Commit Graph

5 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Tom Stellard 206b9927f8 AMDGPU/GlobalISel: Implement call lowering for shaders returning values
Reviewers: arsenm, nhaehnle

Subscribers: kzhuravl, jvesely, wdng, yaxunl, rovka, kristof.beyls, dstuttard, tpr, t-tye, volkan, llvm-commits

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D57166

llvm-svn: 357964
2019-04-09 02:26:03 +00:00
Yaxun Liu 0124b5484c [AMDGPU] Change constant addr space to 4
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D43170

llvm-svn: 325030
2018-02-13 18:00:25 +00:00
Puyan Lotfi 43e94b15ea Followup on Proposal to move MIR physical register namespace to '$' sigil.
Discussed here:

http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2018-January/120320.html

In preparation for adding support for named vregs we are changing the sigil for
physical registers in MIR to '$' from '%'. This will prevent name clashes of
named physical register with named vregs.

llvm-svn: 323922
2018-01-31 22:04:26 +00:00
Justin Bogner 6c452834a1 MIR: Print the register class or bank in vreg defs
This updates the MIRPrinter to include the regclass when printing
virtual register defs, which is already valid syntax for the
parser. That is, given 64 bit %0 and %1 in a "gpr" regbank,

  %1(s64) = COPY %0(s64)

would now be written as

  %1:gpr(s64) = COPY %0(s64)

While this change alone introduces a bit of redundancy with the
registers block, it allows us to update the tests to be more concise
and understandable and brings us closer to being able to remove the
registers block completely.

Note: We generally only print the class in defs, but there is one
exception. If there are uses without any defs whatsoever, we'll print
the class on all uses. I'm not completely convinced this comes up in
meaningful machine IR, but for now the MIRParser and MachineVerifier
both accept that kind of stuff, so we don't want to have a situation
where we can print something we can't parse.

llvm-svn: 316479
2017-10-24 18:04:54 +00:00
Tom Stellard 9d8337d857 AMDGPU/GlobalISel: Add support for amdgpu_vs calling convention
Reviewers: arsenm

Reviewed By: arsenm

Subscribers: kzhuravl, wdng, nhaehnle, yaxunl, rovka, kristof.beyls, igorb, dstuttard, tpr, llvm-commits, t-tye

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D35916

llvm-svn: 309675
2017-08-01 12:38:33 +00:00