Apparently my invocation of clang-format in VIM didn't get this right,
but the patch-version DID. This patch just runs CF on this file.
Change-Id: Ied462a2d921cbb813fa427740d3ef6e97959b56d
llvm-svn: 346696
As approved for the Working Paper in San Diego, support annotating
inline namespaces with 'inline'.
Change-Id: I51a654e11ffb475bf27cccb2458768151619e384
llvm-svn: 346677
Currently, we only accept clang as the scoped attribute identifier for double square bracket attributes provided by Clang, but this has the potential to conflict with user-defined macros. To help alleviate these concerns, this introduces the _Clang scoped attribute identifier as an alias for clang. It also introduces a warning with a fixit on the off chance someone attempts to use __clang__ as the scoped attribute (which is a predefined compiler identification macro).
llvm-svn: 346521
This reverts commit r345487, which reverted r345486. I think the crashes were
caused by an OOM on the builder, trying again to confirm...
llvm-svn: 345517
This commit enables pushing an empty #pragma clang attribute push, then adding
multiple attributes to it, then popping them all with #pragma clang attribute
pop, just like #pragma clang diagnostic. We still support the current way of
adding these, #pragma clang attribute push(__attribute__((...))), by treating it
like a combined push/attribute. This is needed to create macros like:
DO_SOMETHING_BEGIN(attr1, attr2, attr3)
// ...
DO_SOMETHING_END
rdar://45496947
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D53621
llvm-svn: 345486
We need to consider all tokens that start with '>' when
we're checking for the end of an empty template argument list.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D52321
llvm-svn: 342752
Summary:
We previously disallowed use of undocumented attributes with #pragma clang
attribute, but the justification for doing so was weak and it prevented many
reasonable use cases.
Reviewers: aaron.ballman, arphaman
Subscribers: cfe-commits, rnk, benlangmuir, dexonsmith, erik.pilkington
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D51507
llvm-svn: 341437
expression
Clang emits invalid protocol metadata when a @protocol expression is used with a
forward-declared protocol. The protocol metadata is missing protocol conformance
list of the protocol since we don't have access to the definition of it in the
compiled translation unit. The linker then might end up picking the invalid
metadata when linking which will lead to incorrect runtime protocol conformance
checks.
This commit makes sure that Clang fails to compile code that uses a @protocol
expression with a forward-declared protocol. This ensures that Clang does not
emit invalid protocol metadata. I added an extra assert in CodeGen to ensure
that this kind of issue won't happen in other places.
rdar://32787811
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D49462
llvm-svn: 340102
Recommit of r335084 after revert in r335516.
... instead of prepending it at the beginning (the original behavior
since implemented in r122535 2010-12-23). This builds up an
AttributeList in the the order in which the attributes appear in the
source.
The reverse order caused nodes for attributes in the AST (e.g. LoopHint)
to be in the reverse order, and therefore printed in the wrong order in
-ast-dump. Some TODO comments mention this. The order was explicitly
reversed for enable_if attribute overload resolution and name mangling,
which is not necessary anymore with this patch.
The change unfortunately has some secondary effect, especially on
diagnostic output. In the simplest cases, the CHECK lines or expected
diagnostic were changed to the the new output. If the kind of
error/warning changed, the attributes' order was changed instead.
This unfortunately causes some 'previous occurrence here' hints to be
textually after the main marker. This typically happens when attributes
are merged, but are incompatible to each other. Interchanging the role
of the the main and note SourceLocation will also cause the case where
two different declaration's attributes (in contrast to multiple
attributes of the same declaration) are merged to be reverse. There is
no easy fix because sometimes previous attributes are merged into a new
declaration's attribute list, sometimes new attributes are added to a
previous declaration's attribute list. Since 'previous occurrence here'
pointing to locations after the main marker is not rare, I left the
markers as-is; it is only relevant when the attributes are declared in
the same declaration anyway.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D48100
llvm-svn: 338800
This adds support for the unroll_and_jam pragma, to go with the recently
added unroll and jam pass. The name of the pragma is the same as is used
in the Intel compiler, and most of the code works the same as for unroll.
#pragma clang loop unroll_and_jam has been separated into a different
patch. This part adds #pragma unroll_and_jam with an optional count, and
#pragma no_unroll_and_jam to disable the transform.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D47267
llvm-svn: 338566
Summary:
This patch allows the parsing of a postfix expression involving a fold expression, which is legal as a fold-expression is a primary-expression.
