Instead of always displaying the mangled name, try to do better
and get something closer to regular functions.
Recommit r287039 (that was reverted in r287039) with a tweak to
be more generic, and test fixes!
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D26522
llvm-svn: 287085
Instead of always displaying the mangled name, try to do better
and get something closer to regular functions.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D26522
llvm-svn: 287039
Clang emits error message for the following code:
```
template <class F> void parallel_loop(F &&f) { f(0); }
int main() {
int x;
parallel_loop([&](auto y) {
{
x = y;
};
});
}
```
$ clang++ --std=gnu++14 clang_test.cc -o clang_test
clang_test.cc:9:7: error: reference to local variable 'x' declared in enclosing function 'main'
x = y;
^
clang_test.cc:2:48: note: in instantiation of function template specialization 'main()::(anonymous class)::operator()<int>' requested here
template <class F> void parallel_loop(F &&f) { f(0); }
^
clang_test.cc:6:3: note: in instantiation of function template specialization 'parallel_loop<(lambda at clang_test.cc:6:17)>' requested here parallel_loop([&](auto y) {
^
clang_test.cc:5:7: note: 'x' declared here
int x;
^
1 error generated.
Patch fixes this issue.
llvm-svn: 286584
function. In that case, there is no requirement that the callee is actually
defined, and the code may in fact be valid and have defined behavior if the
virtual call is unreachable.
llvm-svn: 286534
can be used to improve the locations when generating remarks for loops.
Depends on the companion LLVM change r286227.
Patch by Florian Hahn.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D25764
llvm-svn: 286456
Similar to r284288, make the Itanium ABI follow MS ABI dllexport
semantics in the case of an explicit instantiation declaration followed
by a dllexport explicit instantiation definition.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D26471
llvm-svn: 286419
Thunks are artificial and have no corresponding source location except for the
line number on the DISubprogram, which is marked as artificial.
<rdar://problem/11941095>
llvm-svn: 286400
* if the base is produced by a series of derived-to-base conversions, check
the expression inside them when looking for an expression with a known
dynamic type
* step past MaterializeTemporaryExprs when checking for a known dynamic type
* when checking for a known dynamic type, treat all class prvalues as having
a known dynamic type after skipping all relevant rvalue subobject
adjustments
* treat callees formed by pointer-to-member access for a non-reference member
type like callees formed by member access.
llvm-svn: 285954
This patch implements the register call calling convention, which ensures
as many values as possible are passed in registers. CodeGen changes
were committed in https://reviews.llvm.org/rL284108.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D25204
llvm-svn: 285849
on cxx-abi-dev (thread starting 2016-10-11). This is currently hidden behind a
cc1-only -m flag, pending discussion of how best to deal with language changes
that require use of new symbols from the ABI library.
llvm-svn: 285664
the body of a function for the purposes of computing its storage
duration and deciding whether its initializer must be constant.
There are a number of problems in our current treatment of compound
literals. C specifies that a compound literal yields an l-value
referring to an object with either static or automatic storage
duration, depending on where it was written; in the latter case,
the literal object has a lifetime tied to the enclosing scope (much
like an ObjC block), not the enclosing full-expression. To get these
semantics fully correct in our current design, we would need to
collect compound literals on the ExprWithCleanups, just like we do
with ObjC blocks; we would probably also want to identify literals
like we do with materialized temporaries. But it gets stranger;
GCC adds compound literals to C++ as an extension, but makes them
r-values, which are generally assumed to have temporary storage
duration. Ignoring destructor ordering, the difference only matters
if the object's address escapes the full-expression, which for an
r-value can only happen with reference binding (which extends
temporaries) or array-to-pointer decay (which does not). GCC then
attempts to lock down on array-to-pointer decay in ad hoc ways.
Arguably a far superior language solution for C++ (and perhaps even
array r-values in C, which can occur in other ways) would be to
propagate lifetime extension through array-to-pointer decay, so
that initializing a pointer object to a decayed r-value array
extends the lifetime of the complete object containing the array.
