targets have the `short_call` attribut, so let's support it for MIPS
for consistency.
llvm-svn: 308719
This patch adds support for the `long_call`, `far`, and `near` attributes
for MIPS targets. The `long_call` and `far` attributes are synonyms. All
these attributes override `-mlong-calls` / `-mno-long-calls` command
line options for particular function.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D35479
llvm-svn: 308667
This diff addresses FIXMEs in lib/Analysis/ScanfFormatString.cpp
for the case of ssize_t format specifier and adds tests.
In particular, this change enables Clang to emit a warning
on incorrect using of "%zd"/"%zn".
Test plan: make check-all
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D35652
llvm-svn: 308662
This seems to have broken the sanitizer-x86_64-linux buildbot. Reverting until
it's fixed, especially since this landed just before the 5.0 branch.
> This commit adds a new -Wpragma-pack warning. It warns in the following cases:
>
> - When a translation unit is missing terminating #pragma pack (pop) directives.
> - When entering an included file if the current alignment value as determined
> by '#pragma pack' directives is different from the default alignment value.
> - When leaving an included file that changed the state of the current alignment
> value.
>
> rdar://10184173
>
> Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D35484
llvm-svn: 308455
and suspicious uses of '#pragma pack' in included files
This commit adds a new -Wpragma-pack warning. It warns in the following cases:
- When a translation unit is missing terminating #pragma pack (pop) directives.
- When entering an included file if the current alignment value as determined
by '#pragma pack' directives is different from the default alignment value.
- When leaving an included file that changed the state of the current alignment
value.
rdar://10184173
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D35484
llvm-svn: 308441
of '#pragma pack' in included files
This commit adds a new -Wpragma-pack warning. It warns in the following cases:
- When a translation unit is missing terminating #pragma pack (pop) directives.
- When entering an included file if the current alignment value as determined
by '#pragma pack' directives is different from the default alignment value.
- When leaving an included file that changed the state of the current alignment
value.
rdar://10184173
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D35484
llvm-svn: 308327
Move builtins from the x86 specific scope into the global
scope. Their use is still limited to x86_64 and aarch64 though.
This allows wine on aarch64 to properly handle variadic functions.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D34475
llvm-svn: 308218
This patch extends the -fzvector language feature to enable the new
"vector float" data type when compiling at -march=z14. This matches
the updated extension definition implemented by other compilers for
the platform, which is indicated to applications by pre-defining
__VEC__ to 10302 (instead of 10301).
llvm-svn: 308198
Summary:
This way, the behavior of that warning flag
more closely resembles that of GCC.
Do note that there is at least one false-negative (see FIXME in tests).
Fixes PR4802.
Testing:
```
ninja check-clang-sema check-clang-semacxx
```
Reviewers: dblaikie, majnemer, rnk
Reviewed By: dblaikie, rnk
Subscribers: mclow.lists, cfe-commits, alexfh, rnk
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D33102
llvm-svn: 307045
Akira Hatanaka