See also https://llvm.org/pr38282
Reviewers: rsmith
Reviewed By: rsmith
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D49848
llvm-svn: 338170
Check each case value in turn while parsing it, performing the
conversion to the switch type within the context of the expression
itself. This will become necessary in order to properly handle cleanups
for temporaries created as part of the case label (in an upcoming
patch). For now it's just good hygiene.
This necessitates moving the checking for the switch condition itself to
earlier, so that the destination type is available when checking the
case labels.
As a nice side-effect, we get slightly improved diagnostic quality and
error recovery by separating the case expression checking from the case
statement checking and from tracking whether there are discarded case
labels.
llvm-svn: 338056
While clang allows declarations in for loop init statements in c89 and
gnu89, gcc does not. So, we should probably warn if users care about gcc
compatibility.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D47840
llvm-svn: 335927
... instead of prepending it at the beginning (the original behavior
since implemented in r122535 2010-12-23). This builds up an
AttributeList in the the order in which the attributes appear in the
source.
The reverse order caused nodes for attributes in the AST (e.g. LoopHint)
to be in the reverse, and therefore printed in the wrong order by
-ast-dump. Some TODO comments mention this. The order was explicitly
reversed for enable_if attribute overload resolution and name mangling,
which is not necessary anymore with this patch.
The change unfortunately has some secondary effects, especially for
diagnostic output. In the simplest cases, the CHECK lines or expected
diagnostic were changed to the the new output. If the kind of
error/warning changed, the attribute's order was changed instead.
It also causes some 'previous occurrence here' hints to be textually
after the main marker. This typically happens when attributes are
merged, but are incompatible. Interchanging the role of the the main
and note SourceLocation will also cause the case where two different
declaration's attributes (in contrast to multiple attributes of the
same declaration) are merged to be reversed. There is no easy fix
because sometimes previous attributes are merged into a new
declaration's attribute list, sometimes new attributes are added to a
previous declaration's attribute list. Since 'previous occurrence here'
pointing to locations after the main marker is not rare, I left the
markers as-is; it is only relevant when the attributes are declared in
the same declaration anyway, which often is on the same line.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D48100
llvm-svn: 335084
This reapplies r334224 and adds explicit triples to some tests to fix
them on Windows (where otherwise they would have run with the default
windows-msvc triple, which I'm changing the behavior for).
Original commit message:
The body of a `@finally` needs to be executed on both exceptional and
non-exceptional paths. On landingpad platforms, this is straightforward:
the `@finally` body is emitted as a normal (non-exceptional) cleanup,
and then a catch-all is emitted which branches to that cleanup (the
cleanup has code to conditionally re-throw based on a flag which is set
by the catch-all).
Unfortunately, we can't use the same approach for MSVC exceptions, where
the catch-all will be emitted as a catchpad. We can't just branch to the
cleanup from within the catchpad, since we can only exit it via a
catchret, at which point the exception is destroyed and we can't
rethrow. We could potentially emit the finally body inside the catchpad
and have the normal cleanup path somehow branch into it, but that would
require some new IR construct that could branch into a catchpad.
Instead, after discussing it with Reid Kleckner, we decided that
frontend outlining was the best approach, similar to how SEH `__finally`
works today. We decided to use CapturedStmt (which was also suggested by
Reid) rather than CaptureFinder (which is what `__finally` uses) since
the latter doesn't handle a lot of cases we care about, e.g. self
accesses, property accesses, block captures, etc. Extending
CaptureFinder to handle those additional cases proved unwieldy, whereas
CapturedStmt already took care of all of those. In theory `__finally`
could also be moved over to CapturedStmt, which would remove some
existing limitations (e.g. the inability to capture this), although
CaptureFinder would still be needed for SEH filters.
The one case supported by `@finally` but not CapturedStmt (or
CaptureFinder for that matter) is arbitrary control flow out of the
`@finally`, e.g. having a return statement inside a `@finally`. We can
add that support as a follow-up, but in practice we've found it to be
used very rarely anyway.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D47564
llvm-svn: 334251
Second attempt. Fix line endings and warning.
As an addition to CXTranslationUnit_SkipFunctionBodies, provide the
new option CXTranslationUnit_LimitSkipFunctionBodiesToPreamble,
which constraints the skipping of functions bodies to the preamble
only. Function bodies in the main file are not affected if this
option is set.
Skipping function bodies only in the preamble is what clangd already
does and the introduced flag implements it for libclang clients.