But this would be a major change in semantics which arguably ought
to be blessed by the committee(s).
Anyway, I'm not fixing any of that in this patch; I did try, but
it got out of hand.
Fixes rdar://28949016.
llvm-svn: 285643
Summary:
This patch was introduced one year ago, but because my google account
was disabled, I didn't get email with failing buildbot and I missed
revert of this commit. There was small but in test regex.
I am back.
Reviewers: rsmith, rengolin
Subscribers: nlewycky, rjmccall, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D26117
llvm-svn: 285497
This has the following ABI impact:
1) Functions whose parameter or return types are non-throwing function pointer
types have different manglings in c++1z mode from prior modes. This is
necessary because c++1z permits overloading on the noexceptness of function
pointer parameter types. A warning is issued for cases that will change
manglings in c++1z mode.
2) Functions whose parameter or return types contain instantiation-dependent
exception specifications change manglings in all modes. This is necessary
to support overloading on / SFINAE in these exception specifications, which
a careful reading of the standard indicates has essentially always been
permitted.
Note that, in order to be affected by these changes, the code in question must
specify an exception specification on a function pointer/reference type that is
written syntactically within the declaration of another function. Such
declarations are very rare, and I have so far been unable to find any code
that would be affected by this. (Note that such things will probably become
more common in C++17, since it's a lot easier to get a noexcept function type
as a function parameter / return type there.)
This change does not affect the set of symbols produced by a build of clang,
libc++, or libc++abi.
llvm-svn: 285150
Summary:
Fixes PR28281.
MSVC lists indirect virtual base classes in the field list of a class.
This change makes Clang emit the information necessary for LLVM to
emit such records.
Reviewers: rnk, ruiu, zturner
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D25579
llvm-svn: 285132
to emit the <template-args> portion. Refactor so that mangleUnresolvedName
actually emits the entire <unresolved-name>, so this mistake is harder to make
again.
llvm-svn: 285022
If we see a virtual method call to Base::foo() but can infer that the
object is an instance of Derived, and that 'foo' is marked 'final' in
Derived, we can devirtualize the call to Derived::foo().
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D25813
llvm-svn: 284766
Preparation to implement DW_AT_alignment support:
- We pass non-zero align value to DIBuilder only when alignment was forced
- Modify tests to match this change
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D24426
llvm-svn: 284679
This bot does not produce the IR I expect -- it's missing some
'handler.dynamic_type_cache_miss:' labels. We don't need to rely on
those labels, so get rid of them in hopes of making the bot happy.
http://bb.pgr.jp/builders/cmake-clang-x86_64-linux/builds/55493
llvm-svn: 284639
ubsan reports a false positive 'invalid member call' diagnostic on the
following example (PR30478):
struct Base1 {
virtual int f1() { return 1; }
};
struct Base2 {
virtual int f1() { return 2; }
};
struct Derived2 final : Base1, Base2 {
int f1() override { return 3; }
};
int t1() {
Derived2 d;
return static_cast<Base2 *>(&d)->f1();
}
Adding the "final" attribute to a most-derived class allows clang to
devirtualize member calls into an instance of that class. We should pass
along the type info of the object pointer to avoid the FP. In this case,
that means passing along the type info for 'Derived2' instead of 'Base2'
when checking the dynamic type of static_cast<Base2 *>(&d2).
