Commit Graph

9 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Konstantin Pyzhov 72e8754916 [AMDGPU] Disable 'Skip Uniform Regions' optimization by default for AMDGPU.
Reviewers: sameerds, dstuttard

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D77228
2020-04-06 09:05:58 -04:00
Konstantin Pyzhov 51dc028314 Revert e1730cfeb3 2020-04-06 05:56:11 -04:00
Konstantin Pyzhov e1730cfeb3 [AMDGPU] Disable 'Skip Uniform Regions' optimization by default for AMDGPU.
Reviewers: sameerds, dstuttard

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D77228
2020-04-06 05:10:37 -04:00
Alexander Timofeev c4d256a590 [AMDGPU] Come back patch for the 'Assign register class for cross block values according to the divergence.'
Detailed description:

    After https://reviews.llvm.org/D59990 submit several issues were discovered.
    Changes in common code were preserved but AMDGPU specific part was reverted to keep the backend working correctly.

    Discovered issues were addressed in the following commits:

    https://reviews.llvm.org/D67662
    https://reviews.llvm.org/D67101
    https://reviews.llvm.org/D63953
    https://reviews.llvm.org/D63731

    This change brings back AMDGPU specific changes.

  Reviewed by: rampitec, arsenm

  Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D68635

llvm-svn: 374767
2019-10-14 12:01:10 +00:00
Alexander Timofeev 37bd9bd137 [AMDGPU] Partial revert for the ba447bae74
"Divergence driven ISel. Assign register class for cross block values
       according to the divergence."
       that discovered the design flaw leading to several issues that
       required to be solved before.

       This change reverts AMDGPU specific changes and keeps common part
       unaffected.

llvm-svn: 362749
2019-06-06 21:13:02 +00:00
Alexander Timofeev ba447bae74 [AMDGPU] Divergence driven ISel. Assign register class for cross block values according to the divergence.
Details: To make instruction selection really divergence driven it is necessary to assign
             the correct register classes to the cross block values beforehand. For the divergent targets
             same value type requires different register classes dependent on the value divergence.

    Reviewers: rampitec, nhaehnle

    Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D59990

    This commit was reverted because of the build failure.
    The reason was mlformed patch.
    Build failure fixed.

llvm-svn: 361741
2019-05-26 20:33:26 +00:00
Peter Collingbourne 3b93737446 Revert r361644, "[AMDGPU] Divergence driven ISel. Assign register class for cross block values according to the divergence."
Broke sanitizer bots:
http://lab.llvm.org:8011/builders/sanitizer-x86_64-linux/builds/21694/steps/bootstrap%20clang/logs/stdio
http://lab.llvm.org:8011/builders/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-fast/builds/32478/steps/check-llvm%20asan/logs/stdio

llvm-svn: 361688
2019-05-25 01:52:38 +00:00
Alexander Timofeev dffedea014 [AMDGPU] Divergence driven ISel. Assign register class for cross block values according to the divergence.
Details: To make instruction selection really divergence driven it is necessary to assign
         the correct register classes to the cross block values beforehand. For the divergent targets
         same value type requires different register classes dependent on the value divergence.

Reviewers: rampitec, nhaehnle

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D59990

llvm-svn: 361644
2019-05-24 15:32:18 +00:00
Nicolai Haehnle 814abb59df AMDGPU: Rewrite SILowerI1Copies to always stay on SALU
Summary:
Instead of writing boolean values temporarily into 32-bit VGPRs
if they are involved in PHIs or are observed from outside a loop,
we use bitwise masking operations to combine lane masks in a way
that is consistent with wave control flow.

Move SIFixSGPRCopies to before this pass, since that pass
incorrectly attempts to move SGPR phis to VGPRs.

This should recover most of the code quality that was lost with
the bug fix in "AMDGPU: Remove PHI loop condition optimization".

There are still some relevant cases where code quality could be
improved, in particular:

- We often introduce redundant masks with EXEC. Ideally, we'd
  have a generic computeKnownBits-like analysis to determine
  whether masks are already masked by EXEC, so we can avoid this
  masking both here and when lowering uniform control flow.

- The criterion we use to determine whether a def is observed
  from outside a loop is conservative: it doesn't check whether
  (loop) branch conditions are uniform.

Change-Id: Ibabdb373a7510e426b90deef00f5e16c5d56e64b

Reviewers: arsenm, rampitec, tpr

Subscribers: kzhuravl, jvesely, wdng, mgorny, yaxunl, dstuttard, t-tye, eraman, llvm-commits

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D53496

llvm-svn: 345719
2018-10-31 13:27:08 +00:00