Commit Graph

6 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Serge Guelton 59a2d7b909 Module::getOrInsertFunction is using C-style vararg instead of variadic templates.
From a user prospective, it forces the use of an annoying nullptr to mark the end of the vararg, and there's not type checking on the arguments.
The variadic template is an obvious solution to both issues.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D31070

llvm-svn: 299949
2017-04-11 15:01:18 +00:00
Diana Picus b050c7fbe0 Revert "Turn some C-style vararg into variadic templates"
This reverts commit r299925 because it broke the buildbots. See e.g.
http://lab.llvm.org:8011/builders/clang-cmake-armv7-a15/builds/6008

llvm-svn: 299928
2017-04-11 10:07:12 +00:00
Serge Guelton 5fd75fb72e Turn some C-style vararg into variadic templates
Module::getOrInsertFunction is using C-style vararg instead of
variadic templates.

From a user prospective, it forces the use of an annoying nullptr
to mark the end of the vararg, and there's not type checking on the
arguments. The variadic template is an obvious solution to both
issues.

llvm-svn: 299925
2017-04-11 08:36:52 +00:00
Mehdi Amini db11fdfda5 Revert "Turn some C-style vararg into variadic templates"
This reverts commit r299699, the examples needs to be updated.

llvm-svn: 299702
2017-04-06 20:23:57 +00:00
Mehdi Amini 579540a8f7 Turn some C-style vararg into variadic templates
Module::getOrInsertFunction is using C-style vararg instead of
variadic templates.

From a user prospective, it forces the use of an annoying nullptr
to mark the end of the vararg, and there's not type checking on the
arguments. The variadic template is an obvious solution to both
issues.

Patch by: Serge Guelton <serge.guelton@telecom-bretagne.eu>

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D31070

llvm-svn: 299699
2017-04-06 20:09:31 +00:00
Hal Finkel 40d7f5c277 Add a counter-function insertion pass
As discussed in https://reviews.llvm.org/D22666, our current mechanism to
support -pg profiling, where we insert calls to mcount(), or some similar
function, is fundamentally broken. We insert these calls in the frontend, which
means they get duplicated when inlining, and so the accumulated execution
counts for the inlined-into functions are wrong.

Because we don't want the presence of these functions to affect optimizaton,
they should be inserted in the backend. Here's a pass which would do just that.
The knowledge of the name of the counting function lives in the frontend, so
we're passing it here as a function attribute. Clang will be updated to use
this mechanism.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D22825

llvm-svn: 280347
2016-09-01 09:42:39 +00:00