We normally don't drop functions from the C API's, but in this case I think we
can:
* The old implementation of getFileOffset was fairly broken
* The introduction of LLVMGetSymbolFileOffset was itself a C api breaking
change as it removed LLVMGetSymbolOffset.
* It is an incredibly specialized use case. The only reason MCJIT needs it is
because of its odd position of being a dynamic linker of .o files.
llvm-svn: 206750
Previously module verification was always enabled, with no way to turn it off.
As of this commit, module verification is on by default in Debug builds, and off
by default in release builds. The default behaviour can be overridden by calling
setVerifyModules(bool) on the JIT instance (this works for both the old JIT, and
MCJIT).
<rdar://problem/16150008>
llvm-svn: 206561
by removing the MallocSlabAllocator entirely and just using
MallocAllocator directly. This makes all off these allocators expose and
utilize the same core interface.
The only ugly part of this is that it exposes the fact that the JIT
allocator has no real handling of alignment, any more than the malloc
allocator does. =/ It would be nice to fix both of these to support
alignments, and then to leverage that in the BumpPtrAllocator to do less
over allocation in order to manually align pointers. But, that's another
patch for another day. This patch has no functional impact, it just
removes the somewhat meaningless wrapper around MallocAllocator.
llvm-svn: 206267
abstract interface. The only user of this functionality is the JIT
memory manager and it is quite happy to have a custom type here. This
removes a virtual function call and a lot of unnecessary abstraction
from the common case where this is just a *very* thin vaneer around
a call to malloc.
Hopefully still no functionality changed here. =]
llvm-svn: 206149
slabs rather than embedding a singly linked list in the slabs
themselves. This has a few advantages:
- Better utilization of the slab's memory by not wasting 16-bytes at the
front.
- Simpler allocation strategy by not having a struct packed at the
front.
- Avoids paging every allocated slab in just to traverse them for
deallocating or dumping stats.
The latter is the really nice part. Folks have complained from time to
time bitterly that tearing down a BumpPtrAllocator, even if it doesn't
run any destructors, pages in all of the memory allocated. Now it won't.
=]
Also resolves a FIXME with the scaling of the slab sizes. The scaling
now disregards specially sized slabs for allocations larger than the
threshold.
llvm-svn: 206147
- take->release: LLVM has moved to C++11. MockWrapper became an instance of unique_ptr.
- method symbol_iterator::increment disappeared recently, in this revision:
r200442 | rafael | 2014-01-29 20:49:50 -0600 (Wed, 29 Jan 2014) | 9 lines
Simplify the handling of iterators in ObjectFile.
None of the object file formats reported error on iterator increment. In
retrospect, that is not too surprising: no object format stores symbols or
sections in a linked list or other structure that requires chasing pointers.
As a consequence, all error checking can be done on begin() and end().
This reduces the text segment of bin/llvm-readobj in my machine from 521233 to
518526 bytes.
My change mimics the change that the revision made to lib/DebugInfo/DWARFContext.cpp .
- const_cast: Shut up a warning from gcc.
I ran unittests/ExecutionEngine/JIT/Debug+Asserts/JITTests to make sure it worked.
- Arch
llvm-svn: 205689
parameters rather than runtime parameters.
There is only one user of these parameters and they are compile time for
that user. Making these compile time seems to better reflect their
intended usage as well.
llvm-svn: 205143
This adds a second implementation of the AArch64 architecture to LLVM,
accessible in parallel via the "arm64" triple. The plan over the
coming weeks & months is to merge the two into a single backend,
during which time thorough code review should naturally occur.
Everything will be easier with the target in-tree though, hence this
commit.
llvm-svn: 205090
top of the default jit memory manager. This will allow them to be used
as template parameters rather than runtime parameters in a subsequent
commit.
llvm-svn: 204992
This adds back r204781.
Original message:
Aliases are just another name for a position in a file. As such, the
regular symbol resolutions are not applied. For example, given
define void @my_func() {
ret void
}
@my_alias = alias weak void ()* @my_func
@my_alias2 = alias void ()* @my_alias
We produce without this patch:
.weak my_alias
my_alias = my_func
.globl my_alias2
my_alias2 = my_alias
That is, in the resulting ELF file my_alias, my_func and my_alias are
just 3 names pointing to offset 0 of .text. That is *not* the
semantics of IR linking. For example, linking in a
@my_alias = alias void ()* @other_func
would require the strong my_alias to override the weak one and
my_alias2 would end up pointing to other_func.
There is no way to represent that with aliases being just another
name, so the best solution seems to be to just disallow it, converting
a miscompile into an error.
llvm-svn: 204934
This reverts commit r204781.
I will follow up to with msan folks to see what is what they
were trying to do with aliases to weak aliases.
llvm-svn: 204784
Aliases are just another name for a position in a file. As such, the
regular symbol resolutions are not applied. For example, given
define void @my_func() {
ret void
}
@my_alias = alias weak void ()* @my_func
@my_alias2 = alias void ()* @my_alias
We produce without this patch:
.weak my_alias
my_alias = my_func
.globl my_alias2
my_alias2 = my_alias
That is, in the resulting ELF file my_alias, my_func and my_alias are
just 3 names pointing to offset 0 of .text. That is *not* the
semantics of IR linking. For example, linking in a
@my_alias = alias void ()* @other_func
would require the strong my_alias to override the weak one and
my_alias2 would end up pointing to other_func.
There is no way to represent that with aliases being just another
name, so the best solution seems to be to just disallow it, converting
a miscompile into an error.
llvm-svn: 204781
Some targets require more than one relocation entry to perform a relocation.
This change allows processRelocationRef to process more than one relocation
entry at a time by passing the relocation iterator itself instead of just
the relocation entry.
