As part of the unification of the debug format and the MIR format, avoid
printing "vreg" for virtual registers (which is one of the current MIR
possibilities).
Basically:
* find . \( -name "*.mir" -o -name "*.cpp" -o -name "*.h" -o -name "*.ll" \) -type f -print0 | xargs -0 sed -i '' -E "s/%vreg([0-9]+)/%\1/g"
* grep -nr '%vreg' . and fix if needed
* find . \( -name "*.mir" -o -name "*.cpp" -o -name "*.h" -o -name "*.ll" \) -type f -print0 | xargs -0 sed -i '' -E "s/ vreg([0-9]+)/ %\1/g"
* grep -nr 'vreg[0-9]\+' . and fix if needed
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D40420
llvm-svn: 319427
LLVM Coding Standards:
Function names should be verb phrases (as they represent actions), and
command-like function should be imperative. The name should be camel
case, and start with a lower case letter (e.g. openFile() or isFoo()).
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D40416
llvm-svn: 319168
All these headers already depend on CodeGen headers so moving them into
CodeGen fixes the layering (since CodeGen depends on Target, not the
other way around).
llvm-svn: 318490
This header includes CodeGen headers, and is not, itself, included by
any Target headers, so move it into CodeGen to match the layering of its
implementation.
llvm-svn: 317647
This fixes bugzilla 26810
https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=26810
This is intended to prevent sequences like:
movl %ebp, 8(%esp) # 4-byte Spill
movl %ecx, %ebp
movl %ebx, %ecx
movl %edi, %ebx
movl %edx, %edi
cltd
idivl %esi
movl %edi, %edx
movl %ebx, %edi
movl %ecx, %ebx
movl %ebp, %ecx
movl 16(%esp), %ebp # 4 - byte Reload
Such sequences are created in 2 scenarios:
Scenario #1:
vreg0 is evicted from physreg0 by vreg1
Evictee vreg0 is intended for region splitting with split candidate physreg0 (the reg vreg0 was evicted from)
Region splitting creates a local interval because of interference with the evictor vreg1 (normally region spliiting creates 2 interval, the "by reg" and "by stack" intervals. Local interval created when interference occurs.)
one of the split intervals ends up evicting vreg2 from physreg1
Evictee vreg2 is intended for region splitting with split candidate physreg1
one of the split intervals ends up evicting vreg3 from physreg2 etc.. until someone spills
Scenario #2
vreg0 is evicted from physreg0 by vreg1
vreg2 is evicted from physreg2 by vreg3 etc
Evictee vreg0 is intended for region splitting with split candidate physreg1
Region splitting creates a local interval because of interference with the evictor vreg1
one of the split intervals ends up evicting back original evictor vreg1 from physreg0 (the reg vreg0 was evicted from)
Another evictee vreg2 is intended for region splitting with split candidate physreg1
one of the split intervals ends up evicting vreg3 from physreg2 etc.. until someone spills
As compile time was a concern, I've added a flag to control weather we do cost calculations for local intervals we expect to be created (it's on by default for X86 target, off for the rest).
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D35816
Change-Id: Id9411ff7bbb845463d289ba2ae97737a1ee7cc39
llvm-svn: 316295
parameterized emit() calls
Summary: This is not functional change to adopt new emit() API added in r313691.
Reviewed By: anemet
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D38285
llvm-svn: 315476
Summary:
If we have a non-allocated register, we allow us to try recoloring of an
already allocated and "Done" register, even if they are of the same
register class, if the non-allocated register has at least one tied def
and the allocated one has none.
It should be easier to recolor the non-tied register than the tied one, so
it might be an improvement even if they use the same regclasses.
Reviewers: qcolombet
Reviewed By: qcolombet
Subscribers: llvm-commits, MatzeB
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D38309
llvm-svn: 314388
removing them"
This was temporarily reverted, but now that the fix has been commited (r313197)
it should be put back in place.
https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=34502
This reverts commit 9ef93d9dc4c51568e858cf8203cd2c5ce8dca796.
llvm-svn: 313349
When removing a live-range we used to not touch them making debug
prints harder to read because the IR was not matching what the
live-ranges information was saying.
This only affects debug printing and allows to put stronger asserts in
the code (see r308906 for instance).
llvm-svn: 311401
We can now end up in situations where we initiate LiveIntervalUnion
queries with different SubRanges against the same register unit, so the
assert() no longer holds in all cases. Just recalculate now when we know
the cache is out of date.
llvm-svn: 296928
- We only need the information from the base class, not the additional
details in the LiveInterval class.
