Factor out two functions calculateRegionSplitCost and doRegionSplit
from tryRegionSplit. These two functions will be used in coming patches.
rdar://16162005
llvm-svn: 204684
No functional change intended.
Merging up-front rather than delaying this task until later. This just
seems simpler and more efficient (avoiding growing the debug loc list
only to have to skip over those post-merged entries, etc).
llvm-svn: 204679
This is used to avoid relocations in the dwo file by allowing
DW_AT_ranges specified in debug_info.dwo to be relative to this base
address. (r204667 implements the base-relative DW_AT_ranges side of
this)
llvm-svn: 204672
This removes the debug_ranges relocations from debug_info.dwo (but
doesn't implement the DW_AT_GNU_ranges_base which is also necessary for
correct functioning)
llvm-svn: 204668
Try to match scalar and first like the other instructions.
Expand 64-bit ands to a pair of 32-bit ands since that is not
available on the VALU.
llvm-svn: 204660
never returns, which is true by design.
Initially assumed that the reason is llvm_unreachable being dependent on NDEBUG.
However, even if llvm_unreachable is replaced by __assume(false), VC still warns in
Release modes but not in Debug modes...
The real reason turned out to be optimization flags.
With /Od in Debug modes the warning is not issued whereas with /O1 it is.
I could not find any documentation to this effect, but it is reproducable:
Try compiling http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/khwfyc5d(v=vs.90).aspx
with /O1 and then with /Od.
llvm-svn: 204659
As a first step towards real little-endian code generation, this patch
changes the PowerPC MC layer to actually generate little-endian object
files. This involves passing the little-endian flag through the various
layers, including down to createELFObjectWriter so we actually get basic
little-endian ELF objects, emitting instructions in little-endian order,
and handling fixups and relocations as appropriate for little-endian.
The bulk of the patch is to update most test cases in test/MC/PowerPC
to verify both big- and little-endian encodings. (The only test cases
*not* updated are those that create actual big-endian ABI code, like
the TLS tests.)
Note that while the object files are now little-endian, the generated
code itself is not yet updated, in particular, it still does not adhere
to the ELFv2 ABI.
llvm-svn: 204634
Those patterns are used when the load cannot be folded into the related broadcast
during the select phase.
This happens when the load gets additional uses that were not anticipated during
the previous lowering phases (constant vector to constant load, then constant
load reused) or when selection DAG is not able to prove that folding the load
will not create a cycle in the DAG.
<rdar://problem/16074331>
llvm-svn: 204631
Previously we would print an error message on machines where the only VS
version we find is 2013, even though we successfully install the integration
files for it.
Also, we shouldn't have two END labels.
llvm-svn: 204629
This can be observed with the old testcase of CodeGen/X86/pr12312.ll:
47c47
< vorps %ymm0, %ymm1, %ymm0
---
> vorps %ymm1, %ymm0, %ymm0
97c97
< vorps %ymm1, %ymm0, %ymm0
---
> vorps %ymm0, %ymm1, %ymm0
The vector VecIns is populated with all the values from VecInMap. This is done
while iterating VecInMap. VecInMap uses a hash of pointer values so the
resulting order can vary depending on the memory layout.
The fix is to populate the vector VecIns earlier as VecInMap is populated.
This is done in DAG traversal order.
Fixes <rdar://problem/16398806>
llvm-svn: 204623
[PPC64LE] ELFv2 ABI updates for the .opd section
The PPC64 Little Endian (PPC64LE) target supports the ELFv2 ABI, and as
such, does not have a ".opd" section. This is keyed off a _CALL_ELF=2
macro check.
The CALL_ELF check is not clearly documented at this time. The basis
for usage in this patch is from the gcc thread here:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2013-11/msg01144.html
> Adding comment from Uli:
Looks good to me. I think the old-style JIT doesn't really work
anyway for 64-bit, but at least with this patch LLVM will compile
and link again on a ppc64le host ...
llvm-svn: 204614
Summary:
These expressions already worked but weren't tested.
Patch by Robert N. M. Watson and David Chisnall (it was originally two patches)
Their work was sponsored by: DARPA, AFRL
Differential Revision: http://llvm-reviews.chandlerc.com/D3156
llvm-svn: 204612
I'm under the impression that we used to infer the isCommutable flag from the
instruction-associated pattern. Regardless, we don't seem to do this (at least
by default) any more. I've gone through all of our instruction definitions, and
marked as commutative all of those that should be trivial to commute (by
exchanging the first two operands). There has been special code for the RL*
instructions, and that's not changed.
