Add builtin and intrinsic for `__addex`.
This patch is part of a series of patches to provide builtins for
compatibility with the XL compiler.
Reviewed By: stefanp, nemanjai, NeHuang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D107002
This is a re-try of 6de1dbbd09 which was reverted because
it missed a null check. Extra test for that failure added.
Original commit message:
This is an adaptation of D41603 and another step on the way
to canonicalizing to the intrinsic forms of min/max.
See D98152 for status.
This reverts the revert 28c04794df.
The failing MLIR test that caused the revert should be fixed in this
version.
Also includes a PPC test fix previously in 1f87c7c478.
For unit-stride and strided load/stores we set the SEW operand of
the pseudo instruction equal the EEW in the opcode. The LMUL
of the pseudo instruction is the LMUL we want.
These instructions calculate EMUL=(EEW/SEW) * LMUL. We can use
this to avoid changing vtype if the SEW/LMUL of the previous
vtype matches the EEW/EMUL ratio we need for the instruction.
Due to how the global analysis works, we can only do this
optimization when the previous vsetvli was produced in the block
containing the store. We need to know in the first phase if the
vsetvli will be inserted so we can propagate information to
the successors in the second phase correctly. This means we can't
depend on predecessors.
Reviewed By: rogfer01
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D106601
We really shouldn't deal with a conditional branch that can be trivially
constant-folded into an unconditional branch.
Indeed, barring failure to trigger BB reprocessing, that should be true,
so let's assert as much, and hope the assertion never fires.
If it does, we have a bug to fix.
Mainly, i want to add an assertion that `SimplifyCFGOpt::simplifyCondBranch()`
doesn't get asked to deal with non-unconditional branches,
and if i do that, then said assertion fires on existing tests,
and this is what prevents it from firing.
This is a direct translation of the select folds added with
D53033 / D53036 and another step towards canonicalization
using the intrinsics (see D98152).
Currently, LNICM pass does not support sinking instructions out of loop nest.
This patch enables LNICM to sink down as many instructions to the exit block of outermost loop as possible.
Reviewed By: Whitney
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D107219
Given a constant operand, the MVE and DAGCombine combines could fight,
each redistributing in the opposite order. Add a guard to the MVE
vecreduce distribution to prevent that.
When depth > 0, callee frame address is used to compute the return address of
callee producing improper return address. This patch adds the fix to use caller
frame address to compute the return address of callee.
Reviewed By: nemanjai, #powerpc
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D107646
This patch adjusts the intrinsics definition of
llvm.matrix.column.major.load and llvm.matrix.column.major.store to
allow overloading the type of the stride. The bitwidth of the stride is
used to perform the offset computation.
This fixes a crash when using __builtin_matrix_column_major_load or
__builtin_matrix_column_major_store on 32 bit platforms. The stride argument
of the builtins are defined as `size_t`, which is 32 bits wide on 32 bit
platforms.
Note that we still perform offset computations with 64 bit width on 32
bit platforms for accesses that do not take a user-specified stride.
This can be fixed separately.
Fixes PR51304.
Reviewed By: erichkeane
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D107349
This patch enables extending loads for fixed length SVE code generation.
There is a slight regression here in the mulh tests; since these tests
load the parameter and then extend it these are treated as extending
loads which are merged, preventing the mulh instruction from being
generated. As this affects scalable SVE codegen as well this should be
addressed in a separate patch.
Reviewed By: bsmith
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D107057
The register classes are generated by TableGen, use them instead of
handwritten tables.
Reviewed By: david-arm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D107763
Originally committed as ffc3fb665d
Reverted in fcf2d5f402 due to an
assertion failure.
Original commit message:
Allow the folding even if there is an
intervening bitcast.
Reviewed By: arsenm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D106667
These rules were originally written when the new predicate based legalizer
was introduced in an attempt to preserve existing behaviour. It wasn't
properly kept up to date as things like vector support was split out into
G_CONCAT_VECTORS, and frankly, even if it was, it was too complex.
It's much easier to start from scratch with what we can actually support,
which is just a few type combinations. Anything illegal we should either
legalize, or should be eliminated as a side effect of artifact combination.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D107937
The assertion can fail in some cases when an i16 constant is promoted
to i32.
e.g. in the added test case the value `i16 -32768` is within the range
of i16 but the assert fails when the constant is promoted to positive
`i32 32768` by an earlier call to DAG.getConstant().