- Spread more `const`
- Some code cleanup
llvm-svn: 296684
This allows MIR passes to emit optimization remarks with the same level
of functionality that is available to IR passes.
It also hooks up the greedy register allocator to report spills. This
allows for interesting use cases like increasing interleaving on a loop
until spilling of registers is observed.
I still need to experiment whether reporting every spill scales but this
demonstrates for now that the functionality works from llc
using -pass-remarks*=<pass>.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D29004
llvm-svn: 293110
The previously used "names" are rather descriptions (they use multiple
words and contain spaces), use short programming language identifier
like strings for the "names" which should be used when exporting to
machine parseable formats.
Also removed a unused TimerGroup from Hexxagon.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D25583
llvm-svn: 287369
In https://reviews.llvm.org/D25347, Geoff noticed that we still have
useless copy that we can eliminate after register allocation. At the
time the allocation is chosen for those copies, they are not useless
but, because of changes in the surrounding code, later on they might
become useless.
The Greedy allocator already has a mechanism to deal with such cases
with a late recoloring. However, we missed to record the some of the
missed hints.
This commit fixes that.
llvm-svn: 287070
About when we should move a vreg from CurrentNewVRegs to NewVRegs,
if the vreg in CurrentNewVRegs was added into RecoloringCandidate and was
evicted, it shouldn't be added to NewVRegs because its physical register
will be restored at the end of tryLastChanceRecoloring after the recoloring
failed. If the vreg in CurrentNewVRegs was not in RecoloringCandidate, i.e.
it was evicted in selectOrSplitImpl inside tryRecoloringCandidates, its
physical register will not be restored even if the recoloring failed. In
that case, we need to add the vreg to NewVRegs.
Same as r281783, the problem was seen on out-of-tree target and we didn't
have a test case that reproduce the problem with in-tree targets.
llvm-svn: 286259
Relax the constraint for empty live-ranges while doing last chance
recoloring. Indeed, those live-ranges do not need an actual color to be
fond for the recoloring to work.
Empty live-range may happen as a result of splitting/spilling.
Unfortunately no test case for in-tree targets.
llvm-svn: 284152
Summary:
Previously, when allocating unspillable live ranges, we would never
attempt to split. We would always bail out and try last ditch graph
recoloring.
This patch changes this by attempting to split all live intervals before
performing recoloring.
This fixes LLVM bug PR14879.
I can't add test cases for any backends other than AVR because none of
them have small enough register classes to trigger the bug.
Reviewers: qcolombet
Subscribers: MatzeB
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D25070
llvm-svn: 283838
The core of the change is supposed to be NFC, however it also fixes
what I believe was an undefined behavior when calling:
va_start(ValueArgs, Desc);
with Desc being a StringRef.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D25342
llvm-svn: 283671
Summary:
Previously, when allocating unspillable live ranges, we would never
attempt to split. We would always bail out and try last ditch graph
recoloring.
This patch changes this by attempting to split all live intervals before
performing recoloring.
This fixes LLVM bug PR14879.
I can't add test cases for any backends other than AVR because none of
them have small enough register classes to trigger the bug.
Reviewers: qcolombet
Subscribers: MatzeB
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D25070
llvm-svn: 282852
When trying to recolor a register we may split live-ranges in the
process. When we create new live-ranges we will have to process them,
but when we move a register from Assign to Split, the allocation is not
changed until the whole recoloring session is successful.
Therefore, only push the live-ranges that changed from Assign to
Split when the recoloring is successful.
Same as the previous commit, I was not able to produce a test case that
reproduce the problem with in-tree targets.
Note: The bug has been here since the recoloring scheme has been added
back in r200883 (Feb 2014).
llvm-svn: 281783
When last chance recoloring is used, the list of NewVRegs may not be
empty when calling selectOrSplitImpl. Indeed, another coloring may have
taken place with splitting/spilling in the same recoloring session.
Relax an assertion to take this into account and adapt a condition to
act as if the NewVRegs were local to this selectOrSplitImpl instance.
Unfortunately I am unable to produce a test case for this, I was only
able to reproduce the conditions on an out-of-tree target.
llvm-svn: 281782
I want to compute the SSA property of .mir files automatically in
upcoming patches. The problem with this is that some inputs will be
reported as static single assignment with some passes claiming not to
support SSA form. In reality though those passes do not support PHI
instructions => Track the presence of PHI instructions separate from the
SSA property.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D22719
llvm-svn: 279573
Because isReallyTriviallyReMaterializableGeneric puts many limits on
rematerializable instructions, this fix can prevent instructions with
tied virtual operands and instructions with virtual register uses from
being kept in DeadRemat, so as to workaround the live interval consistency
problem for the dummy instructions kept in DeadRemat.