Before this change, we had the following commutative instructions:
RLDIMI
RLDIMIo
RLWIMI
RLWIMI8
RLWIMI8o
RLWIMIo
XSADDDP
XSMULDP
XVADDDP
XVADDSP
XVMULDP
XVMULSP
After:
ADD4
ADD4o
ADD8
ADD8o
ADDC
ADDC8
ADDC8o
ADDCo
ADDE
ADDE8
ADDE8o
ADDEo
AND
AND8
AND8o
ANDo
CRAND
CREQV
CRNAND
CRNOR
CROR
CRXOR
EQV
EQV8
EQV8o
EQVo
FADD
FADDS
FADDSo
FADDo
FMADD
FMADDS
FMADDSo
FMADDo
FMSUB
FMSUBS
FMSUBSo
FMSUBo
FMUL
FMULS
FMULSo
FMULo
FNMADD
FNMADDS
FNMADDSo
FNMADDo
FNMSUB
FNMSUBS
FNMSUBSo
FNMSUBo
MULHD
MULHDU
MULHDUo
MULHDo
MULHW
MULHWU
MULHWUo
MULHWo
MULLD
MULLDo
MULLW
MULLWo
NAND
NAND8
NAND8o
NANDo
NOR
NOR8
NOR8o
NORo
OR
OR8
OR8o
ORo
RLDIMI
RLDIMIo
RLWIMI
RLWIMI8
RLWIMI8o
RLWIMIo
VADDCUW
VADDFP
VADDSBS
VADDSHS
VADDSWS
VADDUBM
VADDUBS
VADDUHM
VADDUHS
VADDUWM
VADDUWS
VAND
VAVGSB
VAVGSH
VAVGSW
VAVGUB
VAVGUH
VAVGUW
VMADDFP
VMAXFP
VMAXSB
VMAXSH
VMAXSW
VMAXUB
VMAXUH
VMAXUW
VMHADDSHS
VMHRADDSHS
VMINFP
VMINSB
VMINSH
VMINSW
VMINUB
VMINUH
VMINUW
VMLADDUHM
VMULESB
VMULESH
VMULEUB
VMULEUH
VMULOSB
VMULOSH
VMULOUB
VMULOUH
VNMSUBFP
VOR
VXOR
XOR
XOR8
XOR8o
XORo
XSADDDP
XSMADDADP
XSMAXDP
XSMINDP
XSMSUBADP
XSMULDP
XSNMADDADP
XSNMSUBADP
XVADDDP
XVADDSP
XVMADDADP
XVMADDASP
XVMAXDP
XVMAXSP
XVMINDP
XVMINSP
XVMSUBADP
XVMSUBASP
XVMULDP
XVMULSP
XVNMADDADP
XVNMADDASP
XVNMSUBADP
XVNMSUBASP
XXLAND
XXLNOR
XXLOR
XXLXOR
This is a by-inspection change, and I'm not sure how to write a reliable test
case. I would like advice on this, however.
llvm-svn: 204609
Summary:
- If only two registers are passed to a three-register operation, then the
first argument is both source and destination register.
- If a non-register is passed as the last argument, generate the immediate
version of the instruction.
Also mark DADD commutative and add scheduling information (to the generic
scheduler), and implement DSUB.
Patch by David Chisnall
His work was sponsored by: DARPA, AFRL
CC: theraven
Differential Revision: http://llvm-reviews.chandlerc.com/D3148
llvm-svn: 204605
I've done some experimentation with this, and it looks like using the
lower-latency (but lower throughput) copy instruction is essentially always the
right thing to do.
My assumption is that, in order to be relatively sure that the higher-latency
copy will increase throughput, we'd want to have it unlikely to be in-flight
with its use. On the P7, the global completion table (GCT) can hold a maximum
of 120 instructions, shared among all active threads (up to 4), giving 30
instructions per thread. So specifically, I'd require at least that many
instructions between the copy and the use before the high-latency variant is
used.
Trying this, however, over the entire test suite resulted in zero cases where
the high-latency form would be preferable. This may be a consequence of the
fact that the scheduler views copies as free, and so they tend to end up close
to their uses. For this experiment I created a function:
unsigned chooseVSXCopy(MachineBasicBlock &MBB,
MachineBasicBlock::iterator I,
unsigned DestReg, unsigned SrcReg,
unsigned StartDist = 1,
unsigned Depth = 3) const;
with an implementation like:
if (!Depth)
return PPC::XXLOR;
const unsigned MaxDist = 30;
unsigned Dist = StartDist;
for (auto J = I, JE = MBB.end(); J != JE && Dist <= MaxDist; ++J) {
if (J->isTransient() && !J->isCopy())
continue;
if (J->isCall() || J->isReturn() || J->readsRegister(DestReg, TRI))
return PPC::XXLOR;
++Dist;
}
// We've exceeded the required distance for the high-latency form, use it.
if (Dist > MaxDist)
return PPC::XVCPSGNDP;
// If this is only an exit block, use the low-latency form.
if (MBB.succ_empty())
return PPC::XXLOR;
// We've reached the end of the block, check the successor blocks (up to some
// depth), and use the high-latency form if that is okay with all successors.
for (auto J = MBB.succ_begin(), JE = MBB.succ_end(); J != JE; ++J) {
if (chooseVSXCopy(**J, (*J)->begin(), DestReg, SrcReg,
Dist, --Depth) == PPC::XXLOR)
return PPC::XXLOR;
}
// All of our successor blocks seem okay with the high-latency variant, so
// we'll use it.
return PPC::XVCPSGNDP;
and then changed the copy opcode selection from:
Opc = PPC::XXLOR;
to:
Opc = chooseVSXCopy(MBB, std::next(I), DestReg, SrcReg);
In conclusion, I'm removing the FIXME from the comment, because I believe that
there is, at least absent other examples, nothing to fix.
llvm-svn: 204591
This is a pretty straight forward translation for COFF, we just need to
stick the function in a COMDAT section marked as
IMAGE_COMDAT_SELECT_NODUPLICATES.
llvm-svn: 204565
Kevin Enderby