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D107880
Change-Id: I2f6179783cbc9630e6acab149a762b43c65664de
release call
findSafeStoreForStoreStrongContraction checks whether it's safe to move
the release call to the store by inspecting all instructions between the
two, but was ignoring retain instructions. This was causing objects to
be released and deallocated before they were retained.
rdar://81668577
This patch adds Pass1 of MIRADDFSDiscriminatorsPass before register
allocation, and Pass2 of MIRAddFSDiscriminatorsPass before
Block-Placement. This is still under --enable-fs-discrmininator
option (default false).
This would reduce the turn-around time for FSAFDO transition.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D104579
This is a quick fix for a motivating case that looks like this:
https://godbolt.org/z/GeMqzMc38
As noted, we might be able to restore the min/max patterns
with select folds, or we just wait for this to become easier
with canonicalization to min/max intrinsics.
When enable CSPGO for ThinLTO, there are profile cfg mismatch warnings that will cause lld-link errors (with /WX)
due to source changes (e.g. `#if` code runs for profile generation but not for profile use)
To disable it we have to use an internal "/mllvm:-no-pgo-warn-mismatch" option.
In contrast clang uses option ”-Wno-backend-plugin“ to avoid such warnings and gcc has an explicit "-Wno-coverage-mismatch" option.
Add "lto-pgo-warn-mismatch" option to lld COFF/ELF to help turn on/off the profile mismatch warnings explicitly when build with ThinLTO and CSPGO.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D104431
We are running into more and more cases where the liveouts of low
overhead loops do not validate. Add some extra debug messages to make it
clearer why.
The introduction of `SHF_GNU_RETAIN` has caused massive problems on Solaris.
Initially, as reported in Bug 49437, it caused dozens of testsuite failures
on both sparc and x86. The objects were marked as `ELFOSABI_NONE`, but
`SHF_GNU_RETAIN` is a GNU extension. In the native Solaris ABI, that flag
(in the range for OS-specific values) is `SHF_SUNW_ABSENT` with a
completely different semantics, which confuses Solaris `ld` very much.
Later, the objects became (correctly) marked `ELFOSABI_GNU`, which Solaris
`ld` doesn't support, causing it to SEGV and break the build. The linker
is currently being hardened to not accept non-native OS ABIs to avoid this.
The need for linker support is already documented in
`clang/include/clang/Basic/AttrDocs.td`, but not currently checked.
This patch avoids all this by not emitting `SHF_GNU_RETAIN` on Solaris at all.
Tested on `amd64-pc-solaris2.11`, `sparcv9-sun-solaris2.11`, and
`x86_64-pc-linux-gnu`.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D107747
When enable CSPGO for ThinLTO, there are profile cfg mismatch warnings that will cause lld-link errors (with /WX).
To disable it we have to use an internal "/mllvm:-no-pgo-warn-mismatch" option.
In contrast clang uses option ”-Wno-backend-plugin“ to avoid such warnings and gcc has an explicit "-Wno-coverage-mismatch" option.
Add this "lto-pgo-warn-mismatch" option to lld to help turn on/off the profile mismatch warnings explicitly when build with ThinLTO and CSPGO.
Reviewed By: tejohnson
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D104431
When none of the translation units in the binary have been instrumented
we shouldn't need to link the profile runtime. However, because we pass
-u__llvm_profile_runtime on Linux and Fuchsia, the runtime would still
be pulled in and incur some overhead. On Fuchsia which uses runtime
counter relocation, it also means that we cannot reference the bias
variable unconditionally.
This change modifies the InstrProfiling pass to pull in the profile
runtime only when needed by declaring the __llvm_profile_runtime symbol
in the translation unit only when needed. For now we restrict this only
for Fuchsia, but this can be later expanded to other platforms. This
approach was already used prior to 9a041a7522, but we changed it
to always generate the __llvm_profile_runtime due to a TAPI limitation,
but that limitation may no longer apply, and it certainly doesn't apply
on platforms like Fuchsia.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D98061
PHI nodes are not pass through but change their value, we have to
account for that to avoid missing stores.
Follow up for D107798 to fix PR51249 for good.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D107808
AAPointerInfoFloating needs to visit all uses and some multiple times if
we go through PHI nodes. Attributor::checkForAllUses keeps a visited set
so we don't recurs endlessly. We now allow recursion for non-phi uses so
we track all pointer offsets via PHI nodes properly without endless
recursion.
This replaces the first attempt D107579.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D107798
To avoid simplification with wrong constants we need to make sure we
know that we won't perform specific optimizations based on the users
request. The non-SPMDzation and non-CustomStateMachine flags did only
prevent the final transformation but allowed to value simplification
to go ahead.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D107862
We were calling find and then using operator[]. Instead keep the
iterator from find and use it to get the value.
Just happened to notice while investigating how we decide what extends
to use between basic blocks.
Lei Huang