But we still need to fix the live interval consistency problem. This patch
is just a short time relieve. PR28464 has been filed as a reminder.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D19486
llvm-svn: 274928
two fixes with one about error verify-regalloc reported, and
another about live range update of phi after rematerialization.
r265547:
Replace analyzeSiblingValues with new algorithm to fix its compile
time issue. The patch is to solve PR17409 and its duplicates.
analyzeSiblingValues is a N x N complexity algorithm where N is
the number of siblings generated by reg splitting. Although it
causes siginificant compile time issue when N is large, it is also
important for performance since it removes redundent spills and
enables rematerialization.
To solve the compile time issue, the patch removes analyzeSiblingValues
and replaces it with lower cost alternatives containing two parts. The
first part creates a new spill hoisting method in postOptimization of
register allocation. It does spill hoisting at once after all the spills
are generated instead of inside every instance of selectOrSplit. The
second part queries the define expr of the original register for
rematerializaiton and keep it always available during register allocation
even if it is already dead. It deletes those dead instructions only in
postOptimization. With the two parts in the patch, it can remove
analyzeSiblingValues without sacrificing performance.
Patches on top of r265547:
r265610 "Fix the compare-clang diff error introduced by r265547."
r265639 "Fix the sanitizer bootstrap error in r265547."
r265657 "InlineSpiller.cpp: Escap \@ in r265547. [-Wdocumentation]"
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D15302
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D18934
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D18935
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D18936
llvm-svn: 266162
It caused PR27275: "ARM: Bad machine code: Using an undefined physical register"
Also reverting the following commits that were landed on top:
r265610 "Fix the compare-clang diff error introduced by r265547."
r265639 "Fix the sanitizer bootstrap error in r265547."
r265657 "InlineSpiller.cpp: Escap \@ in r265547. [-Wdocumentation]"
llvm-svn: 265790
when DenseMap growed and moved memory. I verified it fixed the bootstrap
problem on x86_64-linux-gnu but I cannot verify whether it fixes
the bootstrap error on clang-ppc64be-linux. I will watch the build-bot
result closely.
Replace analyzeSiblingValues with new algorithm to fix its compile
time issue. The patch is to solve PR17409 and its duplicates.
analyzeSiblingValues is a N x N complexity algorithm where N is
the number of siblings generated by reg splitting. Although it
causes siginificant compile time issue when N is large, it is also
important for performance since it removes redundent spills and
enables rematerialization.
To solve the compile time issue, the patch removes analyzeSiblingValues
and replaces it with lower cost alternatives containing two parts. The
first part creates a new spill hoisting method in postOptimization of
register allocation. It does spill hoisting at once after all the spills
are generated instead of inside every instance of selectOrSplit. The
second part queries the define expr of the original register for
rematerializaiton and keep it always available during register allocation
even if it is already dead. It deletes those dead instructions only in
postOptimization. With the two parts in the patch, it can remove
analyzeSiblingValues without sacrificing performance.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D15302
llvm-svn: 265547
time issue. The patch is to solve PR17409 and its duplicates.
analyzeSiblingValues is a N x N complexity algorithm where N is
the number of siblings generated by reg splitting. Although it
causes siginificant compile time issue when N is large, it is also
important for performance since it removes redundent spills and
enables rematerialization.
To solve the compile time issue, the patch removes analyzeSiblingValues
and replaces it with lower cost alternatives containing two parts. The
first part creates a new spill hoisting method in postOptimization of
register allocation. It does spill hoisting at once after all the spills
are generated instead of inside every instance of selectOrSplit. The
second part queries the define expr of the original register for
rematerializaiton and keep it always available during register allocation
even if it is already dead. It deletes those dead instructions only in
postOptimization. With the two parts in the patch, it can remove
analyzeSiblingValues without sacrificing performance.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D15302
llvm-svn: 265309
Summary:
Check that any function that has the property set is free of virtual
register operands.
Also, it is actually VirtRegMap (and not the register allocators) that
acutally remove the VReg operands (except for RegAllocFast).
Reviewers: qcolombet
Subscribers: MatzeB, llvm-commits, qcolombet
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D18535
llvm-svn: 264755
MachineFunctionProperties represents a set of properties that a MachineFunction
can have at particular points in time. Existing examples of this idea are
MachineRegisterInfo::isSSA() and MachineRegisterInfo::tracksLiveness() which
will eventually be switched to use this mechanism.