Patch by Nikolai Kosjar.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D45815
llvm-svn: 332587
As an addition to CXTranslationUnit_SkipFunctionBodies, provide the
new option CXTranslationUnit_LimitSkipFunctionBodiesToPreamble,
which constraints the skipping of functions bodies to the preamble
only. Function bodies in the main file are not affected if this
option is set.
Skipping function bodies only in the preamble is what clangd already
does and the introduced flag implements it for libclang clients.
Patch by Nikolai Kosjar.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D45815
llvm-svn: 332578
Restrict the following keywords in the OpenCL C++ language mode,
according to Sections 2.2 & 2.9 of the OpenCL C++ 1.0 Specification.
- dynamic_cast
- typeid
- register (already restricted in OpenCL C, update the diagnostic)
- thread_local
- exceptions (try/catch/throw)
- access qualifiers read_only, write_only, read_write
Support the `__global`, `__local`, `__constant`, `__private`, and
`__generic` keywords in OpenCL C++. Leave the unprefixed address
space qualifiers such as global available, i.e., do not mark them as
reserved keywords in OpenCL C++. libclcxx provides explicit address
space pointer classes such as `global_ptr` and `global<T>` that are
implemented using the `__`-prefixed qualifiers.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D46022
llvm-svn: 331874
When a '>>' token is split into two '>' tokens (in C++11 onwards), or (as an
extension) when we do the same for other tokens starting with a '>', we can't
just use a location pointing to the first '>' as the location of the split
token, because that would result in our miscomputing the length and spelling
for the token. As a consequence, for example, a refactoring replacing 'A<X>'
with something else would sometimes replace one character too many, and
similarly diagnostics highlighting a template-id source range would highlight
one character too many.
Fix this by creating an expansion range covering the first character of the
'>>' token, whose spelling is '>'. For this to work, we generalize the
expansion range of a macro FileID to be either a token range (the common case)
or a character range (used in this new case).
llvm-svn: 331155
template arguments.
This fixes some cases where we'd incorrectly accept "A::template B" when B is a
kind of template that requires template arguments (in particular, a variable
template or a concept).
llvm-svn: 331013
This patch is a tweak of changyu's patch: https://reviews.llvm.org/D40381. It differs in that the recognition of the 'concept' token is moved into the machinery that recognizes declaration-specifiers - this allows us to leverage the attribute handling machinery more seamlessly.
See the test file to get a sense of the basic parsing that this patch supports.
There is much more work to be done before concepts are usable...
Thanks Changyu!
llvm-svn: 330794
In `ParseDeclarationSpecifiers` for the code
class A typename A;
we were able to annotate token `kw_typename` because it refers to
existing type. But later during processing token `annot_typename` we
failed to `SetTypeSpecType` and exited switch statement leaving
annotation token unconsumed. The code after the switch statement failed
because it didn't expect a special token.
The fix is not to assume that switch statement consumes all special
tokens and consume any token, not just non-special.
rdar://problem/37099386
Reviewers: rsmith, arphaman
Reviewed By: rsmith
Subscribers: jkorous-apple, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D44449
llvm-svn: 329735
Found via codespell -q 3 -I ../clang-whitelist.txt
Where whitelist consists of:
archtype
cas
classs
checkk
compres
definit
frome
iff
inteval
ith
lod
methode
nd
optin
ot
pres
statics
te
thru
Patch by luzpaz! (This is a subset of D44188 that applies cleanly with a few
files that have dubious fixes reverted.)
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D44188
llvm-svn: 329399
Summary:
As the title says, this makes following code compile:
```
template<typename> struct Foo {};
Foo() -> Foo<void>;
Foo f; // ok
```
Thanks Nicolas Lesser for coining the fix.
Reviewers: rsmith, lichray
Reviewed By: rsmith, lichray
Subscribers: lichray, cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D38216
llvm-svn: 328409
Summary:
The codegen for conditions assumes that a normal variable declaration is used in a condition, but this is not the case when a structured binding is used.
This fixes [PR36747](http://llvm.org/pr36747).
Thanks Nicolas Lesser for contributing the patch.
Reviewers: lichray, rsmith
Reviewed By: lichray
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D44534
llvm-svn: 327780
Summary:
Let's suppose the `-Weverything` is passed.
Given code like
```
void F() {}
;
```
If the code is compiled with `-std=c++03`, it would diagnose that extra sema:
```
<source>:2:1: warning: extra ';' outside of a function is a C++11 extension [-Wc++11-extra-semi]
;
^~
```
If the code is compiled with `-std=c++11`, it also would diagnose that extra sema:
```
<source>:2:1: warning: extra ';' outside of a function is incompatible with C++98 [-Wc++98-compat-pedantic]
;
^~
```
But, let's suppose the C++11 or higher is used, and the used does not care
about `-Wc++98-compat-pedantic`, so he disables that diagnostic.
