Move the logic for doing this from the ABI argument lowering into
EmitParmDecl, which runs for all parameters. Our codegen is slightly
suboptimal in this case, as we may leave behind a dead store after
optimization, but it's 32-bit inalloca, and this fixes the bug in a
robust way.
Fixes PR30293
llvm-svn: 280836
Bases can be zero-initialized: the storage is zero-initialized before
the base constructor is run.
The MS ABI has a quirk where base VBPtrs are not installed by the
base constructor but by the most derived class. In particular, they are
installed before the base constructor is run.
The derived constructor must be careful to zero-initialize only the bits
of the class which haven't already been populated by virtual base
pointers.
While we correctly avoided this scenario, we didn't handle the case
where the base class has virtual bases which have virtual bases.
llvm-svn: 269271
If we are devirtualizing, then we want to compute the 'this' adjustment
of the devirtualized target, not the adjustment of the base's method
definition, which is usually zero.
Fixes PR27621
llvm-svn: 268418
This is a follow on from a similar LLVM commit: r253511.
Note, this was reviewed (and more details are in) http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-commits/Week-of-Mon-20151109/312083.html
These intrinsics currently have an explicit alignment argument which is
required to be a constant integer. It represents the alignment of the
source and dest, and so must be the minimum of those.
This change allows source and dest to each have their own alignments
by using the alignment attribute on their arguments. The alignment
argument itself is removed.
The only code change to clang is hidden in CGBuilder.h which now passes
both dest and source alignment to IRBuilder, instead of taking the minimum of
dest and source alignments.
Reviewed by Hal Finkel.
llvm-svn: 253512
Certain CXXConstructExpr nodes require zero-initialization before a
constructor is called. We had a bug in the case where the constructor
is called on a virtual base: we zero-initialized the base's vbptr field.
A complementary bug is present in MSVC where no zero-initialization
occurs for the subobject at all.
This fixes PR25370.
llvm-svn: 251783
Introduce an Address type to bundle a pointer value with an
alignment. Introduce APIs on CGBuilderTy to work with Address
values. Change core APIs on CGF/CGM to traffic in Address where
appropriate. Require alignments to be non-zero. Update a ton
of code to compute and propagate alignment information.
As part of this, I've promoted CGBuiltin's EmitPointerWithAlignment
helper function to CGF and made use of it in a number of places in
the expression emitter.
The end result is that we should now be significantly more correct
when performing operations on objects that are locally known to
be under-aligned. Since alignment is not reliably tracked in the
type system, there are inherent limits to this, but at least we
are no longer confused by standard operations like derived-to-base
conversions and array-to-pointer decay. I've also fixed a large
number of bugs where we were applying the complete-object alignment
to a pointer instead of the non-virtual alignment, although most of
these were hidden by the very conservative approach we took with
member alignment.
Also, because IRGen now reliably asserts on zero alignments, we
should no longer be subject to an absurd but frustrating recurring
bug where an incomplete type would report a zero alignment and then
we'd naively do a alignmentAtOffset on it and emit code using an
alignment equal to the largest power-of-two factor of the offset.
We should also now be emitting much more aggressive alignment
attributes in the presence of over-alignment. In particular,
field access now uses alignmentAtOffset instead of min.
Several times in this patch, I had to change the existing
code-generation pattern in order to more effectively use
the Address APIs. For the most part, this seems to be a strict
improvement, like doing pointer arithmetic with GEPs instead of
ptrtoint. That said, I've tried very hard to not change semantics,
but it is likely that I've failed in a few places, for which I
apologize.
ABIArgInfo now always carries the assumed alignment of indirect and
indirect byval arguments. In order to cut down on what was already
a dauntingly large patch, I changed the code to never set align
attributes in the IR on non-byval indirect arguments. That is,
we still generate code which assumes that indirect arguments have
the given alignment, but we don't express this information to the
backend except where it's semantically required (i.e. on byvals).
This is likely a minor regression for those targets that did provide
this information, but it'll be trivial to add it back in a later
patch.
I partially punted on applying this work to CGBuiltin. Please
do not add more uses of the CreateDefaultAligned{Load,Store}
APIs; they will be going away eventually.
llvm-svn: 246985
We currently use i32 (...)** as the type of the vptr field in the LLVM
struct type. LLVM's GlobalOpt prefers any bitcasts to be on the side of
the data being stored rather than on the pointer being stored to.
Reviewers: majnemer
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D5916
llvm-svn: 223267
Summary:
The Itanium ABI approach of using offset-to-top isn't possible with the
MS ABI, it doesn't have that kind of information lying around.
Instead, we do the following:
- Call the virtual deleting destructor with the "don't delete the object
flag" set. The virtual deleting destructor will return a pointer to
'this' adjusted to the most derived class.
- Call the global delete using the adjusted 'this' pointer.
Reviewers: rnk
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D5996
llvm-svn: 220993
This eliminates some i8* GEPs and makes the IR that clang emits a bit
more canonical. More work is needed for vftables, but that isn't a clear
win so I plan to send it for review.
llvm-svn: 220398
Erroring out until we fix the bug means we don't have to keep chasing down
this same miscompile in a bunch of different places.
Differential Revision: http://llvm-reviews.chandlerc.com/D2890
llvm-svn: 202331
This makes the C++ ABI depend entirely on the target: MS ABI for -win32 triples,
Itanium otherwise. It's no longer possible to do weird combinations.
To be able to run a test with a specific ABI without constraining it to a
specific triple, new substitutions are added to lit: %itanium_abi_triple and
%ms_abi_triple can be used to get the current target triple adjusted to the
desired ABI. For example, if the test suite is running with the i686-pc-win32
target, %itanium_abi_triple will expand to i686-pc-mingw32.
Differential Revision: http://llvm-reviews.chandlerc.com/D2545
llvm-svn: 199250
Fixes PR18435, where we generated a base ctor instead of a complete
ctor, and so failed to construct virtual bases when constructing the
complete object.
llvm-svn: 199160
This function only makes sense there. Eventually it should no longer
be part of the CGCXXABI interface, as it is an Itanium-specific detail.
Differential Revision: http://llvm-reviews.chandlerc.com/D821
llvm-svn: 185213
Reid Kleckner