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D25448
llvm-svn: 284636
getClassAtVTableLocation() was calling
ASTRecordLayout::getBaseClassOffset() on a virtual base, causing an
assert.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D25779
llvm-svn: 284624
Although the itanium environment uses the itanium layout for C++, treat the
dllexport semantics more similarly to the MSVC specification. This preserves
the existing behaviour for the use of the itanium ABI on non-windows-itanium
environments. Export the inline definitions too.
llvm-svn: 284288
There was a bug in the implementation of captured statements. If it has
a lambda expression in it and the same lambda expression is used outside
the captured region, clang produced an error:
```
error: definition with same mangled name as another definition
```
Here is an example:
```
struct A {
template <typename L>
void g(const L&) { }
};
template<typename T>
void f() {
{
A().g([](){});
}
A().g([](){});
}
int main() {
f<void>();
}
```
Error report:
```
main.cpp:3:10: error: definition with same mangled name as another
definition
void g(const L&) { }
^
main.cpp:3:10: note: previous definition is here
```
Patch fixes this bug.
llvm-svn: 284229
Summary: https://reviews.llvm.org/D25132 added discriminator even add -g0. This leads to test fail which is addressed in thie patch.
Reviewers: davidxl, dnovillo
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D25133
llvm-svn: 283564
This commit fixes PR 30440 by initializing CXXNameMangler's FunctionTypeDepth
in the two constructors added in r274222 (The commit that caused this
regression).
rdar://28455269
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D24932
llvm-svn: 283428
new expression, distinguish between the case of a constant and non-constant
initializer. In the former case, if the bound is erroneous (too many
initializer elements, bound is negative, or allocated size overflows), reject,
and take the bound into account when determining whether we need to
default-construct any elements. In the remanining cases, move the logic to
check for default-constructibility of trailing elements into the initialization
code rather than inventing a bogus array bound, to cope with cases where the
number of initialized elements is not the same as the number of initializer
list elements (this can happen due to string literal initialization or brace
elision).
This also fixes rejects-valid and crash-on-valid errors when initializing a
new'd array of character type from a braced string literal.
llvm-svn: 283406
Reapplying the patch after modifying the test case.
Inlining the destructor caused the compiler to generate bad IR which failed the Verifier in the backend.
https://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=30341
This patch disables alias to available_externally definitions.
Reviewers: eugenis, rsmith
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D24682
llvm-svn: 283063
When emitting the fundamental type information constants, inherit the
DLLExportAttr from `__fundamental_type_info`. We would previously not
honor the `__declspec(dllexport)` on the type information.
llvm-svn: 282980
Instead of ignoring the evaluation order rule, ignore the "destroy parameters
in reverse construction order" rule for the small number of problematic cases.
This only causes incorrect behavior in the rare case where both parameters to
an overloaded operator <<, >>, ->*, &&, ||, or comma are of class type with
non-trivial destructor, and the program is depending on those parameters being
destroyed in reverse construction order.
We could do a little better here by reversing the order of parameter
destruction for those functions (and reversing the argument evaluation order
for all direct calls, not just those with operator syntax), but that is not a
complete solution to the problem, as the same situation can be reached by an
indirect function call.
Approach reviewed off-line by rnk.
llvm-svn: 282777
Inlining the destructor caused the compiler to generate bad IR which failed the Verifier in the backend.
https://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=30341
This patch disables alias to available_externally definitions.
Reviewers: eugenis, rsmith
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D24682
llvm-svn: 282679
function correctly when targeting MS ABIs (this appears to have never mattered
prior to this change).
Update test case to always cover both 32-bit and 64-bit Windows ABIs, since
they behave somewhat differently from each other here.
Update test case to also cover operators , && and ||, which it appears are also
affected by P0145R3 (they're not explicitly called out by the design document,
but this is the emergent behavior of the existing wording).
Original commit message:
P0145R3 (C++17 evaluation order tweaks): evaluate the right-hand side of
assignment and compound-assignment operators before the left-hand side. (Even
if it's an overloaded operator.)
This completes the implementation of P0145R3 + P0400R0 for all targets except
Windows, where the evaluation order guarantees for <<, >>, and ->* are
unimplementable as the ABI requires the function arguments are evaluated from
right to left (because parameter destructors are run from left to right in the
callee).
llvm-svn: 282619
Adrian Prantl