And that silences the complaint about extra `;` too.
And there is no way to re-enable that particular diagnostic, passing `-Wextra-semi` does nothing...
Now, there is also a related `no newline at end of file` diagnostic, which is also emitted by `-Wc++98-compat-pedantic`
```
<source>:2:2: warning: C++98 requires newline at end of file [-Wc++98-compat-pedantic]
;
^
```
But unlike the previous case, if `-Wno-c++98-compat-pedantic` is passed, that diagnostic stays displayed:
```
<source>:2:2: warning: no newline at end of file [-Wnewline-eof]
;
^
```
This diff refactors the code so `-Wc++98-compat-extra-semi` can be re-enabled, after the `-Wc++98-compat-pedantic` was disabled.
This seems ugly, but there does not seem to be any saner way.
Testing: `$ ninja check-clang`
Reviewers: rsmith, rtrieu, aaron.ballman
Reviewed By: aaron.ballman
Subscribers: jordan_rose, cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D43162
llvm-svn: 327558
We need to treat __unaligned like the other 'cvr' qualifiers when it
appears at the end of a function prototype. We weren't doing that in
some tentative parsing.
Fixes PR36638.
llvm-svn: 326962
Specifically, we would not properly parse these types within template arguments
(for non-type template parameters), and in tentative parses. Fixing both of
these essentially requires that we parse deduced template specialization types
as types in all contexts, even in template argument lists -- in particular,
tentative parsing may look ahead and annotate a deduced template specialization
type before we figure out that we're actually supposed to treat the tokens as a
template-name. We deal with this by simply permitting deduced template
specialization types when parsing template arguments, and converting them to
template template arguments.
llvm-svn: 326299
This is not quite NFC: we don't perform the usual arithmetic conversions unless
we have an operand of arithmetic or enumeration type any more. This matches the
standard rule, but actually has no effect other than to marginally improve our
diagnostics for the non-arithmetic, non-enumeration cases (by not performing
integral promotions on one operand if the other is a pointer).
llvm-svn: 322024
Suggest moving the following erroneous attrib list (based on location)
[[]] struct X;
to
struct [[]] X;
Additionally, added a fixme for the current implementation that diagnoses misplaced attributes to consider using the newly introduced diagnostic (that I think is more user-friendly).
llvm-svn: 321449
This is a slightly odd construct (it's more common to see "A (::B)()") but can
happen in friend declarations, and the parens are not redundant as they prevent
the :: binding to the left.
llvm-svn: 321318
This allows you to dump C++ code that spells bool instead of _Bool, leaves off the elaborated type specifiers when printing struct or class names, and other C-isms.
Fixes the -Wreorder issue and fixes the ast-dump-color.cpp test.
llvm-svn: 321310
This allows you to dump C++ code that spells bool instead of _Bool, leaves off the elaborated type specifiers when printing struct or class names, and other C-isms.
llvm-svn: 321223
Adding the new enumerator forced a bunch more changes into this patch than I
would have liked. The -Wtautological-compare warning was extended to properly
check the new comparison operator, clang-format needed updating because it uses
precedence levels as weights for determining where to break lines (and several
operators increased their precedence levels with this change), thread-safety
analysis needed changes to build its own IL properly for the new operator.
All "real" semantic checking for this operator has been deferred to a future
patch. For now, we use the relational comparison rules and arbitrarily give
the builtin form of the operator a return type of 'void'.
llvm-svn: 320707
Summary:
This feature was discussed but not yet proposed. It allows a structured binding to appear as a //condition//
if (auto [ok, val] = f(...))
So the user can save an extra //condition// if the statement can test the value to-be-decomposed instead. Formally, it makes the value of the underlying object of the structured binding declaration also the value of a //condition// that is an initialized declaration.
Considering its logicality which is entirely evident from its trivial implementation, I think it might be acceptable to land it as an extension for now before I write the paper.
Reviewers: rsmith, faisalv, aaron.ballman
Reviewed By: rsmith
Subscribers: aaron.ballman, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D39284
llvm-svn: 320011
Summary:
This is so we can implement concepts per P0734R0. Relevant failing test
cases are disabled.
Reviewers: hubert.reinterpretcast, rsmith, saar.raz, nwilson
Reviewed By: saar.raz
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D40380
Patch by Changyu Li!
llvm-svn: 319992
Erich Keane