This change introduces the AllVRegsAllocated property; i.e. the property that
all virtual registers have been allocated and there are no VReg operands
left.
With this mechanism, passes can declare that they require a particular property
to be set, or that they set or clear properties by implementing e.g.
MachineFunctionPass::getRequiredProperties(). The MachineFunctionPass base class
verifies that the requirements are met, and handles the setting and clearing
based on the delcarations. Passes can also directly query and update the current
properties of the MF if they want to have conditional behavior.
This change annotates the target-independent post-regalloc passes; future
changes will also annotate target-specific ones.
Reviewers: qcolombet, hfinkel
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D18421
llvm-svn: 264593
with the new pass manager, and no longer relying on analysis groups.
This builds essentially a ground-up new AA infrastructure stack for
LLVM. The core ideas are the same that are used throughout the new pass
manager: type erased polymorphism and direct composition. The design is
as follows:
- FunctionAAResults is a type-erasing alias analysis results aggregation
interface to walk a single query across a range of results from
different alias analyses. Currently this is function-specific as we
always assume that aliasing queries are *within* a function.
- AAResultBase is a CRTP utility providing stub implementations of
various parts of the alias analysis result concept, notably in several
cases in terms of other more general parts of the interface. This can
be used to implement only a narrow part of the interface rather than
the entire interface. This isn't really ideal, this logic should be
hoisted into FunctionAAResults as currently it will cause
a significant amount of redundant work, but it faithfully models the
behavior of the prior infrastructure.
- All the alias analysis passes are ported to be wrapper passes for the
legacy PM and new-style analysis passes for the new PM with a shared
result object. In some cases (most notably CFL), this is an extremely
naive approach that we should revisit when we can specialize for the
new pass manager.
- BasicAA has been restructured to reflect that it is much more
fundamentally a function analysis because it uses dominator trees and
loop info that need to be constructed for each function.
All of the references to getting alias analysis results have been
updated to use the new aggregation interface. All the preservation and
other pass management code has been updated accordingly.
The way the FunctionAAResultsWrapperPass works is to detect the
available alias analyses when run, and add them to the results object.
This means that we should be able to continue to respect when various
passes are added to the pipeline, for example adding CFL or adding TBAA
passes should just cause their results to be available and to get folded
into this. The exception to this rule is BasicAA which really needs to
be a function pass due to using dominator trees and loop info. As
a consequence, the FunctionAAResultsWrapperPass directly depends on
BasicAA and always includes it in the aggregation.
This has significant implications for preserving analyses. Generally,
most passes shouldn't bother preserving FunctionAAResultsWrapperPass
because rebuilding the results just updates the set of known AA passes.
The exception to this rule are LoopPass instances which need to preserve
all the function analyses that the loop pass manager will end up
needing. This means preserving both BasicAAWrapperPass and the
aggregating FunctionAAResultsWrapperPass.
Now, when preserving an alias analysis, you do so by directly preserving
that analysis. This is only necessary for non-immutable-pass-provided
alias analyses though, and there are only three of interest: BasicAA,
GlobalsAA (formerly GlobalsModRef), and SCEVAA. Usually BasicAA is
preserved when needed because it (like DominatorTree and LoopInfo) is
marked as a CFG-only pass. I've expanded GlobalsAA into the preserved
set everywhere we previously were preserving all of AliasAnalysis, and
I've added SCEVAA in the intersection of that with where we preserve
SCEV itself.
One significant challenge to all of this is that the CGSCC passes were
actually using the alias analysis implementations by taking advantage of
a pretty amazing set of loop holes in the old pass manager's analysis
management code which allowed analysis groups to slide through in many
cases. Moving away from analysis groups makes this problem much more
obvious. To fix it, I've leveraged the flexibility the design of the new
PM components provides to just directly construct the relevant alias
analyses for the relevant functions in the IPO passes that need them.
This is a bit hacky, but should go away with the new pass manager, and
is already in many ways cleaner than the prior state.
Another significant challenge is that various facilities of the old
alias analysis infrastructure just don't fit any more. The most
significant of these is the alias analysis 'counter' pass. That pass
relied on the ability to snoop on AA queries at different points in the
analysis group chain. Instead, I'm planning to build printing
functionality directly into the aggregation layer. I've not included
that in this patch merely to keep it smaller.
Note that all of this needs a nearly complete rewrite of the AA
documentation. I'm planning to do that, but I'd like to make sure the
new design settles, and to flesh out a bit more of what it looks like in
the new pass manager first.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D12080
llvm-svn: 247167
PR24139 contains an analysis of poor register allocation. One of the findings
was that when calculating the spill weight, a rematerializable interval once
split is no longer rematerializable. This is because the isRematerializable
check in CalcSpillWeights.cpp does not follow the copies introduced by live
range splitting (after splitting, the live interval register definition is a
copy which is not rematerializable).