Related to <rdar://problem/16199095>
llvm-svn: 204439
RTDyldMemoryManager, regardless of whether it thinks they're "required for
execution".
Currently, RuntimeDyld only passes sections that are "required for execution"
to the RTDyldMemoryManager, and takes "required for execution" to mean exactly
"contains symbols or relocations". There are two problems with this:
(1) It can drop sections with anonymous data that is referenced by code.
(2) It leaves the JIT client no way to inspect interesting sections that aren't
actually required to run the program (e.g dwarf sections).
A test case is still in the works.
Future work: We may want to replace this with a generic section filtering
mechanism, but that will require more consideration. For now, this flag at least
allows clients to volunteer to do the filtering themselves.
Fixes <rdar://problem/15177691>.
llvm-svn: 204398
When resolving a function call to an external routine, the dynamic
loader must patch the "nop" after the branch instruction to a load
that restores the TOC register.
Current code does that, but only with the *first* instance of a call
to any particular external routine, i.e. at the point where it also
allocates the call stub. With subsequent calls to the same routine,
current code neglects to patch in the TOC restore code. This is a
bug, and leads to corrupt TOC pointers in those cases.
Fixed by patching in restore code every time.
llvm-svn: 203580
relevant subclasses of RuntimeDyldImpl. This allows construction of
RuntimeDyldImpl instances to be deferred until after the target architecture is
known.
llvm-svn: 203352
This compiles with no changes to clang/lld/lldb with MSVC and includes
overloads to various functions which are used by those projects and llvm
which have OwningPtr's as parameters. This should allow out of tree
projects some time to move. There are also no changes to libs/Target,
which should help out of tree targets have time to move, if necessary.
llvm-svn: 203083
directly care about the Value class (it is templated so that the key can
be any arbitrary Value subclass), it is in fact concretely tied to the
Value class through the ValueHandle's CallbackVH interface which relies
on the key type being some Value subclass to establish the value handle
chain.
Ironically, the unittest is already in the right library.
llvm-svn: 202824
Move the test for this class into the IR unittests as well.
This uncovers that ValueMap too is in the IR library. Ironically, the
unittest for ValueMap is useless in the Support library (honestly, so
was the ValueHandle test) and so it already lives in the IR unittests.
Mmmm, tasty layering.
llvm-svn: 202821
name might indicate, it is an iterator over the types in an instruction
in the IR.... You see where this is going.
Another step of modularizing the support library.
llvm-svn: 202815
Eventually DataLayoutPass should go away, but for now that is the only easy
way to get a DataLayout in some APIs. This patch only changes the ones that
have easy access to a Module.
One interesting issue with sometimes using DataLayoutPass and sometimes
fetching it from the Module is that we have to make sure they are equivalent.
We can get most of the way there by always constructing the pass with a Module.
In fact, the pass could be changed to point to an external DataLayout instead
of owning one to make this stricter.
Unfortunately, the C api passes a DataLayout, so it has to be up to the caller
to make sure the pass and the module are in sync.
llvm-svn: 202204
TargetLoweringBase is implemented in CodeGen, so before this patch we had
a dependency fom Target to CodeGen. This would show up as a link failure of
llvm-stress when building with -DBUILD_SHARED_LIBS=ON.
This fixes pr18900.
llvm-svn: 201711
r201608 made llvm corretly handle private globals with MachO. r201622 fixed
a bug in it and r201624 and r201625 were changes for using private linkage,
assuming that llvm would do the right thing.
They all got reverted because r201608 introduced a crash in LTO. This patch
includes a fix for that. The issue was that TargetLoweringObjectFile now has
to be initialized before we can mangle names of private globals. This is
trivially true during the normal codegen pipeline (the asm printer does it),
but LTO has to do it manually.
llvm-svn: 201700
The IR
@foo = private constant i32 42
is valid, but before this patch we would produce an invalid MachO from it. It
was invalid because it would use an L label in a section where the liker needs
the labels in order to atomize it.
One way of fixing it would be to just reject this IR in the backend, but that
would not be very front end friendly.
What this patch does is use an 'l' prefix in sections that we know the linker
requires symbols for atomizing them. This allows frontends to just use
private and not worry about which sections they go to or how the linker handles
them.
One small issue with this strategy is that now a symbol name depends on the
section, which is not available before codegen. This is not a problem in
practice. The reason is that it only happens with private linkage, which will
be ignored by the non codegen users (llvm-nm and llvm-ar).
llvm-svn: 201608
findOrEmitSection).
Vaidas Gasiunas's patch, r201259, fixed one instance where we were always
allocating sections as text. This patch fixes the remaining buggy call sites.
No test case: This isn't breaking anything that I know of, it's just
inconsistent.
<rdar://problem/15943542>
llvm-svn: 201605
required for all sections in a module. This can be useful when targets or
code-models place strict requirements on how sections must be laid out
in memory.
If RTDyldMemoryManger::needsToReserveAllocationSpace() is overridden to return
true then the JIT will call the following method on the memory manager, which
can be used to preallocate the necessary memory.
void RTDyldMemoryManager::reserveAllocationSpace(uintptr_t CodeSize,
uintptr_t DataSizeRO,
uintptr_t DataSizeRW)
Patch by Vaidas Gasiunas. Thanks very much Viadas!
llvm-svn: 201259
uintptr_t. An unsigned could overflow for large sections.
No test case - anything big enough to overflow an unsigned is going to take an
appreciable time to zero when the test passes.
The choice of uintptr_t was made to match the RTDyldMemoryManager APIs, but
these should probably be hardcoded to uint64_ts: It is legitimate to JIT for
64-bit targets from a 32-bit host/compiler.
llvm-svn: 201127
Chandler Carruth