Reviewers: qcolombet
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D11686
llvm-svn: 244439
The idea of deferred spilling is to delay the insertion of spill code until the
very end of the allocation. A "candidate" to spill variable might not required
to be spilled because of other evictions that happened after this decision was
taken. The spirit is similar to the optimistic coloring strategy implemented in
Preston and Briggs graph coloring algorithm.
For now, this feature is highly experimental. Although correct, it would require
much more modification to properly model the effect of spilling.
Anyway, this early patch helps prototyping this feature.
Note: The test case cannot unfortunately be reduced and is probably fragile.
llvm-svn: 242585
Pass a const reference to LiveRegMatrix to getRegAllocationHints()
because some targets can prodive better hints if they can test whether a
physreg has been used for register allocation yet.
llvm-svn: 242340
Do not use MachineRegisterInfo::setPhysRegUsed()/isPhysRegUsed()
anymore. This bitset changes function-global state and is set by the
VirtRegRewriter anyway.
Simply use a bitvector private to RAGreedy.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D10910
llvm-svn: 242169
Specify an allocation order with a register class. This is used by register
allocators with a greedy heuristic. This is usefull as it is sometimes
beneficial to color more constrained classes first.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D8626
llvm-svn: 233743
When allocating live intervals in linear order and all of them are local
to a single basic block you get an optimal coloring. This is also true
if you reverse the order, but it is not true if you sort live ranges
beginnings in reverse order, change to sort live range endings in
reverse order. Take the following live ranges for example:
|---| |--------|
|----------| |-------|
They get colored suboptimally with 3 registers if you sort the live range
starting points in reverse order (but optimally with live range begins in order,
or live range ends in reverse order).
Apparently the previous strategy was intentional because of allocation
time considerations. I am having a hard time replicating these effects,
while I see substantial improvements in allocation quality with this
change.
No testcase as none of the (in tree) targets use reverse order mode.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D8625
llvm-svn: 233742
A broken hint is a copy where both ends are assigned different colors. When a
variable gets evicted in the neighborhood of such copies, it is likely we can
reconcile some of them.
** Context **
Copies are inserted during the register allocation via splitting. These split
points are required to relax the constraints on the allocation problem. When
such a point is inserted, both ends of the copy would not share the same color
with respect to the current allocation problem. When variables get evicted,
the allocation problem becomes different and some split point may not be
required anymore. However, the related variables may already have been colored.
This usually shows up in the assembly with pattern like this:
def A
...
save A to B
def A
use A
restore A from B
...
use B
Whereas we could simply have done:
def B
...
def A
use A
...
use B
** Proposed Solution **
A variable having a broken hint is marked for late recoloring if and only if
selecting a register for it evict another variable. Indeed, if no eviction
happens this is pointless to look for recoloring opportunities as it means the
situation was the same as the initial allocation problem where we had to break
the hint.
Finally, when everything has been allocated, we look for recoloring
opportunities for all the identified candidates.
The recoloring is performed very late to rely on accurate copy cost (all
involved variables are allocated).
The recoloring is simple unlike the last change recoloring. It propagates the
color of the broken hint to all its copy-related variables. If the color is
available for them, the recoloring uses it, otherwise it gives up on that hint
even if a more complex coloring would have worked.
The recoloring happens only if it is profitable. The profitability is evaluated
using the expected frequency of the copies of the currently recolored variable
with a) its current color and b) with the target color. If a) is greater or
equal than b), then it is profitable and the recoloring happen.
** Example **
Consider the following example:
BB1:
a =
b =
BB2:
...
= b
= a
Let us assume b gets split:
BB1:
a =
b =
BB2:
c = b
...
d = c
= d
= a
Because of how the allocation work, b, c, and d may be assigned different
colors. Now, if a gets evicted to make room for c, assuming b and d were
assigned to something different than a.
We end up with:
BB1:
a =
st a, SpillSlot
b =
BB2:
c = b
...
d = c
= d
e = ld SpillSlot
= e
This is likely that we can assign the same register for b, c, and d,
getting rid of 2 copies.
** Performances **
Both ARM64 and x86_64 show performance improvements of up to 3% for the
llvm-testsuite + externals with Os and O3. There are a few regressions too that
comes from the (in)accuracy of the block frequency estimate.
<rdar://problem/18312047>
llvm-svn: 225422
Francis Visoiu Mistrih